Is geometric morphometrics efficient for comparing otolith shape of different fish species?
2006; Wiley; Volume: 267; Issue: 6 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1002/jmor.10439
ISSN1097-4687
Autores Tópico(s)Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
ResumoJournal of MorphologyVolume 267, Issue 6 p. 750-757 Article Is geometric morphometrics efficient for comparing otolith shape of different fish species? Dominique Ponton, Corresponding Author Dominique Ponton [email protected] IRD, BPA5, 98848 Nouméa, New CaledoniaIRD, BPA5, 98848 Nouméa cedex, New CaledoniaSearch for more papers by this author Dominique Ponton, Corresponding Author Dominique Ponton [email protected] IRD, BPA5, 98848 Nouméa, New CaledoniaIRD, BPA5, 98848 Nouméa cedex, New CaledoniaSearch for more papers by this author First published: 08 March 2006 https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.10439Citations: 73AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat Abstract The 2D shape of sagittae of Encrasicholina devisi, E. heteroloba, E. cf. punctifer, and Stolephorus indicus, four tropical Engraulididae of New Caledonia, was studied with 1) dimensionless shape descriptors (form factor, roundness, and aspect ratio); 2) elliptic Fourier analysis (EFA) and Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) of 2D outline; and 3) geometric morphometrics (GM) based on four standard landmarks and nine semi-landmarks. The largest sagittae of E. cf. punctifer were lacier, i.e., had a smaller form factor, than the sagittae of the other species. The sagittae of E. devisi and S. indicus were more roundish, and presented a lower aspect ratio, than those of E. heteroloba and E. cf. punctifer. Between-class correspondence analysis (COA) indicated that between-species inertia was the lowest when based on the 96 Fourier coefficients originating from EFA, and the highest when based on the 22 partial warps originating from GM. As otoliths of different sizes from different species presented similar shapes, relative between-species inertia increased markedly when length, width, perimeter, and area were added to the set of variables originating from EFA, FFT, or GM. Despite otoliths having only a few, sparsely located, homologous landmarks, GM appeared slightly more efficient in distinguishing the sagittae of the four species and allowed visualization of the modification of otolith shape as they grow. J. Morphol. © 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc. LITERATURE CITED Adams DC, Rohlf FJ, Slice DE. 2004. Geometric morphometrics: ten years of progress following the ‘revolution.’ Ital J Zool 71: 5–16. Begg GA, Brown RW. 2000. Stock identification of haddock Melanogrammus aeglefinus on Georges bank based on otolith shape analysis. Trans Am Fish Soc 129: 935–945. Begg GA, Overholtz WJ, Munroe NJ. 2000. The use of internal otolith morphometrics for identification of haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus) stocks on Georges Bank. Fish Bull 99: 1–14. Benzecri JP. 1983. Analyse de l'inertie intra-classe par l'analyse d'un tableau de correspondances. Cah Anal Donn 8: 351–358. Blaber SJM, Milton DA, Rawlinson NJ, Sesewa A. 1993. Predators of tuna baitfish and the effects of baitfishing on the subsistence reef fisheries of Fidji. In: SJM Blaber, DA Milton, NJ Rawlinson, editors. Tuna baitfish in Fidji and Solomon Islands: proceedings of a workshop, Nadi, Fidji, 17–18 August 1993. ACIAR Proc No 52. Canberra: Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR). p 51–61. Bookstein FL. 1997. Landmark methods for forms without landmarks: morphometrics of group differences in outline shape. Med Image Anal 1: 225–243. Bugoni L, Vooren CM. 2004. Feeding ecology of the common tern Sterna hirundo in a wintering area in southern Brazil. Ibis 146: 438–453. Campana SE, Casselman JM. 1993. Stock discrimination using otolith shape analysis. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 50: 1062–1083. Castonguay M, Simard P, Gagnon P. 1991. Usefulness of Fourier analysis of otolith shape for Atlantic mackerel (Scomber scombrus) stock discrimination. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 48: 296–302. Clarke TA. 1989. The Hawaiian anchovy or nehu Encrasicholina purpurea (Engraulidae). Washington, US Army Corps of Engineers. Species profiles: life histories and environmental requirements of coastal vertebrates and invertebrates Pacific Ocean region. 4: 1–20. Crampton JS, Haines AJ. 1996. Users' manual for programs HANGLE, HMATCH, and HCURVE for the Fourier shape analysis of two-dimensional outlines. Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences science report 96/37: 1–28. DeVries DA, Grimes CB, Prager MH. 2002. Using otolith shape analysis to distinguish eastern Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic Ocean stocks of king mackerel. Fish Res 57: 51–62. Dolédec S, Chessel D. 1991. Recent developments in linear ordination methods for environmental sciences. Adv Ecol 1: 133–155. Ferson S, Rohlf FJ, Koehn RK. 1985. Measuring shape variation of two-dimensional outlines. Syst Zool 34: 59–68. Fourmanoir P. 1971. Liste des espèces de poissons contenus dans les estomacs de thons jaunes, Thunnus albacares (Bonnaterre 1788) et de thons blancs, Thunnus alalunga (Bonnaterre 1788). Cah ORSTOM Sér Océanogr IX: 109–118. Gerig G, Styner M, Shenton ME, Lieberman JA. 2001. Shape versus size: improved understanding of the morphology of brain structures. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention 2208: 24–32. Good P. 1993. Permutation tests — a practical guide to resampling methods for testing hypotheses. New York: Springer. Greenacre M. 1984. Theory and applications of correspondence analysis. London: Academic Press. Haines AJ, Crampton JS. 2002. Improvements to the method of Fourier shape analysis as applied in morphometric studies. Palaeontology 43: 765–783. Hida TS. 1973. Food of tunas and dolphins (Pisces: Scombridae and Coryphaenidae) with emphasis on the distribution and biology of their prey Stolephorus buccaneeri (Engraulidae). Fish Bull 71: 135–143. Isaev MA, Denisova LN. 1995. The computer programs for shape analysis of plant leaves. Proc Math Comput Educ Int Conf Pushchino (Russia). Jobling M, Beriby A. 1986. The use and abuse of fish otoliths in studies of feeding habits of marine piscivores. Sarsia 17: 265–274. Kauppinen H, Seppänen T, Pietikäinen M. 1995. An experimental comparison of autoregressive and Fourier-based descriptors in 2-D shape classification. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal 17: 201–207. Kuhl FP, Giardina CR. 1982. Elliptic Fourier features of a closed contour. Comput Graph Image Process 18: 236–258. L'Abee-Lund JH. 1988. Otolith shape discriminates between juvenile Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L., and brown trout, Salmo trutta L. J Fish Biol 33: 899–903. L'Abee-Lund JH, Jensen AJ. 1993. Otoliths as natural tags in the systematics of salmonids. Environ Biol Fish 36: 389–393. Lagardère F, Chaumillon G, Amara R, Heineman G, Lago JM. 1995. Examination of otolith morphology and microstructure using laser scanning microscopy. In: DH Secor, JM Dean, SE Campana, editors. Recent developments in fish otolith research. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press. p 7–26. Lestrel PE. 1997. Introduction and overview of Fourier descriptors. In: PE Lestrel, editor. Fourier descriptors and their applications in biology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. p 22–44. Manly BFJ. 1997. Randomization, bootstrap and Monte-Carlo methods in biology. London: Chapman & Hall. Monteiro LR, Beneditto AP, Guillermo LH, Rivera LA. 2005. Allometric changes and shape differentiation of sagitta otoliths in sciaenid fishes. Fish Res 74: 288–299. Nolf D. 1995. Studies of fossil otoliths—the state of the art. In: DH Secor, JM Dean, SE Campana, editors. Recent developments in fish otolith research. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press. p 513–544. Panfili J. 2002. Preparation and observation techniques B. Extraction and conservation of calcified structures. In: J Panfili, H De Pontual, H Troadec, PJ Wright, editors. Manual of fish sclerochronology. Brest: Ifremer-IRD coedition. p 317–329. Peura M, Iivarinen J. 1997. Efficiency of simple shape descriptors. Capri, 3rd Int. Workshop on Visual Form, May 28–30 1997. p 1–9. Popper AN, Lu Z. 2000. Structure-function relationships in fish otolith organs. Fish Res 46: 15–25. Read DW. 1997. Growth and form revisited. In: PE Lestrel, editor. Fourier descriptors and their applications in biology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. p 45–73. Reznick D, Lindbeck E, Bryga HA. 1989. Slower growth results in larger otoliths: an experimental test with guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 46: 108–112. Rohlf FJ, Archie JW. 1984. A comparison of Fourier methods for the description of wing shape in mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae). Syst Zool 33: 302–317. Rohlf FJ, Marcus LF. 1993. A revolution in morphometrics. Trends Ecol Evol 8: 129–132. Rohlf FJ, Slice DE. 1990. Extensions of the Procustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Syst Zool 39: 40–59. Russ JC. 1994. The image processing handbook. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. Secor DH, Dean JM, Laban EH. 1992. Otolith removal and preparation for microstructural examination. In: DK Stevenson, SE Campana, editors. Otolith microstructure examination and analysis. Ottawa: Department of Fisheries and Oceans. p 19–57. Simoneau M, Casselman JM, Fortin R. 2000. Determining the effect of negative allometry (length/height relationship) on variation in otolith shape in lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush), using Fourier-series analysis. Can J Zool 78: 1597–1603. Stransky C. 2004. Stock separation and growth of redfish (genus Sebastes) in the North Atlantic by means of shape and elemental analysis of otoliths. PhD dissertation, Hamburg University. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. 2000. Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Thioulouse J, Chessel D, Dolédec S, Olivier JM. 1997. ADE-4: a multivariate analysis graphical display software. Stat Comput 7: 75–83. Tollit DJ, Heaslip SG, Trites AW. 2004a. Sizes of walleye pollock (Theragra chalcogramma) consumed by the eastern stock of Steller sea lions (Eumetopias jubatus) in southeast Alaska from 1994 to 1999. Fish Bull 102: 522–532. Tollit DJ, Heaslip SG, Zeppelin TK, Joy R, Call KA, Trites AW. 2004b. A method to improve size estimates of walleye pollock (Theragra chalcogramma) and Atka mackerel (Pleurogrammus monopterygius) consumed by pinnipeds: digestion correction factors applied to bones and otoliths recovered in scats. Fish Bull 102: 498–508. Torres GJ, Lombarte A, Morales-Nin B. 2000. Variability of the sulcus acusticus in the sagittal otolith of the genus Merluccius (Merlucciidae). Fish Res 46: 5–13. Tuset VM, Lombarte A, Gonzalez JA, Pertusa JF, Lorente M. 2003a. Comparative morphology of the sagittal otolith in Serranus spp. J Fish Biol 63: 1491–1504. Tuset VM, Lozano IJ, Gonzalez JA, Pertusa JF, Garcia-Diaz MM. 2003b. Shape indices to identify regional differences in otolith morphology of comber, Serranus cabrilla (L., 1758). J Appl Ichthyol 19: 88–93. Watkinson DA, Gillis DM. 2003. Stock differentiation of walleye based on the Fourier approximation of averaged scale outline signals. N Am J Fish Manag 23: 91–99. Whitehead PJP, Nelson GJ, Wongratana T. 1988. FAO species catalogue. Vol. 7. Clupeoid fishes of the world (suborder Clupeoidei). An annotated and illustrated catalogue of the herrings, sardines, pilchards, sprats, shads, anchovies and wolf-herrings. Part 2. Engraulididae. Rome: United Nations Development Programme, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Wright PJ, Panfili J, Morales-Nin B, Geffen A. 2002. Types of calcified structures A. Otoliths. In: J Panfili, H De Pontual, H Troadec, PJ Wright, editors. Manual of fish sclerochronology. Brest: Ifremer-IRD coedition. p 31–57. Zahn CT, Roskies RZ. 1972. Fourier descriptors for plane closed curves. IEEE Trans Comput C-21: 269–281. Zelditch ML, Swiderski DL, Sheets HD, Fink WL. 2004. Geometric morphometrics for biologists: a primer. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Zeppelin TK, Tollit DJ, Call KA, Orchard TJ, Gudmundson CJ. 2004. Sizes of walleye pollock (Theragra chalcogramma) and Atka mackerel (Pleurogrammus monopterygius) consumed by the western stock of Steller sea lions (Eumetopias jubatus) in Alaska from 1998 to 2000. Fish Bull 102: 509–521. Citing Literature Volume267, Issue6June 2006Pages 750-757 ReferencesRelatedInformation
Referência(s)