The Dominant Value Profile of American Culture
1955; Wiley; Volume: 57; Issue: 6 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1525/aa.1955.57.6.02a00130
ISSN1548-1433
Autores Tópico(s)Social and Cultural Dynamics
ResumoAmerican AnthropologistVolume 57, Issue 6 p. 1232-1239 Free Access The Dominant Value Profile of American Culture CORA DU BOIS, CORA DU BOIS Harvard UniversitySearch for more papers by this author CORA DU BOIS, CORA DU BOIS Harvard UniversitySearch for more papers by this author First published: December 1955 https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1955.57.6.02a00130Citations: 33AboutPDF ToolsExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat REFERENCES CITED Albert, Ethel M. 1954 Theory construction for the comparative study of values in five cultures: a report on the value study. Harvard University, Laboratory of Social Relations: Value Study. (Dittoed.). Caudill, William 1952 Japanese-American personality and acculturation. Genetic Psychology Monographs, No. 45: 3– 102. Kluckhohn, Clyde and others 1951 Value and value orientation in the theory of action. In Toward a General Theory of Action, ed. Talcott Parsons and Edward A. Shils, pp. 388– 433. Cambridge, Mass., Harvard University Press. Kluckhohn, Clyde and Florence Kluckhohn 1947 American culture: generalized orientations and class patterns. In Conflicts of Power in Modem Culture: Seventh Symposium, ed. Lyman Bryson, pp. 106– 28. New York, Conference on Science, Philosophy and Religion in Their Relation to the Democratic Way of Life, Inc. (distributed by Harper and Bros.). Kluckhohn, Florence 1950 Dominant and substitute profiles of cultural orientations: their significance for the analysis of social stratification. Social Forces 28: 376– 93. Citing Literature Volume57, Issue6December 1955Pages 1232-1239 ReferencesRelatedInformation
Referência(s)