THE ENGINEERING STUDY
1963; Wiley; Volume: 1963; Issue: 2 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1002/j.2333-8504.1963.tb00496.x
ISSN0424-6144
Autores Tópico(s)Engineering Education and Pedagogy
ResumoETS Research Bulletin SeriesVolume 1963, Issue 2 p. i-384 ArticleFree Access THE ENGINEERING STUDY John K. Hemphill Editor, John K. Hemphill EditorSearch for more papers by this author John K. Hemphill Editor, John K. Hemphill EditorSearch for more papers by this author First published: December 1963 https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.1963.tb00496.xCitations: 4AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat REFERENCES 1Coombs, Clyde H. Some hypotheses for the analysis of qualitative variables. Psychol. Rev., 1948, 55, 167–174. 10.1037/h0056980 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 2Davidson, W. M., and Carroll, J. B. Speed and level components in time-limit scores. Educ. psychol. Measmt, 1945, 5, 411–435. 10.1177/001316444500500408 Web of Science®Google Scholar 3Dunnette, Marvin D. The Minnesota Engineering Analogies Test. J. appl. Psychol., 1953, 37, 170–175. 10.1037/h0056333 Web of Science®Google Scholar 4Dunnette, Marvin D. Vocational interest differences among engineers employed in different functions. J. appl. Psychol., 1957, 41, 273–278. 10.1037/h0046985 Web of Science®Google Scholar 5Dunnette, Marvin D., and England, George W. A checklist for differentiating engineering jobs. Pers. Psychol., 1957, 10, 191–198. 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1957.tb00777.x Web of Science®Google Scholar 6Fruchter, Benjamin. The nature of verbal fluency. Educ. psychol. Measmt, 1948, 8, 33–47. 10.1177/001316444800800103 Web of Science®Google Scholar 7Guilford, J. P. Creativity. Amer. Psychologist, 1950, 5, 444–454. 10.1037/h0063487 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 8Guilford, J. P., Kettner, N. W., and Christensen, P. R. The relation of certain thinking factors to training criteria in the U.S. Coast Guard Academy. Rep. Psychol. Lab. Univer. So. Calif., 1955, 13. Google Scholar 9Guilford, J. P., Kettner, N. W., and Christensen, P. R. A factor analytic study across the domains of reasoning, creativity, and evaluation, II: Administration of tests and analysis of results. Rep. Psychol. Lab. Univer. So. Calif., 1956, 16. Google Scholar 10Guilford, J. P., Wilson, R. C., Christensen, P. R., and Lewis, D. J. A factor-analytic study of creative thinking, I: Hypotheses and description of tests. Rep. Psychol. Lab. Univer. So. Calif., 1951, 4. Google Scholar 11Guilford, J. P., Wilson, R. C., and Christensen, P. R. A factor-analytic study of creative thinking, II: Administration of tests and analysis of results. Rep. Psychol. Lab. Univer. So. Calif., 1952, 8. Google Scholar 12Hills, John R. Scoring a Controlled-Association Test. Research Bulletin 56-12. Princeton, N. J.: Educational Testing Service, 1956. Google Scholar 13Kendall, M. G. Rank Correlation Methods. London: C. Griffin, 1948. Google Scholar 14Kerr, Willard A., and Speroff, Boris J. Validation and evaluation of the Empathy Test, J. gen. Psychol., 1954, 50, 269–276. 10.1080/00221309.1954.9710125 Web of Science®Google Scholar 15Kettner, N. W. An information summary of studies of thinking abilities. Los Angeles: University of Southern California, 1955. (Mimeo.) Web of Science®Google Scholar 16Kuder, G. F., and Richardson, M. W. The theory of the estimation of test reliability. Psychometrika, 1937, 2, 151–160. 10.1007/BF02288391 Web of Science®Google Scholar 17Lord, Frederic M. A study of speed factors in tests and academic grades. Psychometrika, 1956, 21, 1. 10.1007/BF02289085 Web of Science®Google Scholar 18Mandell, Milton M., and Chad, Seymour. Tests for selecting engineers. Publ. Pers. Rev., 1950, 11, 217–222. Google Scholar 19McNemar, Olga W. An attempt to differentiate between individuals with high and low reasoning ability. Amer. J. Psychol., 1955, 68, 20–36. 10.2307/1418387 CASPubMedGoogle Scholar 20Mills, John. The Engineer in Society. New York: Van Nostrand, 1946. Google Scholar 21Myers, Charles T. The factorial composition and validity of differently speeded tests. Psychometrika, 1952, 17, 347–352. 10.1007/BF02288766 Web of Science®Google Scholar 22O'Connor, Johnson. Structural Visualization. Boston: Human Engineering Laboratory, 1943. Google Scholar 23Saunders, David R. Use of an objective method to determine engineering job families that will apply in several companies. Research Bulletin 54-26. Princeton, N. J.: Educational Testing Service, 1954. Google Scholar 24Saunders, David R. Some preliminary interpretive material for the Personality Research Inventory. Research Memorandum 55-15. Princeton, N. J.: Educational Testing Service, 1955. Google Scholar 25Saunders, David R. Objective description and classification of engineering jobs, II: Factor analysis of the Key Group Data Form. Research Bulletin 56-5. Princeton, N. J.: Educational Testing Service, 1956. Google Scholar 26Saunders, David R. Concurrent validation of engineering placement tests against placement criteria for experienced engineers. Research Bulletin 57-5. Princeton, N. J.: Educational Testing Service, 1957. Google Scholar 27Taafe, G. The relation of experimental tests of reasoning and creative thinking to research performance. Los Angeles: University of Southern California, 1953. (Mimeo.) Google Scholar 28Taylor, H. C., and Russell, J. T. The relationship of validity coefficients to the practical effectiveness of tests in selection. J. appl. Psychol., 1939, 23, 565–578. 10.1037/h0057079 PubMedGoogle Scholar 29Thurstone, L. L. Primary mental abilities. Psychometric Monogr., 1934, No. I, Supplement, 1938. Google Scholar 30Thurstone, L. L. Multiple Factor Analysis. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1947, Chapter VIII. Google Scholar 31Tucker, Ledyard R. Factor analysis of double centered score matrices. Research Memorandum 56-3. Princeton, N. J.: Educational Testing Service, 1956. Google Scholar 32Wilson, R. C., Guilford, J. P., and Christensen, P. R. The measurement of individual differences in originality. Psychol. Bull., 1953, 50, 362–370. 10.1037/h0060857 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 33Woodworth, R. S. Experimental Psychology. New York: Henry Holt & Co., Inc., 1938. Google Scholar Citing Literature Volume1963, Issue2December 1963Pages i-384 ReferencesRelatedInformation
Referência(s)