Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Accessing preappraised evidence: fine-tuning the 5S model into a 6S model

2009; American College of Physicians; Volume: 151; Issue: 6 Linguagem: Inglês

10.7326/0003-4819-151-6-200909150-02002

1539-3704

Alba DiCenso,

Evaluation and Performance Assessment

ACP Journal Club15 September 2009Accessing preappraised evidence: fine-tuning the 5S model into a 6S modelAlba DiCenso, RN, PhD, Liz Bayley, MLS, R. Brian Haynes, MD, PhDAlba DiCenso, RN, PhDMcMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (A.D., L.B., R.B.H.), Liz Bayley, MLSMcMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (A.D., L.B., R.B.H.), R. Brian Haynes, MD, PhDMcMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (A.D., L.B., R.B.H.)Author, Article, and Disclosure Informationhttps://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-6-200909150-02002 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail The application of high-quality evidence to clinical decision making requires that we know how to access that evidence. In years past, this meant literature searching know-how and application of critical appraisal skills to separate lower- from higher-quality clinical studies. However, over the past decade, many practical resources have been created to facilitate ready access to high-quality research. We call these resources "preappraised" because they have undergone a filtering process to include only those studies that are of higher quality, and they are regularly updated so that the evidence we access through these resources is current.To facilitate use of the ...References1 Haynes RB. Of studies, summaries, synopses, and systems: the "4S" evolution of services for finding current best evidence. ACP J Club. 2001;134:A11-3. [PMID: 11280129] Google Scholar2 Haynes RB. Of studies, syntheses, synopses, summaries, and systems: the "5S" evolution of information services for evidence-based health care decisions. ACP J Club. 2006;145:A8. [PMID: 17080967] Google Scholar3 Garg AX, Adhikari N, McDonald H, et al. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA. 2005;293:1223-38. [PMID: 15755945] Google Scholar4 Fitzmaurice DA, Hobbs FD, Murray ET, et al. Oral anticoagulation management in primary care with the use of computerized decision support and near-patient testing: a randomized, controlled trial. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:2343-8. [PMID: 10927732] Google Scholar5 Fitzmaurice DA. Oral anticoagulation control: the European perspective. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2006;21:95-100. [PMID: 16475050] Google Scholar6 Gerard MN, Trick WE, Das K, et al. Use of clinical decision support to increase influenza vaccination: multi-year evolution of the system. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008;15:776-9. [PMID: 18756001] Google Scholar7 Field MJ, Lohr KN, eds. Clinical Practice Guidelines: Directions for a New Program. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1990. Google Scholar8 Registered Nurses Association of Ontario. Promoting Asthma Control in Children. Toronto, Canada: Registered Nurses Association of Ontario, 2004 (revised 2008 supplement) www.rnao.org/Storage/39/3387_Promoting_Asthma_Control_in_Children_with_2008_supplement_FINAL.pdf (accessed 28 Jul 09) Google Scholar9 Canadian Diabetes Association Clinical Practice Guidelines Expert Committee. Canadian Diabetes Association 2008 clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and management of diabetes in Canada. Canadian Journal of Diabetes. 2008;32:S1-201. Google Scholar10 Zaroukian MH. PubMed clinical queries. Evid Based Med. 2001;6:8. Google Scholar Author, Article, and Disclosure InformationAffiliations: McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada (A.D., L.B., R.B.H.)This article was published at Annals.org on 1 September 2009. PreviousarticleNextarticle Advertisement FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Metrics Cited ByHypertension and periodontitis: A joint report by the Italian society of hypertension (SIIA) and the Italian society of periodontology and implantology (SIdP)Hypertension and Periodontitis: A Joint Report by the Italian Society of Hypertension (SIIA) and the Italian Society of Periodontology and Implantology (SIdP)Evidence‐based Nursing PracticeInformation Retrieval5-Aminolevulinic acid for recurrent malignant gliomas: A systematic reviewContentImplementation of a Computerized Decision Support System for Computed Tomography Scan Requests for Nontraumatic Headache in the Emergency DepartmentThe Importance of Applying Evidence-Based Medicine in Clinical PracticeEn pacientes con probabilidad clínica baja de tromboembolia pulmonar aguda, ¿cuándo debe realizarse la angiografía pulmonar por tomografía computarizada?Introducing Knowledge Translation to Plastic Surgery¿Se debe realizar como primera prueba de imagen una radiografía de tórax en inspiración o en espiración ante la sospecha de neumotórax?¿Está indicado realizar una tomografía computarizada torácica urgente en el traumatismo leve-moderado?Evidence-based prosthodontics: 25 years laterDiretrizes para detecção precoce do câncer de mama no Brasil. I - Métodos de elaboração¿Cómo hacer lectura crítica en oftalmología? Parte 1: Reducción del riesgo de edema macular cistoide poscirugía de catarataCitation analysis as a literature search method for systematic reviewsEl SPRINT en la práctica médica: ¿es momento de modificar el manejo de la hipertensión arterial en Latinoamérica?EBHC pyramid 5.0 for accessing preappraised evidence and guidancePyramids are guides not rules: the evolution of the evidence pyramidSystematic reviews are not enough: policymakers need a greater variety of synthesized evidenceResearch methodsElaboración y evaluación crítica de las guías de práctica clínicaEvidence-based Practice of RadiologyEfficacy of homecare regimens for mechanical plaque removal in managing gingivitis a meta reviewEvidence based application of BNP/NT-proBNP testing in heart failureMethodological Guide to Adopting New Aesthetic Surgical InnovationsInformation-Seeking Behaviors of Medical Students: A Cross-Sectional Web-Based SurveyAn experimental search strategy retrieves more precise results than PubMed and Google for questions about medical interventionsIncreasing the quantity and quality of searching for current best evidence to answer clinical questions: protocol and intervention design of the MacPLUS FS Factorial Randomized Controlled TrialsPresentation abstracts / Résumés d'exposésSearching for Answers to Clinical Questions Using Google Versus Evidence-Based Summary ResourcesInformation Retrieval and Digital LibrariesSpeed and Accuracy of a Point of Care Web-Based Knowledge Resource for Clinicians: A Controlled Crossover TrialDevelopment of a complex intervention to improve health literacy skillsFeatures of Effective Medical Knowledge Resources to Support Point of Care Learning: A Focus Group StudyUna educación para la clínica del siglo xxi: el currículo para la práctica basada en la evidenciaCritically Appraised Topics: una nueva oportunidad de publicación en RadiologíaNet Improvement of Correct Answers to Therapy Questions After PubMed Searches: Pre/Post ComparisonThe quality, breadth, and timeliness of content updating vary substantially for 10 online medical texts: an analytic surveyAnnual review of selected scientific literature: Report of the committee on scientific investigation of the American Academy of Restorative DentistryEvaluation of a Web Portal for Improving Public Access to Evidence-Based Health Information and Health Literacy Skills: A Pragmatic TrialSkin Stretching for Burn Scar Excision – A Critically Appraised TopicFinding and Evaluating Renal Evidence: Bridging the Knowledge GapSicily statement on classification and development of evidence-based practice learning assessment toolsTo Compare PubMed Clinical Queries and UpToDate in Teaching Information Mastery to Clinical Residents: A Crossover Randomized Controlled TrialGetting the Evidence Straight in Emergency DiagnosticsRadiología basada en la evidencia en el diagnóstico por imagen: ¿qué es y cómo se practica?Evidence-based radiology for diagnostic imaging: What it is and how to practice itLista de comprobación en revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisis: la declaración PRISMA, más allá de QUOROMThe Technology of Evidence-Based Practice: Tools for Navigating the Health Sciences LiteratureType of Evidence Behind Point-of-Care Clinical Information Products: A Bibliometric AnalysisJa til kunnskapsbasert praksisWiring a nation: putting knowledge into action 15 September 2009Volume 151, Issue 6Page: JC3-2KeywordsClinical decision support systemsComputing systemsDatabasesEvidence based medicineHealth careInformation technologyLibrariesSoftware toolsSystematic reviewsTreatment guidelines ePublished: 15 September 2009 Issue Published: 15 September 2009 CopyrightCopyright © 2009 by American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.PDF DownloadLoading ...