Empirical Evidence on the Selection Hypothesis and the Decision to Litigate or Settle
1990; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 19; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1086/467845
ISSN1537-5366
AutoresLinda R. Stanley, Don Coursey,
Tópico(s)Construction Project Management and Performance
ResumoPrevious articleNext article No AccessEmpirical Evidence on the Selection Hypothesis and the Decision to Litigate or SettleLinda R. Stanley and Don L. CourseyLinda R. Stanley and Don L. CourseyPDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The Journal of Legal Studies Volume 19, Number 1Jan., 1990 Sponsored by The University of Chicago Law School Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/467845 Views: 9Total views on this site Citations: 27Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1990 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Murali Jagannathan, Venkata Santosh Kumar Delhi Identifying focus areas to decode the decision to litigate contractual disputes in construction, Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management 29, no.88 (Jun 2021): 2976–2998.https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-01-2021-0014Yun-chien Chang, William Hubbard New Empirical Tests for Classic Litigation Selection Models: Evidence from a Low Settlement Environment, American Law and Economics Review 23, no.22 (Oct 2021): 348–394.https://doi.org/10.1093/aler/ahab008Paul Pecorino, Mark Van Boening An empirical analysis of litigation with discovery: The role of fairness, Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics 81 (Aug 2019): 172–184.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2019.06.009Paul Pecorino, Mark Van Boening Costly Voluntary Disclosure in a Signaling Game, Review of Law & Economics 0, no.00 (Mar 2019).https://doi.org/10.1515/rle-2016-0074Michael McBride, Stergios Skaperdas, Pi-Han Tsai Why go to court? Bargaining failure under the shadow of trial with complete information, European Journal of Political Economy 55 (Dec 2018): 151–168.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2017.12.001Paul Pecorino, Mark Van Boening An Empirical Analysis of the Signaling and Screening Models of Litigation, American Law and Economics Review 20, no.11 (Apr 2018): 214–244.https://doi.org/10.1093/aler/ahy002Yun-chien Chang, William H. J. Hubbard Does the Priest and Klein Model Travel? Testing Litigation Selection Hypotheses with Foreign Court Data, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2018).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3127728Paul Pecorino, Mark van Boening Costly Voluntary Disclosure in a Signaling Game, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2016).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2809174Mark van Boening, Paul Pecorino An Empirical Analysis of Litigation with Discovery, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2016).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2816642Paul Pecorino, Mark Van Boening Costly voluntary disclosure in a screening game, International Review of Law and Economics 44 (Oct 2015): 16–28.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2015.08.002Paul Pecorino, Mark van Boening Costly Voluntary Disclosure in a Screening Game, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2013).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2285718Yannick Gabuthy, Nicolas Jacquemet Analyse économique du droit et méthode expérimentale, Économie & prévision n° 202-203, no.11 (Jan 2013): 121.https://doi.org/10.3917/ecop.202.0121Florian Baumann, Tim Friehe Emotions in litigation contests, Economics of Governance 13, no.33 (Jun 2012): 195–215.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10101-012-0110-1James Fallows Tierney Economic Theory of Bellwether Trials, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2011).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1754231Paul Pecorino, Mark van Boening An Empirical Analysis of the Signaling and Screening Models of Litigation, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2011).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1988244Walter W. Austin, Linda L. Brennan, James L. Hunt Legal Truth and Consequences for a Failed ERP Implementation, Journal of Cases on Information Technology 13, no.11 (Jan 2011): 37–56.https://doi.org/10.4018/jcit.2011010103Bryan C. McCannon, Siddhartha Bandyopadhyay Re-Election Concerns and the Failure of Plea Bargaining, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2010).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1691769Paul Pecorino, Mark van Boening Bargaining with Asymmetric Dispute Costs, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2010).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.922063Alan C. Marco Learning by Suing: Structural Estimates of Court Errors in Patent Litigation, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2006).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.913408Brian G.M. Main, Andrew Park The impact of defendant offers into court on negotiation in the shadow of the law: experimental evidence, International Review of Law and Economics 22, no.22 (Aug 2002): 177–192.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0144-8188(02)00086-8 Paul Pecorino and Mark Van Boening Bargaining and Information: An Empirical Analysis of a Multistage Arbitration Game Pecorino and Van Boening, Journal of Labor Economics 19, no.44 (Jul 2015): 922–948.https://doi.org/10.1086/322825Amy Farmer, Jill Tiefenthaler Conflict in divorce disputes: the determinants of pretrial settlement, International Review of Law and Economics 21, no.22 (Jun 2001): 157–180.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0144-8188(01)00054-0Thomas J. Miceli Introduction: The law and economics of real estate, The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 12, no.11 (Jan 1996): 7–8.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00127762Martin J. Bailey, Paul H. Rubin A positive theory of legal change, International Review of Law and Economics 14, no.44 (Dec 1994): 467–477.https://doi.org/10.1016/0144-8188(94)90027-2 Terry L. Anderson , and Fred S. Mc Chesney Raid or Trade? An Economic Model of Indian-White Relations, The Journal of Law and Economics 37, no.11 (Oct 2015): 39–74.https://doi.org/10.1086/467306 George Loewenstein , Samuel Issacharoff , Colin Camerer , and Linda Babcock Self-Serving Assessments of Fairness and Pretrial Bargaining, The Journal of Legal Studies 22, no.11 (Oct 2015): 135–159.https://doi.org/10.1086/468160Walter W. Austin, Linda L. Brennan, James L. Hunt Legal Truth and Consequences for a Failed ERP Implementation, (): 46–69.https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-3619-4.ch003
Referência(s)