Pay Discrimination Research and Litigation: The Use of Regression
1982; Wiley; Volume: 21; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1111/j.1468-232x.1982.tb00240.x
ISSN1468-232X
AutoresDavid E. Bloom, Mark R. Killingsworth,
Tópico(s)Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
ResumoIndustrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and SocietyVolume 21, Issue 3 p. 318-339 Pay Discrimination Research and Litigation: The Use of Regression DAVID E. BLOOM, DAVID E. BLOOM *The authors are, respectively, Assistant Professor of Economics, Harvard University, and Assistant Professor of Economics, Rutgers—The State University of New Jersey.Search for more papers by this authorMARK R. KILLINGSWORTH, MARK R. KILLINGSWORTH *The authors are, respectively, Assistant Professor of Economics, Harvard University, and Assistant Professor of Economics, Rutgers—The State University of New Jersey.Search for more papers by this author DAVID E. BLOOM, DAVID E. BLOOM *The authors are, respectively, Assistant Professor of Economics, Harvard University, and Assistant Professor of Economics, Rutgers—The State University of New Jersey.Search for more papers by this authorMARK R. KILLINGSWORTH, MARK R. KILLINGSWORTH *The authors are, respectively, Assistant Professor of Economics, Harvard University, and Assistant Professor of Economics, Rutgers—The State University of New Jersey.Search for more papers by this author First published: September 1982 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-232X.1982.tb00240.xCitations: 14 AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat References Agarwal v. McKee, 15 E. P. D. 8301 (N.D. California, 1977). Ashenfelter, Orley C. and John Pencavel. Estimating the Effects on Cost and Price of the Elimination of Sex Discrimination: The Case of Telephone Rates.” In Phyllis A. Wallace, ed., Equal Employment Opportunity and the AT&T Case. Cambridge , Mass. : MIT Press, 1976, pp. 111–124. Baldus, David C. and James W. L. Cole. Statistical Proof of Discrimination, New York : McGraw-Hill, 1980. Borjas, George. Discrimination in HEW: Is the Doctor Sick or Are the Patients Healthy Journal of Law and Economics, XXI (April, 1978), 97–110. Boyd v. Bechtel Corporation, 610 F. Supp. 610 (N. D. California, 1979). Bloom, David E. and Mark R. Killingsworth. Correcting for Selection Bias in Truncated Samples: Theory, with an Application to the Analysis of Sex Salary Differentials in Academe.” Unpublished working paper, 1981. Brown, Charles. Estimating the Determinants of Employee Performance,” Journal of Human Resources, XVII (Spring, 1982), 178–194. Cain, Glen G.. The Challenge of Segmented Labor Market Theories to Orthodox Theory: A Survey,” Journal of Economic Literature, XIV (December, 1976), 1215–1257. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Local 542, IUOE, 469 F. Supp. 329 (E. D. Pennsylvania, 1978). Dickerson v. U.S. Steel, 472 F. Supp. 1304 (E. D. Pennsylvania, 1978). Eastland v Freeman, 528 F. Supp. 822 (N. D. Alabama, 1981). Fienberg, Stephen E. The Increasing Sophistication of Statistical Assessments as Evidence in Discrimination Litigation—A Comment on Kaye.” Technical Report No. 216, Department of Statistics, Carnegie-Mellon University, 1982 (forthcoming, Journal of the American Statistical Association). Fienberg, Stephen E. and Miron L. Straf Statistical Assessments as Evidence.” Technical Report No. 237, Department of Statistics, Carnegie-Mellon University, 1982. Finkelstein, Michael O.. The Judicial Reception of Multiple Regression Studies in Race and Sex Discrimination Cases,” Columbia Law Review, LXXX (September, 1980), 737–754. Fisher, Franklin M.. Multiple Regression in Legal Proceedings,” Columbia Law Review, LXXX (September, 1980), 702–736. Gordon, Nancy M. and Thomas E. Morton. The Staff Salary Structure of a Large Urban University,” Journal of Human Resources, XI (Summer, 1976), 374–382. Gordon, Nancy M., Thomas E. Morton, and Ina C. Braden. Faculty Salaries: Is There Discrimination by Sex, Race and Discipline American Economic Review, LXIV (June, 1974), 419–427. Greenspan et al. v. Automobile Club of Michigan, 28 F. E. P. Cases 184 (E. D. Michigan, 1980). Griliches, Zvi, Bronwyn Hall, and Jerry A. Hausman. Missing Data and Self-Selection in Large Panels,” Annales de l'INSEE, XXX–XXXI (April-September 1978), 137–176. Gwartney, James, Ephraim Asher, Charles Haworth, and Joan Haworth. Statistics, the Law and Title VII: An Economist's View,” Notre Dame Lawyer, LIV (April, 1979), 633–660. Harvard Law Review. “Employment Discrimination and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964,” Harvard Law Review, LXXXIV (March, 1971), 1109–1316. Harvard Law Review. “Beyond the Prima Facie Case in Employment Discrimination Law: Statistical Proof and Rebuttal,” Harvard Law Review, LXXXIX (December, 1975), 387–422. Haworth, Joan G. and Charles T. Haworth. Statistical Inference in Civil Rights Decisions,” Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Social Sciences Section, 1976, Part I. Washington, D.C.: 1976, pp. 47–52. Heckman, James J.. Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error,” Econometrica, XLVII (January, 1979), 153–162. Heckman, James J., Mark R. Killingsworth, and Thomas MaCurdy. Empirical Evidence on Static Labour Supply Models: A Survey of Recent Developments.” In Zmira Hornstein, Joseph Grice, and Alfred Webb, eds., The Economics of the Labour Market. London : HMSO, 1981, pp. 73–122. James v. Stockham Values, 394 F. Supp. 434 (N. D. Alabama, 1975), 559 F. 2nd 310 (Fifth Circuit, 1977). Kmenta, Jan. Elements of Econometrics. New York : Macmillan, 1971. Malkiel, Burton G. and Judith A. Malkiel. Male-Female Pay Differentials in Professional Employment,” American Economic Review, LXIII (September, 1973), 693–705. Mecklenburg v. Montana Board of Regents of Higher Education, 13 E. P. D. 11438 (N. D. Montana, 1976). Medoff, James L. and Katherine G. Abraham. Are Those Paid More Really More Productive? The Case of Experience,” Journal of Human Resources, XVI (Spring, 1981), 186–216. Mincer, Jacob. Schooling, Experience and Earnings. New York : Columbia University Press, 1974. Nie, Norman H., C. Hadlai Hull, Jean G. Jenkins, Karin Steinbrenner, and Dale H. Bent. Statistical Package fur the Social Sciences. New York : McGraw-Hill, 1970. Oaxaca, Ronald. Male-Female Wage Differentials in the Telephone Industry.” In Phyllis A. Wallace, ed., Equal Employment Opportunity and the AT&T Case. Cambridge , Mass. : MIT Press, 1976, pp. 17–48. Osterman, Paul. Sex Discrimination in Professional Employment: A Case Study,” Industrial and Labor Relations Review, XXXII (July, 1979), 451–464. Pascal, Anthony and Leonard A. Rapping. The Economics of Racial Discrimination in Organized Baseball.” In Anthony Pascal, ed., Racial Discrimination in Economic Life. Lexington , Mass. : Lexington Books, 1974, pp. 119–156. Patterson v. Western Development Laboratories, 13 F. E. P. Cases 772 (N. D. California, 1976). Presseisen v. Swarthmore College, 442 F. Supp. 593 (E. D. Pennsylvania, 1977). Reimers, Cordelia W. Why Are Hispanic Americans' Incomes So Low? An Analysis of the Family Incomes and Earnings of the Major Hispanic Origin Groups in the U.S.” Final Report to U.S. Department of Labor, Princeton University, 1982. Roberts, Harry V. Statistical Biases in the Measurement of Employment Discrimination.” In E. Robert Livernash, ed., Comparable Worth: Issues and Alternatives. Washington , D.C. : Equal Employment Advisory Council, 1980, pp. 173–195. Rosario et al. v. New York Times, 84 F. R. D. 626 (S. D. New York, 1979). Segar v. Civiletti, 508 F. Supp. 690 (District of Columbia, 1981). Service, Jolayne. User's Guide to the Statistical Analysis System. Raleigh , N.C. : North Carolina State University, 1972. Smith, Sharon P. Equal Pay in the Public Sector: Fact or Fantasy. Princeton , N.J. : Industrial Relations Section, Princeton University, 1977. Smith v. Union Oil Company, 17 F. E. P. Cases 960 (N. D. California, 1977). Stastny v Southern Bell Telephone Co., 458 F. Supp. 314 (W. D. North Carolina, 1978). Trout v. Hidalgo, 517 F. Supp. 873 (District of Columbia, 1981). United States v. U. S. Steel, 371 F. Supp. 1045 (N. D. Alabama, 1973), 520 F. 2nd 1043 (Fifth Circuit, 1975). Valentino v. U.S. Postal Service, 511 F. Supp. 917 (District of Columbia, 1981), 28 F. E. P. Cases 592 (District of Columbia Circuit, 1982). Vuyanich v. Republic National Bank, 505 F. Supp. 224 (N. D. Texas, 1980). Wade v. Mississippi Cooperative Extension Service, 372 F. Supp. 126 (N. D. Mississippi, 1974), 528 F. 2nd 508 (Fifth Circuit, 1976). Wilkins v. University of Houston, 471 F. Supp. 1054 (S. D. Texas, 1979), 26 F. E. P. Cases 1041 (Fifth Circuit, 1981a), 662 F. 2nd 1156 (Fifth Circuit, 1981b). Citing Literature Volume21, Issue3September 1982Pages 318-339 ReferencesRelatedInformation
Referência(s)