Caspase-dependent Cleavage of ErbB-2 by Geldanamycin and Staurosporin
2001; Elsevier BV; Volume: 276; Issue: 36 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1074/jbc.m101394200
ISSN1083-351X
AutoresOleg Tikhomirov, Graham Carpenter,
Tópico(s)RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
ResumoThe geldanamycin-induced degradation of ErbB-2 produces a 23-kDa carboxyl-terminal fragment, which has been isolated and subjected to amino-terminal microsequencing. The obtained sequence indicates that the amino terminus of this fragment corresponds to Gly-1126 of ErbB-2. Analysis of the residues immediately before Gly-1126 suggests that cleavage may involve caspase activity. Site-directed mutagenesis of Asp-1125 in ErbB-2 prevents geldanamycin-provoked formation of the 23-kDa fragment, consistent with the requirement of this residue for caspase-dependent cleavage in known substrates. Also, the addition of the pan-caspase inhibitor Z-VAD-FMK blocks formation of the 23-kDa ErbB-2 fragment in cells exposed to geldanamycin. Interestingly, staurosporin and curcumin are also shown to provoke the degradation of ErbB-2 with formation of the 23-kDa carboxyl-terminal fragment. The generation of this fragment by staurosporin or curcumin is likewise blocked by caspase inhibition. Caspase inhibition does not prevent accelerated degradation of the 185-kDa native ErbB-2 in geldanamycin-treated cells but does significantly prevent staurosporin-stimulated metabolic loss of ErbB-2. The geldanamycin-induced degradation of ErbB-2 produces a 23-kDa carboxyl-terminal fragment, which has been isolated and subjected to amino-terminal microsequencing. The obtained sequence indicates that the amino terminus of this fragment corresponds to Gly-1126 of ErbB-2. Analysis of the residues immediately before Gly-1126 suggests that cleavage may involve caspase activity. Site-directed mutagenesis of Asp-1125 in ErbB-2 prevents geldanamycin-provoked formation of the 23-kDa fragment, consistent with the requirement of this residue for caspase-dependent cleavage in known substrates. Also, the addition of the pan-caspase inhibitor Z-VAD-FMK blocks formation of the 23-kDa ErbB-2 fragment in cells exposed to geldanamycin. Interestingly, staurosporin and curcumin are also shown to provoke the degradation of ErbB-2 with formation of the 23-kDa carboxyl-terminal fragment. The generation of this fragment by staurosporin or curcumin is likewise blocked by caspase inhibition. Caspase inhibition does not prevent accelerated degradation of the 185-kDa native ErbB-2 in geldanamycin-treated cells but does significantly prevent staurosporin-stimulated metabolic loss of ErbB-2. N-acetyl-l-leucinyl-l-leucinyl- l-norleucinal benzyloxycarbonyl-Val-Ala-Asp-fluoromethyl ketone polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis ErbB-2, a Type I transmembrane receptor tyrosine kinase, functions as a co-receptor by dimerizing with ligand-occupied members of the ErbB family, the EGF receptor, ErbB-3, or ErbB-4 (1Karunagaran D. Tzahar E. Beerli R.R. Chen X. Graus-Porta D. Ratzkin B. Seger R. Hynes N. Yarden Y. EMBO J. 1996; 15: 254-264Crossref PubMed Scopus (589) Google Scholar, 2Riese III, D.J. Stern D.F. Bioessays. 1998; 20: 41-48Crossref PubMed Scopus (698) Google Scholar, 3Alroy I. Yarden Y. FEBS Lett. 1997; 410: 83-86Crossref PubMed Scopus (657) Google Scholar). This heterodimerization event is considered to alter the signaling capacity and cellular responses provoked by homodimers of occupied ErbB receptors. No ligand has been identified that directly interacts with the ectodomain of ErbB-2. ErbB-2 was originally identified as the transforming oncogeneneu, which contains a point mutation in the transmembrane domain that is responsible for its oncogenic potential (4Segatto O. King C.R. Pierce J.H. Di Fiore P.P. Aaronson S.A. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1988; 8: 5570-5574Crossref PubMed Scopus (159) Google Scholar). Overexpression of ErbB-2 also produces a transformed phenotype in experimental systems (5Di Marco E. Pierce J.H. Knicley C.L. Di Fiore P.P. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1990; 11: 3191-3202Google Scholar, 6Di Fiore P.P. Pierce J.H. Kraus M.H. Segatto O. King C.R. Aaronson S.A. Science. 1987; 237: 178-182Crossref PubMed Scopus (875) Google Scholar, 7Hudziak R.M. Schlessinger J. Ullrich A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1987; 84: 7159-7163Crossref PubMed Scopus (552) Google Scholar). Importantly, ErbB-2 is frequently overexpressed in carcinomas, particularly mammary and ovarian carcinomas, and is associated with a poor prognosis (8Revillion F. Bonneterre J. Peyrat J.P. Eur. J. Cancer. 1998; 34: 791-808Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (409) Google Scholar, 9Klapper L.N. Kirschbaum M.H. Sela M. Yarden Y. Adv. Cancer Res. 2000; 77: 25-79Crossref PubMed Scopus (517) Google Scholar, 10Slamon D.J. Clark G.M. Wong S.G. Keith D.E. Levin W.J. Ullrich A. McGuire W.L. Science. 1987; 235: 177-182Crossref PubMed Scopus (10014) Google Scholar). ErbB-2 antibodies (11Kumar R. Shepard H.M. Mendelsohn J. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1991; 11: 979-986Crossref PubMed Scopus (116) Google Scholar, 12Roh H. Pippin J. Drebin J.A. Cancer Res. 2000; 60: 560-565PubMed Google Scholar) and agents such as interferon (13Kominsky S.L. Hobeika A.C. Lake F.A. Torres B.A. Johnson H.M. Cancer Res. 2000; 60: 3904-3908PubMed Google Scholar) or tyrosine kinase inhibitors (14You X.-L. Yen L. Zeng-Rong N. Al Moustafa A.L. Alaoui-Jamali M.A. Oncogene. 1998; 17: 3177-3186Crossref PubMed Scopus (24) Google Scholar) decrease the growth of ErbB-2-expressing tumor cells and also reduce the cellular level of ErbB-2 (15Zhou B. Hu M. Miller S.A., Yu, Z. Xia W. Lin S. Hung M.-C. J. Biol. Chem. 2000; 275: 8027-8031Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (342) Google Scholar). In many of these instances the decreased growth provoked by the loss of ErbB-2 is due to increased apoptosis. In contrast, the overexpression of ErbB-2 can prevent the induction of apoptosis (15Zhou B. Hu M. Miller S.A., Yu, Z. Xia W. Lin S. Hung M.-C. J. Biol. Chem. 2000; 275: 8027-8031Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (342) Google Scholar). Hence, the growth-controlling activity of ErbB-2 is related to structural changes or alterations in its level of expression. The benzoquinoid anasamycin antibiotic geldanamycin was first isolated and described as an inhibitor of tyrosine kinase activity (16Omura S. Iwai Y. Takahashi Y. Sadakane N. Nakagawa A. J. Antibiot. (Tokyo). 1979; 32: 255-261Crossref PubMed Scopus (164) Google Scholar). Subsequently, geldanamycin was shown to possess tumoricidal activity toward cell lines that overexpress ErbB-2 (17Miller P. DiOrio C. Moyer M. Schnur R.C. Bruskin A. Cullen W. Moyer J.D. Cancer Res. 1994; 54: 2724-2730PubMed Google Scholar). Currently geldanamycin derivatives designed to reduce toxicity are in clinical trials for certain cancer patients (18Mandler R. Wu C. Sausville E.A. Roettinger A.J. Newman D.K. Ho D. King R. Yang D. Lippman M.E. Landolfi N.F. Dadachova E. Brechbiel M.W. Waldman T. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2000; 95: 1573-1581Crossref Scopus (52) Google Scholar). The addition of geldanamycin to cells results in an increased rate of degradation of several protein kinases, including ErbB-2 (17Miller P. DiOrio C. Moyer M. Schnur R.C. Bruskin A. Cullen W. Moyer J.D. Cancer Res. 1994; 54: 2724-2730PubMed Google Scholar), Src (19Whitesell L. Mimnaugh E.G. De Costa B. Myers C.E. Neckers L.M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1994; 91: 8324-8328Crossref PubMed Scopus (1337) Google Scholar), Raf (26Schulte T.W. Blagosklonny M. Ingui C. Neckers L. J. Biol. Chem. 1995; 270: 24585-24588Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (427) Google Scholar), and focal adhesion kinase (20Ochel H.-J. Schulte T.W. Nguyen P. Trepel J. Neckers L. Mol. Genet. Metabol. 1999; 64: 24-30Crossref Scopus (66) Google Scholar) as well as other growth-regulating proteins such as p53 (21Blagosklonny M. Toretsky J. Neckers L. Oncogene. 1995; 11: 933-939PubMed Google Scholar). The mechanism by which geldanamycin provokes the degradation of these and other proteins is not clear but is thought to involve the Hsp90 family of chaperones, which are the major intracellular proteins that bind geldanamycin (22Pratt W.B. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 1998; 217: 420-434Crossref PubMed Scopus (416) Google Scholar, 23Pratt W.B. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 1997; 37: 297-326Crossref PubMed Google Scholar). However, the manner in which Hsp90 or other geldanamycin-binding proteins influences the physiology of ErbB-2 is not known. Geldanamycin binds to Hsp90 and inhibits its ATPase activity, which is required for its chaperone function (24Pratt W.B. Toft D.O. Endocr. Rev. 1997; 18: 306-360Crossref PubMed Scopus (1543) Google Scholar, 25Smith D. Whitesell L. Nair S. Chen S. Prapapanich V. Rimerman R. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1995; 15: 6804-6812Crossref PubMed Scopus (272) Google Scholar). Although association of Hsp90 with Src (19Whitesell L. Mimnaugh E.G. De Costa B. Myers C.E. Neckers L.M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1994; 91: 8324-8328Crossref PubMed Scopus (1337) Google Scholar) and Raf (26Schulte T.W. Blagosklonny M. Ingui C. Neckers L. J. Biol. Chem. 1995; 270: 24585-24588Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (427) Google Scholar) have been documented, only GRP94 was originally reported to be associated with ErbB-2 (27Chavany C. Mimnagh E. Miller P. Bitton R. Nguyen P. Trepel J. Whitesell L. Schnur R. Moyer J.D. Neckers L. J. Biol. Chem. 1996; 271: 4974-4977Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (402) Google Scholar). The idea that GRP94 mediates geldanamycin-induced degradation of ErbB-2 was not widely accepted, however, due to its subcellular localization (31Nicchita C. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 1998; 10: 103-109Crossref PubMed Scopus (120) Google Scholar) and the fact that geldanamycin-sensitivity requires the tyrosine kinase domain of ErbB-2 (17Miller P. DiOrio C. Moyer M. Schnur R.C. Bruskin A. Cullen W. Moyer J.D. Cancer Res. 1994; 54: 2724-2730PubMed Google Scholar, 29Tikhomirov O. Carpenter G. J. Biol. Chem. 2000; 275: 26625-26631Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (77) Google Scholar), which is never present within the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum. However, recently it has been reported that Hsp90 does, in fact, associate with ErbB-2 in a manner that is disrupted by the presence of geldanamycin (30Xu W. Mimnaugh E.G Rosser M.F. Nicchitta C. Marcu M. Yarden Y. Neckers L. J. Biol. Chem. 2001; 276: 3702-3708Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (328) Google Scholar). Hence it is possible that Hsp90 is associated with the tyrosine kinase domain of ErbB-2 and may regulate the conformation or the enzymatic function of ErbB-2. Geldanamycin then represents a tool with which to perturb that association. A previous study of ErbB-2 degradation stimulated by geldanamycin demonstrated the appearance of two fragments (29Tikhomirov O. Carpenter G. J. Biol. Chem. 2000; 275: 26625-26631Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (77) Google Scholar). One large fragment of 135 kDa included the ectodomain, the transmembrane domain, and part of the cytoplasmic domain. The other fragment of 23 kDa was derived from the carboxyl-terminal portion of the ErbB-2 cytoplasmic domain. These studies also indicated that the 135-kDa fragment was degraded by lysosomes, whereas degradation of the 23-kDa fragment depended on proteosome function. In the experiments reported in this manuscript, the exact nature of the 23-kDa fragment is described as is the nature of the enzyme that produces this fragment from ErbB-2. Geldanamycin, curcumin, staurosporin, and enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) reagents were purchased from Sigma. Polyvinylidene difluoride membrane was from Bio-Rad.N-Acetyl-l-leucinyl-l-leucinyl-l-norleucinal (ALLN),1 caspase inhibitor I (Z-VAD-FMK), and proteasome inhibitor I were from Calbiochem. Monoclonal antibody against the ErbB-2 extracellular domain (Ab5) was from Transduction Laboratories, whereas monoclonal antibody against the ErbB-2 carboxyl-terminal domain (Ab3) was purchased from Calbiochem. The pcDNA3.1+ vector was obtained from Invitrogen. Goat anti-mouse antibody cross-linked with horseradish peroxidase was from Zymed Laboratories Inc., and LipofectAMINE was purchased from Life Technologies, Inc. SKBr3 human breast cancer cells were grown to near confluence in 5% CO2 at 37 °C in McCoy's medium with 10% fetal bovine serum and then washed and treated with the indicated compounds in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium. Cos7 cells were grown overnight in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium with 10% fetal bovine serum to about 80% confluence and then transfected with LipofectAMINE according to the manufacture's recommendations (3 μg of DNA of pcDNA3.1+ vector was used per 60-mm culture dish). ErbB-2 mutants were prepared by site-directed mutagenesis using a megaprimer approach. To facilitate manipulations with the ErbB-2 intracellular region, a SalI restriction site downstream of the transmembrane region was generated by polymerase chain reaction (silent mutagenesis) using the following primers: primer 1, ACT ACG TCC AGT TCT AGA TCA CAC TGG CAC GTC CAG ACC (3′); primer 2, AAG TAC ACG ATG CGT CGA CTG CTG CAG (5′); primer 3, CTG CAG CAG TCG ACG CAT CGT GTA(3′); primer 4, AGA CCC AAG CTG GCT AGC GCC ACC ATG GAG CTG GCG GCC TTG TGC CGC(5′). The resultant two polymerase chain reaction products (primers 1 and 2; primers 3 and 4) were cut with NheI, SalI, and XbaI restriction sites and ligated into the pcDNA3.1+ vector through NheI and XbaI sites (3-piece ligation). Mutations in the ErbB-2 carboxyl terminus were introduced in the first round of polymerase chain reaction with primer 1 as the 3′ primer and the following 5′ primers: primer 5, CTG CCC TCT GAG ACT GCT GGC TAC GTT (D1125-A); primer 6, TCT GAG ACT GAA GGC TAC GTT (D1125-E); primer 7, TCT GAG ACT GAT GCC TAC GTT GC (G1126-A). One strand of these products was used as the 3′ primer in the second round of polymerase chain reaction with primer 2 as the 5′ primer. The final products were ligated through SalI and XbaI restriction sites into the pcDNA3.1+ vector. All mutations were confirmed by sequencing. At the end of each experiment the cells were solubilized by scraping into cold lysis buffer (10 mmTris/HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mm NaCl, 2 mm EDTA, 1% Nonidet P-40, 1 mm phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 μg/ml aprotinin, 10 μg/ml leupeptin, 1 mmNa3VO4). The lysates were then clarified by centrifugation (14,000 × g, 10 min), and equal aliquots (40 μg) were subjected to SDS-PAGE electrophoresis. Proteins were then transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane for Western blotting. The membrane was blocked by incubation with 5% bovine serum albumin in phosphate buffer saline for 1 h at room temperature. The membrane was then incubated for 1 h with the indicated primary antibody in TBSTw buffer (50 mm Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 150 mm NaCl, 0.05% Tween 20, 0.2% nonfat milk), washed 3 times in the same buffer, and incubated for 1 h with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated second antibody. The membrane was then washed five times with TBSTw buffer and visualized by ECL. SKBr3 cells were grown on 20 150-mm tissue culture dishes to 80% confluence (∼10 × 106 cells/plate) and washed with Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium. The cells were then preincubated for 1 h with ALLN (250 μm) and treated with geldanamycin (3 μm) for 5 h. Subsequently, the cells were scraped with a rubber policeman into cold lysis buffer and centrifuged (20,000 × g, 30 min). The high molecular weight proteins, including native ErbB-2, were removed by ultrafiltration using a Centriplus membrane with a cut-off of 100 kDa (Millipore). The filtrate (∼30 ml) was incubated with 40 μg of antibody against ErbB-2 carboxyl terminus and protein G-Sepharose for 2 h and then washed five times with lysis buffer. Immunoreactive material was separated by 13% SDS-PAGE, transferred to the polyvinylidene difluoride membrane, and stained with Coomassie Blue. The 23-kDa band was cut out of the membrane and subjected to 7 cycles of Edman degradation using an Applied Biosystems Procise sequencer. Previously, we have shown that when the mammary carcinoma cell line SKBr3 is incubated with geldanamycin, a 23-kDa carboxyl-terminal fragment of ErbB-2 is produced (29Tikhomirov O. Carpenter G. J. Biol. Chem. 2000; 275: 26625-26631Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (77) Google Scholar). This fragment is rapidly degraded by proteosome activity unless a proteosome inhibitor is added. The data in Fig.1 show that a similar 23-kDa fragment accumulates when transfected Cos7 transiently expressing human ErbB-2 are treated with geldanamycin and ALLN, a proteosome inhibitor. To isolate this 23-kDa ErbB-2 fragment for sequence analysis, we employed transfected Cos7 cells treated with geldanamycin and ALLN for 6 h. ErbB-2 was then immunoprecipitated from cell lysates with an antibody to the carboxyl terminus of ErbB-2. The resulting immunoprecipitate was subjected to SDS-PAGE, the separated proteins were transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane, and the membrane was stained with Coomassie. The stained protein band at 23 kDa representing the carboxyl-terminal ErbB-2 fragment was clearly visible. The 23-kDa peptide was eluted from the membrane and subjected to automated Edman amino-terminal microsequencing, which yielded a sequence of GYVAPLT through the first seven cycles. There was no evidence of heterogeneity in this sequence, which if present might indicate proteolytic processing of the amino terminus of the fragment. The recovered sequence corresponds exactly to residues 1126–1132 in the deduced cDNA sequence of human ErbB-2 (32Coussen L. Yang-Feng T.L. Liao Y.-C. Chen E. Gray A. McGrath J. Seeburg P.H. Libermann T.A. Schlessinger J. Francke U. Levinson A. Ullrich A. Science. 1985; 230: 1132-1139Crossref PubMed Scopus (1573) Google Scholar). Although it is possible that post-cleavage amino-terminal processing has taken place to yield the isolated 23-kDa fragment, we considered whether sequence information would predict a known proteolytic cleavage consensus site between residues 1125 and 1126 in ErbB-2. This analysis did show that there is a significant similarity between the ErbB-2 sequence immediately upstream from Gly-1126, which is PSETD, and caspase consensus cleavage sites that have been defined using a positional scanning combinatorial substrate library (33Margolin N. Raybuck S.A. Wilson K.P. Chen W. Fox T. Gu Y. Livingston D.J. J. Biol. Chem. 1997; 272: 7223-7228Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (225) Google Scholar, 34Thornberry N.A. Rano T.A. Peterson E.P. Rasper D.M. Timkey T. Garcia-Calvo M. Houtzager V.M. Nordstrom P.A. Roy S. Vaillancourt J.P. Chapman K.T. Nicholson D. J. Biol. Chem. 1997; 272: 17907-17911Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (1852) Google Scholar, 35Talanian R.V. Quinlan C. Trautz S. Hackett M.C. Mankovich J. Banach D. Ghayur T. Brady K.D. Wong W.W. J. Biol. Chem. 1997; 272: 9677-9682Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (776) Google Scholar) and analysis of known caspase cleavage sites in proteins (36Nicholson D.W. Cell Death Differ. 1999; 6: 1028-1042Crossref PubMed Scopus (1306) Google Scholar, 37Cohen G.M. Biochem. J. 1997; 326: 1-16Crossref PubMed Scopus (4146) Google Scholar). These caspase cleavage sequences are characterized by an essential Asp residue at the P1 position and frequently a Glu residue at the P3 position which correspond, respectively, to Asp-1125 and Glu-1123 in the ErbB-2 sequence. To test the possibility that this putative caspase cleavage sequence in ErbB-2 was necessary to generate the 23-kDa ErbB-2 fragment, site-directed mutagenesis was employed. The Asp at residue 1125 of ErbB-2 was mutated to either Ala or Glu, and Gly-1126 was changed to Ala. In regard to the conservative D1125E mutation, published structural data show that the aspartyl carboxylate side chain at the P1 position in a caspase substrate fits into a highly restrictive "socket" of enzyme that does not accommodate the side chain of a glutamate residue (36Nicholson D.W. Cell Death Differ. 1999; 6: 1028-1042Crossref PubMed Scopus (1306) Google Scholar). The wild-type and mutant ErbB-2 constructs were transiently expressed in Cos7 cells and exposed to geldanamycin without or with ALLN. The results in Fig. 2 show that mutagenesis of Asp-1125 to either Glu or Ala prevented production of the 23-kDa fragment from ErbB-2. Interestingly, in the case of these two mutations a new fragment of 30 kDa was generated from the carboxyl terminus of ErbB-2, and the depletion of the cellular level of native ErbB-2 by geldanamycin was not affected. In the case of the G1126A mutation, there was no effect on geldanamycin-induced ErbB-2 degradation or formation of the 23-kDa fragment. That mutagenesis of Gly-1126 did not abrogate production of the 23-kDa fragment is not surprising in view of the fact that caspase cleavage sites, although preferring Gly at the P′1 position, exhibit considerable flexibility at this position (35Talanian R.V. Quinlan C. Trautz S. Hackett M.C. Mankovich J. Banach D. Ghayur T. Brady K.D. Wong W.W. J. Biol. Chem. 1997; 272: 9677-9682Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (776) Google Scholar). To test the possibility that caspase activity is required for production of this 23-kDa fragment from ErbB-2, the pan-caspase inhibitor Z-VAD-FMK (38McColl K.S. He H. Zhong H. Whitacre C.M. Berger N.A. Distelhorst C.W. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 1998; 139: 229-238Crossref PubMed Scopus (59) Google Scholar, 39Pronk G.J. Ramer K. Amiri P. Williams L.T. Science. 1996; 271: 808-810Crossref PubMed Scopus (260) Google Scholar) was tested. As can be seen in the data presented in Fig. 3, Z-VAD-FMK completely prevented the formation of the 23-kDa ErbB-2 fragment induced by geldanamycin. In the D1125E ErbB-2 mutant geldanamycin induces a 30-kDa fragment instead of the 23-kDa fragment. To determine whether the formation of this 30-kDa fragment might also be caspase-dependent, we incubated cells expressing the D1125E mutant with geldanamycin in the presence and absence of Z-VAD-FMK. The data shown in Fig. 4 indicate that the amount of the 30-kDa fragment is significantly reduced when these cells are exposed to geldanamycin in the presence of the caspase inhibitor.Figure 4Influence of caspase inhibitor on formation of the 30-kDa ErbB-2 fragment. The ErbB-2 mutant D1125A was expressed in Cos7 cells. The cells were then preincubated with ALLN (250 μm) for 1 h and with geldanamycin (GA, 3 μm) for an additional 6 h. Cell lysates (40 μg) were prepared and analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting (W.B.) with antibody against carboxyl-terminal domain (CT) of ErbB-2. Bound antibody was detected by ECL. An arrowhead indicates the 30-kDa band.View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT) Geldanamycin induces ErbB-2 degradation, in part through a caspase-dependent mechanism, and geldanamycin is known to induce apoptosis in some cell lines (40Khan S.M. Oliver R.H. Dauffenbach L.M. Yeh J.J. Fertil. Steril. 2000; 74: 359-365Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (17) Google Scholar). Therefore, we tested whether other reported inducers of apoptosis, particularly in mammary carcinoma cell lines, also provoke ErbB-2 degradation. Two known stimulators of apoptosis, which are also known protein kinase inhibitors, did induce ErbB-2 degradation in a manner similar to geldanamycin. The results with staurosporin are shown in Fig.5. The data in the upper panelof Fig. 5 A show that staurosporin decreases the level of native ErbB-2 with about the same time course as that previously reported for geldanamycin (17Miller P. DiOrio C. Moyer M. Schnur R.C. Bruskin A. Cullen W. Moyer J.D. Cancer Res. 1994; 54: 2724-2730PubMed Google Scholar), whereas the results in the upper panel of Fig. 5 B show that maximal degradation of ErbB-2 was achieved with a staurosporin concentration of ∼2 μm. Significantly, the ErbB-2 degradation elicited by staurosporin is accompanied by the production of a 23-kDa carboxyl-terminal ErbB-2 fragment, shown in the lower panelsof Figs. 5, A and B, similar to that recorded for degradation induced by geldanamycin. The data in Fig.6 demonstrate that formation of this 23-kDa fragment from ErbB-2 in the presence of staurosporin is prevented by the pan-caspase inhibitor Z-VAD-FMK. Comparison of geldanamycin and staurosporin-induced ErbB-2 degradation in the same cell line (SKBr3) can be made by comparing the data in Figs. 3 and 6, respectively. The results show that in the absence of ALLN, the 23-kDa fragment produced by staurosporin accumulates to a significantly greater level than the same fragment generated in geldanamycin-treated cells. Also, the presence of ALLN significantly increases the level of this fragment in geldanamycin-treated cells but actually decreases the fragment level in staurosporin-treated cells. These results suggest significant, but unknown, distinctions in the mechanisms of action of geldanamycin and staurosporin.Figure 6Capacity of caspase inhibitor to block the 23-kDa ErbB-2 fragment formation induced by staurosporin. SKBr3 cells were preincubated with ALLN (250 μm) and Z-VAD-FMK (50 μm) for 1 h. The cells were then incubated with staurosporin (5 μm) for an additional 6 h. Cell lysates were prepared, and an aliquot (40 μg) of each was analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting (W.B.) with antibody against ErbB-2 carboxyl-terminal domain (CT). Bound antibody was detected by ECL.View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT) Curcumin is another protein kinase inhibitor that has been reported to induce apoptosis in numerous cell lines and also to deplete cellular level of ErbB-2 (41Hong R.-L. Spohn W.H. Hung M.-C. Clin. Cancer Res. 1999; 5: 1884-1891PubMed Google Scholar, 42Khar A. Mubarak A.A. Pardhasaradhi B.V. Begum Z. Anjum R. FEBS Lett. 1999; 445: 165-168Crossref PubMed Scopus (174) Google Scholar, 43Chen H. Zhang Z. Zhang Y. Zhou D. Anticancer Res. 1999; 19: 3675-3680PubMed Google Scholar, 44Kuo M.-L. Huang T.-S. Lin J.-K. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1996; 1317: 95-100Crossref PubMed Scopus (391) Google Scholar). The data in Fig.7 show that curcumin depletion of cellular ErbB-2 involves production of a 23-kDa ErbB-2 carboxyl-terminal fragment, which is stabilized in the presence of proteasome inhibitor I. Furthermore, the formation of this fragment in cells treated with curcumin is blocked in the presence of Z-VAD-FMK. However, not all inducers of apoptosis provoked ErbB-2 degradation in SKBr3 cells. Etoposide (100 μm), actinomycin D (5 μg/ml), hydroxyurea (5 μm), camptothecin (100 μm), paclitaxel (1 μm) with or without the MEK (mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase kinase) inhibitor PD98059 (50 μm) (45McKeigan J.P. Collins T.S. Ting J.P.-Y. J. Biol. Chem. 2000; 275: 38953-38956Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (215) Google Scholar) and the potent kinase inhibitor H7 (100 μm) did not decrease ErbB-2 levels in SKBr3. In many cases, these compounds did induce dramatic morphological changes in the cells. Both staurosporin and geldanamycin induce the degradation of ErbB-2 with formation of a 23-kDa fragment that is dependent on caspase activity. We have asked whether the inhibition of caspase activity interferes with the drug-induced degradation of the native 185-kDa ErbB-2 molecule. The data in Fig. 8 show that Z-VAD-FMK does not block geldanamycin-induced ErbB-2 degradation, but the inhibitor significantly attenuates degradation induced by staurosporin. Like geldanamycin-induced ErbB-2 degradation, curcumin-mediated degradation of this transmembrane protein was not prevented by Z-VAD-FMK (data not shown). The induction of ErbB-2 degradation by geldanamycin is associated with proteolytic fragmentation of the receptor (29Tikhomirov O. Carpenter G. J. Biol. Chem. 2000; 275: 26625-26631Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (77) Google Scholar). This includes the formation of a 23-kDa fragment that is recognized by antibodies as an epitope, within residues 1242–1255, in the carboxyl-terminal domain of the ErbB-2. Sequencing of this fragment shows that its amino terminus corresponds to Gly-1126 in the human ErbB-2 sequence. If the 23-kDa fragment includes all residues from Gly-1126 to the ErbB-2 carboxyl terminus Val-1255, then it has a calculated molecular mass of 16,091. Hence its apparent Mr value on SDS-PAGE is an overestimation of the actual mass due to anomalous migration in the gel. This fragment would contain most of the known ErbB-2 autophosphorylation sites that provide its coupling to signal transduction proteins (46Margolis B.L. Lax I. Kris R. Dombalagian M. Honnegger A.M. Howk R. Givol D. Ullrich A. Schlessinger J. J. Biol. Chem. 1989; 264: 10667-10671Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar, 47Hazan R. Margolis B. Dombalagian M. Ullrich A. Zilberstein A. Schlessinger J. Cell Growth Differ. 1990; 1: 3-7PubMed Google Scholar) as well as the carboxyl-terminal PDZ domain recognition motif that is involved in targeting ErbB-2 to the basolateral surface of polarized cells (48Borg J. Marchetto S. Le Bivic A. Ollendorff V. Jaulin-Bastard F. Saito H. Fournier E. Adelaide J. Margolis B. Birnbaum D. Nat. Cell Biol. 2000; 2: 407-414Crossref PubMed Scopus (258) Google Scholar). It is possible that cleavage of ErbB-2 occurs between residues 1125 and 1126 to generate the 23-kDa fragment or that the primary cleavage event occurs upstream of these residues, and post-cleavage processing occurs at the amino terminus to produce the observed fragment. Several facts suggest that the former is more plausible. First, we did not detect heterogeneity in the amino-terminal amino acids recovered in microsequencing of this fragment. Second, the residues immediately upstream of Gly-1126 constitute a site favorable for caspase-dependent cleavage. This includes the essential Asp at residue 1125. Analysis of caspase cleavage sites shows that cleavage invariably occurs immediately after an Asp residue at the P1 position and frequently includes a Glu residue at the P3 position (34Thornberry N.A. Rano T.A. Peterson E.P. Rasper D.M. Timkey T. Garcia-Calvo M. Houtzager V.M. Nordstrom P.A. Roy S. Vaillancourt J.P. Chapman K.T. Nicholson D. J. Biol. Chem. 1997; 272: 17907-17911Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (1852) Google Scholar, 35Talanian R.V. Quinlan C. Trautz S. Hackett M.C. Mankovich J. Banach D. Ghayur T. Brady K.D. Wong W.W. J. Biol. Chem. 1997; 272: 9677-9682Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (776) Google Scholar), which in this instance corresponds to Glu-1123 in the ErbB-2 sequence. Our data show that mutagenesis of the essential Asp at position P1 (residue 1125) prevents geldanamycin-induced formation of the 23-kDa fragment. This includes the conservative D1125E mutation, which on the basis of the structure of caspase active sites with model substrates, is predicted to inhibit peptide bond hydrolysis by these proteases (36Nicholson D.W. Cell Death Differ. 1999; 6: 1028-1042Crossref PubMed Scopus (1306) Google Scholar). Last, the pan-caspase inhibitor Z-VAD-FMK blocks geldanamycin-induced formation of the 23-kDa peptide. Hence, we conclude that this fragment is formed by cleavage between residues 1125 and 1126 in ErbB-2. It is interesting that when Asp-1125 is mutated in ErbB-2, geldanamycin treatment of cells gives rise to a new carboxyl-terminal fragment of 30 kDa instead of the 23-kDa fragment. Formation of this fragment in the ErbB-2 mutant is partially sensitive to the caspase inhibitor. There are consensus caspase cleavage sites upstream of Asp-1125 that could generate the 30-kDa fragment. These include Asp-1087 and Asp-1016 and Asp-1019, which constitute a nested cleavage site. Cleavage at Asp-1087 would directly produce a carboxyl-terminal ErbB-2 fragment of about 30 kDa, whereas cleavage at Asp-1016 or Asp-1019 would generate a theoretical 40-kDa fragment, which would require additional processing to produce the observed 30-kDa fragment. It is important to note that when the caspase-dependent cleavages at the carboxyl terminus are prevented by the addition of Z-VAD-FMK to geldanamycin-treated cells, the cellular content of the native ErbB-2 molecule is still decreased. This implies that cleavage at the ErbB-2 carboxyl terminus is not necessary to initiate the geldanamycin-dependent reduction in the ErbB-2 levels. However, Z-VAD-FMK does prevent staurosporin-dependent degradation of the native ErbB-2 molecule, suggesting that caspase activity is more significant in the degradation of ErbB-2 by staurosporin than by geldanamycin. The current proposed mechanism for geldanamycin-induced ErbB-2 degradation involves the drug-dependent dissociation of Hsp90 from the kinase domain of ErbB-2 (27Chavany C. Mimnagh E. Miller P. Bitton R. Nguyen P. Trepel J. Whitesell L. Schnur R. Moyer J.D. Neckers L. J. Biol. Chem. 1996; 271: 4974-4977Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (402) Google Scholar, 28Mimnaugh E.G. Chavany C. Neckers L. J. Biol. Chem. 1996; 271: 22796-22801Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (416) Google Scholar, 30Xu W. Mimnaugh E.G Rosser M.F. Nicchitta C. Marcu M. Yarden Y. Neckers L. J. Biol. Chem. 2001; 276: 3702-3708Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (328) Google Scholar). Since geldanamycin is known to induce apoptosis and some but not all cell types (40Khan S.M. Oliver R.H. Dauffenbach L.M. Yeh J.J. Fertil. Steril. 2000; 74: 359-365Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (17) Google Scholar, 49Davis M. Carbott D. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 1999; 161: 59-74Crossref PubMed Scopus (11) Google Scholar,53Nimmanapalli R. O'Bryan E. Bhalla K. Cancer Res. 2001; 61: 1799-1804PubMed Google Scholar) and, as mentioned above, caspase activity seems involved in ErbB-2 degradation induced by this drug, we tested other known inducers of apoptosis for their capacity to provoke ErbB-2 degradation and formation of the 23-kDa fragment. Of the various inducers of apoptosis tested, two compounds (staurosporin and curcumin) were found to promote formation of a 23-kDa fragment. Others report that curcumin inhibits the tyrosine kinase activity of ErbB-2 and depletes the cellular content of native ErbB-2 (41Hong R.-L. Spohn W.H. Hung M.-C. Clin. Cancer Res. 1999; 5: 1884-1891PubMed Google Scholar). Curcumin also induces an apoptotic response in mammary carcinoma cells (50Ramachandran C. You W. Breast Cancer Res. 1999; 54: 269-278Crossref Scopus (140) Google Scholar). Curcumin has been reported to dissociate the endoplasmic reticulum heat shock protein GRP94 from ErbB-2 (41Hong R.-L. Spohn W.H. Hung M.-C. Clin. Cancer Res. 1999; 5: 1884-1891PubMed Google Scholar). However, it is not known whether curcumin actually binds to GRP94, and its effect on Hsp90 has not been reported. Less is known regarding the effects of staurosporin on ErbB-2. Staurosporin, a broad spectrum protein kinase inhibitor, has not been reported to interact with heat shock proteins and is well described as an inducer of apoptosis (51Andersson M. Sjostrand J. Petersen A. Honarvar A.K. Karlsson J. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2000; 41: 2623-2632PubMed Google Scholar, 52Rokhlin O.W. Glover R.A. Cohen M.B. Cancer Res. 1998; 58: 5870-5875PubMed Google Scholar). Staurosporin, like geldanamycin and curcumin, is a weak inhibitor of receptor tyrosine kinases (51Andersson M. Sjostrand J. Petersen A. Honarvar A.K. Karlsson J. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2000; 41: 2623-2632PubMed Google Scholar) but has not been previously shown to alter the cellular level of ErbB-2. The similarities in ErbB-2 metabolism between cells treated with geldanamycin or staurosporin suggest that the observed degradation of ErbB-2 by these compounds does not necessarily have to proceed through dissociation of heat shock proteins from ErbB-2. It may be that inhibition of kinase activities along with promotion of caspase activities is sufficient for ErbB-2 degradation. The identity of the target kinases, however, is unclear. It has been reported that the metabolic stability of a kinase-negative ErbB-2 mutant is decreased by geldanamycin (30Xu W. Mimnaugh E.G Rosser M.F. Nicchitta C. Marcu M. Yarden Y. Neckers L. J. Biol. Chem. 2001; 276: 3702-3708Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (328) Google Scholar), which suggests that perhaps non-tyrosine kinases are the target of these drugs.
Referência(s)