Female control of paternity in the internally fertilizing compound ascidian Diplosoma listerianum. II. Investigation of male mating success using RAPD markers
1996; Royal Society; Volume: 263; Issue: 1369 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1098/rspb.1996.0061
ISSN1471-2954
AutoresJohn Bishop, Catherine S. Jones, Leslie R. Noble,
Tópico(s)Forest Insect Ecology and Management
ResumoRestricted accessMoreSectionsView PDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail Cite this article Bishop John D. D. , Jones Cathy S. and Noble Leslie R. 1996Female control of paternity in the internally fertilizing compound ascidian Diplosoma listerianum. II. Investigation of male mating success using RAPD markersProc. R. Soc. Lond. B.263401–407http://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1996.0061SectionRestricted accessArticleFemale control of paternity in the internally fertilizing compound ascidian Diplosoma listerianum. II. Investigation of male mating success using RAPD markers John D. D. Bishop Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for more papers by this author , Cathy S. Jones Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for more papers by this author and Leslie R. Noble Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for more papers by this author John D. D. Bishop Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed , Cathy S. Jones Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed and Leslie R. Noble Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Published:22 April 1996https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1996.0061AbstractRandomly amplified polymorphic DNA paternity markers were used to assess male success during simultaneous, three-way mating opportunities between cultured clones of the hermaphroditic protochordate Diplosoma listerianum. The previously reported blockage of sperm movement in the oviduct, barring access to the site of fertilization in the ovary, was shown to prevent cross-fertilization between two particular clones. The same mechanism prevents selfing. Direct observation of pairings within a more extensive set of laboratory clones derived from the same natural population indicated that failure of one or both partners of a pair to produce brooded progeny was relatively common. A weak negative correlation was found between the mating success of pairs and their overall genetic similarity estimated from RAPD fingerprints from several primers. The data suggest the operation of a somatic-gametic incompatibility mechanism regulating mating in D. listerianum. This may involve differential phagocytic removal, in the oviduct, of sperm that share self-recognition markers with maternal tissue.FootnotesThis text was harvested from a scanned image of the original document using optical character recognition (OCR) software. As such, it may contain errors. Please contact the Royal Society if you find an error you would like to see corrected. Mathematical notations produced through Infty OCR. Previous ArticleNext Article VIEW FULL TEXT DOWNLOAD PDF FiguresRelatedReferencesDetailsCited by Olsen K and Levitan D (2022) Interpopulation variation in inbreeding is primarily driven by tolerance of mating with relatives in a spermcasting invertebrate, Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 10.1111/jeb.14125, 36:1, (95-108), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2023. Kahrl A, Snook R and Fitzpatrick J (2021) Fertilization mode drives sperm length evolution across the animal tree of life, Nature Ecology & Evolution, 10.1038/s41559-021-01488-y, 5:8, (1153-1164) Bhaisare L, Paraste S, Kaushik S, Chaudhary D, Al-Misned F, Mahboob S, Al-Ghanim K and Ansari M (2021) Reproductive success in Zygogramma bicolorata: A role of post-insemination association of male and female, Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.12.030, 28:3, (1539-1543), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2021. Olsen K, Ryan W, Kosman E, Moscoso J, Levitan D and Winn A (2021) Lessons from the study of plant mating systems for exploring the causes and consequences of inbreeding in marine invertebrates, Marine Biology, 10.1007/s00227-021-03838-7, 168:3, Online publication date: 1-Mar-2021. Nydam M (2020) Evolution of Allorecognition in the Tunicata, Biology, 10.3390/biology9060129, 9:6, (129) Olsen K, Ryan W, Winn A, Kosman E, Moscoso J, Krueger‐Hadfield S, Burgess S, Carlon D, Grosberg R, Kalisz S and Levitan D (2020) Inbreeding shapes the evolution of marine invertebrates, Evolution, 10.1111/evo.13951, 74:5, (871-882), Online publication date: 1-May-2020. Pitnick S, Wolfner M and Dorus S (2019) Post‐ejaculatory modifications to sperm (PEMS), Biological Reviews, 10.1111/brv.12569, 95:2, (365-392), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2020. Havelka M, Šachlová H, Shaliutina-Kolešová A and Rodina M (2016) Fertilization success of sterlet Acipenser ruthenus and Siberian sturgeon Acipenser baerii gametes under conditions of heterospecific mating, Animal Reproduction Science, 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2016.09.012, 174, (107-113), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2016. Beekman M, Nieuwenhuis B, Ortiz-Barrientos D and Evans J (2016) Sexual selection in hermaphrodites, sperm and broadcast spawners, plants and fungi, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 371:1706, Online publication date: 19-Oct-2016. Janicke T, Sandner P, Ramm S, Vizoso D and Schärer L (2016) Experimentally evolved and phenotypically plastic responses to enforced monogamy in a hermaphroditic flatworm, Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 10.1111/jeb.12910, 29:9, (1713-1727), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2016. Rosengrave P, Montgomerie R and Gemmell N (2016) Cryptic female choice enhances fertilization success and embryo survival in chinook salmon, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 283:1827, Online publication date: 30-Mar-2016. Schärer L and Ramm S (2016) Hermaphrodites Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Biology, 10.1016/B978-0-12-800049-6.00160-8, (212-224), . Jenkins H, Bishop J and Hughes R (2015) Prudent female allocation by modular hermaphrodites: female investment is promoted by the opportunity to outcross in cyclostome bryozoans, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 10.1111/bij.12631, 116:3, (593-602), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2015. Fitzpatrick J and Evans J (2014) Postcopulatory inbreeding avoidance in guppies, Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 10.1111/jeb.12545, 27:12, (2585-2594), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2014. Manier M, Lüpold S, Pitnick S and Starmer W (2013) An Analytical Framework for Estimating Fertilization Bias and the Fertilization Set from Multiple Sperm-Storage Organs, The American Naturalist, 10.1086/671782, 182:4, (552-561), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2013. Lüpold S, Pitnick S, Berben K, Blengini C, Belote J and Manier M (2013) Female mediation of competitive fertilization success in Drosophila melanogaster , Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 10.1073/pnas.1300954110, 110:26, (10693-10698), Online publication date: 25-Jun-2013. Ala-Honkola O, Tuominen L and Lindström K (2010) Inbreeding avoidance in a poeciliid fish (Heterandria formosa), Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 10.1007/s00265-010-0955-7, 64:9, (1403-1414), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2010. HALL M, BUSSIÈRE L, DEMONT M, WARD P and BROOKS R (2010) Competitive PCR reveals the complexity of postcopulatory sexual selection in Teleogryllus commodus , Molecular Ecology, 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04496.x, 19:3, (610-619), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2010. Schärer L (2009) TESTS OF SEX ALLOCATION THEORY IN SIMULTANEOUSLY HERMAPHRODITIC ANIMALS, Evolution, 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00669.x, 63:6, (1377-1405), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2009. Yeates S, Einum S, Fleming I, Megens H, Stet R, Hindar K, Holt W, Van Look K and Gage M (2008) Atlantic salmon eggs favour sperm in competition that have similar major histocompatibility alleles, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 276:1656, (559-566), Online publication date: 7-Feb-2009. Pitnick S, Wolfner M and Suarez S (2009) Ejaculate–female and sperm–female interactions Sperm Biology, 10.1016/B978-0-12-372568-4.00007-0, (247-304), . Champion de Crespigny F, Hurst L and Wedell N (2007) DO WOLBACHIA-ASSOCIATED INCOMPATIBILITIES PROMOTE POLYANDRY?, Evolution, 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00274.x, 62:1, (107-122) Dupont L, Viard F, David P and Bishop J (2007) Combined effects of bottlenecks and selfing in populations of Corella eumyota, a recently introduced sea squirt in the English Channel, Diversity and Distributions, 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2007.00405.x, 13:6, (808-817) PANHUIS T and NUNNEY L (2007) Insight into post-mating interactions between the sexes: relatedness suppresses productivity of singly mated female Drosophila melanogaster , Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007.01363.x, 20:5, (1988-1997), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2007. Bjork A, Starmer W, Higginson D, Rhodes C and Pitnick S (2007) Complex interactions with females and rival males limit the evolution of sperm offence and defence, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 274:1619, (1779-1788), Online publication date: 22-Jul-2007. Teng Z and Kang L (2007) EGG-HATCHING BENEFITS GAINED BY POLYANDROUS FEMALE LOCUSTS ARE NOT DUE TO THE FERTILIZATION ADVANTAGE OF NONSIBLING MALES, Evolution, 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00030.x, 61:2, (470-476), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2007. Nordeide J (2007) Is there more in 'gamete quality' than quality of the gametes? A review of effects of female mate choice and genetic compatibility on offspring quality, Aquaculture Research, 10.1111/j.1365-2109.2006.01635.x, 38:1, (1-16), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2007. Kempenaers B (2007) Mate Choice and Genetic Quality: A Review of the Heterozygosity Theory , 10.1016/S0065-3454(07)37005-8, (189-278), . Engqvist L (2006) Females benefit from mating with different males in the scorpionfly Panorpa cognata, Behavioral Ecology, 10.1093/beheco/arj046, 17:3, (435-440), Online publication date: 1-May-2006. Simmons L (2005) The Evolution of Polyandry: Sperm Competition, Sperm Selection, and Offspring Viability, Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.102403.112501, 36:1, (125-146), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2005. Koene J, Pförtner T and Michiels N (2005) Piercing the partner's skin influences sperm uptake in the earthworm Lumbricus terrestris, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 10.1007/s00265-005-0030-y, 59:2, (243-249), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2005. MARSHALL D and EVANS J (2005) The benefits of polyandry in the free-spawning polychaete Galeolaria caespitosa, Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00873.x, 18:3, (735-741) Jennions M, Hunt J, Graham R and Brooks R (2004) NO EVIDENCE FOR INBREEDING AVOIDANCE THROUGH POSTCOPULATORY MECHANISMS IN THE BLACK FIELD CRICKET, TELEOGRYLLUS COMMODUS, Evolution, 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb00876.x, 58:11, (2472-2477), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2004. Maclean L, Pardini A, Noble L, Bishop J and Jones C (2004) Polymorphic dinucleotide microsatellite loci in the clonal ascidian Diplosoma listerianum: predominance of compound and highly interrupted imperfect repeats, Molecular Ecology Notes, 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2004.00643.x, 4:2, (283-285), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2004. Pemberton A, Sommerfeldt A, Wood C, Flint H, Noble L, Clarke K and Bishop J (2004) Plant-like mating in an animal: sexual compatibility and allocation trade-offs in a simultaneous hermaphrodite with remote transfer of sperm, Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00708.x, 17:3, (506-518) Jennions M, Hunt J, Graham R and Brooks R (2004) NO EVIDENCE FOR INBREEDING AVOIDANCE THROUGH POSTCOPULATORY MECHANISMS IN THE BLACK FIELD CRICKET, TELEOGRYLLUS COMMODUS, Evolution, 10.1554/04-261, 58:11, (2472), . Zeh J and Zeh D (2003) Toward a New Sexual Selection Paradigm: Polyandry, Conflict and Incompatibility (Invited Article), Ethology, 10.1046/j.1439-0310.2003.00945.x, 109:12, (929-950), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2003. Ball M and Parker G (2003) Sperm competition games: sperm selection by females, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 10.1016/S0022-5193(03)00118-8, 224:1, (27-42), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2003. SOMMERFELDT A, BISHOP J and WOOD C (2003) Chimerism following fusion in a clonal ascidian (Urochordata), Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 10.1046/j.1095-8312.2003.00179.x, 79:1, (183-192) Pemberton A, Noble L and Bishop J (2003) Frequency dependence in matings with water-borne sperm, Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2003.00509.x, 16:2, (289-301) Hosken D and Stockley P (2003) Benefits of Polyandry: A Life History Perspective Evolutionary Biology, 10.1007/978-1-4757-5190-1_4, (173-194), . Porter J, Ryland J and Carvalho G (2002) Micro- and macrogeographic genetic structure in bryozoans with different larval strategies, Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 10.1016/S0022-0981(02)00042-4, 272:2, (119-130), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2002. Birkhead T and Pizzari T (2002) Postcopulatory sexual selection, Nature Reviews Genetics, 10.1038/nrg774, 3:4, (262-273), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2002. Seror B, Zorovsky Y, Terkel A and Katcoff D (2002) Genetic kinship and social structure in a herd of square-lipped rhinoceroses (Ceratotherium simum simum) at the zoological center, Tel Aviv/Ramat-Gan, Israel, Zoo Biology, 10.1002/zoo.10056, 21:6, (561-571), . Wilkinson G and Fry C (2001) Meiotic drive alters sperm competitive ability in stalk-eyed flies, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 268:1485, (2559-2564), Online publication date: 22-Dec-2001. Zeh J and Zeh D (2001) Reproductive mode and the genetic benefits of polyandry, Animal Behaviour, 10.1006/anbe.2000.1705, 61:6, (1051-1063), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2001. Eady P (2006) Postcopulatory, prezygotic reproductive isolation, Journal of Zoology, 10.1017/S095283690100005X, 253:1, (47-52), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2001. Bishop J, Pemberton A, Sommerfeldt A and Wood C (2001) Laboratory Studies of Mating in the Aplousobranch Diplosoma listerianum The Biology of Ascidians, 10.1007/978-4-431-66982-1_48, (305-310), . Tregenza T and Wedell N (2000) Genetic compatibility, mate choice and patterns of parentage: Invited Review, Molecular Ecology, 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.00964.x, 9:8, (1013-1027), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2000. Bishop J, Manríquez P and Hughes R (2000) Water–borne sperm trigger vitellogenic egg growth in two sessile marine invertebrates, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 267:1449, (1165-1169), Online publication date: 22-Jun-2000.Bishop J, Pemberton A and Noble L (2000) Sperm precedence in a novel context: mating in a sessile marine invertebrate with dispersing sperm, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 267:1448, (1107-1113), Online publication date: 7-Jun-2000. JENNIONS M and PETRIE M (2007) Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits, Biological Reviews, 10.1111/j.1469-185X.1999.tb00040.x, 75:1, (21-64) Curach N and Sunnucks P (1999) Molecular anatomy of an onychophoran: compartmentalized sperm storage and heterogeneous paternity, Molecular Ecology, 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1999.00698.x, 8:9, (1375-1385), Online publication date: 1-Sep-1999. Trouvé S and Coustau C (1999) Chemical communication and mate attraction in echinostomes, International Journal for Parasitology, 10.1016/S0020-7519(99)00075-2, 29:9, (1425-1432), Online publication date: 1-Sep-1999. Stockley P (1999) Sperm selection and genetic incompatibility: does relatedness of mates affect male success in sperm competition?, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 266:1429, (1663-1669), Online publication date: 22-Aug-1999. Dorothea Sommerfeldt and Bishop J (2002) Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis reveals extensive natural chimerism in a marine protochordate, Molecular Ecology, 10.1046/j.1365-294X.1999.00625.x, 8:5, (885-890), Online publication date: 1-May-1999. Bishop J and Sommerfeldt A (1999) Not like Botryllus: indiscriminate post–metamorphic fusion in a compound ascidian, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 266:1416, (241-248), Online publication date: 7-Feb-1999. Arnqvist G and Danielsson I (2017) COPULATORY BEHAVIOR, GENITAL MORPHOLOGY, AND MALE FERTILIZATION SUCCESS IN WATER STRIDERS, Evolution, 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1999.tb05340.x, 53:1, (147-156), Online publication date: 1-Feb-1999. CUNNINGHAM E and BIRKHEAD T (1998) Sex roles and sexual selection, Animal Behaviour, 10.1006/anbe.1998.0953, 56:6, (1311-1321), Online publication date: 1-Dec-1998. Birkhead T (2017) CRYPTIC FEMALE CHOICE: CRITERIA FOR ESTABLISHING FEMALE SPERM CHOICE, Evolution, 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1998.tb01848.x, 52:4, (1212-1218), Online publication date: 1-Aug-1998. MØLLER A and THORNHILL R (1998) Male parental care, differential parental investment by females and sexual selection, Animal Behaviour, 10.1006/anbe.1998.0731, 55:6, (1507-1515), Online publication date: 1-Jun-1998. Bishop J (1998) Fertilization in the sea: are the hazards of broadcast spawning avoided when free–spawned sperm fertilize retained eggs?, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 265:1397, (725-731), Online publication date: 22-Apr-1998.Magurran A, May R, Parker G and Partridge L (1998) Sexual conflict and speciation, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 353:1366, (261-274), Online publication date: 28-Feb-1998. Birkhead T and Møller A (1998) Sperm Competition, Sexual Selection and Different Routes to Fitness Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection, 10.1016/B978-012100543-6/50042-8, (757-781), . Birkhead T (1998) Sperm Competition in Birds: Mechanisms and Function Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection, 10.1016/B978-012100543-6/50039-8, (579-622), . Simmons L and Siva-Jothy M (1998) Sperm Competition in Insects: Mechanisms and the Potential for Selection Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection, 10.1016/B978-012100543-6/50035-0, (341-434), . Michiels N (1998) Mating Conflicts and Sperm Competition in Simultaneous Hermaphrodites Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection, 10.1016/B978-012100543-6/50032-5, (219-254), . Eberhard W (1998) Female Roles in Sperm Competition Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection, 10.1016/B978-012100543-6/50028-3, (91-116), . Møller A (1998) Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection, 10.1016/B978-012100543-6/50027-1, (55-90), . Stockley P (1997) No evidence of sperm selection by female common shrews, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 264:1387, (1497-1500), Online publication date: 22-Oct-1997.Wilson N, Tubman S, Eady P and Robertson G (1997) Female genotype affects male success in sperm competition, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 264:1387, (1491-1495), Online publication date: 22-Oct-1997.Bishop J (1997) Female control of paternity in the internally fertilizing compound ascidian Diplosoma listerianum. I. Autoradiographic investigation of sperm movements in the female reproductive tract, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 263:1368, (369-376), Online publication date: 22-Mar-1996. This Issue22 April 1996Volume 263Issue 1369 Article InformationDOI:https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1996.0061Published by:Royal SocietyPrint ISSN:0962-8452Online ISSN:1471-2954History: Manuscript received05/09/1995Manuscript accepted07/12/1995Published online01/01/1997Published in print22/04/1996 License:Scanned images copyright © 2017, Royal Society Citations and impact Large datasets are available through Proceedings B's partnership with Dryad
Referência(s)