Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Endoscopic Revision (StomaphyX) versus Formal Surgical Revision (Gastric Bypass) for Failed Vertical Band Gastroplasty

2013; Hindawi Publishing Corporation; Volume: 2013; Linguagem: Inglês

10.1155/2013/108507

2090-0716

J P Bolton, Richdeep S. Gill, Akram Aljahdali, Simon Byrns, Xinzhe Shi, Daniel W. Birch, Shahzeer Karmali,

Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes

Background . Weight regain secondary to VBG pouch dilation is a typical referral for Bariatric surgeons. In this study we compare an endoluminal pouch reduction (Stomaphyx) to RYGB for revision. Methods . A retrospective review was completed for patients with a previous VBG presenting with weight regain between 2003–2010. Results . Thirty patients were identified for study 23 RYGB, 14 StomaphyX. Significant post procedure BMI loss was seen in each cohort (RYGB, 47.7 ± 7 kg/m 2 to 35 ± 7 kg/m 2 ; StomaphyX 43 ± 10 kg/m 2 to 40 ± 9 kg/m 2 , P = 0.0007 ). Whereas nausea and headache were the only complications observed in StomaphyX patients, the RYGB group had a 43.5% complication rate and 1 mortality. Complications following RYGB include: incisional hernia (13%), anastomotic leak (8.7%), respiratory failure (8.7%), fistula (8.7%), and perforation (4.35%). The median length of stay following RYGB was 6 days compared to 1.5 ± 0.5 days following StomaphyX. Conclusion . This study suggests that while RYGB revision may achieve greater weight loss, the complication rates and severity is discouraging. StomaphyX may be a safe alternative. Further technical modifications of the device and longer follow-up may clarify the role of this approach.