Indemnity, Settlement, and Litigation, or I'll Be Suing You
1989; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 18; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1086/468144
ISSN1537-5366
Autores ResumoPrevious articleNext article No AccessIndemnity, Settlement, and Litigation, or I'll Be Suing YouJohn C. HauseJohn C. HausePDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmailPrint SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The Journal of Legal Studies Volume 18, Number 1Jan., 1989 Sponsored by The University of Chicago Law School Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/468144 Views: 15Total views on this site Citations: 65Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1989 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Ben Depoorter, Jef De Mot Optimism & Expenditures: The Effect on Settlements, Review of Law & Economics 18, no.22 (Oct 2022): 199–221.https://doi.org/10.1515/rle-2021-0075Aineas Mallios Patent Licensing and Litigation: A Duopoly Game, SSRN Electronic Journal 8 (Jan 2022).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4072567Wladislaw Mill, Jonathan Stäbler Spite in Litigation, SSRN Electronic Journal 49 (Jan 2022).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4095791Gabriel Doménech-Pascual, Marta Martínez-Matute, Juan S. Mora-Sanguinetti Do fee-shifting rules affect plaintiffs’ win rates? A theoretical and empirical analysis, International Review of Law and Economics 65 (Mar 2021): 105967.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2020.105967Erya Yang Optimism and pessimism in bargaining and contests, International Review of Law and Economics 64 (Dec 2020): 105935.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2020.105935Giuseppe Dari-Mattiacci, Margherita Saraceno Fee shifting and accuracy in adjudication, International Review of Law and Economics 63 (Sep 2020): 105890.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2020.105890Jef De Mot, Thomas J. Miceli The optimal adjustment to liability when litigation is costly: A note, International Review of Law and Economics 58 (Jun 2019): 127–131.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2019.03.008Kathryn E. Spier Litigation, Economics of, (Feb 2018): 7939–7950.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2492Amy Farmer, Paul Pecorino Dispute Resolution, (Feb 2018): 2947–2952.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2722Paul Fenn, Veronica Grembi, Neil Rickman ‘No Win, No Fee’, Cost‐shifting and the Costs of Civil Litigation: A Natural Experiment, The Economic Journal 127, no.605605 (Oct 2017): F142–F163.https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12532William H. J. Hubbard Costly Signaling, Pleading, and Settlement, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2017).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2947302Giuseppe DariiMattiacci, Margherita Saraceno Fee Shifting and Accuracy in Adjudication, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2017).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2982293Emanuela Carbonara, Francesco Parisi, Georg von Wangenheim Rent-Seeking and Litigation: The Hidden Virtues of Limited Fee Shifting, Review of Law & Economics 11, no.22 (Jun 2015): 113–148.https://doi.org/10.1515/rle-2015-0027Herbert M. Kritzer Litigation, (Jan 2015): 265–275.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.86082-1Christian Schwab, Hin-Yue Benny Tang, Stefan Winter Free choice of legal fee shifting rules?, European Journal of Law and Economics 37, no.22 (Dec 2011): 299–324.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-011-9296-xPaul Fenn, Veronica Grembi, Neil Rickman 'No Win, No Fee', Cost-Shifting and the Costs of Civil Litigation: A Natural Experiment, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2014).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2398295Francesco Parisi, Barbara Luppi Litigation as Rent-Seeking, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2013).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2224179Anthony J. Casey, Anthony Niblett Noise Reduction: The Screening Value of Qui Tam, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2013).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2237658Luciana Echazu, Nuno Garoupa Why not adopt a loser-pays-all rule in criminal litigation?, International Review of Law and Economics 32, no.22 (Jun 2012): 233–241.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2012.01.004Neil Rickman, Paul Fenn 'No Win, No Fee' and the Costs of Civil Litigation, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2012).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2110343Jef P. B. De Mot, Barbara Luppi, Francesco Parisi Are Sequential Trials Really Better than Unitary Trials?, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2012).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2139787Emanuela Carbonara, Francesco Parisi Rent-Seeking and Litigation: The Hidden Virtues of the Loser-Pays Rule, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2012).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2144800Amy Farmer, Paul Pecorino Litigation with a Variable Cost of Trial, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2012).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2151942Marc Poitras, Ralph Frasca A unified model of settlement and trial expenditures: The Priest–Klein model extended, International Review of Law and Economics 31, no.33 (Sep 2011): 188–195.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2011.07.006Nuno M. Garoupa, Carlos Gómez Ligüerre The Evolution of the Common Law and Efficiency, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2011).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1805141Avery W. Katz, Chris William Sanchirico Fee Shifting in Litigation: Survey and Assessment, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2010).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1714089Virginia Rosales-López Economics of court performance: an empirical analysis, European Journal of Law and Economics 25, no.33 (Feb 2008): 231–251.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-008-9047-9Richard Lewis Moorhead 'Improving Access to Justice' Contingency Fees: A Study of Their Operation in the United States, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2008).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1302843Richard Lewis Moorhead, Rebecca Cumming Damage-Based Contingency Fees in Employment Cases: A Survey of Practitioners, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2008).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1306308Amy Farmer, Paul Pecorino Dispute Resolution, (Nov 2016): 1–6.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_2722-1Kathryn E. Spier Litigation, Economics of, (Dec 2016): 1–12.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_2492-1William Choi, Lan Liang Reverse moral hazard of liability insurers: evidence from medical malpractice claims, Applied Economics 39, no.1818 (Oct 2007): 2331–2340.https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840500427080Kathryn E. Spier Chapter 4 Litigation, (Jan 2007): 259–342.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0730(07)01004-3Neil Rickman, Dionisia Tzavara Optimal Pricing of Court Services, European Journal of Law and Economics 20, no.11 (Jul 2005): 31–41.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-005-1013-1Michael R. Baye, Dan Kovenock, Casper G. de Vries Comparative Analysis of Litigation Systems: An Auction‐Theoretic Approach, The Economic Journal 115, no.505505 (Jul 2005): 583–601.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2005.01010.xMichael R. Baye, Dan Kovenock, Casper G. de Vries Comparative Analysis Of Litigation Systems: An Auction-Theoretic Approach, (Jan 2005): 421–439.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79247-5_24Kong-Pin Chen, Jue-Shyan Wang Fee-Shifting Rules in Litigation with Contingency Fees, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2005).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.798044 Amy Farmer , Paul Pecorino , and Victor Stango The Causes of Bargaining Failure: Evidence from Major League Baseball Farmer/Pecorino/Stango, The Journal of Law and Economics 47, no.22 (Jul 2015): 543–568.https://doi.org/10.1086/422981Steven Shavell Economic Analysis of Litigation and the Legal Process, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2003).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.382060Charles E. Hyde, Philip L. Williams Necessary costs and expenditure incentives under the English rule, International Review of Law and Economics 22, no.22 (Aug 2002): 133–152.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0144-8188(02)00087-XFrancesco Parisi Rent-seeking through litigation: adversarial and inquisitorial systems compared, International Review of Law and Economics 22, no.22 (Aug 2002): 193–216.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0144-8188(02)00089-3Francesco Parisi Rent-seeking through litigation: adversarial and inquisitorial systems compared, (Jan 2002): 397–420.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79247-5_23Louis Kaplow, Steven Shavell Economic Analysis of Law, (Jan 2002): 1661–1784.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1573-4420(02)80029-5Kent Roach, J. R. S. Prichard Comparative Common Law: The Consequences of Differing Incentives to Litigate, (Jan 2017): 336–339.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-74173-1_68James W. Hughes, Edward A. Snyder Allocation of Litigation Costs: American and English rules, (Jan 2017): 51–56.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-74173-1_13Bruce L. Hay, Kathryn E. Spier Settlement of Litigation, (Jan 2017): 1842–1851.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-74173-1_349Francesco Parisi Rent-Seeking Through Litigation: Adversarial and Inquisitorial Systems Compared, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2001).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.229687Amy Farmer, Paul Pecorino Does jury bias matter?, International Review of Law and Economics 20, no.33 (Sep 2000): 315–328.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0144-8188(00)00033-8J Gong, RP McAfee Pretrial negotiation, litigation, and procedural rules, Economic Inquiry 38, no.22 (Apr 2000): 218–238.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.2000.tb00015.xJesse L. Bull, Joel C. Watson Evidence Disclosure and Verifiability, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2000).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.235395Amy Farmer, Paul Pecorino Legal expenditure as a rent-seeking game, (Jan 1999): 379–396.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79247-5_22Amy Farmer, Paul Pecorino A reputation for being a nuisance: frivolous lawsuits and fee shifting in a repeated play game, International Review of Law and Economics 18, no.22 (Jun 1998): 147–157.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0144-8188(98)00003-9Peter Newman S, (Jan 1998): 395–559.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14286-6_4Andrew F. Daughety, Jennifer F. Reinganum Appealing Judgments, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 1998).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.124368Gyooho Lee In Search of the Optimal Tort Litigation System: Reflections on Korea's Civil Procedure through Inquiry into American Jurisprudence, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 1998).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1656205Avery Wiener Katz Indemnity of Legal Fees, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 1998).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.57958Andrew F. Daughety, Jennifer F. Reinganum On the Economics of Trials: Adversarial Process, Evidence and Equilibrium Bias, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 1998).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.91609Clinton F. Beckner, Avery Katz The incentive effects of litigation fee shifting when legal standards are uncertain, International Review of Law and Economics 15, no.22 (Jun 1995): 205–224.https://doi.org/10.1016/0144-8188(95)00007-U James W. Hughes , and Edward A. Snyder Litigation and Settlement under the English and American Rules: Theory and Evidence, The Journal of Law and Economics 38, no.11 (Oct 2015): 225–250.https://doi.org/10.1086/467330Peter-J. Jost Disclosure of Information and Incentives for Care, International Review of Law and Economics 15, no.11 (Jan 1995): 65–85.https://doi.org/10.1016/0144-8188(94)00001-BAmy Farmer, Paul Pecorino Pretrial negotiations with asymmetric information on risk preferences, International Review of Law and Economics 14, no.33 (Sep 1994): 273–281.https://doi.org/10.1016/0144-8188(94)90043-4Amy Farmer Curry, Paul Pecorino The Use of Final Offer Arbitration as a Screening Device, Journal of Conflict Resolution 37, no.44 (Dec 1993): 655–669.https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002793037004004 Keith N. Hylton Litigation Cost Allocation Rules and Compliance with the Negligence Standard, The Journal of Legal Studies 22, no.22 (Oct 2015): 457–476.https://doi.org/10.1086/468172H.S.E. Gravelle The efficiency implications of cost-shifting rules, International Review of Law and Economics 13, no.11 (Mar 1993): 3–18.https://doi.org/10.1016/0144-8188(93)90018-ZPeter H. Huang, Ho-Mou Wu Emotional responses in litigation, International Review of Law and Economics 12, no.11 (Mar 1992): 31–44.https://doi.org/10.1016/0144-8188(92)90004-B
Referência(s)