RISKS AND COMPLICATIONS OF TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND GUIDED PROSTATE NEEDLE BIOPSY: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY AND REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE
1998; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; Volume: 160; Issue: 6 Part 1 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1016/s0022-5347(01)62255-9
ISSN1527-3792
AutoresLarissa V. Rodríguez, Martha K. Terris,
Tópico(s)Genital Health and Disease
ResumoNo AccessJournal of UrologyClinical Urology: Original Articles1 Dec 1998RISKS AND COMPLICATIONS OF TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND GUIDED PROSTATE NEEDLE BIOPSY: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY AND REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE LARISSA V. RODRIGUEZ and MARTHA K. TERRIS LARISSA V. RODRIGUEZLARISSA V. RODRIGUEZ More articles by this author and MARTHA K. TERRISMARTHA K. TERRIS More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(01)62255-9AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract Purpose: Transrectal ultrasound guided needle biopsy of the prostate is routinely performed to diagnose and stage prostate cancer. We prospectively evaluated the true incidence of complications and identified risk factors of needle biopsy. Materials and Methods: We prospectively studied 128 patients who underwent transrectal ultrasound guided needle biopsy. A pre-biopsy questionnaire provided demographic information. Immediate complications were recorded by the surgical team at the procedure. Information on delayed complications was obtained by telephone interview. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Results: There was 1 major and 135 minor complications in 77 patients with at least 1 complication in 63.6%. Most patients tolerated the procedure with minimal discomfort regardless of the number and location of biopsies but younger patients had significantly more discomfort than older men (R = -0.26, p = 0.005). The most common complication was persistent hematuria in 47.1% of cases. None of the hemorrhagic complications was related to previous aspirin or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use, or the total number of biopsies performed. Infectious complications were rare with only a 1.7% incidence of fever. This rate was associated with the choice of antibiotic combination used (R = 0.25, p = 0.006). Conclusions: Transrectal ultrasound guided needle biopsy is safe for diagnosing prostate cancer with few major but frequent minor complications. Patients are likely to have persistent hematuria for up to 3 to 7 days after the procedure. Recent use of aspirin or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs is not an absolute contraindication for this procedure. Additional analgesics are not required in patients who undergo anterior or multiple biopsies but they may be useful in younger patients. References 1 : Clinical application of transrectal ultrasonography and prostate specific antigen in the search for prostate cancer. J. Urol.1988; 139: 758. Link, Google Scholar 2 : Ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the palpably abnormal prostate. J. Urol.1989; 142: 66. Link, Google Scholar 3 : Prostate cancer detection in a clinical urological practice by ultrasonography, digital rectal examination and prostate specific antigen. J. Urol.1990; 143: 1146. Link, Google Scholar 4 : The ability of systematic transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy to detect prostate cancer in men with the clinical diagnosis of benign prostatic hyperplasia. J. Urol.1991; 146: 75. Link, Google Scholar 5 : Transrectal needle method for biopsy of the prostate: review of 90 cases. Amer. Surg.1975; 41: 659. Google Scholar 6 : Transrectal biopsy of the prostate and bacteremia. Brit. J. Surg.1980; 67: 127. Google Scholar 7 : The problem of infection after prostatic biopsy: the case for the transperineal approach. Brit. J. Urol.1982; 54: 736. Google Scholar 8 : Prevention of urinary tract infection and sepsis following transrectal prostatic biopsy. J. Urol.1982; 127: 449. Link, Google Scholar 9 : Complications following combined transrectal aspiration and core biopsy of the prostate. Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol.1990; 24: 249. Google Scholar 10 : Multiple transrectal ultrasound-guided prostatic biopsies-true morbidity and patient acceptance. Brit. J. Urol.1993; 71: 460. Google Scholar 11 : Transrectal ultrasound examination of the prostate: complications and acceptance by patients. Brit. J. Urol.1993; 71: 457. Google Scholar 12 : Antibiotic prophylaxis in ultrasound guided transrectal prostate biopsy. J. Urol.1997; 157: 2199. Link, Google Scholar 13 : Morbidity of ultrasound-guided transrectal core biopsy of the prostate without prophylactic antibiotic therapy. A prospective study in 415 cases. Brit. J. Urol.1997; 79: 777. Google Scholar 14 : Complications of transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic sextant biopsies of the prostate: evaluation of complication rates and risk factors within a population-based screening program. Urology1997; 49: 875. Google Scholar 15 : Determinants of complications after multiple transrectal core biopsies of the prostate. Eur. Rad.1996; 6: 457. Google Scholar 16 : Infection after transrectal core biopsies of the prostate-risk factors and antibiotic prophylaxis. Brit. J. Urol1996; 77: 851. Google Scholar 17 : Side effects and patient acceptability of transrectal biopsy of the prostate. Clin. Rad.1993; 47: 125. Google Scholar 18 : Transrectal biopsy of the prostate guided with transrectal US: longitudinal and multiplanar scanning. Radiology1989; 170: 23. Google Scholar 21 : Urinary contamination as a result of transrectal biopsy of the prostate. J. Urol.1971; 105: 545. Link, Google Scholar 22 : Urinary tract infection following trans-rectal biopsy of the prostate. Brit. J. Urol.1975; 47: 679. Google Scholar 23 : Prophylaxis against systemic infection after transrectal biopsy for suspected prostatic carcinoma. Brit. Med. J.1978; 2: 1263. Google Scholar 24 : Antibiotic prophylaxis for transrectal prostate biopsy. J. Antimicrob. Chemother.1997; 39: 115. Google Scholar 25 : Anaerobic infection as a consequence of transrectal prostatic biopsy. J. Urol.1978; 120: 502. Link, Google Scholar 26 : Fatal anaerobic infection following transrectal biopsy of a rare prostatic tumor. Brit. J. Urol.1993; 72: 977. Google Scholar 27 : Transrectal ultrasound and core biopsies for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. A study of pretreatment investigation strategy for patients with suspected prostate cancer. Acta Rad.1994; 393: 1. Google Scholar 28 : Systematic prostatic biopsies in 100 men with no suspicion of cancer on digital rectal examination. J. Urol.1991; 146: 1308. Link, Google Scholar 29 : Patient tolerance of transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate. Brit. J. Urol.1997; 79: 608. Google Scholar 30 : Transrectal ultrasound guided prostatic nerve blockade eases systematic needle biopsy of the prostate. J. Urol.1996; 155: 607. Link, Google Scholar From the Department of Urology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford and Section of Urology, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California© 1998 by American Urological Association, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byDiBianco J, Mullins J and Allaway M (2018) Ultrasound Guided, Freehand Transperineal Prostate Biopsy: An Alternative to the Transrectal ApproachUrology Practice, VOL. 3, NO. 2, (134-140), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2016.Pham K, Johnston R, Jeldres C, Lewinshtein D and Porter C (2018) The Impact of Multiple Prostate Needle Biopsies on Long-Term Erectile DysfunctionUrology Practice, VOL. 2, NO. 2, (85-89), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2015.Olshtain-Pops K, Block C, Temper V, Hidalgo-Grass C, Gross I, Moses A, Gofrit O and Benenson S (2018) An Outbreak of Achromobacter xylosoxidans Associated With Ultrasound Gel Used During Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Prostate BiopsyJournal of Urology, VOL. 185, NO. 1, (144-147), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2011.Loeb S, Carter H, Berndt S, Ricker W and Schaeffer E (2018) Complications After Prostate Biopsy: Data From SEER-MedicareJournal of Urology, VOL. 186, NO. 5, (1830-1834), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2011.Klein T, Palisaar R, Holz A, Brock M, Noldus J and Hinkel A (2018) The Impact of Prostate Biopsy and Periprostatic Nerve Block on Erectile and Voiding Function: A Prospective StudyJournal of Urology, VOL. 184, NO. 4, (1447-1452), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2010.Ankerst D, Miyamoto R, Nair P, Pollock B, Thompson I and Parekh D (2018) Yearly Prostate Specific Antigen and Digital Rectal Examination Fluctuations in a Screened PopulationJournal of Urology, VOL. 181, NO. 5, (2071-2076), Online publication date: 1-May-2009.Feliciano J, Teper E, Ferrandino M, Macchia R, Blank W, Grunberger I and Colon I (2018) The Incidence of Fluoroquinolone Resistant Infections After Prostate Biopsy—Are Fluoroquinolones Still Effective Prophylaxis?Journal of Urology, VOL. 179, NO. 3, (952-955), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2008.ROCHESTER M, LE MONNIER K and BREWSTER S (2018) A DOUBLE-BLIND, RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED TRIAL OF TOPICAL GLYCERYL TRINITRATE FOR TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND GUIDED PROSTATE BIOPSYJournal of Urology, VOL. 173, NO. 2, (418-420), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2005.SIU W, DUNN R, SHAH R and WEI J (2018) USE OF EXTENDED PATTERN TECHNIQUE FOR INITIAL PROSTATE BIOPSYJournal of Urology, VOL. 174, NO. 2, (505-509), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2005.LEE-ELLIOTT C, DUNDAS D and PATEL U (2018) Randomized Trial of Lidocaine Vs Lidocaine/Bupivacaine Periprostatic Injection on Longitudinal Pain Scores After Prostate BiopsyJournal of Urology, VOL. 171, NO. 1, (247-250), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2004.HAQ A, PATEL H, HABIB M, DONALDSON P and PARRY J (2018) DICLOFENAC SUPPOSITORY ANALGESIA FOR TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND GUIDED BIOPSIES OF THE PROSTATE: A DOUBLE-BLIND, RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALJournal of Urology, VOL. 171, NO. 4, (1489-1491), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2004.MATLAGA B, ESKEW L and McCULLOUGH D (2018) Prostate Biopsy: Indications and TechniqueJournal of Urology, VOL. 169, NO. 1, (12-19), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2003.ROY C, BUY X, LANG H, SAUSSINE C and JACQMIN D (2018) Contrast Enhances Color Doppler Endorectal Sonography of Prostate: Efficiency for Detecting Peripheral Zone Tumors and Role for Biopsy ProcedureJournal of Urology, VOL. 170, NO. 1, (69-72), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2003.ÖZDEN E, YAMAN Ö, GÖĞÜŞ Ç, ÖZGENCIL E and SOYGÜR T (2018) The Optimum Doses of and Injection Locations for Periprostatic Nerve Blockade for Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Biopsy of the Prostate: A Prospective, Randomized, Placebo Controlled StudyJournal of Urology, VOL. 170, NO. 6, (2319-2322), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2003.DAVIS M, SOFER M, KIM S and SOLOWAY M (2018) THE PROCEDURE OF TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND GUIDED BIOPSY OF THE PROSTATE: A SURVEY OF PATIENT PREPARATION AND BIOPSY TECHNIQUEJournal of Urology, VOL. 167, NO. 2 Part 1, (566-570), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2002.Öbek C, Önal B, Özkan B, Önder A, Yalçin V and Solok V (2018) Is Periprostatic Local Anesthesia For Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Prostate Biopsy Associated With Increased Infectious Or Hemorrhagic Complications? A Prospective Randomized TrialJournal of Urology, VOL. 168, NO. 2, (558-561), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2002.Masood J, Shah N, Lane T, Andrews H, Simpson P and Barua J (2018) Nitrous Oxide (Entonox) Inhalation and Tolerance of Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Prostate Biopsy: A Double-blind Randomized Controlled StudyJournal of Urology, VOL. 168, NO. 1, (116-120), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2002.PEYROMAURE M, RAVERY V, MESSAS A, TOUBLANC M, BOCCON-GIBOD L and BOCCON-GIBOD L (2018) PAIN AND MORBIDITY OF AN EXTENSIVE PROSTATE 10-BIOPSY PROTOCOL: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY IN 289 PATIENTSJournal of Urology, VOL. 167, NO. 1, (218-221), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2002.ZISMAN A, LEIBOVICI D, KLEINMANN J, COOPER A, SIEGEL Y and LINDNER A (2018) THE IMPACT OF PROSTATE BIOPSY ON PATIENT WELL-BEING: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF VOIDING IMPAIRMENTJournal of Urology, VOL. 166, NO. 6, (2242-2246), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2001.EMILIOZZI P, LONGHI S, SCARPONE P, PANSADORO A, DePAULA F and PANSADORO V (2018) THE VALUE OF A SINGLE BIOPSY WITH 12 TRANSPERINEAL CORES FOR DETECTING PROSTATE CANCER IN PATIENTS WITH ELEVATED PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGENJournal of Urology, VOL. 166, NO. 3, (845-850), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2001.DJAVAN B, WALDERT M, ZLOTTA A, DOBRONSKI P, SEITZ C, REMZI M, BORKOWSKI A, SCHULMAN C and MARBERGER M (2018) SAFETY AND MORBIDITY OF FIRST AND REPEAT TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND GUIDED PROSTATE NEEDLE BIOPSIES: RESULTS OF A PROSPECTIVE EUROPEAN PROSTATE CANCER DETECTION STUDYJournal of Urology, VOL. 166, NO. 3, (856-860), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2001.CAREY J and KORMAN H (2018) TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND GUIDED BIOPSY OF THE PROSTATE. DO ENEMAS DECREASE CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT COMPLICATIONS?Journal of Urology, VOL. 166, NO. 1, (82-85), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2001.ZISMAN A, LEIBOVICI D, KLEINMANN J, SIEGEL Y and LINDNER A (2018) THE IMPACT OF PROSTATE BIOPSY ON PATIENT WELL-BEING: : A PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF PAIN, ANXIETY AND ERECTILE DYSFUNCTIONJournal of Urology, VOL. 165, NO. 2, (445-454), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2001.POTTS J (2018) PROSPECTIVE IDENTIFICATION OF NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH CATEGORY IV PROSTATITIS IN MEN WITH ELEVATED PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGENJournal of Urology, VOL. 164, NO. 5, (1550-1553), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2000.Fergany A and Angermeier K (2018) RE: A TECHNIQUE OF TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND GUIDED TRANSPERINEAL RANDOM PROSTATE BIOPSY IN PATIENTS WITH ULCERATIVE COLITIS AND AN ILEAL POUCHJournal of Urology, VOL. 164, NO. 1, (130-130), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2000.SHALEV M, KADMON D, TEH B, BUTLER E, AGUILAR-CORDOVA E, THOMPSON T, HERMAN J, ADLER H, SCARDINO P and MILES B (2018) SUICIDE GENE THERAPY TOXICITY AFTER MULTIPLE AND REPEAT INJECTIONS IN PATIENTS WITH LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCERJournal of Urology, VOL. 163, NO. 6, (1747-1750), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2000.ROBERTS R, BERGSTRALH E, PETERSON N, BOSTWICK D, LIEBER M and JACOBSEN S (2018) POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE BIOPSIES IN THE PRE-PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN AND PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN ERAS, 1980 TO 1997Journal of Urology, VOL. 163, NO. 5, (1471-1475), Online publication date: 1-May-2000.BORBOROGLU P, COMER S, RIFFENBURGH R and AMLING C (2018) EXTENSIVE REPEAT TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND GUIDED PROSTATE BIOPSY IN PATIENTS WITH PREVIOUS BENIGN SEXTANT BIOPSIESJournal of Urology, VOL. 163, NO. 1, (158-162), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2000.NAUGHTON C, ORNSTEIN D, SMITH D and CATALONA W (2018) PAIN AND MORBIDITY OF TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND GUIDED PROSTATE BIOPSY: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF 6 VERSUS 12 CORESJournal of Urology, VOL. 163, NO. 1, (168-171), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2000. Volume 160Issue 6 Part 1December 1998Page: 2115-2120 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 1998 by American Urological Association, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information LARISSA V. RODRIGUEZ More articles by this author MARTHA K. TERRIS More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Referência(s)