The Contribution of FRBR to the Identification of Bibliographic Relationships: The New RDA-Based Ways of Representing Relationships in Catalogs
2012; Taylor & Francis; Volume: 50; Issue: 5-7 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1080/01639374.2012.680847
ISSN1544-4554
AutoresPaola Picco, Virginia Ortiz‐Repiso,
Tópico(s)Digital and Traditional Archives Management
ResumoAbstract Libraries that have implemented Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) are obliged to resort to auxiliary models to display bibliographic records. This article examines the use of Resource Description and Access (RDA) for recording the different types of relationships (identifiers, authorized access points, composite structured and unstructured descriptions) and how to represent them in existing formats. It also analyzes the modifications that will be needed and the elements that should be taken into account in order to develop innovative tools capable of representing relationships in the clearest and most appropriate way for users, while staying current with the latest trends in information organization. KEYWORDS: FRBRFRADRDAbibliographic relationshipsSemantic Web Notes 1. Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records. Final Report. Approved by the Standing Committee of the Cataloguing Section on September 1997 as amended and corrected through February 2009. http://www.ifla.org/files/cataloguing/frbr/frbr_2008.pdf 2. Athena Salaba and Zhang Yin, "Application and System Development," Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 33, no. 6 (2007): 17–23. 3. W3C Library Linked Data Incubator Group. Library Standards. http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/images/1/12/LayeredModelV3.pdf (accessed July 18, 2011). 4. Yin Zhang and Athena Salaba, "What is Next for FRBR? A Delphi Study," The Library Quarterly 79, no. 2 (2009): 233–255. 5. Resource Description and Access (Chicago: American Library Association; Ottawa: Canadian Library Association; London: Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals (CILIP), 2010–). 6. Karen Coyle, "FRBR, the Domain Model," Library Technology Reports 46, no. 2 (2010): 20–25. 7. Library of Congress. Proposed Methodology for U.S. National Libraries RDA Test. http://www.loc.gov/bibliographic-future/rda/testing.html (accessed July 7, 2011). 8. OCLC Policy Statement on RDA Cataloging in WorldCat for the US Testing Period and Beyond. http://www.oclc.org/us/en/rda/policy.htm (accessed July 7, 2011). 9. National Library of Australia, "Resource Description and Access (RDA) in Australia." http://www.nla.gov.au/lis/stndrds/grps/acoc/rda.html (accessed April 10, 2011). 10. U.S. RDA Test Coordinating Committee, "Testing Resource Description and Access (RDA): Final Report and Recommendations," 2011. http://www.loc.gov/bibliographic-future/rda/index.html (accessed September 7, 2011). 11. Library of Congress, "A Bibliographic Framework for the Digital Age," 2011. http://www.loc.gov/marc/transition/pdf/bibframework-10312011.pdf (accessed December 29, 2011). 12. Response of the Library of Congress, the National Agriculture Library and the National Library of Medicine to the RDA Test Coordinating Committee, 2011. http://www.nlm.nih.gov/tsd/cataloging/RDA_Executives_statement.pdf (accessed, December 29, 2011). 13. RDA in Europe: Making it happen, Summary of Presentations by European Countries on Plans for Moving to RDA, 2010). http://www.slainte.org.uk/eurig/docs/RDA2010/OtherEURIG2010.pdf (accessed August 15, 2011). 14. A. M. Hernández, "RDA in BNE," 2010. http://www.bne.es/opencms/es/Servicios/NormasEstandares/DocumentosProfesionales/Docs/RDAenBNE.pdf (accessed June 15, 2011). 15. Deutsche Nationalbibliothek, "Linked Data Service for the German National Library." http://www.d-nb.de/eng/hilfe/service/linked_data_service.htm (accessed September 8, 2011). 16. Bibliothèque nationale de France, "RDA in Europe: Report of the Work in Progress in France," 2011. http://www.slainte.org.uk/eurig/docs/BnF-ADM-2011-066286-01_%28p2%29.pdf (accessed December 29, 2011). 17. Statement of Principles adopted by the International Conference on Cataloging Principles, Paris, October 1961. http://sibuc.ucuenca.edu.ec/site/local/File/ABCD_Workshop_CUE/MARC/paris_principles_1961.pdf (accessed September 7, 2011). 18. Anglo-American Cataloging Rules (Ottawa: Canadian Library Association, 2002–2005). 19. Library of Congress, "MARC21 Format for Bibliographic Data." http://www.loc.gov/marc/bibliographic/ecbdhome.html (accessed September 7, 2011). 20. ISBD: International Standard Bibliographic Description. (Berlin/Munich: de Gruyter Saur, 2011). 21. UNIMARC Manual: Bibliographic Format 1994. http://archive.ifla.org/VI/3/p1996-1/sec-uni.htm (accessed December 29, 2011). 22. Reglas de Catalogación, 1999. http://www.calameo.com/read/000075335257895264ba5 (accessed December 29, 2011) 23. Seungmin Lee and Elin K. Jacob, "An Integrated Approach to Metadata Interoperability: Construction of a Conceptual Structure Between MARC and FRBR," Library Resources and Technical Services 55, no. 1 (2011): 17–32. 24. Martha M. Yee, "FRBR and Moving Image Materials: Content (Work and Expression) versus Carrier (Manifestation)." In Understanding FRBR: What It Is and How It Will Affect Our Retrieval Tools, ed. Arlene G. Taylor (Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited, 2007). 25. Coyle, "FRBR, the Domain Model." 26. Lee and Jacob, "An Integrated Approach to Metadata Interoperability." 27. Coyle, "FRBR, the Domain Model." 28. Pat Riva, "Introducing the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records and Related IFLA Developments," Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 33, no. 6 (2007): 7–11. 29. Patrick Le Boeuf, "FRBR and Further," Cataloging and Classification Quarterly 32, no. 4 (2002): 15–52. 30. Maja Žumer, "FRBR: The End of the Road or a New Beginning?" Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 33, no. 6 (2007): 27–29. 31. Yin Zhang and Athena Salaba, Implementing FRBR in Libraries (New York: Neal Schuman, 2009). 32. IFLA, Functional Requirements for Authority Data: A Conceptual Model (München: K. G. Saur, 2009). 33. IFLA, "Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data: A Conceptual Model," http://www.ifla.org/files/classification-and-indexing/functional-requirements-for-subject-authority-data/frsad-model.pdf (accessed July 18, 2011) 34. Introduction to RDA, Resource Description and Access. (Chicago: American Library Association; Ottawa: Canadian Library Association; London: Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals (CILIP), 2010–). 35. Barbara B. Tillett, "The History of Linking Devices," Library Resources and Technical Services 36 (1992): 23–36. 36. Barbara B. Tillett, Bibliographic Relationships Towards a Conceptual Structure of Bibliographic Information Used in Cataloging (University of California, Los Angeles, 1987). 37. Antonio Panizzi, "Rules for the Compilation of the Catalogue," In Cataloging printed books, 1841 (London: British Museum, 1971). 38. Richard P. Smiraglia, "Bibliographic Families and Superworks." In Understanding FRBR: What It Is and How It Will Affect Our Retrieval Tools, ed. Arlene G. Taylor (Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited, 2007). 39. Richard P. Smiraglia, "The 'Works' Phenomenon and Best Selling Books," Cataloging and Classification Quarterly 44, no. 3 (2007): 179–185. 40. Barbara B. Tillett, "Bibliographic Relationships." In Relationships in the Organization of Knowledge, ed. Carol Bean and Rebecca Green (Dordrecht: Kluver, 2002). 41. Richard P. Smiraglia, "Derivative Bibliographic Relationships: Linkages in the Bibliographic Universe." In Navigating the Networks: Proceedings of the ASIS Mid-Year Meeting, Portland, Oregon May 21–25 (Medford: Learned Information, 1994). 42. Sherry Vellucci, "Bibliographic Relationships" (Paper presented at the International Conference on the Principles and Future Development of AACR, Toronto, Canada, October 23–25, 1997). http://epe.lac-bac.gc.ca/100/200/300/jsc_aacr/bib_rel/r-bibrel.pdf (accessed July 10, 2011) 43. Resource Description and Access. 44. Ibid. 45. Glossary In RDA, Resource Description and Access. (Chicago: American Library Association; Ottawa: Canadian Library Association; London: Chartered Institute of Library and Information Professionals (CILIP), 2010–). 46. Ibid. 47. Library of Congress. "Bibliographic Framework Transition Initiative." http://www.loc.gov/marc/transition/ (accessed September 8, 2011) 48. Angela Fogarolli et al., "AGRIS: From a Bibliographical Database to a Web Data Service on Agricultural Research Information," Agricultural Information Worldwide 3, no. 1 (2010): 26–30. 49. Deutsche Nationalbibliothek, "Linked Data Service for the German National Library." 50. Stefan Gradmann, "Rdfs: FRBR Towards an Implementation Model for Library Catalogs Using Semantic Web Technology," Cataloging and Classification Quarterly 39, no. 3/4 (2005): 63–75. 51. Sean B. Palmer, "The Semantic Web: An Introduction." http://infomesh.net/2001/swintro/ (accessed September 8, 2011). 52. W3C Semantic Web, "Resource Description Framework (RDF)." http://www.w3.org/RDF/ (accessed September 8, 2011). 53. Tom Heath and Christian Bizer, Linked Data: Evolving the Web Into a Global Data Space (Morgan & Claypool Publishers, 2011). 54. Karen Coyle, "Changing the Nature of Library Data," Library Technology Reports 46, no. 1 (2010): 14–29. 55. Open Metadata Registry "The RDA Vocabularies." http://metadataregistry.org/rdabrowse.htm (accessed July 18, 2011). 56. Diane Hillman, "MMA Version of MARC21 Elements and Vocabularies in RDF." http://celeripedean.wordpress.com/2011/09/14/mma-version-of-marc21-elements-and-vocabularies-in-rdf/ (accessed September 18, 2011).
Referência(s)