Artigo Revisado por pares

AN EXAMINATION OF DEBT‐EQUITY PROXIES VS. ACTUAL DEBT COVENANT RESTRICTIONS IN ACCOUNTING CHOICE STUDIES

1995; Wiley; Volume: 22; Issue: 5 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1111/j.1468-5957.1995.tb00379.x

ISSN

1468-5957

Autores

Joanne C. Duke, David P. Franz, Herbert G. Hunt,

Tópico(s)

Financial Reporting and Valuation Research

Resumo

Journal of Business Finance & AccountingVolume 22, Issue 5 p. 615-635 AN EXAMINATION OF DEBT-EQUITY PROXIES VS. ACTUAL DEBT COVENANT RESTRICTIONS IN ACCOUNTING CHOICE STUDIES Joanne C. Duke, Joanne C. DukeSearch for more papers by this authorDavid P. Franz, David P. FranzSearch for more papers by this authorHerbert G. Hunt III, Corresponding Author Herbert G. Hunt III The authors are respectively, Professor of Accounting at San Francisco State University; Associate Professor of Accounting at San Francisco State University; and Associate Professor of Accounting at the University of Vermont. They gratefully acknowledge the thoughtful comments received on earlier versions of this paper from Steve Dempsey, Gene Laber, Eric Press, Joe Weintrop and the anonymous referee.Address for correspondence: Herbert G. Hunt III, Associate Professor of Accounting, School of Business Administration, University of Vermont, Kalkin Hall, Burlington, VT 05405, USA.Search for more papers by this author Joanne C. Duke, Joanne C. DukeSearch for more papers by this authorDavid P. Franz, David P. FranzSearch for more papers by this authorHerbert G. Hunt III, Corresponding Author Herbert G. Hunt III The authors are respectively, Professor of Accounting at San Francisco State University; Associate Professor of Accounting at San Francisco State University; and Associate Professor of Accounting at the University of Vermont. They gratefully acknowledge the thoughtful comments received on earlier versions of this paper from Steve Dempsey, Gene Laber, Eric Press, Joe Weintrop and the anonymous referee.Address for correspondence: Herbert G. Hunt III, Associate Professor of Accounting, School of Business Administration, University of Vermont, Kalkin Hall, Burlington, VT 05405, USA.Search for more papers by this author First published: July 1995 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.1995.tb00379.xCitations: 4 AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat References Ayres, F.L. (1986), ‘Characteristics of Firms Electing Early Adoption of SFAS 52’, Journal of Accounting and Economics (June), pp. 143–158. 10.1016/0165-4101(86)90015-7 Web of Science®Google Scholar Begley, J. (1989), ‘ The Use of Accounting and Non-accounting Based Covenants in Public Debenture Agreements: An Empirical Investigation’, Working paper (University of Rochester). Google Scholar Begley, J. (1990), ‘Debt Covenants and Accounting Choice’, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 12 (January), pp. 125–139. 10.1016/0165-4101(90)90044-5 Web of Science®Google Scholar Bouillon, M.L. and P.B. Shane (1990), ‘ LIFO Inventory Liquidations and Debt Covenant Constraints’, Presented at Annual American Accounting Association Meeting ( Toronto , August). Google Scholar Bowen, R.M., E.W. Noreen and J.M. Lacey (1981), ‘Determinants of the Corporate Decision to Capitalize Interest’, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 3, pp. 151–179. 10.1016/0165-4101(81)90011-2 Google Scholar Chen, K.C.W. and K.C.J. Wei (1993), ‘Creditors “Decisions to Waive” Violations of Accounting-Based Debt Covenants’, The Accounting Review (April), pp. 218–232. Web of Science®Google Scholar Chow, C.W. (1982), ‘The Demand for External Auditing: Size, Debt and Ownership Influences’, The Accounting Review (April), pp. 272–291. Web of Science®Google Scholar Christie, A. A. (1990), ‘Aggregation of Test Statistics: An Evaluation of the Evidence on Contracting and Size Hypotheses’, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 12 (January), pp. 15–36. 10.1016/0165-4101(90)90039-7 Web of Science®Google Scholar Daley, L.A. and R.L. Vigeland (1983), ‘The Effects of Debt Covenants and Political Costs on the Choice of Accounting Methods: The Case of Accounting for R&D Costs’, Journal of Accounting and Economics (December), pp. 195–211. 10.1016/0165-4101(83)90012-5 Web of Science®Google Scholar Deakin, E.B. (1989), ‘Rational Economic Behavior and Lobbying on Accounting Issues: Evidence from the Oil and Gas Industry’, The Accounting Review (January), pp. 137–151. Web of Science®Google Scholar DeAngelo, H. and L. DeAngelo (1990), ‘Dividend Policy and Financial Distress: An Empirical Investigation of Troubled NYSE Firms’, The Journal of Finance (December), pp. 1415–1431. Web of Science®Google Scholar DeAngelo, H. and D.J. Skinner (1994), ‘Accounting Choice in Troubled Companies’, Journal of Accounting and Economics (January), pp. 113–143. 10.1016/0165-4101(94)90007-8 Web of Science®Google Scholar Defond, M. and J. Jiambalvo (1991), ‘Incidence and Circumstances of Accounting Errors’, The Accounting Review (July), pp. 643–655. Web of Science®Google Scholar Duke, J.C. (1987), ‘ Debt Covenant Restrictions and Accounting Technique Choice: An Empirical Study’, unpublished dissertation (Pennsylvania State University). Google Scholar Duke, J.C. and H.G. Hunt (1990), ‘An Empirical Examination of Debt Covenant Restrictions and Accounting-Related Debt Proxies’, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 12 (January), pp. 45–63. 10.1016/0165-4101(90)90041-2 Web of Science®Google Scholar El-Gazzar, S. and V. Pastena (1991), ‘Factors Affecting the Scope and Initial Tightness of Covenant Restrictions in Private Lending Agreements’, Contemporary Accounting Research (Fall), pp. 132–148. 10.1111/j.1911-3846.1991.tb00839.x Google Scholar Frost, C.A. and V.L. Bernard (1989), ‘The Role of Debt Covenants in Assessing the Economic Consequences of Limiting Capitalization of Exploration Costs’, The Accounting Review (October), pp. 788–808. Web of Science®Google Scholar Ghicas, D.C. (1990), ‘Determinants of Actuarial Cost Method Changes for Pension Accounting and Funding’, The Accounting Review (April), pp. 384–405. Web of Science®Google Scholar Gopalakrishnan, J. and T.F. Sugrue (1992), ‘Economic Consequences of Pension Policy Deliberations (SFAS No. 87): An Empirical Assessment of Debt-Covenant Hypothesis’, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Vol. 19, No. 5 (September), pp. 751–775. 10.1111/j.1468-5957.1992.tb00655.x Google Scholar Haka, S. and P. Chalos (1990), ‘Evidence of Agency Conflict Among Management, Auditors, and the Audit Committee Chair’, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy (Winter), pp. 271–292. 10.1016/0278-4254(90)90003-I Web of Science®Google Scholar Harrell, F.E., Jr. (1983), ‘ The PHGLM Procedure’, in SUGI Supplemental Library User's Guide: 1983 (SAS Institute), pp. 67–94. Google Scholar Haw, I.M., K. Jung and S.B. Lilien (1991), ‘Overfunded Defined Benefit Pension Plan Settlements Without Asset Reversions’, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 14, pp. 295–320. 10.1016/0165-4101(91)90016-H Web of Science®Google Scholar Healy, P.M. and K.G. Palepu (1990), ‘Effectiveness of Accounting-Based Dividend Covenants’, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 12 (January), pp. 97–123. 10.1016/0165-4101(90)90043-4 Web of Science®Google Scholar Holthausen, R.W. (1981), ‘Evidence on the Effect of Bond Covenants and Management Compensation Contracts on the Choice of Accounting Techniques’, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 3, pp. 73–109. 10.1016/0165-4101(81)90035-5 Google Scholar Hunt, H.G. (1985), ‘Potential Determinants of Corporate Inventory Accounting Decisions’, Journal of Accounting Research (Autumn), pp. 338–467. Google Scholar Hunt, H.G. and J.K. Ord (1988), ‘Matched-Pairs Discrimination: Methodology and an Investigation of Corporate Accounting Policies’, Decision Sciences, Vol. 19 (Spring), pp. 373–382. 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1988.tb00273.x Web of Science®Google Scholar Johnson, W.B. and D.S. Dhaliwal (1988), ‘LIFO Abandonment’, Journal of Accounting Research (Autumn), pp. 236–272. 10.2307/2491103 Web of Science®Google Scholar Johnson, W.B. and R. Ramanan (1988), ‘Discretionary Accounting Changes for “Successful Efforts” to “Full Cost” Methods: 1970–76’, The Accounting Review (January), pp. 96–110. Web of Science®Google Scholar Kalay, A. (1979), ‘ Corporate Dividend Policy – A Collection of Related Essays’, unpublished Ph.D. thesis (University of Rochester). Google Scholar Kelly, L. (1985), ‘Corporate Management Lobbying on FAS No. 8: Some Further Evidence’, Journal of Accounting Research (Autumn), pp. 619–632. 10.2307/2490829 Web of Science®Google Scholar Kwon, S. (1990), ‘ Economic Determinants of the Assumed Interest Rate in Pension Accounting’, Presented at the American Accounting Association Annual Meeting ( Toronto , August). Google Scholar Leftwich, R. (1981), ‘Evidence on the Impact of Mandatory Changes in Accounting Principles on Corporate Loan Agreements’, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 3, pp. 3–36. 10.1016/S0165-4101(81)80001-8 Google Scholar Leftwich, R. (1990), ‘Aggregation of Test Statistics; Statistics vs. Economics’, Journal of Accounting and Economics (January), pp. 37–44. 10.1016/0165-4101(90)90040-B Web of Science®Google Scholar Lys, T. (1984), ‘Mandated Accounting Changes and Debt Covenants: The Case of Oil and Gas Accounting’, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 6, pp. 39–65. 10.1016/0165-4101(84)90019-3 Web of Science®Google Scholar Malmquist, D.H. (1990), ‘Efficient Contracting and the Choice of Accounting Method in the Oil and Gas Industry’, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 12 (January), pp. 173–205. 10.1016/0165-4101(90)90046-7 Web of Science®Google Scholar Press, E.G. and J.B. Weintrop (1990), ‘Accounting-Based Constraints in Public and Private Debt Agreements: Their Association with Leverage and Impact on Accounting Choice’, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 12 (January), pp. 65–95. 10.1016/0165-4101(90)90042-3 Web of Science®Google Scholar Rusbarsky, M. (1988), ‘ Motivations for Discretionary Accounting Changes: The Case of the Switch From Accelerated to Straight-Line Depreciation’, unpublished working paper (University of California). Google Scholar Salatka, W.K. (1989), ‘The Impact of SFAS No. 8 on Equity Prices or Early and Late Adopting Firms: An Events Study and Cross-Sectional Analysis’, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 11 (February), pp. 35–69. 10.1016/0165-4101(89)90013-X Web of Science®Google Scholar Senteney, D.L. and J.R. Strawser (1988), ‘ The Association Between Firm Characteristics and Management's Early Adoption of SFAS 87’, Presented at the American Accounting Association Meeting ( Orlando , Florida , August). Google Scholar Smith, C.W. Jr. and J.B. Warner (1979), ‘On Financial Contracting: An Analysis of Bond Covenants’, Journal of Financial Economics, pp. 117–161. 10.1016/0304-405X(79)90011-4 PubMedGoogle Scholar Trombley, M.A. (1989), ‘Accounting Method Choice in the Software Industry: Characteristics of Firms Electing Early Adoption of SFAS No. 86’, The Accounting Review (July), pp. 529–538. Web of Science®Google Scholar Waas, R.L. and J.L. Zimmerman (1986), Positive Accounting Theory (Prentice-Hall). Google Scholar Waats, R.L. and J.L. Zimmerman (1990), ‘Positive Accounting Theory – A Ten-Year Perspective’, The Accounting Review (January), pp. 131–156. Google Scholar Wong, J. (1988), ‘Political Costs and an Intraperiod Accounting Choice for Export Tax Credits’, Journal of Accounting and Economics (January), pp. 37–51. 10.1016/0165-4101(88)90022-5 Web of Science®Google Scholar Zimmer, I. (1986), ‘Accounting for Interest by Real Estate Developers’, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 8 (March), pp. 37–51. 10.1016/0165-4101(86)90009-1 Web of Science®Google Scholar Zmijewski, M. and R. Hagerman (1981), ‘An Income Strategy Approach to the Positive Theory of Accounting Standard Setting/Choice’, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 3, pp. 129–149. 10.1016/0165-4101(81)90010-0 Google Scholar Citing Literature Volume22, Issue5July 1995Pages 615-635 ReferencesRelatedInformation

Referência(s)