Catheter Ablation of Cardiac Arrhythmias
1999; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; Volume: 99; Issue: 2 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1161/01.cir.99.2.195
ISSN1524-4539
Autores Tópico(s)Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
ResumoHomeCirculationVol. 99, No. 2Catheter Ablation of Cardiac Arrhythmias Free AccessEditorialPDF/EPUBAboutView PDFView EPUBSections ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationsTrack citationsPermissions ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyReddit Jump toFree AccessEditorialPDF/EPUBCatheter Ablation of Cardiac Arrhythmias Usually Cure, but Complications May Occur Hein J. J. Wellens Hein J. J. WellensHein J. J. Wellens From the Department of Cardiology, Academic Hospital Maastricht, Netherlands. Originally published19 Jan 1999https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.99.2.195Circulation. 1999;99:195–197In cardiology, our ability to cure is rare. When cardiac disease is diagnosed, most of our treatments are palliative. They may remove or diminish complaints and prolong life but usually will not be able to stop the disease process. Cure is possible, however, in the patient suffering from a tachycardia in an otherwise normal heart. In that patient, we can locate the site of abnormal impulse formation or a critical part of the tachycardia pathway by cardiac activation mapping during the arrhythmia. Through the same or another catheter, radiofrequency (RF) energy can be applied to that area, resulting in destruction of a few millimeters of critical tissue and cure of the patient. That technique has been with us now for a decade.1234 During that decade, RF energy applied through a catheter has been shown to be very effective in different types of supraventricular tachycardia.A method can be effective, but its use may be limited because of complications. The key question, therefore, is, how safe is RF catheter ablation in the treatment of patients with arrhythmias? Certain risks are associated with RF ablation. They include the general risks of any cardiac catheterization, such as thromboembolic complications, infection, bleeding, cardiac perforation with or without cardiac tamponade, valvular damage, and radiation damage. In addition, specific risks are related to the ablation procedure itself.To abolish the substrate of an arrhythmia, a small area of myocardial necrosis is necessary. It is difficult, however, to assess in vivo the amount of tissue destroyed by RF ablation. Several investigators have looked at the value of biochemical markers to estimate the amount of myocardial necrosis after ablation. Haines et al5 showed that measurement of the creatine activity significantly underestimated the volume of myocardial injury because creatine kinase (CK) activity is not stable at temperatures >65°C, which are routinely attained within the central zone of RF ablation. A better marker to assess the size of necrosis seems to be the release of cardiac troponin I. Madrid et al6 found elevated values in 44 of 46 patients after RF ablation. In their studies, cardiac troponin I release varied according to the site in the heart (atrium, AV node, accessory pathway, ventricle) at which the RF ablation was applied, was moderately related to the number of RF pulses, and reached a peak value 8 hours after ablation. Madrid et al found that cardiac troponin I had the greatest sensitivity (better than that of CK and CK-MB) for detecting minor myocardial damage. It is important to know that in vivo studies could not demonstrate a good correlation between lesion size as found at autopsy and the amount of energy delivered during ablation, the duration of RF application, and the degree of catheter contact.789 More information about the value of cardiac troponin I to estimate cardiac damage after RF ablation is needed to obtain a better idea about the size of the area of necrosis, especially after multiple RF applications or the drawing of long ablation lines, as in atrial fibrillation.When myocardial necrosis occurs during application of RF energy in a specific area like the atrioventricular (AV) node, complete AV block may occur. This has occurred more commonly in the so-called anterior approach to AV nodal tachycardia ablation, in which the AV nodal fast pathway is ablated rather than slow pathway ablation.10 In patients with accessory AV pathways (APs), the risk of catheter ablation is related to the location of the accessory pathway. Ablation of a para-Hisian accessory pathway carries the risk of complete AV block. In epicardially located posteroseptal or left posterior bypasses, in which ablation has to be performed from the coronary venous system, there is the risk of damage to the coronary artery or perforation of the venous system, leading to cardiac tamponade. Also, in right free wall accessory pathways, the right coronary artery may be damaged.How dangerous, therefore, is the application of a catheter ablative procedure in patients with a cardiac arrhythmia?That question was addressed in the prospective multicenter study by Calkins et al11 in this issue of Circulation. A total of 1050 consecutive patients participating in the clinical evaluation of a new RF catheter ablation system were included in the study. Ablation was performed in ≈50% of the patients because of an accessory AP, in 33% of the patients because of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVRNT), and in 121 patients to interrupt conduction in the AV junction. Catheter ablation was successful in 95% of patients (100% in AV junction ablation, 97% in AVRNT, and 93% in APs). Within 1 month of the ablation, 3% of patients developed a major complication (such as death, stroke, myocardial infarction, complete AV block), and 8.2% a minor complication.Complications occurred in all 3 groups of patients (AVNRT, AP, and AV junction) and were more common in patients with structural heart disease and multiple ablation targets. That they were found in patients who underwent ablation of the AV junction is not surprising. These patients more often have associated cardiac disease with diminished cardiac function. But complications also occurred in the patients with AVNRT and accessory AV pathways. There was a 1.3% (5 of 373 patients) and 1% (5 of 500 patients) incidence of complete AV block in patients with AVNRT and accessory pathways, respectively. It is not clear whether all patients with AVNRT underwent ablation of the slow AV nodal pathway (the study was performed between 1992 and 1995). Of the minor complications listed in Table 4 of the article by Calkins et al,11 no information is given as to their effect on length of hospital stay and the financial consequences. Recurrences of arrhythmias occurred primarily in the patients with right free wall, posteroseptal, septal, and multiple accessory pathways and were found in 6% of the patients. These locations of accessory pathways more likely to have arrhythmia recurrences are well known and are related to greater difficulty in obtaining correct catheter-tissue contact to achieve adequate tissue heating.The findings on complications of RF ablation from the prospective multicenter study by Calkins et al are not very different from those found in the earlier Multicenter European Radiofrequency Survey reported by Hindricks.12 In that retrospective study, in which 2222 patients with accessory APs were treated by catheter ablation in the years 1987 to 1992, 14 patients (0.63%) developed complete AV block, 16 patients (0.72%) cardiac perforation with or without tamponade, and 12 patients clinically significant pericardial effusion. In 3 patients, death was thought to be related to the procedure. Both Calkins et al and Hindricks indicate that patient load and the experience of the center at which the ablation is performed are important determinants of success and complication rate.The study by Calkins et al11 shows that RF catheter ablation can be performed with a high degree of success in patients with AVNRT and accessory APs. But in view of the sometimes serious complications, catheter ablation should be suggested only when the tachycardias are symptomatic and interfere with the well-being of the patient. The procedure should be performed in specialized centers by clinical electrophysiologists with extensive experience in the investigation of patients with AVNRT and accessory AV pathways. In patients with accessory pathways in the right free wall, epicardial posteroseptal, epicardial left posterior, and para-Hisian locations, the threshold to perform ablation should be higher, because of the higher incidence of complications. Rarely will there be an indication for catheter ablation in the asymptomatic patient with AV conduction over an accessory pathway, probably only in the case of an occupational hazard (airline pilot, bus driver, or athlete). In the patient with an accessory pathway who has rare and well-tolerated episodes of tachycardia, the value of vagal maneuvers should be explained and pharmacological treatment, either intravenous or oral, given only when the tachycardia cannot be terminated by a vagal maneuver. For intravenous use, adenosine or verapamil is preferred for an orthodromic circus movement tachycardia and procainamide for atrial fibrillation. For oral drug treatment, sotalol or class Ic drugs can be used.In the patient with AVNRT, RF modification of AV nodal conduction carries the risk of AV block. Therefore, patients are instructed about vagal maneuvers, and long-term drug therapy is prescribed only when tachycardias are frequent and poorly tolerated. If therapy with drugs such as digoxin, calcium antagonists, or β-blockers is not succesful or not tolerated, RF catheter treatment is advised. As in the patient with an accessory pathway, in case of a rare and well-tolerated AVNRT, drug treatment is given only when a tachycardia occurs following an approach similar to that discussed under circus movement tachycardia.It is important to note that in the study by Calkins et al,11 no differences were found between children and adults with regard to success and complications. Previously, concern was expressed about RF ablation in the small child because of a possible increase in size of the RF lesion when the heart enlarges,13 and it was considered prudent to abstain from an RF intervention until the child had reached the age of 10 years.14 However, current information suggests that ablation should be postponed until the child weighs >15 kg.15In conclusion, RF ablation usually results in cure in patients with supraventricular tachycardia. However, the possibility of complications should always be considered. The information from the study by Calkins et al11 is helpful in making a risk profile for the individual patient.The opinions expressed in this editorial are not necessarily those of the editors or of the American Heart Association.FootnotesCorrespondence to Hein J.J. Wellens, MD, Department of Cardiology, Academic Hospital Maastricht, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, Netherlands. References 1 Jackman WM, Xunzhang W, Friday KJ, Roman CA, Moulton KP, Beckman KJ, McClelland JH, Twidale N, Hazlitt HA, Prior MI. Catheter ablation of accessory atrioventricular pathways (Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome) by radiofrequency current. N Engl J Med.1991; 324:1605–1611.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar2 Calkins H, Sousa J, El-Atassi R, Rosenheck S, DeBuitleir M, Kou WH, Kadish AH, Langberg JJ, Morady F. Diagnosis and cure of the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome or paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardias during a single electrophysiologic test. N Engl J Med.1991; 324:1612–1618.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar3 Kuck KH, Schluter M, Geiger M, Siebels J, Duckeck W. Radiofrequency current catheter ablation of accessory atrioventricular pathways. Lancet.1991; 337:1557–1561.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar4 Lee MA, Morady F, Kadish A, Schamp DJ, Chin MC, Scheinmann MM, Griffin JC, Lesh MD, Pederson D, Goldberger J, Calkins H, DeBuitleir M, Kou WH, Rosenheck S, Sousa J, Langberg JJ. Catheter modification of the atrioventricular junction with radiofrequency energy in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia. Circulation.1991; 83:827–835.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar5 Haines DE, Whayne J, Waker J, Nath S, Bruns D. The effect of radiofrequency catheter ablation on myocardial creatine kinase activity. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol.1995; 6:79–88.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar6 Madrid AH, Del Rey JM, Novo L, Sanchez A, Jiménez A, Martin J, Rubi J, Ripoll E, Moro C. Biochemical markers and C-troponin I release after radiofrequency catheter ablation. approach to the size of the necrosis. In: Farré J, Moro C, eds. Ten Years of Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation. Armonk, NY: Futura Publishing Co; 1998:31–40.Google Scholar7 Langberg JJ, Lee MA, Chin MC. Radiofrequency catheter ablation: the effect of electrode size on lesion volume in vitro. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol.1990; 13:242–251.Google Scholar8 Huang SK, Graham AR, Wharton K. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of the left and right ventricles: anatomic and electrophysiologic observations. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol.1988; 11:449–457.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar9 Hindricks G, Haverkamp H, Gulker H, Rissel U, Budde T, Richter KD, Borggrefe M, Breithardt G. Radiofrequency coagulation of ventricular myocardium: improved prediction of lesion size by monitoring catheter tip temperature. Eur Heart J.1989; 10:972–984.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar10 Hindricks G. Incidence of complete atrioventricular block following attempted radiofrequency catheter modification of the atrioventricular node in 880 patients. Eur Heart J.1996; 17:82–88.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar11 Calkins H, Yong P, Miller JM, Olshansky B, Carlson M, Saul JP, Huang SKS, Liem LB, Klein LS, Moser SA, Bloch DA, Gillette P, Prystowsky E, for the ATAKR Multicenter Investigators Group. Catheter ablation of accessory pathways, atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia, and the atrioventricular junction: final results of a prospective multicenter clinical trial. Circulation.1998; 98:262–270.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar12 Hindricks G. Complications of radiofrequency catheter ablation of arrhythmias. Eur Heart J.1993; 14:1644–1653.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar13 Saul JP, Hulse JE, Papagiannis J, Van Praagh R, Walsh EP. Late enlargement of radiofrequency lesions in infant lambs: implications for ablation procedures in small children. Circulation.1994; 90:492–499.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar14 Case CL, Gillette PC, Oslizlok PC, Knick BJ, Blair HC. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of incessant, medically resistant supraventricular tachycardias in infants and small children. J Am Coll Cardiol.1992; 20:1435–1450.Google Scholar15 Kugler JD, Danford DA, Deal BJ, Gillette PC, Perry JC, Silka MJ, Van Hare GF, Walsh EP. Radiofrequency catheter ablation for tachyarrhythmias in children and adolescents. N Engl J Med.1994; 330:1481–1487.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar Previous Back to top Next FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited By Panizo J and Barra S (2018) Premature Ventricular Complex-induced Cardiomyopathy, Arrhythmia & Electrophysiology Review, 10.15420/aer.2018.23.2, 7:2, (128), . Li L, Zhang B, Zhang B, Ma J, Liu X and Jiang S (2016) Prevention and Treatment of Lower Limb Deep Vein Thrombosis after Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation: Results of a Prospective active controlled Study, Scientific Reports, 10.1038/srep28439, 6:1, Online publication date: 1-Jun-2016. Cha Y, Lee G, Klarich K and Grogan M (2012) Premature Ventricular Contraction-Induced Cardiomyopathy, Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 5:1, (229-236), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2012. EYERLY S, HSU S, AGASHE S, TRAHEY G, LI Y and WOLF P (2010) An In Vitro Assessment of Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Imaging for Visualizing Cardiac Radiofrequency Ablation Lesions , Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2009.01664.x, 21:5, (557-563), Online publication date: 1-May-2010. Stephenson E and Davis A (2010) Electrophysiology, Pacing, and Devices Paediatric Cardiology, 10.1016/B978-0-7020-3064-2.00022-9, (379-413), . Issa Z, Miller J and Zipes D (2009) Electrophysiological Testing Clinical Arrhythmology and Electrophysiology, 10.1016/B978-1-4160-5998-1.00005-7, (27-56), . SHIVKUMAR K and PERLOFF J (2009) Electrophysiologic Abnormalities: Unoperated Occurrence and Postoperative Residua and Sequelae Congenital Heart Disease in Adults, 10.1016/B978-1-4160-5894-6.50026-5, (418-459), . TSAO H, WU M, CHERN M, TAI C, LIN Y, CHANG S, CHIANG S, ONG M, WONGCHAROEN W, HSU N, CHANG C and CHEN S (2006) Anatomic Proximity of the Esophagus to the Coronary Sinus: Implication for Catheter Ablation Within the Coronary Sinus, Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2006.00353.x, 17:3, (266-269), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2006. Viana Llamas M, Hernndez Madrid A and Moro Serrano C (2005) Tratamiento de las taquiarritmias por m?todos no farmacol?gicos. T?cnicas de ablaci?n. Desfibriladores, Medicine - Programa de Formaci?n M?dica Continuada Acreditado, 10.1016/S0211-3449(05)73732-2, 9:36, (2391-2399), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2005. Ghaye B, Szapiro D, Dacher J, Rodriguez L, Timmermans C, Devillers D and Dondelinger R (2003) Percutaneous Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: The Role of Cross-sectional Imaging, RadioGraphics, 10.1148/rg.23si035513, 23:suppl_1, (S19-S33), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2003. Cabeza P, Hernández Madrid A, Palmeiro A, Rebollo J, Peña G, Escobar C, Bueno M, Correa C, Chércoles A, Marín I, Bernal E, Peng J, Nannini S, Limón L, Viana M and Moro C (2003) Lesiones producidas por la ablación con radiofrecuencia del istmo cavotricuspídeo en un modelo experimental, Revista Española de Cardiología, 10.1016/S0300-8932(03)76993-0, 56:10, (963-970), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2003. Alboni P, Menozzi C, Tomasi C, Bottoni N and Paparella N (2002) "Pill in The Pocket" or Chronic Drug Prophylaxis for Patients with Paroxysmal Supraventricular Tachycardias without Indication for Catheter Ablation? Cardiac Arrhythmias 2001, 10.1007/978-88-470-2103-7_49, (324-328), . Alboni P, Tomasi C, Menozzi C, Bottoni N, Paparella N, Fucà G, Brignole M and Cappato R (2001) Efficacy and safety of out-of-hospital self-administered single-dose oral drug treatment in the management of infrequent, well-tolerated paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 10.1016/S0735-1097(00)01128-1, 37:2, (548-553), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2001. Moro Serrano C, Hernández Madrid A, Socas A, González Rebollo J and Mejía Alcaide M (2001) Tratamiento no farmacológico de las arritmias. Técnicas de ablación por catéter, Medicine - Programa de Formación Médica Continuada Acreditado, 10.1016/S0304-5412(01)70411-8, 8:41, (2173-2178), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2001. Madrid A, González Rebollo J, del Rey J, Peña G, Camino A, Socas A, Palmeiro Uriach A, Vázquez C, Palacios F, García-Cosío M, Correa C, Chércoles A and Moro C (2001) Estudio macro y microscópico de la arteria coronaria derecha tras ablación con catéter y radiofrecuencia del istmo cavotricuspídeo en un modelo experimental, Revista Española de Cardiología, 10.1016/S0300-8932(01)76384-1, 54:6, (693-702), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2001. Almendral Garrote (coordinador) J, Marín Huerta E, Medina Moreno O, Peinado Peinado R, Pérez Álvarez L, Ruiz Granell R and Viñolas Prat X (2001) Guías de práctica clínica de la Sociedad Española de Cardiología en arritmias cardíacas, Revista Española de Cardiología, 10.1016/S0300-8932(01)76313-0, 54:3, (307-367), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2001. Brembilla-Perrot B, Carette B, Houriez P and Beurrier D (2001) Transformation d'un syndrome de Wolff–Parkinson–White asymptomatique en forme symptomatique par une ablation du faisceau de Kent, Annales de Cardiologie et d'Angéiologie, 10.1016/S0003-3928(01)00020-8, 50:4, (202-205), . Wren C (2008) Radiofrequency ablation in children, Cardiology in the Young, 10.1017/S1047951100009604, 10:4, (303-306), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2000. JAMES T (1999) The Tendons of Todaro and the "Triangle of Koch":., Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 10.1111/j.1540-8167.1999.tb00207.x, 10:11, (1478-1496), Online publication date: 1-Nov-1999. January 19, 1999Vol 99, Issue 2 Advertisement Article InformationMetrics Copyright © 1999 by American Heart Associationhttps://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.99.2.195 Originally publishedJanuary 19, 1999 Keywordscatheter ablationarrhythmiaEditorialsPDF download Advertisement
Referência(s)