Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

The Nature and Causes of Female Suppression

1977; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 2; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1086/493386

1545-6943

Abigail J. Stewart, David G. Winter,

Parental Involvement in Education

Previous articleNext article No AccessThe Nature and Causes of Female SuppressionAbigail J. Stewart, and David G. WinterAbigail J. Stewart Search for more articles by this author , and David G. Winter Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Signs Volume 2, Number 3Spring, 1977 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/493386 Views: 22Total views on this site Citations: 44Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1977 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Moosung Lee, Tom Friedrich Citation Network Analysis of Comparative Education Texts, (Jan 2011): 113–144.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-722-6_7Wendy Wood, Alice H. Eagly A cross-cultural analysis of the behavior of women and men: Implications for the origins of sex differences., Psychological Bulletin 128, no.55 (Jan 2002): 699–727.https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.5.699Jean M. Twenge Changes in women's assertiveness in response to status and roles: A cross-temporal meta-analysis, 1931-1993., Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81, no.11 (Jan 2001): 133–145.https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.1.133Steve Stack The relationship of female labor force participation to suicide: A comparative analysis, Archives of Suicide Research 4, no.33 (Jul 1998): 249–261.https://doi.org/10.1080/13811119808258300Joan L. Griscom Women and Power, Psychology of Women Quarterly 16, no.44 (Dec 1992): 389–414.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1992.tb00264.xRiaz Hassan, Gerald Tan Women's Emancipation and Suicide in Australia: a Replication, The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Sociology 28, no.11 (Sep 2016): 89–104.https://doi.org/10.1177/144078339202800105D. Lester Murdering babies, Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 26, no.22 (Jan 1991): 83–85.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00791532David M. Buss Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12, no.11 (Feb 2010): 1–14.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00023992C. J. Barnard Sex, wealth, and productivity: The neo-Darwinian way, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12, no.0101 (Feb 2010): 14.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00024006Ray H. Bixler Diversity: A historical/comparative perspective, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12, no.11 (Feb 2010): 15–16.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00024018Gerald Borgia Typology and human mating preferences, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12, no.11 (Feb 2010): 16–17.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0002402XLinnda R. Caporael Mechanisms matter: The difference between socioblology and evolutionary psychology, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12, no.11 (Feb 2010): 17–18.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00024031Charles Crawford Sex differences in life histories: The role of sexual selection and mate choice, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12, no.11 (Feb 2010): 18–18.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00024043Mildred Dickemann Aggregates, averages, and behavioral plasticity, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12, no.11 (Feb 2010): 18–19.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00024055Susan M. Essock Spouse preference shifts with age, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12, no.11 (Feb 2010): 19–20.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00024067Michael T. Ghiselin Darwinism versus neo-Darwinism in the study of human mate preferences, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12, no.11 (Feb 2010): 20–20.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00024079Brian A. Gladue Missing link in mate preference studies: Reproduction, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12, no.11 (Feb 2010): 21–21.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00024080Norval D. Glenn Intersocietal variation in the mate preferences of males and females, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12, no.11 (Feb 2010): 21–23.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00024092John Hartung Too many P's in the pod, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12, no.11 (Feb 2010): 23–23.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00024109William Irons Mating preferences surveys: Ethnographic follow-up would be a good next step, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12, no.11 (Feb 2010): 24–24.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00024110Douglas T. Kenrick, Richard C. Keefe Time to integrate sociobiology and social psychology, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12, no.0101 (Feb 2010): 24.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00024122Janet L. Leonard Homo sapiens: A good fit to theory, but posing some enigmas, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12, no.11 (Feb 2010): 26–27.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00024134Walter J. Lonner Another intriguing data bank for use in testing culture-related hypotheses, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12, no.11 (Feb 2010): 27–28.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00024146Nadav Nur The sociobiology of human mate preference: On testing evolutionary hypotheses, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12, no.11 (Feb 2010): 28–29.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00024158Helmuth Nyborg, Charlotte Boeggild Mating behavior: Moves of mind or molecules?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12, no.11 (Feb 2010): 29–30.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0002416XDaniel Rancour-Laferriere Some psychoanalytic considerations, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12, no.11 (Feb 2010): 30–30.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00024171David C. Rowe Preference for mates: Cultural choice or natural desire?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12, no.11 (Feb 2010): 30–31.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00024183J. Philippe Rushton Epigenesis and social preference, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12, no.11 (Feb 2010): 31–32.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00024195R. J. H. Russell, J. Bartrip Homo sociobiologicus not found, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12, no.11 (Feb 2010): 32–33.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00024201Robert W. Smuts Behavior depends on context, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12, no.11 (Feb 2010): 33–34.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00024213Donald Symons The psychology of human mate preferences, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12, no.11 (Feb 2010): 34–35.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00024225Nancy Wilmsen Thornhill Characteristics of female desirability: Facultative standards of beauty, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12, no.11 (Feb 2010): 35–36.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00024237John Tooby, Leda Cosmides The innate versus the manifest: How universal does universal have to be?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12, no.11 (Feb 2010): 36–37.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00024249Kim Wallen Mate selection: Economics and affection, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12, no.11 (Feb 2010): 37–38.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00024250Ada Zohar, Ruth Guttman Mate preference is not mate selection, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12, no.11 (Feb 2010): 38–39.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00024262David M. Buss Toward an evolutionary psychology of human mating, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12, no.11 (Feb 2010): 39–49.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00024274David Lester National suicide and homicide rates: Correlates versus predictors, Social Science & Medicine 29, no.1111 (Jan 1989): 1249–1252.https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(89)90064-6David G Winter, Nicole B Barenbaum Responsibility and the power motive in women and men, Journal of Personality 53, no.22 (Jun 1985): 335–355.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1985.tb00369.xDavid Lester Regional Variation in Suicide and Homicide, Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior 15, no.22 (Dec 2010): 110–116.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1943-278X.1985.tb00645.xLaurie Larwood, Urs E. Gattiker Rational Bias and Interorganizational Power in the Employment of Management Consultants, Group & Organization Studies 10, no.11 (Nov 2016): 3–17.https://doi.org/10.1177/105960118501000101David Lester Suicide, (Jan 1984): 145–156.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-4562-6_7JOSEPH HRABA, PAUL YARBROUGH Gender Consciousness and Class Action for Women, Youth & Society 15, no.22 (Aug 2016): 115–131.https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X83015002001Alice C. Andrews TOWARD A STATUS-OF-WOMEN INDEX, The Professional Geographer 34, no.11 (Mar 2010): 24–31.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0033-0124.1982.00024.xHelen R. Kearney Feminist Challenges to the Social Structure and Sex Roles, Psychology of Women Quarterly 4, no.11 (Dec 2016): 16–31.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1979.tb00696.x