A rare case of seronegative neurobrucellosis
2010; King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre; Volume: 30; Issue: 5 Linguagem: Italiano
10.4103/0256-4947.67084
ISSN0975-4466
AutoresSüda Tekin-Koruk, Fazılet Duygu, Bensu Gürsoy, Leman Karaağaç, Mehmet Bayraktar,
Tópico(s)Galectins and Cancer Biology
Resumocase reportA rare case of seronegative neurobrucellosis Suda Tekin-Koruk, Fazilet Duygu, Bensu Gursoy, Leman Karaagac, and Mehmet Bayraktar Suda Tekin-Koruk From Harran University, Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology Yenisehir Campus, Sanliurfa, Turkey Search for more papers by this author , Fazilet Duygu From Harran University, Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology Yenisehir Campus, Sanliurfa, Turkey Search for more papers by this author , Bensu Gursoy From Harran University, Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology Yenisehir Campus, Sanliurfa, Turkey Search for more papers by this author , Leman Karaagac From Harran University, Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology Yenisehir Campus, Sanliurfa, Turkey Search for more papers by this author , and Mehmet Bayraktar From Harran University, Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology Yenisehir Campus, Sanliurfa, Turkey Search for more papers by this author Published Online:7 Oct 2010https://doi.org/10.4103/0256-4947.67084SectionsPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationTrack citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail AboutAbstractNeurobrucellosis is one of the complications of brucellosis. We report a rare case of a 17-year-old girl with seronegative neurobrucellosis and depression and diplopia. Results of agglutination tests for Brucella both in serum and CSF were negative. Diagnosis was made only by positive culture of Brucella mellitensis with inoculation of the patient’s cerebrospinal fluid in a BACTEC 9050 System. The patient was successfully treated using ceftriaxone, doxycycline and rifampicin therapy for six months.IntroductionHuman brucellosis is a multisystem zoonotic disease with varied manifestations. It is endemic in many parts of the world, including the Middle East, the Arabian Peninsula, South Asia and Turkey.1,2 In 2004, the incidence of brucellosis in Turkey was 25.67/100000 population.3 Neurologic manifestations of brucellosis occur in 3% to 5% of patients.4,5 The symptoms of neurobrucellosis includes meningitis, encephalitis, myelitis, radiculoneuronitis, brain abscess, epidural abscess, granuloma, and demyelinating and meningovascular syndromes.6 The disease is diagnosed by positive serology (Rose Bengal agglutination test and standard tube dilution test) with neurological dysfunction not explained by other neurologic diseases or isolation of other bacteria either in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or blood concomitant with abnormal CSF findings (increase in leucocytes and protein, decrease in glucose levels).7,8 We present a rare case of seronegative neurobrucellosis with depression and diplopia caused by Brucella melitensis and subsequent treatment by the combined therapy in this report.CASEA 17-year-old girl presented with diplopia, headache, nausea and vomiting of 6 weeks’ duration with no fever or sweating. Headache was continuous and nonpulsatile and associated with vomiting, which was nonprojectile in nature. Pain in the lumbosacral region was moderate. There was no history of convulsions, but the patient displayed absurd speech, depression and lack of communication. She had visited the neurology department and had taken several drugs like analgesics and antidepressants, but her complaints worsened.On physical examination she had a fever of 36.8°C, her pulse was 96/minute and regular, blood pressure 90/60 mm Hg, and the respiratory rate was 20 breaths per minute. A neurological examination showed diplopia. The fundus examination was normal. Her mental status was normal. There was no neck stiffness, Kernig sign or neurologic deficits on physical examination. The cardiovascular system, respiratory system and gastrointestinal system examinations were unremarkable.Hematological examination revealed a hemoglobin of 12.8 g/dL, white blood cell 5470/mm3 (leukocytes included 64% lymphocytes, 24% neutrophils and 12% monocytes), high sensitivity C-reactive protein was 2.7 mg/L, and an erythrocyte sedimentation rate of 40 mm/h. Other investigations, including renal and liver function tests and urine analysis, were within normal limits. Blood serological studies for brucellosis, toxoplasmosis, cytomegalovirus and herpes virus were negative. Neuroimaging studies (cranial CT and MRI) were normal. Nearly six weeks following onset of symptoms, the patient was admitted to the hospital immediately. CSF was taken in our clinic by performing lumbar puncture. The opening pressure was 240 mm H2O. Examination of the CSF revealed 430 lymphocytes per mm3, with 515 mg/dL protein and 44 mg/dL glucose (serum glucose: 104 mg/dL). No microorganisms were seen on Gram, methylene blue or acid-fast stains of CSF. Simultaneously a 2-mL CSF sample was inoculated into a blood bottle, BACTEC 9050 (Becton, Dickinson and Company, USA).Brucella melitensis was isolated on the fifth day of incubation and identified according to the conventional methods. The serum Rose Bengal test was negative. Both CSF Brucella agglutination and serum Coombs tests were also negative. After diagnosis of neurobrucellosis, the patient was re-interrogated for specific risk factors for brucellosis. Her family had animals (sheep) and her diet included the consumption of unpasteurized cheese.She was treated with ceftriaxone (2 g twice daily), doxycycline (200 mg/day) and rifampicin (600 mg/day) orally. The patient recovered completely, her diplopia disappeared, and the CSF leukocyte count decreased to 100 per mm3 on the fifth day of therapy. After 3 weeks, she was discharged from the hospital and advised to continue the anti-Brucella medication. The CSF analysis was returned to normal within 5 months. The duration of therapy was 6 months on the whole. She was healthy. No relapse was seen 6 months after the end of therapy.DISCUSSIONNeurobrucellosis, a form of chronic meningitis, has an onset measured in weeks to months and is generally defined when symptoms, signs, and the CSF remain abnormal for at least 4 weeks. Acute purulent bacterial meningitis is clinically defined as a syndrome characterized by the onset of meningeal symptoms over the course of hours to up to several days. 9 Neurobrucellosis has a diverse clinical presentation. It can affect both the central and peripheral nervous system. The central nervous system is involved in less than 5% of cases.6 It is easily confused with many other neurological, neurosurgical, or even psychiatric disorders. Patients may visit psychiatry departments owing to the chronic character of the disease.10 Similarly, our case was previously examined by neurologist twice with no response.Clinical manifestations of neurobrucellosis vary widely. Meningitis is the most frequent one. However, it has been noted that <50% of patients with Brucella meningitis exhibit meningeal signs.4 We did not encounter any meningeal symptom other than headache and diplopia in our patient. The diagnosis of nuerobrucellosis depends on the demonstration of meningeal inflammation and detection of specific antibodies in the CSF because Gram stains of CSF are usually negative and cultures are positive in less than one quarter of cases. CSF analysis reveals a lymphocytic pleocytosis, elevated protein and low to normal glucose.6,11 In a large series, 96% of the cases are seropositive, but cases may be seronegative, as in our case.12 Our patient’s CSF culture yielded B melitensis, but serologic tests for brucellosis were negative both in blood and CSF. Awareness of the existence of brucellosis is essential, especially in endemic regions.Isolation of the organism from specimens like blood, bone marrow or other tissues makes the diagnosis certain. The rate of isolation ranges from 15% to more than 90% depending on the methods used.13 Most laboratories now use an automated blood culture system (e.g., BACTEC). In the BACTEC culture system, the mean detection time for Brucella is reported to be 2 to 7 days.14 Ozisik et al reported that Brucella spp. was identified using BACTEC 9120 blood culture system on the fifth day after inoculation.15 In our case, an automated culture system, BACTEC 9050 yielded Brucella spp. from the patient’s CSF. BACTEC culture systems can yield the organism faster, resulting in isolation and identification of Brucella in patients with an epidemiologically relevant history, who are suspected to have brucellosis.The treatment of neurobrucellosis poses special problems and there is no single opinion regarding the optimal regimen. Nevertheless, most authorities recommend the use of doxycycline in combination with two or more antimicrobial agents that penetrate the blood-brain barrier well.5,6 Bodur et al treated their patients successfully with a combination of doxycycline plus rifampin and ceftriaxone in their study.16 On the other hand, after isolation of Brucella spp. from CSF, Ozısık et al treated their patient with rifampin (600 mg/day orally) and trimethoprimsulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) (160 mg twice a day) for five months (doxycycline was not tolerated and was stopped on the fifth day).15 Gul et al recommends parenteral ceftriaxone as an initial alternative in the management of neurobrucellosis and the duration of therapy should be a minimum of 6 months with suitable antibiotics.17 In our case, we continued our regimen for six months.This case illustrates that brucellosis can present in various clinical forms in endemic areas and can be characterized by severe complications. It may be difficult to diagnose brucellosis, especially in patients with atypical syndromes. It should be kept in mind, that in endemic areas like Turkey, brucellosis should be suspected in patients who experience unexplainable neurological and psychiatric problems and the CSF should be adequately analyzed.ARTICLE REFERENCES:1. In: Pappas G, Akritidis N, Bosilkoviski M, Tsianos E. "Brucellosis" . N Engl J Med. 2005; 352:2325-36. Google Scholar2. Young EJ. "An overview of human brucellosis" . Clin Infect Dis. 1995; 21:283-90. Google Scholar3. "Ministry of Health of Turkey" . General Directorate of Primary Health ServicesAvailable from: http://www.saglik.gov.tr [Last accessed on 2005 Dec 01]. Google Scholar4. In: McLean DR, Russell N, Khan MY. "Neurobrucellosis: Clinical and therapeutic features" . Clin Infect Dis. 1992; 15:582-90. Google Scholar5. In: Gotuzzo E, Carrillo C. In: Gorbach SL, Bartlett JG, Blacklow NR. "Brucella" . Infectious diseases. 20043rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins1717-24. Google Scholar6. Young EJ. In: Douglas M. "Brucella species" . Bennett’s principles and practice of infectious diseases. 20056th ed. Churchill Livingstone Co2669-73. Google Scholar7. In: Heper Y, Yılmaz E, Akalın H, Mıstık R, Helvacı S. "Neurobrucellosis: Evaluation of 9 cases" . Klimik Derg. 2004; 17:99-102. Google Scholar8. In: Kochar DK, Kumawat BL, Agarwal N, Shubharakaran , Aseri S, Sharma BV , et al.. "Meningoencephalitis in brucellosis" . Neurol India. 2000; 48:170-173. Google Scholar9. In: Tunkel AR, Scheld WM. In: Mandell G, Bennett J, Dolin R. "Acute Meningitis" . Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases. 20056th ed. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone1084-126. Google Scholar10. In: Ersöz-Arat M, Karsen H, Bakırcı A, Akdeniz H. "A case of neurobrucellosis with coma" . Klimik Derg. 2006; 219:36-7. Google Scholar11. In: Hatipoglu CA, Yetkin A, Ertem GT, Tulek N. "Unusual clinical presentation of brucellosis" . Scand Infect Dis. 2004; 36:694-7. Google Scholar12. In: Memish Z, Mah MW, AI Mahmoud S, AI Shalan M, Khan MY. "Brucella bacteraemia: Clinical and laboratory observations in 160 patients" . J Infect. 2000; 40:59-63. Google Scholar13. Yagupsky P. "Detection of brucellae in blood cultures" . J Clin Microbiol. 1999; 37:3437-42. Google Scholar14. In: Durmaz G, Aydinli A, Kiremitci A, Kiraz N, Akgün Y. "Optimum detection times for bacteria and yeast species with the BACTEC 9120 aerobic blood culture system: Evaluation for a 5-year period in a Turkish university hospital" . J Clin Microbiol. 2003; 41:819-21. Google Scholar15. In: Ozisik HI, Ersoy Y, Tevfik MR, Kızkın S, Ozcan C. "Isolated intracranial hypertension: A rare presentation of neurobrucellosis" . Microbes Infect. 2004; 6:861-3. Google Scholar16. In: Bodur H, Erbay A, Akinci E, Copan A, Cevik MA, Balaban N. "Neurobrucellosis in an endemic area of brucellosis" . Scand J Infect Dis. 2003; 35:94-7. Google Scholar17. In: Gul HC, Erdem H, Gorenek L, Ozdag MF, Kalpakci Y, Avci IY, et al.. "Management of Neurobrucellosis: An Assessment of 11 Cases Inter Med" . 2008; 47:995-1001. Google Scholar Previous article Next article FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 30, Issue 5Sep–Oct 2010 Metrics History Accepted1 September 2009Published online7 October 2010 InformationCopyright © 2010, Annals of Saudi MedicineThis is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.PDF download
Referência(s)