Matters of Consequence: An Empirical Investigation of the WAIS-III and WAIS-IV and Implications for Addressing the Atkins Intelligence Criterion

2013; Taylor & Francis; Volume: 13; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1080/15228932.2013.746913

ISSN

1522-9092

Autores

Gordon E. Taub, Nicholas Benson,

Tópico(s)

Psychological Testing and Assessment

Resumo

Abstract “Which test provides the better measurement of intelligence, the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Third Edition (WAIS-III) or the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV)?” is an important question to professional psychologists; however, it has become a critical issue in Atkins cases wherein courts are often presented with divergent Full-Scale IQ (FSIQ) scores on the WAIS-III and WAIS-IV. In these instances, courts are required to render a decision stating which test provided the better measure of an inmate's intellectual functioning. This study employed structural equation modeling to empirically determine which instrument; the WAIS-III or the WAIS-IV, provides the better measure of intelligence via the FSIQ score. Consistent with the publisher's representation of intellectual functioning, the results from this study indicate the WAIS-IV provides superior measurement, scoring, and structural models to measure FSIQ when compared to the WAIS-III. Keywords: Atkinsintelligenceintelligence quotientexpert testimonyWechsler Adult Intelligence Scale

Referência(s)