Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

The Senate Judiciary Committee and Supreme Court Nominees: Measuring the Dynamics of Confirmation Criteria

1994; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 56; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês

10.2307/2132192

1468-2508

Frank Guliuzza, Daniel J. Reagan, David M. Barrett,

Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems

Previous articleNext article No AccessResearch NotesThe Senate Judiciary Committee and Supreme Court Nominees: Measuring the Dynamics of Confirmation CriteriaFrank Guliuzza III, Daniel J. Reagan, and David M. BarrettFrank Guliuzza III, Daniel J. Reagan, and David M. BarrettPDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The Journal of Politics Volume 56, Number 3Aug., 1994 Sponsored by the Southern Political Science Association Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.2307/2132192 Views: 27Total views on this site Citations: 15Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1994 University of Texas PressPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:ALLEN HUANG, KAI WAI HUI, REEYARN ZHIYANG LI Federal Judge Ideology: A New Measure of Ex Ante Litigation Risk, Journal of Accounting Research 57, no.22 (Apr 2019): 431–489.https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12260Charles R. Shipan, Brooke Thomas Allen, Andrew Bargen Choosing When to Choose: Explaining the Duration of Presidential Supreme Court Nomination Decisions, Congress & the Presidency 41, no.11 (Feb 2014): 1–24.https://doi.org/10.1080/07343469.2013.851129Matthew E. K. Hall, Ryan C. Black Keeping the Outliers in Line? Judicial Review of State Laws by the U.S. Supreme Court, Social Science Quarterly 94, no.22 (Dec 2012): 395–409.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2012.00939.xDion Farganis, Justin Wedeking "No Hints, No Forecasts, No Previews": An Empirical Analysis of Supreme Court Nominee Candor from Harlan to Kagan, Law & Society Review 45, no.33 (Sep 2011): 525–559.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2011.00443.xBrandon Rottinghaus, Chris Nicholson Counting Congress In: Patterns of Success in Judicial Nomination Requests by Members of Congress to Presidents Eisenhower and Ford, American Politics Research 38, no.44 (Feb 2010): 691–717.https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X09356269Dion Farganis, Justin Wedeking No Hints, No Forecasts, No Previews: Analyzing Supreme Court Nominee Evasiveness, 1955-2009, SSRN Electronic Journal 68 (Jan 2010).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1628813James L. Gibson, Gregory A. Caldeira Confirmation Politics and The Legitimacy of the U.S. Supreme Court: Institutional Loyalty, Positivity Bias, and the Alito Nomination, American Journal of Political Science 53, no.11 (Jan 2009): 139–155.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00362.xArtemus Ward 'Overly Deferential to Executive Power:' Partisanship and Evasiveness in Justice Samuel Alito's Confirmation Hearing, SSRN Electronic Journal 36 (Jan 2008).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1080083Elisha Carol Savchak, Thomas G. Hansford, Donald R. Songer, Kenneth L. Manning, Robert A. Carp Taking It to the Next Level: The Elevation of District Court Judges to the U.S. Courts of Appeals, American Journal of Political Science 50, no.22 (Apr 2006): 478–493.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00197.xCharles R. Shipan Choosing When to Choose: Explaining the Duration of Presidential Supreme Court Nomination Decisions, SSRN Electronic Journal 17 (Jan 2006).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1019065Lauren Cohen Bell Senatorial Discourtesy: The Senate's Use of Delay to Shape the Federal Judiciary, Political Research Quarterly 55, no.33 (Jul 2016): 589–607.https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290205500305 Wendy L. Martinek , Mark Kemper , and Steven R. Van Winkle To Advise and Consent: The Senate and Lower Federal Court Nominations, 1977-1998, The Journal of Politics 64, no.22 (Oct 2015): 337–361.https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2508.00129Micheal W Giles, Virginia A. Hettinger, Todd Peppers Picking Federal Judges: A Note on Policy and Partisan Selection Agendas, Political Research Quarterly 54, no.33 (Jul 2016): 623–641.https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290105400307Ayo Ogundele, Linda Camp Keith Reexamining the Impact of the Bork Nomination to the Supreme Court, Political Research Quarterly 52, no.22 (Jul 2016): 403–420.https://doi.org/10.1177/106591299905200208Karen J. Maschke, Susan J. Siggelakis TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: SENATORS' OPENING STATEMENTS AT SUPREME COURT CONFIRMATON HEARINGS, Southeastern Political Review 24, no.11 (Nov 2008): 77–97.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.1996.tb00433.x