The Evolution of Self-Fertilization in Plants: A Population Genetic Model
1984; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 124; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1086/284287
ISSN1537-5323
AutoresKent E. Holsinger, Marcus W. Feldman, F. Christiansen,
Tópico(s)Plant Reproductive Biology
ResumoPrevious articleNext article No AccessNotes and CommentsThe Evolution of Self-Fertilization in Plants: A Population Genetic ModelKent E. Holsinger, Marcus W. Feldman, and Freddy B. ChristiansenKent E. Holsinger, Marcus W. Feldman, and Freddy B. ChristiansenPDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The American Naturalist Volume 124, Number 3Sep., 1984 Published for The American Society of Naturalists Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/284287 Views: 22Total views on this site Citations: 176Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1984 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Jessica J. Minnaar, Stephanie L. Payne, Glynis V. Cron Self-compatibility provides little reproductive assurance in the summer-flowering Aloe reitzii var. reitzii, South African Journal of Botany 147 (Jul 2022): 1164–1170.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2022.05.036Rachel B. Spigler, Rossana Maguiña Changes in female function and autonomous selfing across floral lifespan interact to drive variation in the cost of selfing, American Journal of Botany 109, no.44 (Mar 2022): 616–627.https://doi.org/10.1002/ajb2.1816Robert M. McElderry, Rachel B. Spigler, Donna W. Vogler, Susan Kalisz How early does the selfing syndrome arise? Associations between selfing ability and flower size within populations of the mixed‐mater Collinsia verna, American Journal of Botany 109, no.22 (Feb 2022): 333–344.https://doi.org/10.1002/ajb2.1804Courtney E. Gorman, Yan Li, Marcel E. Dorken, Marc Stift No evidence for incipient speciation by selfing in North American Arabidopsis lyrata, Journal of Evolutionary Biology 34, no.99 (Jul 2021): 1397–1405.https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.13901Ivain Martinossi‐Allibert, Carl Veller, S. Lorena Ament‐Velásquez, Aaron A. Vogan, Claus Rueffler, Hanna Johannesson Invasion and maintenance of meiotic drivers in populations of ascomycete fungi, Evolution 23 (May 2021).https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.14214Wujian Xiong, Jeff Ollerton, Sigrid Liede‐Schumann, Wanyi Zhao, Qiancai Jiang, Hongmei Sun, Wenbo Liao, Wenhui You Specialized cockroach pollination in the rare and endangered plant Vincetoxicum hainanense in China, American Journal of Botany 107, no.1010 (Oct 2020): 1355–1365.https://doi.org/10.1002/ajb2.1545Diala Abu Awad, Denis Roze Epistasis, inbreeding depression, and the evolution of self‐fertilization, Evolution 74, no.77 (May 2020): 1301–1320.https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.13961F J Jiménez-López, P L Ortiz, M Talavera, J R Pannell, M Arista The role of lateral and vertical herkogamy in the divergence of the blue- and red-flowered lineages of Lysimachia arvensis, Annals of Botany 125, no.77 (Mar 2020): 1127–1135.https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcaa047Philipp Kaufmann, Lukas Schärer Is the initiation of selfing linked to a hermaphrodite's female or male reproductive function?, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 74, no.44 (Mar 2020).https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-020-2816-3Nora Underwood, Peter A. Hambäck, and Brian D. Inouye Pollinators, Herbivores, and Plant Neighborhood Effects, The Quarterly Review of Biology 95, no.11 (Feb 2020): 37–57.https://doi.org/10.1086/707863Sylvain Gandon Epistasis and the evolution of selfing, Peer Community In Evolutionary Biology (Feb 2020): 100093.https://doi.org/10.24072/pci.evolbiol.100093Beth H. Ansaldi, Jennifer J. Weber, Carol Goodwillie, Steven J. Franks Low levels of inbreeding depression and enhanced fitness in cleistogamous progeny in the annual plant Triodanis perfoliata, Botany 97, no.77 (Jul 2019): 405–415.https://doi.org/10.1139/cjb-2019-0022Alexander Harkness, Yaniv Brandvain, Emma E. Goldberg The evolutionary response of mating system to heterosis, Journal of Evolutionary Biology 32, no.55 (Mar 2019): 476–490.https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.13430Juannan Zhou, Elizabeth A. Zimmer, Charles B. Fenster, Michele R. Dudash Characterization of the mating system of a native perennial tetraploid herb, Silene stellata, American Journal of Botany 105, no.1010 (Oct 2018): 1643–1652.https://doi.org/10.1002/ajb2.1158D. Justin Yeh, Janette W. Boughman, Glenn‐Peter Sætre, Maria R. Servedio The evolution of sexual imprinting through reinforcement*, Evolution 72, no.77 (May 2018): 1336–1349.https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.13500Per Toräng, Linus Vikström, Jörg Wunder, Stefan Wötzel, George Coupland, Jon Ågren Evolution of the selfing syndrome: Anther orientation and herkogamy together determine reproductive assurance in a self-compatible plant, Evolution 71, no.99 (Aug 2017): 2206–2218.https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.13308Víctor Rosas-Guerrero, Diego Hernández, Eduardo Cuevas Influence of pollen limitation and inbreeding depression in the maintenance of incomplete dichogamy in Salvia elegans, Ecology and Evolution 7, no.1212 (Apr 2017): 4129–4134.https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2827Ryan D. Briscoe Runquist, Monica A. Geber, Michael Pickett-Leonard, and David A. Moeller Mating System Evolution under Strong Pollen Limitation: Evidence of Disruptive Selection through Male and Female Fitness in Clarkia xantiana, The American Naturalist 189, no.55 (Mar 2017): 549–563.https://doi.org/10.1086/691192Mark D. Rausher Selfing, Local Mate Competition, and Reinforcement, The American Naturalist 189, no.22 (Dec 2016): 87–104.https://doi.org/10.1086/690009Brett S. Younginger, Dagmara Sirová, Mitchell B. Cruzan, Daniel J. Ballhorn Is biomass a reliable estimate of plant fitness?, Applications in Plant Sciences 5, no.22 (Feb 2017): 1600094.https://doi.org/10.3732/apps.1600094Yifan QIAN, Yun Xiang LI, Xuemei ZHANG, Qiu Mei QUAN Yuhina nigrimenta Blyth (Zosteropidae) as a bird pollinator ofBrandisia hancei Hook.f. (Scrophulariaceae) during winter, TURKISH JOURNAL OF BOTANY 41 (Jan 2017): 476–485.https://doi.org/10.3906/bot-1610-48T. Itagaki, M. K. Kimura, M. Maki, S. Sakai Differential self-fertilization rates in response to variation in floral traits within inflorescences of Aquilegia buergeriana var. oxysepala (Ranunculaceae), Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 181, no.22 (Mar 2016): 294–304.https://doi.org/10.1111/boj.12410Chloé EL Delmas, Pierre-Olivier Cheptou, Nathalie Escaravage, André Pornon High lifetime inbreeding depression counteracts the reproductive assurance benefit of selfing in a mass-flowering shrub, BMC Evolutionary Biology 14, no.11 (Nov 2014).https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-014-0243-7Pamela K. Diggle Modularity and intra-floral integration in metameric organisms: plants are more than the sum of their parts, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 369, no.16491649 (Aug 2014): 20130253.https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0253A. Kamran-Disfani, A. F. Agrawal Selfing, adaptation and background selection in finite populations, Journal of Evolutionary Biology 27, no.77 (Mar 2014): 1360–1371.https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.12343Zhiyuan Song, Marcus W. Feldman Adaptive foraging behaviour of individual pollinators and the coexistence of co-flowering plants, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 281, no.17761776 (Feb 2014): 20132437.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.2437Tim Janicke, Nikolas Vellnow, Violette Sarda, Patrice David SEX-SPECIFIC INBREEDING DEPRESSION DEPENDS ON THE STRENGTH OF MALE-MALE COMPETITION, Evolution (Jun 2013): n/a–n/a.https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.12167J. J. Weber, C. Goodwillie Variation in floral longevity in the genus Leptosiphon : mating system consequences, Plant Biology 15, no.11 (May 2012): 220–225.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.2012.00595.xR. Doroteo, J. A. Vargas Nucleocytoplasmic Gynodioecy, Applied Mathematics 04, no.1212 (Jan 2013): 1658–1668.https://doi.org/10.4236/am.2013.412226Jennifer J. Weber, Stephen G. Weller, Ann K. Sakai, Annie Nguyen, Nguyen D. Tai, César A. Domínguez, Francisco E. Molina-Freaner Purging of inbreeding depression within a population of Oxalis alpina (Oxalidaceae), American Journal of Botany 99, no.55 (May 2012): 923–932.https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1100383Jeffrey D. Karron, Randall J. Mitchell Effects of floral display size on male and female reproductive success in Mimulus ringens, Annals of Botany 109, no.33 (Aug 2011): 563–570.https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcr193Jeffrey D. Karron, Christopher T. Ivey, Randall J. Mitchell, Michael R. Whitehead, Rod Peakall, Andrea L. Case New perspectives on the evolution of plant mating systems, Annals of Botany 109, no.33 (Dec 2011): 493–503.https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcr319Charles L. Argue Tribe Arethuseae (Calopogon R. Brown and Arethusa L.) and Subfamily Vanilloideae (Part One) (Pogonia Jussieu), (Aug 2011): 147–164.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0622-8_8Alice A. Winn, Elizabeth Elle, Susan Kalisz, Pierre-Olivier Cheptou, Christopher G. Eckert, Carol Goodwillie, Mark O. Johnston, David A. Moeller, Richard H. Ree, Risa D. Sargent, Mario Vallejo-Marín ANALYSIS OF INBREEDING DEPRESSION IN MIXED-MATING PLANTS PROVIDES EVIDENCE FOR SELECTIVE INTERFERENCE AND STABLE MIXED MATING, Evolution 65, no.1212 (Oct 2011): 3339–3359.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01462.xJuan S. Escobar, Josh R. Auld, Ana C. Correa, Juan M. Alonso, Yves K. Bony, Marie‐Agnès Coutellec, Joris M. Koene, Jean‐Pierre Pointier, Philippe Jarne, Patrice David PATTERNS OF MATING‐SYSTEM EVOLUTION IN HERMAPHRODITIC ANIMALS: CORRELATIONS AMONG SELFING RATE, INBREEDING DEPRESSION, AND THE TIMING OF REPRODUCTION, Evolution 65, no.55 (Jan 2011): 1233–1253.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01218.xRonald M. Nelson, Jaco M. Greeff Evolutionarily stable mixed mating in a variety of genetic systems, Evolutionary Ecology 25, no.22 (Aug 2010): 291–306.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-010-9418-xDulce M. Figueroa-Castro, Timothy P. Holtsford Floral traits and mating systems in sister species of Nicotiana: interpopulational variability and sympatry effects, Plant Ecology 211, no.11 (May 2010): 119–132.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-010-9777-yKathryn E. Theiss, Kent E. Holsinger, Margaret E. K. Evans Breeding system variation in 10 evening primroses ( Oenothera sections Anogra and Kleinia ; Onagraceae), American Journal of Botany 97, no.66 (Jun 2010): 1031–1039.https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.0900260Jorge I. Mena-Alí, Lidewij H. Keser, Andrew G. Stephenson The effect of sheltered load on reproduction in Solanum carolinense, a species with variable self-incompatibility, Sexual Plant Reproduction 22, no.22 (Jan 2009): 63–71.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00497-008-0092-xJ M Greeff, G J Jansen van Vuuren, P Kryger, J C Moore Outbreeding and possibly inbreeding depression in a pollinating fig wasp with a mixed mating system, Heredity 102, no.44 (Feb 2009): 349–356.https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.2009.2Mark O. Johnston, Emmanuelle Porcher, Pierre‐Olivier Cheptou, Christopher G. Eckert, Elizabeth Elle, Monica A. Geber, Susan Kalisz, John K. Kelly, David A. Moeller, Mario Vallejo‐Marín, and Alice A. Winn Correlations among Fertility Components Can Maintain Mixed Mating in Plants. M. O. Johnston et al., The American Naturalist 173, no.11 (Jul 2015): 1–11.https://doi.org/10.1086/593705Carol Goodwillie TRANSIENT SI AND THE DYNAMICS OF SELF-INCOMPATIBILITY ALLELES: A SIMULATION MODEL AND EMPIRICAL TEST, Evolution 62, no.88 (Aug 2008): 2105–2111.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00429.x Elena Carrió , Raquel Herreros , Gianluigi Bacchetta , and Jaime Güemes Evidence of Delayed Selfing in Fumana juniperina (Cistaceae) Carrió et al., International Journal of Plant Sciences 169, no.66 (Jul 2015): 761–767.https://doi.org/10.1086/588070Sarah E. Marcinko, John L. Randall Protandry, mating systems, and sex expression in the federally endangered Ptilimnium nodosum (apiaceae) 1, The Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 135, no.22 (Apr 2008): 178–188.https://doi.org/10.3159/07-RA-008.1S. V. Good-Avila, J. I. Mena-Alí, A. G. Stephenson Genetic and Environmental Causes and Evolutionary Consequences of Variations in Self-Fertility in Self Incompatible Species, (Jan 2008): 33–51.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68486-2_2Christopher G. Oakley, Ken S. Moriuchi, Alice A. Winn The Maintenance of Outcrossing in Predominantly Selfing Species: Ideas and Evidence from Cleistogamous Species, Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 38, no.11 (Dec 2007): 437–457.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.38.091206.095654Juan Sebastián Escobar, Guillaume Epinat, Violette Sarda, Patrice David NO CORRELATION BETWEEN INBREEDING DEPRESSION AND DELAYED SELFING IN THE FRESHWATER SNAIL PHYSA ACUTA, Evolution 61, no.1111 (Nov 2007): 2655–2670.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00223.xTomás Rodríguez-Riaño, Amots Dafni Pollen–Stigma Interference in Two Gynodioecious Species of Lamiaceae with Intermediate Individuals, Annals of Botany 100, no.22 (Jul 2006): 423–431.https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcl168Jennifer J. Weber, Carol Goodwillie Timing of self‐compatibility, flower longevity, and potential for male outcross success in Leptosiphon jepsonii (Polemoniaceae), American Journal of Botany 94, no.88 (Aug 2007): 1338–1343.https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.94.8.1338Philip P. Molloy, Matthew J.G. Gage Evolution: Vertebrate Reproductive Strategies Get Mixed up, Current Biology 16, no.2020 (Oct 2006): R876–R879.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2006.09.023Joseph H. Rausch, Martin T. Morgan FORMULATION OF COMPETITION BETWEEN SEXUAL AND SELFING FORMS: A RESPONSE TO YAMAUCHI, Evolution 60, no.99 (Sep 2006): 1954–1955.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2006.tb00539.xCAROL GOODWILLIE, MARY CATHERINE KNIGHT Inbreeding Depression and Mixed Mating in Leptosiphon jepsonii: A Comparison of Three Populations, Annals of Botany 98, no.22 (May 2006): 351–360.https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcl105Risa D. Sargent, Mohammad A. Mandegar, Sarah P. Otto A MODEL OF THE EVOLUTION OF DICHOGAMY INCORPORATING SEX-RATIO SELECTION, ANTHER-STIGMA INTERFERENCE, AND INBREEDING DEPRESSION, Evolution 60, no.55 (May 2006): 934–944.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2006.tb01172.xDouglas G Scofield, Stewart T Schultz Mitosis, stature and evolution of plant mating systems: low-Φ and high-Φ plants, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 273, no.15841584 (Nov 2005): 275–282.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2005.3304Risa D. Sargent, Mohammad A. Mandegar, Sarah P. Otto A MODEL OF THE EVOLUTION OF DICHOGAMY INCORPORATING SEX-RATIO SELECTION, ANTHER-STIGMA INTERFERENCE, AND INBREEDING DEPRESSION, Evolution 60, no.55 (Jan 2006): 934.https://doi.org/10.1554/05-389.1Atsushi Yamauchi FORMULATION OF COMPETITION BETWEEN SEXUAL AND SELFING FORMS, Evolution 60, no.99 (Jan 2006): 1952.https://doi.org/10.1554/05-675.1DAVID A. MOELLER, MONICA A. GEBRE ECOLOGICAL CONTEXT OF THE EVOLUTION OF SELF-POLLINATION IN CLARKIA XANTLANA: POULATION SIZE, PLANT COMMUNITIES, AND REPRODUCTTIVE ASSURANCE, Evolution 59, no.44 (Apr 2005): 786–799.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb01753.xA. D. Cutter Mutation and the experimental evolution of outcrossing in Caenorhabditis elegans, Journal of Evolutionary Biology 18, no.11 (Jan 2005): 27–34.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00804.xDavid A. Moeller, Monica A. Geber ECOLOGICAL CONTEXT OF THE EVOLUTION OF SELF-POLLINATION IN CLARKIA XANTIANA: POPULATION SIZE, PLANT COMMUNITIES, AND REPRODUCTIVE ASSURANCE, Evolution 59, no.44 (Jan 2005): 786.https://doi.org/10.1554/04-656Sabin Lessard, Ghislain Rocheleau Kin selection and coefficients of relatedness in family-structured populations with inbreeding, Theoretical Population Biology 66, no.44 (Dec 2004): 287–306.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tpb.2004.05.004STEVEN E. TRAVERS, JORGE MENA-ALI, ANDREW G. STEPHENSON Plasticity in the self-incompatibility system of Solanum carolinense, Plant Species Biology 19, no.33 (Dec 2004): 127–135.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-1984.2004.00109.xCarla Fehr, Mark D. Rausher Effects of variation at the flower-colour A locus on mating system parameters in Ipomoea purpurea, Molecular Ecology 13, no.77 (Apr 2004): 1839–1847.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02182.xLila Fishman, Donald A. Stratton THE GENETICS OF FLORAL DIVERGENCE AND POSTZYGOTIC BARRIERS BETWEEN OUTCROSSING AND SELFING POPULATIONS OF ARENARIA UNIFLORA (CARYOPHYLLACEAE), Evolution 58, no.22 (May 2007): 296–307.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb01646.xMario Vallejo-Marín, Marcy K. Uyenoyama ON THE EVOLUTIONARY COSTS OF SELF-INCOMPATIBILITY: INCOMPLETE REPRODUCTIVE COMPENSATION DUE TO POLLEN LIMITATION, Evolution 58, no.99 (Jan 2004): 1924.https://doi.org/10.1554/04-277T. Y. Ida, G. Kudo Floral color change in Weigela middendorffiana (Caprifoliaceae): reduction of geitonogamous pollination by bumble bees, American Journal of Botany 90, no.1212 (Dec 2003): 1751–1757.https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.90.12.1751Matthew S. Finer, Martin T. Morgan Effects of natural rates of geitonogamy on fruit set in Asclepias speciosa (Apocynaceae): evidence favoring the plant's dilemma, American Journal of Botany 90, no.1212 (Dec 2003): 1746–1750.https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.90.12.1746 Ann Smithson and Luc D. B. Gigord The Evolution of Empty Flowers Revisited. A. Smithson and L. D. B. Gigord, The American Naturalist 161, no.44 (Jul 2015): 537–552.https://doi.org/10.1086/368347Gregory J. Anderson, Steven D. Johnson, Paul R. Neal, Gabriel Bernardello Reproductive biology and plant systematics: the growth of a symbiotic association, TAXON 51, no.44 (Nov 2002): 637–653.https://doi.org/10.2307/3647326E. Elle, J. D. Hare Environmentally induced variation in floral traits affects the mating system in Datura wrightii, Functional Ecology 16, no.11 (Mar 2002): 79–88.https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0269-8463.2001.00599.xPierre-Olivier Cheptou, Daniel J. Schoen THE COST OF FLUCTUATING INBREEDING DEPRESSION, Evolution 56, no.55 (Jan 2002): 1059.https://doi.org/10.1554/0014-3820(2002)056[1059:TCOFID]2.0.CO;2Lila Fishman, Alan J. Kelly, John H. Willis MINOR QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI UNDERLIE FLORAL TRAITS ASSOCIATED WITH MATING SYSTEM DIVERGENCE IN MIMULUS, Evolution 56, no.1111 (Jan 2002): 2138.https://doi.org/10.1554/0014-3820(2002)056[2138:MQTLUF]2.0.CO;2James A. Fausto, Vincent M. Eckhart, Monica A. Geber Reproductive assurance and the evolutionary ecology of self‐pollination in Clarkia xantiana (Onagraceae), American Journal of Botany 88, no.1010 (Oct 2001): 1794–1800.https://doi.org/10.2307/3558355Ann Smithson, Luc D. B. Gigord Are there fitness advantages in being a rewardless orchid? Reward supplementation experiments with Barlia robertiana, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 268, no.14751475 (Jul 2001): 1435–1441.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2001.1705Aneil F. Agrawal, Curtis M. Lively PARASITES AND THE EVOLUTION OF SELF-FERTILIZATION, Evolution 55, no.55 (May 2007): 869–879.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb00604.xMarcy K Uyenoyama, Yu Zhang, Ed Newbigin On the Origin of Self-Incompatibility Haplotypes: Transition Through Self-Compatible Intermediates, Genetics 157, no.44 (Apr 2001): 1805–1817.https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/157.4.1805A. Elizabeth Fetscher Resolution of male-female conflict in an hermaphroditic flower, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 268, no.14661466 (Mar 2001): 525–529.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2000.1395John R. Pannell, Spencer C.H. Barrett Effects of Population Size and Metapopulation Dynamics on a Mating-System Polymorphism, Theoretical Population Biology 59, no.22 (Mar 2001): 145–155.https://doi.org/10.1006/tpbi.2000.1496Aneil F. Agrawal, Curtis M. Lively , Evolution 55, no.55 ( 2001): 869.https://doi.org/10.1554/0014-3820(2001)055[0869:PATEOS]2.0.CO;2Kent E. Holsinger Reproductive systems and evolution in vascular plants, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 97, no.1313 (Jun 2000): 7037–7042.https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.13.7037Banu Subramaniam, Mark D. Rausher BALANCING SELECTION ON A FLORAL POLYMORPHISM, Evolution 54, no.22 (Jan 2000): 691.https://doi.org/10.1554/0014-3820(2000)054[0691:BSOAFP]2.0.CO;2Naoki Takebayashi, Lynda F. Delph AN ASSOCIATION BETWEEN A FLORAL TRAIT AND INBREEDING DEPRESSION, Evolution 54, no.33 (Jan 2000): 840.https://doi.org/10.1554/0014-3820(2000)054[0840:AABAFT]2.3.CO;2Lila Fishman POLLEN DISCOUNTING AND THE EVOLUTION OF SELFING IN ARENARIA UNIFLORA (CARYOPHYLLACEAE), Evolution 54, no.55 (Jan 2000): 1558.https://doi.org/10.1554/0014-3820(2000)054[1558:PDATEO]2.0.CO;2Gaku Kudo, Ulf Molau Variations in reproductive traits at inflorescence and flower levels of an arctic legume, Astragalus alpinus L.: Comparisons between a subalpine and an alpine population, Plant Species Biology 14, no.33 (Dec 1999): 181–191.https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1442-1984.1999.00012.xS C Weeks, N Zucker Rates of inbreeding in the androdioecious clam shrimp Eulimnadia texana, Canadian Journal of Zoology 77, no.99 (Nov 1999): 1402–1408.https://doi.org/10.1139/z99-103D. L. Byers, D. M. Waller Do Plant Populations Purge Their Genetic Load? Effects of Population Size and Mating History on Inbreeding Depression, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 30, no.11 (Nov 1999): 479–513.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.30.1.479Shu‐Mei Chang, Mark D. Rausher THE ROLE OF INBREEDING DEPRESSION IN MAINTAINING THE MIXED MATING SYSTEM OF THE COMMON MORNING GLORY, IPOMOEA PURPUREA, Evolution 53, no.55 (May 2017): 1366–1376.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1999.tb05401.x Mark D. Rausher and Shu‐Mei Chang Stabilization of Mixed‐Mating Systems by Differences in the Magnitude of Inbreeding Depression for Male and Female Fitness Components. M. D. Rausher and S.‐M. Chang, The American Naturalist 154, no.22 (Jul 2015): 242–248.https://doi.org/10.1086/303225 Steinbachs, HolSinger Pollen transfer dynamics and the evolution of gametophytic self-incompatibility, Journal of Evolutionary Biology 12, no.44 (Jul 1999): 770–778.https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1420-9101.1999.00085.xStephen C. Weeks, Vivien Marcus, Bobbi R. Crosser INBREEDING DEPRESSION IN A SELF‐COMPATIBLE, ANDRODIOECIOUS CRUSTACEAN, EULIMNADIA TEXANA, Evolution 53, no.22 (May 2017): 472–483.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1999.tb03782.x Kaltz, Shykoff Selfing versus outcrossing propensity of the fungal pathogen Microbotryumviolaceum across Silenelatifolia host plants, Journal of Evolutionary Biology 12, no.22 (Dec 2001): 340–349.https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1420-9101.1999.00014.x Affre, Thompson Variation in self‐fertility, inbreeding depression and levels of inbreeding in four Cyclamen species, Journal of Evolutionary Biology 12, no.11 (Jun 2008): 113–122.https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1420-9101.1999.00015.x Shu‐Mei Chang and Mark D. Rausher Frequency‐Dependent Pollen Discounting Contributes to Maintenance of a Mixed Mating System in the Common Morning Glory Ipomoea purpurea Chang & Rausher, The American Naturalist 152, no.55 (Jul 2015): 671–683.https://doi.org/10.1086/286198 Lawrence D. Harder and William G. Wilson A Clarification of Pollen Discounting and Its Joint Effects with Inbreeding Depression on Mating System Evolution Harder & Wilson, The American Naturalist 152, no.55 (Jul 2015): 684–695.https://doi.org/10.1086/286199Maureen A. Levri The effect of timing of pollination on the mating system and fitness of Kalmia latifolia (Ericaceae), American Journal of Botany 85, no.1111 (Nov 1998): 1626–1630.https://doi.org/10.2307/2446491John R. Pannell, Spencer C. H. Barrett BAKER'S LAW REVISITED: REPRODUCTIVE ASSURANCE IN A METAPOPULATION, Evolution 52, no.33 (May 2017): 657–668.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1998.tb03691.xBrian Charlesworth, Deborah Charlesworth Some evolutionary consequences of deleterious mutations, (Jan 1998): 3–19.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5210-5_1Mark O. Johnston Evolution of intermediate selfing rates in plants: pollination ecology versus deleterious mutations, (Jan 1998): 267–278.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5210-5_22Kenichi Aoki, Marcus W. Feldman A gene–culture coevolutionary model for brother–sister mating, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 94, no.2424 (Nov 1997): 13046–13050.https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.94.24.13046 Martin T. Morgan , Daniel J. Schoen , and Thomas M. Bataillon The Evolution of Self‐Fertilization in Perennials Morgan, Schoen, & Bataillon, The American Naturalist 150, no.55 (Jul 2015): 618–638.https://doi.org/10.1086/286085Laurence Affre, John D. Thompson Population genetic structure and levels of inbreeding depression in the Mediterranean island endemic Cyclamen creticum (Primulaceae), Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 60, no.44 (Jan 2008): 527–549.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.1997.tb01511.xMichele R. Dudash, David E. Carr, Charles B. Fenster FIVE GENERATIONS OF ENFORCED SELFING AND OUTCROSSING IN MIMULUS GUTTATUS : INBREEDING DEPRESSION VARIATION AT THE POPULATION AND FAMILY LEVEL, Evolution 51, no.11 (May 2017): 54–65.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1997.tb02388.xJames D. Fry, Mark D. Rausher SELECTION ON A FLORAL COLOR POLYMORPHISM IN THE TALL MORNING GLORY ( IPOMOEA PURPUREA ): TRANSMISSION SUCCESS OF THE ALLELES THROUGH POLLEN, Evolution 51, no.11 (May 2017): 66–78.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1997.tb02389.xKent E. Holsinger, Jennifer E. Steinbachs Mating Systems and Evolution in Flowering Plants, (Jan 1997): 223–248.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-65918-1_11Curtis M. Lively, R. Stephen Howard Selection by parasites for clonal diversity and mixed mating, (Jan 1997): 1–11.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0077-6_1Kaius Helenurm, Barbara A. Schaal Genetic load, nutrient limitation, and seed production in Lupinus texensis (Fabaceae), American Journal of Botany 83, no.1212 (Dec 1996): 1585–1595.https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1996.tb12817.xKaius Helenurm, Barbara A. Schaal Genetic and maternal effects on offspring fitness in Lupinus texensis (Fabaceae), American Journal of Botany 83, no.1212 (Dec 1996): 1596–1608.https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1996.tb12818.xAllison J. Back, Paul Kron, Steven C. Stewart Phenological regulation of opportunities for within-inflorescence geitonogamy in the clonal species, iris versicolor (iridaceae), American Journal of Botany 83, no.88 (Aug 1996): 1033–1040.https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1996.tb12800.xMark O. Johnston, Daniel J. Schoen CORRELATED EVOLUTION OF SELF-FERTILIZATION AND INBREEDING DEPRESSION: AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF NINE POPULATIONS OF AMSINCKIA (BORAGINACEAE), Evolution 50, no.44 (May 2017): 1478–1491.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1996.tb03921.xDEBORAH GLOVER, MARY L. DURBIN, GAVIN HUTTLEY, MICHAEL T. CLEGG Genetic Diversity in the Common Morning Glory, Plant Species Biology 11, no.11 (Jun 1996): 41–50.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-1984.1996.tb00107.xStephanie S. Mayer, Deborah Charlesworth, Blake Meyers INBREEDING DEPRESSION IN FOUR POPULATIONS OF COLLINSIA HETEROPHYLLA NUTT (SCROPHULARIACEAE), Evolution 50, no.22 (May 2017): 879–891.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1996.tb03896.xSpencer C. H. Barrett, David G. Lloyd, Juan Arroyo Stylar Polymorphisms and the Evolution of Heterostyly in Narcissus (Amaryllidaceae), (Jan 1996): 339–376.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1165-2_13Lawrence D. Harder, Spencer C. H. Barrett Pollen Dispersal and Mating Patterns in Animal-Pollinated Plants, (Jan 1996): 140–190.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1165-2_6Allison A. Snow, Timothy P. Spira, Rachel Simpson, Robert A. Klips The Ecology of Geitonogamous Pollination, (Jan 1996): 191–216.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1165-2_7Timothy P Holtsford Variation in inbreeding depression among families and populations of Clarkia tembloriensis (Onagraceae), Heredity 76, no.11 (Jan 1996): 83–91.https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1996.11Svenja Belaoussoff, Joel S. Shore FLORAL CORRELATES AND FITNESS CONSEQUENCES OF MATING-SYSTEM VARIATION IN TURNERA ULMIFOLIA, Evolution 49, no.33 (May 2017): 545–556.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1995.tb02286.xJoanna K. Norman, Ann K. Sarai, Stephen G. Weller, Todd E. Dawson INBREEDING DEPRESSION IN MORPHOLOGICAL AND PHYSIOLOGICAL TRAITS OF SCHIEDEA LYDGATEI (CARYOPHYLLACEAE) IN TWO ENVIRONMENTS, Evolution 49, no.22 (May 2017): 297–306.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1995.tb02242.xLawrence D. Harder, Spencer C. H. Barrett Mating cost of large floral displays in hermaphrodite plants, Nature 373, no.65146514 (Feb 1995): 512–515.https://doi.org/10.1038/373512a0 Selection by parasites for clonal diversity and mixed mating, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 346, no.13171317 (Jan 1997): 271–281.https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1994.0144Charles B Fenster, Kermit Ritland Quantitative genetics of mating system divergence in the yellow monkeyflower species complex, Heredity 73, no.44 (Oct 1994): 422–435.https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1994.190Joshua R. Kohn, Spencer C. H. Barrett POLLEN DISCOUNTING AND THE SPREAD OF A SELFING VARIANT IN TRISTYLOUS EICHHORNIA PANICULATA: EVIDENCE FROM EXPERIMENTAL POPULATIONS, Evolution 48, no.55 (May 2017): 1576–1594.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1994.tb02197.xSteven C Stewart Genetic constraints
Referência(s)