LIGATION OF THE NATIVE URETER IN RENAL TRANSPLANTATION
2002; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; Volume: 167; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1016/s0022-5347(05)65375-x
ISSN1527-3792
AutoresMICHAEL L. GALLENTINE, Francis H. Wright,
Tópico(s)Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
ResumoNo AccessJournal of UrologyCLINICAL UROLOGY: Original Articles1 Jan 2002LIGATION OF THE NATIVE URETER IN RENAL TRANSPLANTATION MICHAEL L. GALLENTINE and FRANCIS H. WRIGHT MICHAEL L. GALLENTINEMICHAEL L. GALLENTINE and FRANCIS H. WRIGHTFRANCIS H. WRIGHT View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)65375-XAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract Purpose: Native ureteral ligation may be required in renal transplantation when ureteroureterostomy is performed. Native nephrectomy has been done to avoid the complication of hydronephrosis after native ureteral ligation. We reviewed the records of renal transplant recipients who underwent native ureteral ligation to determine the incidence of post-ligation symptoms and need for native nephrectomy. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 1,275 renal transplants performed from January 1986 through September 1999, including 278 cases (22%) of native ureteral ligation. The majority of patients had anuria or oligouria before transplantation, although 3 were not dialysis dependent. Followup was 1 to 140 months. Charts were reviewed for flank pain, infection and the need for native nephrectomy. Results: Six of 278 patients (2.2%) required native nephrectomy 7 to 82 months after transplantation with flank pain as the indication in all. The cause of renal failure was polycystic disease in 3 of the 6 cases, unknown in 2 and diabetes in 1. The patient with diabetes had papillary necrosis and bleeding in the nephrectomized kidney. None of the 278 patients had infection and early post-ligation flank pain developed in only 1 (0.4%). Conclusions: The native ureter may be safely ligated during renal transplantation. Late nephrectomy may be required in a small percent of cases, most commonly in those of polycystic disease. The need for nephrectomy is most often related to the original renal disease. References 1 : Selective pre-transplant nephrectomy: indications and perioperative management. J Urol1985; 133: 379. Link, Google Scholar 2 : Experience with pyeloureterostomy in renal transplantation. Ann Surg1982; 196: 588. Google Scholar 3 : Ureteropyelostomy and ureteroneocystostomy in renal transplantation: postoperative urological complications. J Urol1977; 118: 17. Link, Google Scholar 4 : The ureteropyelostomy in human renal transplantation. J Urol1973; 110: 24. Link, Google Scholar 5 : Pyeloureterostomy reconstruction in human renal transplantation. Ann Surg1975; 181: 61. Google Scholar 6 : Re-establishment of urinary tract continuity by uretero-ureterostomy during kidney transplantation. J d'Urol1985; 91: 27. Google Scholar 7 : Secondary ureteral pyelostomy in renal transplant recipients. J Urol1981; 126: 723. Abstract, Google Scholar 8 : Experience with pyeloureterostomy associated with simple ligation of native ureter without ipsilateral nephrectomy in renal transplantation. J Urol1985; 133: 386. Link, Google Scholar 9 : Ureteroureterostomy and pyeloureterostomy without native nephrectomy in renal transplantation. Br J Urol1991; 67: 349. Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar 10 : The effects of ureteral obstruction: experimental and clinical. Surg Gynecol Obstet1912; 15: 290. Google Scholar 11 : Pathophysiology of urinary tract obstruction. In: . Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders1998: 350. chapt. 9. Google Scholar 12 : Pyeloureterostomy in the management of renal allograft ureteral complications: an alternative technique. J Urol1993; 149: 366. Link, Google Scholar From the Department of Urology, Wilford Hall Medical Center and Texas Transplant Institute, Methodist Specialty and Transplant Hospital, San Antonio, Texas© 2002 by American Urological Association, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byLopes R, Fernandez N, Koyle M, dos Santos J, Perez J, Romao R and Lorenzo A (2017) Clinical Outcomes of the Upper Urinary Tract after Ureteral Clipping for Treatment of Low Functioning or Nonfunctioning Renal MoietiesJournal of Urology, VOL. 199, NO. 2, (558-564), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2018.Torino G, Innocenzi M, Mele E, Nappo S and Capozza N (2016) Comparison of Native Ureteral Ligation and Open Nephrectomy for Pediatric Renal TransplantationJournal of Urology, VOL. 196, NO. 3, (875-880), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2016.Canning D (2015) Re: Laparoscopic Ureteral Ligation (Clipping): A Novel, Simple Procedure for Pediatric Urinary Incontinence Due to Ectopic Ureters Associated with Non-Functioning Upper Pole Renal MoietiesJournal of Urology, VOL. 195, NO. 1, (168-170), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2016.Timsit M, Lalloué F, Bayramov A, Taylor M, Billaut C, Legendre C, Kreis H, Badet L and Méjean A (2010) Should Routine Pyeloureterostomy be Advocated in Adult Kidney Transplantation? A Prospective Study of 283 RecipientsJournal of Urology, VOL. 184, NO. 5, (2043-2048), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2010. Volume 167Issue 1January 2002Page: 29-30 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2002 by American Urological Association, Inc.Keywordsnephrectomykidney transplantationligationureterMetricsAuthor Information MICHAEL L. GALLENTINE More articles by this author FRANCIS H. WRIGHT More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Referência(s)