Decision-Theoretic Consequentialism and the Nearest and Dearest Objection
1991; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 101; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1086/293312
ISSN1539-297X
Autores Tópico(s)Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
ResumoPrevious articleNext article No AccessDecision-Theoretic Consequentialism and the Nearest and Dearest ObjectionFrank JacksonFrank JacksonPDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Ethics Volume 101, Number 3Apr., 1991 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/293312 Views: 104Total views on this site Citations: 166Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1991 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Miles Tucker Consequentialism and our best selves, Philosophical Studies 73 (Sep 2022).https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-022-01879-2Benjamin Lange The ethics of partiality, Philosophy Compass 22 (Jul 2022).https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12860Nathan Robert Howard Consequentialism and the Agent's Point of View, Ethics 132, no.44 (Jun 2022): 787–816.https://doi.org/10.1086/719517Brian Zamulinski Clifford's Consequentialism, Utilitas 2 (Jun 2022): 1–11.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953820822000139Ryan Doody Don't Go Chasing Waterfalls: Against Hayward's "Utility Cascades", Utilitas 34, no.22 (Feb 2022): 225–232.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953820822000012Davide Fassio What the doctor should do: perspectivist duties for objectivists about ought, Philosophical Studies 179, no.55 (Sep 2021): 1523–1544.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-021-01717-xAmelia Hicks Non-ideal prescriptions for the morally uncertain, Philosophical Studies 179, no.44 (Jul 2021): 1039–1064.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-021-01686-1Arnon Keren, Ori Lev Informed Consent, Error and Suspending Ignorance: Providing Knowledge or Preventing Error?, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 25, no.22 (Feb 2022): 351–368.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-022-10277-wHayden Wilkinson Infinite Aggregation and Risk, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 10 (Mar 2022): 1–20.https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2021.2013265Martin Montminy Micro credit and the threshold of praiseworthiness, Analytic Philosophy 63, no.11 (Dec 2020): 28–43.https://doi.org/10.1111/phib.12214Justin Clarke-Doane From Non-Usability to Non-Factualism, Analysis 81, no.44 (Feb 2022): 747–758.https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anab029Joona Auvinen Non-accidental piety: reliable reasoning and modally robust adherence to the divine will, International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 91, no.11 (Aug 2021): 43–61.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-021-09806-xRichard Yetter Chappell Pandemic Ethics and Status Quo Risk, Public Health Ethics 16 (Jan 2022).https://doi.org/10.1093/phe/phab031Sanjit Chakraborty Moral Simpliciter of Ethical Giving, (Dec 2021): 1–5.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23514-1_1309-1Jesse Kirkpatrick Moral Injury and Revisionist Just War Theory, Ethics & International Affairs 36, no.11 (Mar 2022): 27–35.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0892679422000041Leszek Wroński Objective consequentialism and the plurality of chances, Synthese 198, no.1212 (Sep 2020): 12089–12105.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02851-5Darren Bradley Ought-contextualism and reasoning, Synthese 199, no.1-21-2 (Jan 2021): 2977–2999.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02918-3Chad Marxen On the epistemic rationality and significance of self-fulfilling beliefs, Synthese 199, no.1-21-2 (Jan 2021): 4243–4260.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02977-6Davide Fassio, Jie Gao Do we really need a knowledge-based decision theory?, Synthese 199, no.3-43-4 (Mar 2021): 7031–7059.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-021-03104-9Francisco Lara Moral bioenhancements and the future of utilitarianism, Ethics & Bioethics 11, no.3-43-4 (Dec 2021): 217–230.https://doi.org/10.2478/ebce-2021-0016Jonathan Way A puzzle about enkratic reasoning, Philosophical Studies 178, no.1010 (Oct 2020): 3177–3196.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-020-01575-zMichael Zhao Ignore risk; Maximize expected moral value, Noûs 87 (Sep 2021).https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12398Daniel Muñoz, Jack Spencer Knowledge of Objective 'Oughts': Monotonicity and the New Miners Puzzle, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 103, no.11 (May 2020): 77–91.https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12702Elinor Mason Making Morality Work , by Holly Smith, Mind 130, no.517517 (Jan 2020): 346–354.https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzz078Wolfgang Schwarz Objects of Choice, Mind 130, no.517517 (Oct 2020): 165–197.https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzaa032Wooram Lee Two roles for reasons: Cause for divorce?, Philosophical Studies 178, no.66 (Aug 2020): 1993–2008.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-020-01519-7Zach Barnett Rational Moral Ignorance, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 102, no.33 (Mar 2020): 645–664.https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12684Ewan Kingston Shopping with a Conscience? The Epistemic Case for Relinquishment over Conscientious Consumption, Business Ethics Quarterly 31, no.22 (Jul 2020): 242–274.https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2020.13Noel Semple Everybody to Count for One? Inclusion and Exclusion in Welfare-Consequentialist Public Policy, Moral Philosophy and Politics 0, no.00 (Feb 2021).https://doi.org/10.1515/mopp-2020-0014Peter A. Graham Two Arguments for Objectivism about Moral Permissibility, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 99, no.11 (Feb 2020): 100–113.https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2020.1716818Tena Thau Rethinking the unfair advantage argument, Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 48, no.11 (Sep 2020): 63–81.https://doi.org/10.1080/00948705.2020.1816834Preston Greene, Benjamin A. Levinstein Act Consequentialism without Free Rides, Philosophical Perspectives 34, no.11 (Aug 2020): 88–116.https://doi.org/10.1111/phpe.12138Daniel Lassiter Graded Modality, (Nov 2020): 1–25.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118788516.sem074Joachim Wündisch Middle ground on liability for costs?, Philosophical Studies 177, no.1010 (Oct 2019): 3097–3115.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-019-01361-6Benjamin Kiesewetter Rationality as Reasons-Responsiveness, Australasian Philosophical Review 4, no.44 (Nov 2021): 332–342.https://doi.org/10.1080/24740500.2021.1964239Javier González de Prado Dispossessing Defeat, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 101, no.22 (Apr 2019): 323–340.https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12593A. V. Prokof'ev Morality, Probability, and Risk, Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences 90, no.55 (Nov 2020): 600–606.https://doi.org/10.1134/S1019331620050160Alexander Greenberg Should I believe all the truths?, Synthese 197, no.88 (Jul 2018): 3279–3303.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-1882-9Peter A. Graham Avoidable Harm, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 101, no.11 (Apr 2019): 175–199.https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12586William MacAskill, Toby Ord Why Maximize Expected Choice‐Worthiness?1, Noûs 54, no.22 (Jul 2018): 327–353.https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12264Maria Lasonen-Aarnio Enkrasia or evidentialism? Learning to love mismatch, Philosophical Studies 177, no.33 (Nov 2018): 597–632.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-018-1196-2Christopher Jay Subjective Consequentialism and the Unforeseeable, Utilitas 32, no.11 (Sep 2019): 33–49.https://doi.org/10.1017/S095382081900030XDaniel Cohen An Actualist Explanation of the Procreation Asymmetry, Utilitas 32, no.11 (Sep 2019): 70–89.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953820819000293Thomas Crawley Disability, Options and Well-Being, Utilitas 44 (Jan 2020): 1–19.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953820819000463Chad Lee-Stronach The Problem of Ignorance, Ethics 130, no.22 (Dec 2019): 211–227.https://doi.org/10.1086/705371Carlos Núñez , Philosophical Studies 177, no.99 ( 2020): 2471.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-019-01321-0Steven Steyl Caring Actions, Hypatia 35, no.22 (May 2020): 279–297.https://doi.org/10.1017/hyp.2020.12Davide Fassio Are epistemic reasons perspective-dependent?, Philosophical Studies 176, no.1212 (Oct 2018): 3253–3283.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-018-1173-9Stephen Kershnar Consequentialism and the Case of Symmetrical Attackers, Utilitas 31, no.44 (Jun 2019): 395–413.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953820819000177Samuel Asarnow Internal Reasons and the Boy Who Cried Wolf, Ethics 130, no.11 (Sep 2019): 32–58.https://doi.org/10.1086/704342Nick Hughes Dilemmic Epistemology, Synthese 196, no.1010 (Nov 2017): 4059–4090.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1639-xArif Ahmed, Jack Spencer Objective Value Is Always Newcombizable, Mind 129, no.516516 (Dec 2019): 1157–1192.https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzz070Maria Lasonen‐Aarnio Guidance, epistemic filters, and non‐accidental ought‐doing, Philosophical Issues 29, no.11 (Sep 2019): 172–183.https://doi.org/10.1111/phis.12166Kimberly Kessler Ferzan Deontological Distinction in War, Ethics 129, no.44 (Jun 2019): 603–624.https://doi.org/10.1086/702974Ján Kalajtzidis Ethics of Social Consequences as a Hybrid Form of Ethical Theory?, Philosophia 47, no.33 (Aug 2018): 705–722.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-018-0013-7Nils Holtug Prioritarianism: Ex Ante, Ex Post, or Factualist Criterion of Rightness?, Journal of Political Philosophy 27, no.22 (Nov 2018): 207–228.https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12174William Sin Confucianism, Rule‐Consequentialism, and the Demands of Filial Obligations, Journal of Religious Ethics 47, no.22 (May 2019): 377–393.https://doi.org/10.1111/jore.12262Anandi Hattiangadi No, one should not believe all truths, Inquiry 16 (May 2019): 1–13.https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2019.1610054Anne Schwenkenbecher Collective Moral Obligations: 'We-Reasoning' and the Perspective of the Deliberating Agent, The Monist 102, no.22 (Mar 2019): 151–171.https://doi.org/10.1093/monist/onz003Andreas Mogensen Racial Profiling And Cumulative Injustice, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 98, no.22 (Oct 2017): 452–477.https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12451THOMAS HURKA More Seriously Wrong, More Importantly Right, Journal of the American Philosophical Association (Jan 2019): 1–18.https://doi.org/10.1017/apa.2018.41Helen Frowe If You'll Be My Bodyguard: Agreements to Save and the Duty to Minimize Harm, Ethics 129, no.22 (Dec 2018): 204–229.https://doi.org/10.1086/700030Allan Hazlett The guise of the good and the problem of partiality, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 49, no.66 (Jan 2020): 851–872.https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.2018.1433794Daniel Wodak An Objectivist's Guide to Subjective Reasons, Res Philosophica 96, no.22 (Jan 2019): 229–244.https://doi.org/10.11612/resphil.1750NICK HUGHES Luminosity Failure, Normative Guidance and the Principle 'Ought-Implies-Can', Utilitas 30, no.44 (May 2018): 439–457.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953820818000092Kristian Olsen Subjective Rightness and Minimizing Expected Objective Wrongness, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 99, no.33 (Feb 2017): 417–441.https://doi.org/10.1111/papq.12188Adam Bales Indeterminate permissibility and choiceworthy options, Philosophical Studies 175, no.77 (May 2017): 1693–1702.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-017-0930-5Seth Lazar In dubious battle: uncertainty and the ethics of killing, Philosophical Studies 175, no.44 (Mar 2017): 859–883.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-017-0896-3J. Robert G. Williams Rational Illogicality, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 96, no.11 (Jun 2017): 127–141.https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2017.1323933Michael Zimmerman , Journal of Moral Philosophy 15, no.44 ( 2018): 444.https://doi.org/10.1163/17455243-01504002Benjamin Kiesewetter , Journal of Moral Philosophy 15, no.44 ( 2018): 415.https://doi.org/10.1163/17455243-20170007Ben Eggleston Decision Theory, (Dec 2017): 706–717.https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139519267.054Kristian Olsen A Defense of the Objective/Subjective Moral Ought Distinction, The Journal of Ethics 21, no.44 (Oct 2017): 351–373.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-017-9258-9Barry Maguire Love in the Time of Consequentialism, Noûs 51, no.44 (Aug 2016): 686–712.https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12169Tara Nair, Julian Savulescu, Jim Everett, Ryan Tonkens, Dominic Wilkinson Settling for second best: when should doctors agree to parental demands for suboptimal medical treatment?, Journal of Medical Ethics 43, no.1212 (Sep 2017): 831–840.https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2016-103461Christian Tarsney DOES A DISCOUNT RATE MEASURE THE COSTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE?, Economics and Philosophy 33, no.33 (Apr 2017): 337–365.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267117000049Jessica Brown BLAME AND WRONGDOING, Episteme 14, no.33 (Sep 2017): 275–296.https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2017.23Thomas J. Roulet, Michael J. Gill, Sebastien Stenger, David James Gill Reconsidering the Value of Covert Research, Organizational Research Methods 20, no.33 (Mar 2017): 487–517.https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428117698745Michael J. Zimmerman Prospective Possibilism, The Journal of Ethics 21, no.22 (Feb 2017): 117–150.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-017-9245-1Vasil Gluchman G. E. Moore and theory of moral/right action in ethics of social consequences, Ethics & Bioethics 7, no.1-21-2 (Jun 2017): 57–65.https://doi.org/10.1515/ebce-2017-0002Sara Lumbreras The Limits of Machine Ethics, Religions 8, no.55 (May 2017): 100.https://doi.org/10.3390/rel8050100Scott Woodcock When Will a Consequentialist Push You in Front of a Trolley?, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 95, no.22 (Aug 2016): 299–316.https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2016.1212909Seth Lazar Deontological Decision Theory and Agent-Centered Options, Ethics 127, no.33 (Mar 2017): 579–609.https://doi.org/10.1086/690069Jonathan Way, Daniel Whiting Perspectivism and the Argument from Guidance, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 20, no.22 (Dec 2016): 361–374.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-016-9775-9Errol Lord What You're Rationally Required to Do and What You Ought to Do (Are the Same Thing!), Mind (Jan 2017): fzw023.https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzw023Javier González de Prado Salas The contrast between permissions to act and permissions to believe, Philosophical Explorations 20, no.11 (Oct 2016): 21–34.https://doi.org/10.1080/13869795.2016.1234637J. L. Dowell Truth-assessment Methodology and the Case against the Relativist Case 1 a gainst Contextualism about Deontic Modals, Res Philosophica 94, no.33 (Jan 2017): 325–357.https://doi.org/10.11612/resphil.1564Matthew McGrath Cohen on 'Epistemic', Inquiry 59, no.7-87-8 (Aug 2016): 889–905.https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2016.1200812John Pittard, Alex Worsnip Metanormative Contextualism and Normative Uncertainty, Mind (Oct 2016): fzv208.https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzv208Guy Kahane, Jonathan Pugh, Julian Savulescu Bioconservatism, Partiality, and the Human-Nature Objection to Enhancement, The Monist 99, no.44 (Jan 2017): 406–422.https://doi.org/10.1093/monist/onw013Jonathan Way, Daniel Whiting If you justifiably believe that you ought to Φ, you ought to Φ, Philosophical Studies 173, no.77 (Oct 2015): 1873–1895.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-015-0582-2Peter Shiu-Hwa Tsu Can the Canberrans' Supervenience Argument Refute Shapeless Moral Particularism?, Erkenntnis 81, no.33 (Aug 2015): 545–560.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-015-9754-xLuc Bovens Selection under Uncertainty: Affirmative Action at Shortlisting Stage: Table 1., Mind 125, no.498498 (Apr 2016): 421–437.https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzv157William Sin Caring for parents: a consequentialist approach, Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 19, no.11 (Oct 2015): 3–10.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-015-9668-zVuko Andrić, Attila Tanyi Multi-Dimensional Consequentialism and Risk, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 19, no.11 (Dec 2015): 49–57.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-015-9658-5Elizabeth Harman Morally Permissible Moral Mistakes, Ethics 126, no.22 (Dec 2015): 366–393.https://doi.org/10.1086/683539Horacio Spector DECISIONAL NONCONSEQUENTIALISM AND THE RISK SENSITIVITY OF OBLIGATION, Social Philosophy and Policy 32, no.22 (Apr 2016): 91–128.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052516000121Amia Srinivasan Normativity without Cartesian privilege, Philosophical Issues 25, no.11 (Oct 2015): 273–299.https://doi.org/10.1111/phis.12059Seth Lazar Authority, Oaths, Contracts, and Uncertainty in War, Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 4, no.11 (Apr 2015): 52–58.https://doi.org/10.1002/tht3.157Philip Pettit Consequentialism (Including Utilitarianism), (Jan 2015): 679–683.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.63011-8Alistair Wardrope LIBERAL INDIVIDUALISM, RELATIONAL AUTONOMY, AND THE SOCIAL DIMENSION OF RESPECT, IJFAB: International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 8, no.11 (Jan 2015): 37–66.https://doi.org/10.3138/ijfab.8.1.0037John Oberdiek The Ideal of Justice, Jurisprudence 5, no.22 (May 2015): 363–368.https://doi.org/10.5235/20403313.5.2.363Daniel Lassiter Modality, Scale Structure, and Scalar Reasoning, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 95, no.44 (Dec 2014): 461–490.https://doi.org/10.1111/papq.12045Fabrizio Cariani Attitudes, Deontics and Semantic Neutrality, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 95, no.44 (Dec 2014): 491–511.https://doi.org/10.1111/papq.12046Frank Jackson Procrastinate Revisited, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 95, no.44 (Dec 2014): 634–647.https://doi.org/10.1111/papq.12051Miriam Schoenfield DECISION MAKING IN THE FACE OF PARITY, Philosophical Perspectives 28, no.11 (Dec 2014): 263–277.https://doi.org/10.1111/phpe.12044Holly M. Smith The Subjective Moral Duty to Inform Oneself before Acting, Ethics 125, no.11 (Jun 2015): 11–38.https://doi.org/10.1086/677024Alex Silk Evidence Sensitivity in Weak Necessity Deontic Modals, Journal of Philosophical Logic 43, no.44 (Jun 2013): 691–723.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-013-9286-2Johan E. Gustafsson, Olle Torpman In Defence of My Favourite Theory, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 95, no.22 (Mar 2014): 159–174.https://doi.org/10.1111/papq.12022Errol Lord The Coherent and the Rational, Analytic Philosophy 55, no.22 (Jan 2014): 151–175.https://doi.org/10.1111/phib.12034Tim Henning Normative Reasons Contextualism, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 88, no.33 (Nov 2012): 593–624.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2012.00645.xBen Eggleston, Dale E. Miller The Cambridge Companion to Utilitarianism, 16 (Feb 2014).https://doi.org/10.1017/CCO9781139096737Justin Oakley Moral Philosophy in Australasia, (Jun 2014): 511–541.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6958-8_21Gregory M. Mikkelson Richness Theory: From Value to Action1, Les ateliers de l'éthique 9, no.22 (Sep 2014): 99–109.https://doi.org/10.7202/1026680arStephanie Collins Duties to Make Friends, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16, no.55 (Apr 2013): 907–921.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-013-9422-7 Bibliography, (Aug 2013): 295–302.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118609088.biblioFabrizio Cariani, Magdalena Kaufmann, Stefan Kaufmann Deliberative modality under epistemic uncertainty, Linguistics and Philosophy 36, no.33 (Aug 2013): 225–259.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-013-9134-4Todd Calder Is evil just very wrong?, Philosophical Studies 163, no.11 (Sep 2011): 177–196.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-011-9806-2Justin Oakley Personal Relationships, (Feb 2013).https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444367072.wbiee176Dean Cocking Friendship, (Feb 2013).https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444367072.wbiee774Vuko Andrić Objective consequentialism and the licensing dilemma, Philosophical Studies 162, no.33 (Aug 2011): 547–566.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-011-9781-7Martin Peterson, Nicolas Espinoza Risk and Degrees of Rightness, (Nov 2012): 193–206.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5243-6_12FRED FELDMAN True and Useful: On the Structure of a Two Level Normative Theory, Utilitas 24, no.22 (May 2012): 151–171.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953820812000155Tim Willenken Deontic Cycling and the Structure of Commonsense Morality, Ethics 122, no.33 (Jul 2015): 545–561.https://doi.org/10.1086/664750KarstenKlint Jensen A Philosophical Assessment of Decision Theory, (Jan 2012): 405–439.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1433-5_16Simon Robertson Epistemic constraints on practical normativity, Synthese 181, no.S1S1 (Nov 2010): 81–106.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-010-9851-yMATTHEW TEDESCO Intuitions and the Demands of Consequentialism, Utilitas 23, no.11 (Feb 2011): 94–104.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953820810000476Christian Munthe Ethics and Risks, (Apr 2011): 55–84.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1330-7_4William A. Edmundson On GA Cohen, 'Political Philosophy and Personal Behavior', SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2011).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1849207Ralph Wedgwood The Nature of Normativity: A Reply to Holton, Railton, and Lenman, Philosophical Studies 151, no.33 (Apr 2010): 479–491.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-010-9554-8Michael G. Titelbaum NOT ENOUGH THERE THERE EVIDENCE, REASONS, AND LANGUAGE INDEPENDENCE, Philosophical Perspectives 24, no.11 (Jan 2011): 477–528.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1520-8583.2010.00201.x by Peter A. Graham In Defense of Objectivism about Moral Obligation, Ethics 121, no.11 (Jul 2015): 88–115.https://doi.org/10.1086/656328Holly M. Smith SUBJECTIVE RIGHTNESS, Social Philosophy and Policy 27, no.22 (Jun 2010): 64–110.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052509990161by Mark van Roojen Moral Rationalism and Rational Amoralism van Roojen, Ethics 120, no.33 (Jul 2015): 495–525.https://doi.org/10.1086/652302SCOTT WOODCOCK Moral Schizophrenia and the Paradox of Friendship, Utilitas 22, no.11 (Feb 2010): 1–25.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953820809990331Johan Brännmark, Nils‐Eric Sahlin Ethical theory and the philosophy of risk: first thoughts, Journal of Risk Research 13, no.22 (Mar 2010): 149–161.https://doi.org/10.1080/13669870903126192Jennie Louise I won't do it! Self-prediction, moral obligation and moral deliberation, Philosophical Studies 146, no.33 (Aug 2008): 327–348.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-008-9258-5Michael Ridge CONSEQUENTIALIST KANTIANISM1, Philosophical Perspectives 23, no.11 (Dec 2009): 421–438.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1520-8583.2009.00178.xJohan Brännmark Ethical Theories and the Transparency Condition, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12, no.55 (Feb 2009): 449–462.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-009-9160-zHUGH BREAKEY The Epistemic and Informational Requirements of Utilitarianism, Utilitas 21, no.0101 (Feb 2009): 72–99.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953820808003373David Sosa WHAT IS IT LIKE TO BE A GROUP?, Social Philosophy and Policy 26, no.11 (Nov 2008): 212–226.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052509090098by Stephen Kearns and Daniel Star Reasons: Explanations or Evidence? Kearns and Star, Ethics 119, no.11 (Jul 2015): 31–56.https://doi.org/10.1086/592587BRUNO VERBEEK CONSEQUENTIALISM AND RATIONAL CHOICE: LESSONS FROM THE ALLAIS PARADOX, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 89, no.11 (Mar 2008): 86–116.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0114.2008.00311.xJEAN-PAUL VESSEL The Probabilistic Nature of Objective Consequentialism, Theoria 73, no.11 (Oct 2008): 46–67.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-2567.2007.tb01187.x by Mark Schroeder Teleology, Agent‐Relative Value, and 'Good' Schroeder, Ethics 117, no.22 (Jul 2015): 265–000.https://doi.org/10.1086/511662Akiko SUZUKI, Ai YAMAMOTO, Yoichi SHINTANI, Akimichi MORITA, Zenzo ISOGAI, Yoshihito HAYAMI, Ryuzo UEDA Aplastic Anemia is Suspected in a Patient with Pachydermoperiostosis, Nishi Nihon Hifuka 69, no.44 (Jan 2007): 382–386.https://doi.org/10.2336/nishinihonhifu.69.382Michael J. Zimmerman On the Fulfillment of Moral Obligation, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 9, no.55 (Oct 2006): 577–597.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-006-9037-3Fred Feldman Actual Utility, The Objection from Impracticality, and the Move to Expected Utility, Philosophical Studies 129, no.11 (May 2006): 49–79.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-005-3021-y by Sarah Stroud Epistemic Partiality in Friendship Stroud, Ethics 116, no.33 (Jul 2015): 498–524.https://doi.org/10.1086/500337M. J. Zimmerman Risk, Rights, and Restitution, Philosophical Studies 128, no.22 (Mar 2006): 285–311.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-004-7800-7J. David Velleman Self to Self, 121 (Jul 2009).https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498862Justin Oakley, Dean Cocking Consequentialism, Complacency, and Slippery Slope Arguments, Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 26, no.33 (May 2005): 227–239.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-005-3985-9Julia Driver Consequentialism and Feminist Ethics, Hypatia 20, no.44 (Mar 2020): 183–199.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2005.tb00543.xAndy Egan, Brian Weatherson Prankster's Ethics, Philosophical Perspectives 18, no.11 (Nov 2004): 45–52.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1520-8583.2004.00020.xMichael Byron Satisficing and Maximizing, 93 (Dec 2009).https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511617058ROBERT F. CARD CONSEQUENTIALISM, TELEOLOGY, AND THE NEW FRIENDSHIP CRITIQUE 1, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 85, no.22 (May 2004): 149–172.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0279-0750.2004.00192.xMary Gore Forrester The Meaning of 'Ought' — A Formal Scheme, (Jan 2002): 37–60.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9994-8_2Michael Smith Immodest Consequentialism and Character, Utilitas 13, no.22 (Jan 2009): 173–194.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953820800003125P. Pettit Consequentialism Including Utilitarianism, (Jan 2001): 2613–2618.https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/01055-XJAMES LENMAN Consequentialism and Cluelessness, Philosophy Public Affairs 29, no.44 (Oct 2000): 342–370.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2000.00342.xKeith Horton The Limits Of Human Nature, The Philosophical Quarterly 49, no.197197 (Oct 1999): 452–470.https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9213.00153Tim Mulgan A Non-proportional Hybrid Moral Theory, Utilitas 9, no.33 (Jan 2009): 291–306.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953820800005380Peter Singer, Leslie Cannold, Helga Kuhse William Godwin and the Defence of Impartialist Ethics, Utilitas 7, no.11 (Jan 2009): 67–86.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953820800001850NICHOLAS AGAR DESIGNING BABIES: MORALLY PERMISSIBLE WAYS TO MODIFY THE HUMAN GENOME, Bioethics 9, no.11 (Jan 1995): 1–15.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.1995.tb00297.xPhilip Pettit Consequentialism and moral psychology, International Journal of Philosophical Studies 2, no.11 (Mar 1994): 1–17.https://doi.org/10.1080/09672559408570780William A. Edmundson, George Pavlakos, Veronica Rodriguez-Blanco Ought we to do what we ought to be made to do? Cohen and Nagel on the personal and the political, (): 176–204.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107707573.012
Referência(s)