Revisão Acesso aberto Revisado por pares

The diagnosis of rupture of fetal membranes (ROM): a meta-analysis

2012; De Gruyter; Volume: 41; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1515/jpm-2012-0247

ISSN

1619-3997

Autores

Babett Ramsauer, Alex C. Vidaeff, Irène Hösli, Joong Shin Park, Alexander Strauß, Zulfiya Khodjaeva, A. Aguarón de la Cruz, Txantón Martínez‐Astorquiza, J. Horovitz, F. Coatleven, Hanns Helmer,

Tópico(s)

Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies

Resumo

Abstract Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the performance of tests based on the detection of insulin-like growth factor binding protein 1 (IGFBP-1) and placental α-microglobulin-1 (PAMG-1) in diagnosing rupture of fetal membranes (ROM) across different patient populations. Methods: A meta-analysis was conducted on prospective observational or cohort studies investigating ROM tests based on the detection of IGFBP-1 and PAMG-1 meeting the following criteria: (1) performance metrics calculated by comparing results to an adequate reference method; (2) sensitivity thresholds of the investigated tests matching those of the currently available tests; (3) study population, as a minimum, included patients between 25 and 37 weeks of gestation. Sensitivities, specificities, and diagnostic odds ratios were calculated. Results: Across all patient populations, the analyzed performance measures of the PAMG-1 test were significantly superior compared with those of the IGFBP-1 test. Of particular clinical relevance, PAMG-1 outperformed IGFBP-1 in the equivocal group, which comprised patients with uncertain rupture of membranes (sensitivity, 96.0% vs. 73.9%; specificity, 98.9% vs. 77.8%; PAMG-1 vs. IGFBP-1 tests, respectively). Conclusions: Compared with its performance in women with known membrane status, the accuracy of the IGFBP-1 test decreases significantly when used on patients whose membrane status is unknown. In this latter clinically relevant population, the PAMG-1 test has higher accuracy than the IGFBP-1 test.

Referência(s)