Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

What are The Recent Advances in Forensic Oral Fluid Bioanalysis?

2013; Future Science Ltd; Volume: 5; Issue: 17 Linguagem: Inglês

10.4155/bio.13.186

1757-6199

João A. Queiroz, Eugénia Gallardo, Mário Barroso,

Analytical chemistry methods development

BioanalysisVol. 5, No. 17 EditorialWhat are the recent advances in forensic oral fluid bioanalysis?João A Queiroz, Eugenia Gallardo & Mário BarrosoJoão A Queiroz* Author for correspondenceCICS-UBI - Centro de Investigação em Ciências da Saúde, Universidade da Beira Interior, Av. Infante D. Henrique, 6201–556 Covilhã, Portugal. , Eugenia GallardoCICS-UBI - Centro de Investigação em Ciências da Saúde, Universidade da Beira Interior, Covilhã, Portugal & Mário BarrosoServiço de Química e Toxicologia Forenses, Instituto Nacional de Medicina Legal e Ciências Forenses – Delegação do Sul, Rua Manuel Bento de Sousa, 3, 1169-201 Lisboa, PortugalPublished Online:21 Aug 2013https://doi.org/10.4155/bio.13.186AboutSectionsView ArticleView Full TextPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail View articleKeywords: drug analysisforensic toxicologyGC–MSLC–MSoral fluidroadside testingReferences1 GallardoE, Queiroz JA. The role of alternative specimens on toxicological analysis. Biomed. Chromatogr.22,795–821 (2008).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar2 Lund HM, Øiestad EL, Gjerde H, Christophersen AS. Drugs of abuse in oral fluid collected by two different sample kits--stability testing and validation using ultra performance tandem mass spectrometry analysis. J. Chromatogr. B879(30),3367–3377 (2011).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar3 Gallardo E, Barroso M, Queiroz JA. Current technologies and considerations for drug bioanalysis in oral fluid. Bioanalysis1(3),637–667 (2009).Link, CAS, Google Scholar4 de Castro A, Piñeiro B, Lendoiro E, Cruz A, López-Rivadulla M. Quantification of selected synthetic cannabinoids and Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol in oral fluid by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A1295,99–106 (2013).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar5 Wille SM, Di Fazio V, Ramírez-Fernandez M del M, Kummer N, Samyn N. Driving under the influence of cannabis: pitfalls, validation, and quality control of a UPLC–MS/MS method for the quantification of tetrahydrocannabinol in oral fluid collected with StatSure, Quantisal, or Certus collector. Ther. Drug Monit.35(1),101–111 (2013).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar6 Gómez-Talegón T, Fierro I, González-Luque JC, Colás M, López-Rivadulla M, Javier Álvarez F. Prevalence of psychoactive substances, alcohol, illicit drugs, and medicines, in Spanish drivers: a roadside study. Forensic Sci. Int.223(1–3),106–113 (2012).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar7 Gunnar T, Ariniemi K, Lillsunde P. Validated toxicological determination of 30 drugs of abuse as optimized derivatives in oral fluid by long column fast gas chromatography/electron impact mass spectrometry. J. Mass Spectrom.40,739–753 (2005).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar8 da Fonseca BM, Moreno IE, Magalhães AR, et al. Determination of biomarkers of tobacco smoke exposure in oral fluid using solid-phase extraction and gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. B889–890,116–122 (2012).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar9 Quintela O, Cruz A, Castro A, Concheiro M, López-Rivadulla M. Liquid chromatography-electrospray ionisation mass spectrometry for the determination of nine selected benzodiazepines in human plasma and oral fluid. J. Chromatogr. B825,63–71 (2005).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar10 Fisher DS, van Schalkwyk GI, Seedat S, Curran SR, Flanagan RJ. Plasma, oral fluid, and whole-blood distribution of antipsychotics and metabolites in clinical samples. Ther. Drug Monit.35(3),345–351 (2013).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar11 Das R, Agrawal YK. Simultaneous monitoring of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in human urine, plasma and oral fluid by reverse-phase high performance liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. Sci.51(2),146–154 (2013).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar12 Lanaro R, Costa JL, Fernandes LC, Resende RR, Tavares MF. Detection of paraquat in oral fluid, plasma, and urine by capillary electrophoresis for diagnosis of acute poisoning. J. Anal. Toxicol.35(5),274–279 (2011).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar13 Scheidweiler KB, Himes SK, Chen X, Liu HF, Huestis MA. 11-Nor-9-carboxy-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol quantification in human oral fluid by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Bioanal. Chem.405(18),6019–6027 (2013).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar14 Wille SM, Ramírez-Fernandez Mdel M, Samyn N, De Boeck G. Conventional and alternative matrices for driving under the influence of cannabis: recent progress and remaining challenges. Bioanalysis2(4),791–806 (2010).Link, CAS, Google Scholar15 Toennes SW, Schneider K, Wunder C et al. Influence of ethanol on the pharmacokinetic properties of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol in oral fluid. J. Anal. Toxicol.37(3),152–158 (2013).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar16 Moore C. Oral fluid for workplace drug testing: laboratory implementation. Drug Test Anal.4(2),89–93 (2012).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar17 Van der Linden T, Legrand SA, Silverans P, Verstraete AG. DUID: oral fluid and blood confirmation compared in Belgium. J. Anal. Toxicol.36(6),418–421 (2012).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar18 Chu M, Gerostamoulos D, Beyer J, Rodda L, Boorman M, Drummer OH. The incidence of drugs of impairment in oral fluid from random roadside testing. Forensic Sci. Int.215(1–3),28–31 (2012).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar101 EU Project: Roadsite Testing Assessment. www.rosita.org (Accessed 5 October 2012Google Scholar102 Driving under the Influence of Drugs, Alcohol and Medicines. www.druid-project.eu/cln_031/sid_88616A688365B3A430C026A8F940684E/Druid/EN/home/homepage__node.html?__nnn=true (Accessed 5 October 2012)Google ScholarFiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByRecent Developments in the Determination of Biomarkers of Tobacco Smoke Exposure in Biological Specimens: A Review11 February 2021 | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol. 18, No. 4Analysis of biofluids by paper spray-MS in forensic toxicologyAna Luiza Freitas de Assis Linhares & Mauricio Yonamine31 July 2020 | Bioanalysis, Vol. 12, No. 15Determination of methadone and EDDP in oral fluid using the dried saliva spots sampling approach and gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry2 March 2019 | Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, Vol. 411, No. 10Cannabis and Its Secondary Metabolites: Their Use as Therapeutic Drugs, Toxicological Aspects, and Analytical Determination23 February 2019 | Medicines, Vol. 6, No. 1Opioid Use in Pregnant Women and Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome—A Review of the Literature16 February 2019 | Toxics, Vol. 7, No. 1Development and validation of a gas chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry method for simultaneous quantitation of several antipsychotics in human plasma and oral fluid5 November 2018 | Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, Vol. 32, No. 23Salvia divinorum: toxicological aspects and analysis in human biological specimensCláudia Margalho, Francisco Corte-Real, Manuel López-Rivadulla & Eugenia Gallardo9 June 2016 | Bioanalysis, Vol. 8, No. 13Compound identification in forensic toxicological analysis with untargeted LC–MS-based techniquesHerbert Oberacher & Kathrin Arnhard13 November 2015 | Bioanalysis, Vol. 7, No. 21 Vol. 5, No. 17 STAY CONNECTED Metrics Downloaded 117 times History Published online 21 August 2013 Published in print September 2013 Information© Future Science LtdKeywordsdrug analysisforensic toxicologyGC–MSLC–MSoral fluidroadside testingFinancial & competing interests disclosureThe authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. This includes employment, consultancies, honoraria, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, grants or patents received or pending, or royalties.No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.PDF download