The Bruce Effect: An Evaluation of Male/Female Advantages
1979; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 114; Issue: 6 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1086/283541
ISSN1537-5323
Autores Tópico(s)Primate Behavior and Ecology
ResumoPrevious articleNext article No AccessNotes and CommentsThe Bruce Effect: An Evaluation of Male/Female AdvantagesP. L. SchwagmeyerP. L. SchwagmeyerPDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The American Naturalist Volume 114, Number 6Dec., 1979 Published for The American Society of Naturalists Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/283541 Views: 14Total views on this site Citations: 64Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1979 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Jules Dezeure, Marie J.E. Charpentier, Elise Huchard Fitness effects of seasonal birth timing in a long-lived social primate living in the equatorial forest, Animal Behaviour 185 (Mar 2022): 113–126.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2022.01.002Katherine Saxton Bruce Effect, (May 2022): 904–906.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55065-7_1922Andrea Bailey, Lynn E. Eberly, Craig Packer Contrasting effects of male immigration and rainfall on rank-related patterns of miscarriage in female olive baboons, Scientific Reports 11, no.11 (Feb 2021).https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-83175-3Matthew N. Zipple, Eila K. Roberts, Susan C. Alberts, Jacinta C. Beehner The Bruce effect should be defined by function, not mechanism: comments on 'How to escape male infanticide: mechanisms for avoiding or terminating pregnancy in mammals', Mammal Review 51, no.44 (Mar 2021): 596–599.https://doi.org/10.1111/mam.12250Luděk Bartoš, Adam Dušek, Jitka Bartošová, Jan Pluháček, Rory Putman How to escape male infanticide: mechanisms for avoiding or terminating pregnancy in mammals, Mammal Review 51, no.11 (Aug 2020): 143–153.https://doi.org/10.1111/mam.12219Peter M. Kappeler Intrasexual Selection: How Males Compete, (Jan 2022): 167–197.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82879-0_9Matthew N. Zipple When will the Bruce effect evolve? The roles of infanticide, feticide and maternal death, Animal Behaviour 160 (Feb 2020): 135–143.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2019.11.014Peter M. Kappeler Intrasexuelle Selektion: wie Männchen konkurrieren, (Sep 2020): 189–224.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-60546-2_9Rachel H Stokes, Aaron A Sandel, Loren Hayes Data quality and the comparative method: the case of pregnancy failure in rodents, Journal of Mammalogy 100, no.55 (Jun 2019): 1436–1446.https://doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/gyz096Heather D. Masonjones, Emily Rose, Ludek Bartos When more is not merrier: Using wild population dynamics to understand the effect of density on ex situ seahorse mating behaviors, PLOS ONE 14, no.77 (Jul 2019): e0218069.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218069Teagan Gale, Michael Garratt, Robert C. Brooks, Christine Miller Perceived threats of infanticide reduce maternal allocation during lactation and lead to elevated oxidative damage in offspring, Functional Ecology 32, no.99 (Jul 2018): 2158–2169.https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.13146Katherine Saxton Bruce Effect, (Jun 2018): 1–3.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47829-6_1922-1Tatsuya Hattori, Takuya Osakada, Takuto Masaoka, Rumi Ooyama, Nao Horio, Kazutaka Mogi, Miho Nagasawa, Sachiko Haga-Yamanaka, Kazushige Touhara, Takefumi Kikusui Exocrine Gland-Secreting Peptide 1 Is a Key Chemosensory Signal Responsible for the Bruce Effect in Mice, Current Biology 27, no.2020 (Oct 2017): 3197–3201.e3.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.09.013Jana A. Eccard, Melanie Dammhahn, Hannu Ylönen The Bruce effect revisited: is pregnancy termination in female rodents an adaptation to ensure breeding success after male turnover in low densities?, Oecologia 185, no.11 (Aug 2017): 81–94.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-017-3904-6Verena Behringer, Tobias Deschner Non-invasive monitoring of physiological markers in primates, Hormones and Behavior 91 (May 2017): 3–18.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2017.02.001K. B. Saxton, A. Gemmill, R. A. Catalano Reproductive suppression follows threats to child survival, Journal of Evolutionary Biology 30, no.55 (Apr 2017): 889–897.https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.13061Peter Kappeler Intrasexuelle Selektion: wie Männchen konkurrieren, (Aug 2016): 262–325.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53145-7_8Andrew I. Furness, Keenan R. Morrison, Teri J. Orr, Jeff D. Arendt, David N. Reznick Reproductive mode and the shifting arenas of evolutionary conflict, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1360, no.11 (Aug 2015): 75–100.https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.12835David A. Wells The extended phenotype(s): a comparison with niche construction theory, Biology & Philosophy 30, no.44 (Feb 2015): 547–567.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-015-9476-0Marianne Peso, Mark A. Elgar, Andrew B. Barron Pheromonal control: reconciling physiological mechanism with signalling theory, Biological Reviews 90, no.22 (Jun 2014): 542–559.https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12123Denys deCatanzaro Sex steroids as pheromones in mammals: The exceptional role of estradiol, Hormones and Behavior 68 (Feb 2015): 103–116.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2014.08.003T. Gale, A. B. Gibson, R. C. Brooks, M. Garratt Exposure to a novel male during late pregnancy influences subsequent growth of offspring during lactation, Journal of Evolutionary Biology 26, no.99 (Jul 2013): 2057–2062.https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.12192Yuting Wang, Dingzhen Liu, Johan J. Bolhuis Low Incidence of Miscarriage Induced by the Scent of Male Littermates of Original Mates: Male Kinship Reduces the Bruce Effect in Female Mice, Mus musculus, PLoS ONE 8, no.77 (Jul 2013): e68673.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068673Eila K. Roberts, Amy Lu, Thore J. Bergman, Jacinta C. Beehner A Bruce Effect in Wild Geladas, Science 335, no.60736073 (Feb 2012): 1222–1225.https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1213600Peter M. Kappeler Intrasexuelle Selektion: wie Männchen konkurrieren, (Jan 2012): 262–325.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20653-5_8A. C Guzzo, R. G Berger, D. deCatanzaro Excretion and binding of tritium-labelled oestradiol in mice (Mus musculus): implications for the Bruce effect, Reproduction 139, no.11 (Sep 2009): 255–263.https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-09-0382Stuart D Becker, Jane L Hurst Female behaviour plays a critical role in controlling murine pregnancy block, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 276, no.16621662 (Feb 2009): 1723–1729.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2008.1780Joanna M. Setchell Alternative reproductive tactics in primates, (Mar 2008): 373–398.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511542602.016Hanna Kokko Animal Behavioral Studies, Non-Primates*, (Jan 2008): 47–56.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012373985-8.00006-4J. Meyer, J. Steinhauser, F. Jeltsch, R. Brandl Large trees, acacia shrubs, and the density of Thallomys nigricauda in the Thornveld savannah of South Africa, Journal of Arid Environments 68, no.33 (Feb 2007): 363–370.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2006.06.001Peter M. Kappeler, Carel P. van Schaik Sexual selection in primates: review and selective preview, (May 2004): 3–23.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511542459.003Joanna M Setchell, Peter M Kappeler Selection in Relation to Sex in Primates, (Jan 2003): 87–173.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-3454(03)33003-7JERRY O. WOLFF Laboratory Studies with Rodents: Facts or Artifacts?, BioScience 53, no.44 (Jan 2003): 421.https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0421:LSWRFO]2.0.CO;2R. R. Warner The role of extreme iteroparity and risk avoidance in the evolution of mating systems, Journal of Fish Biology 53, no.sAsA (Apr 2005): 82–93.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1998.tb01019.xLUIS A. EBENSPERGER Strategies and counterstrategies to infanticide in mammals, Biological Reviews 73, no.33 (Jan 2007): 321–346.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.1998.tb00034.xLuis A. Ebensperger Do female rodents use promiscuity to prevent male infanticide?, Ethology Ecology & Evolution 10, no.22 (Apr 1998): 129–141.https://doi.org/10.1080/08927014.1998.9522862 Monogamy without biparental care in a dwarf antelope, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 263, no.13661366 (Jan 1997): 23–29.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1996.0005Anne E. Storey Pre-implantation Pregnancy Disruption in Female Meadow Voles Microtus pennsylvanicus (Rodentia: Muridae): Male Competition or Female Mate Choice?, Ethology 98, no.22 (Apr 2010): 89–100.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1994.tb01060.x Felix Breden , and Glenn Hausfater Selection Within and Between Social Groups for Infanticide, The American Naturalist 136, no.55 (Oct 2015): 673–688.https://doi.org/10.1086/285122P.A. Verrell, N.R. Mccabe Major histocompatibility antigens and spontaneous abortion: An evolutionary perspective, Medical Hypotheses 32, no.33 (Jul 1990): 235–238.https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-9877(90)90129-3Robert W. Elwood, Hazel F. Kennedy The relationship between infanticide and pregnancy block in mice, Behavioral and Neural Biology 53, no.22 (Mar 1990): 277–283.https://doi.org/10.1016/0163-1047(90)90526-CT.O. Allen, N.T. Adler Effects of Sexual Behavior on Gonadal Function in Rodents, (Jan 1989): 227–269.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-137952-0.50009-4Marcy K. Uyenoyama On the evolution of genetic incompatibility systems. III. Introduction of weak gametophytic self-incompatibility under partial inbreeding, Theoretical Population Biology 34, no.11 (Aug 1988): 47–91.https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-5809(88)90035-4Masakado Kawata Pregnancy failure and suppression by female-female interaction in enclosed populations of the red-backed vole,Clethrionomys rufocanus bedfordiae, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 20, no.22 (Jan 1987): 89–97.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00572630ANNE STOREY Advantages to Female Rodents of Male-Induced Pregnancy Disruptions, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 474, no.1 Reproduction1 Reproduction (Dec 1986): 135–140.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1986.tb28005.xDanilo Mainardi, Marisa Mainardi, Antonio Pasquali Genetic and Experiential Features in a Case of Cultural Transmission in the House Mouse (Mus musculus), Ethology 72, no.33 (Apr 2010): 191–198.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1986.tb00620.xRonald J. Brooks, Melody A. Donald, Lin Schwarzkopf Failure of strange females to cause pregnancy block in collared lemmings, Dicrostonyx groenlandicus, Behavioral and Neural Biology 44, no.33 (Nov 1985): 485–491.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-1047(85)90928-8Donald A. Dewsbury Studies of pericopulatory pregnancy blockage and the gestation period in deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus), Hormones and Behavior 19, no.22 (Jun 1985): 164–173.https://doi.org/10.1016/0018-506X(85)90016-9RANDY THORNHILL Alternative Hypotheses for Traits Believed to Have Evolved by Sperm Competition, (Jan 1984): 151–178.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-652570-0.50012-9 Randy Thornhill Cryptic Female Choice and Its Implications in the Scorpionfly Harpobittacus nigriceps, The American Naturalist 122, no.66 (Oct 2015): 765–788.https://doi.org/10.1086/284170Kunio Yamazaki, Gary K. Beauchamp, Charles J. Wysocki, Judith Bard, Lewis Thomas, Edward A. Boyse Recognition of H-2 Types in Relation to the Blocking of Pregnancy in Mice, Science 221, no.46064606 (Jul 1983): 186–188.https://doi.org/10.1126/science.6857281U. William Huck, Ann C. Bracken, Robert D. Lisk Female-induced pregnancy block in the golden hamster, Behavioral and Neural Biology 38, no.22 (Jul 1983): 190–193.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-1047(83)90184-XJoel Berger Induced abortion and social factors in wild horses, Nature 303, no.59125912 (May 1983): 59–61.https://doi.org/10.1038/303059a0Ian G. McLean Paternal behaviour and killing of young in Arctic ground squirrels, Animal Behaviour 31, no.11 (Feb 1983): 32–44.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(83)80171-7Anna Marchlewska-Koj Pregnancy Blocking by Pheromones, (Jan 1983): 151–174.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-710780-6.50012-1U. William Huck, Robin L. Soltis, Carol B. Coopersmith Infanticide in male laboratory mice: Effects of social status, prior sexual experience, and basis for discrimination between related and unrelated young, Animal Behaviour 30, no.44 (Nov 1982): 1158–1165.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(82)80206-6Donald A. Dewsbury Pregnancy blockage following multiple-male copulation or exposure at the time of mating in deer mice, Peromyscus maniculatus, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 11, no.11 (Aug 1982): 37–42.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00297664 Jay B. Labov Pregnancy Blocking in Rodents: Adaptive Advantages for Females, The American Naturalist 118, no.33 (Oct 2015): 361–371.https://doi.org/10.1086/283828Jay B. Labov Male social status, physiology, and ability to block pregnancies in female house mice (Mus musculus), Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 8, no.44 (Jul 1981): 287–291.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00299528A. Bruce Webster, R. Geoffrey Gartshore, Ronald J. Brooks Infanticide in the meadow vole, Microtus pennsylvanicus: Significance in relation to social system and population cycling, Behavioral and Neural Biology 31, no.33 (Mar 1981): 342–347.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-1047(81)91394-7Rudy Boonstra Infanticide in microtines: Importance in natural populations, Oecologia 46, no.22 (Jan 1980): 262–265.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00540135 Intrasexuelle Selektion: wie Männchen konkurrieren, (): 241–309.https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-29977-7_8Stuart D. Becker, Jane L. Hurst Pregnancy Block from a Female Perspective, (): 141–150.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-73945-8_13 Intrasexuelle Selektion: wie Männchen konkurrieren, (): 255–316.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68792-4_8
Referência(s)