Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

The sequence of withdrawing life-sustaining treatment from patients

1999; Elsevier BV; Volume: 107; Issue: 2 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1016/s0002-9343(99)00198-9

1555-7162

David A. Asch, Kathy Faber‐Langendoen, Judy A. Shea, Nicholas A. Christakis,

Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units

Purpose: To describe the observed sequence of withdrawal of eight different forms of life-sustaining treatment and to determine whether aspects of those treatments determine the order of withdrawal. Subjects and methods: We observed 211 consecutive patients dying in four midwestern US hospitals from whom at least one of eight specific life-sustaining treatments was or could have been withdrawn. We used a parametric statistical technique to explain the order of withdrawal based on selected characteristics of the forms of life support, including cost, scarcity, and discomfort. Results: The eight forms of life support were withdrawn in a distinct sequence. From earliest to latest, the order was blood products, hemodialysis, vasopressors, mechanical ventilation, total parenteral nutrition, antibiotics, intravenous fluids, and tube feedings (P <0.0001). The sequence was almost identical to that observed in a previous study based on hypothetical scenarios. Forms of life support that were perceived as more artificial, scarce, or expensive were withdrawn earlier. Conclusion: The preference for withdrawing some forms of life-sustaining treatments more than others is associated with intrinsic characteristics of these treatments. Once the decision has been made to forgo life-sustaining treatment, the process remains complex and appears to target many different goals simultaneously.