Medical research: Why trouble the patient for informed consent?
2002; Alan R. Liss, Inc.; Volume: 39; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1002/mpo.10109
ISSN1096-911X
Autores Tópico(s)Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
ResumoMedical and Pediatric OncologyVolume 39, Issue 3 p. 207-209 Ethical Issues Medical research: Why trouble the patient for informed consent? Sheila M. Farnell PhD, Corresponding Author Sheila M. Farnell PhD The Garden House, 32 Mallorie Park Drive, Ripon, HG4 2QF, EnglandThe Garden House, 32 Mallorie Park Drive, Ripon, HG4 2QF, England.Search for more papers by this author Sheila M. Farnell PhD, Corresponding Author Sheila M. Farnell PhD The Garden House, 32 Mallorie Park Drive, Ripon, HG4 2QF, EnglandThe Garden House, 32 Mallorie Park Drive, Ripon, HG4 2QF, England.Search for more papers by this author First published: 23 July 2002 https://doi.org/10.1002/mpo.10109Citations: 9AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat No abstract is available for this article. REFERENCES 1 Farnell SM. The ethical implications of experimental therapies in paediatric oncology, PhD. England: The University of Hull; 1996. 2 Byrne P. Cancer and the ethics of clinical research. Can Topics 1990; 8: 20–21. 3 Tobias JS, Souhami RL. Fully informed consent can be needlessly cruel. Br Med J 1993; 307: 1119–1201. 4 Baum M. The ethics of clinical research. In: P Byrne, editor. Ethics and law in health care and research. United Kingdom: Wiley; 1990. p 1–7. 5 Anonymous. Informed consent: ethical, legal, and medical implications for doctors and patients who participate in randomised clinical trials. Br Med J 1983; 286: 1117–1121. 6 British Medical Association. Philosophy and practice of medical ethics. British Medical association. 3rd edition. United Kingdom: British; 1988. p 101–102. 7 Nuremberg Code. Trials of war criminals before the Nuremberg military tribunals under control council law: 1949. No. 10, Vol. 2, p 1891–1892. US Government. In: RJ Levine, editor. Ethics and regulations of clinical research. 2nd edition. USA: Urban & Schwarzenberg; 1986. 8 Emberton M, Wood C, Meredith P. Informed consent in clinical trials. Should be comprehensive … [letter; comment on: Br Med J 1993; 307: 1199–1201]. Br Med J 1993; 307: 1494. 9 Sharp MC, Strauss RP, Lorch SC. Communicating medical bad news: parents' experiences and preferences. J Pediatr 1992; 121: 539–546. 10 Cassileth BR, Zupkis RV, Sutton-Smith K, March V. Information and participation preferences among cancer patients. Ann Intern Med 1980; 92: 832–836. 11 Lidz CW, Appelbaum PS, Meisel A. Two models of implementing informed consent. Arch Intern Med 1988; 148: 1385–1389. 12 Wong JG. Informed consent in clinical trials. Open discussion promotes trust. [letter; comment on: Br Med J 1993; 307: 1199–1201]. Br Med J 1993; 307: 1495. 13 Kodish E, Lantos JD, Siegler M. Ethical considerations in randomized controlled clinical trials. Cancer [Supplement] 1990; 65: 2400–2404. 14 Bok S. Informed consent in tests of patient reliability. JAMA 1992; 267: 1118–1119. Citing Literature Volume39, Issue3September 2002Pages 207-209 ReferencesRelatedInformation
Referência(s)