Reply to Grünbaum
2000; Oxford University Press; Volume: 51; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1093/bjps/51.3.481
ISSN1464-3537
Autores Tópico(s)Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
ResumoPrevious articleNext article No AccessDiscussionReply to GrünbaumRichard SwinburneRichard Swinburne Oriel College, Oxford OX1 4EW, UK E-mail: [email protected] Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science Volume 51, Number 3September 2000 Society: The British Society for the Philosophy of Science Views: 3Total views on this site Citations: 2Citations are reported from Crossref Views: 3Total views on this site Citations: 2Citations are reported from Crossref Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/51.3.481 Views: 3Total views on this site Citations: 2Citations are reported from Crossref © 2000 by The Author. All rights reserved.PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Richard Swinburne Second Reply to Grünbaum, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56, no.44 (Nov 2020): 919–925.https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axi144Adolf Grünbaum The Poverty of Theistic Cosmology, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55, no.44 (Dec 2020): 561–614.https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/55.4.561
Referência(s)