Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Tort Standards and Jury Decisions

1985; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 14; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1086/467797

1537-5366

James K. Hammitt, Stephen J. Carroll, Daniel A. Relles,

Corporate Law and Human Rights

Previous articleNext article No AccessTort Standards and Jury DecisionsJames K. Hammitt, Stephen J. Carroll, and Daniel A. RellesJames K. Hammitt Search for more articles by this author , Stephen J. Carroll Search for more articles by this author , and Daniel A. Relles Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The Journal of Legal Studies Volume 14, Number 3Dec., 1985Critical Issues in Tort Law Reform: A Search for Principles Sponsored by The University of Chicago Law School Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/467797 Views: 10Total views on this site Citations: 21Citations are reported from Crossref PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Anne Lippert, Jonathan Golding, Kellie Lynch, Eric Haak When a corporation rapes: perceptions of rape in civil court for corporate defendants, Psychology, Crime & Law 24, no.77 (Jan 2018): 703–726.https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2017.1421185Jennifer K. Robbennolt, Valerie P. Hans The Psychology of Tort Law, (Jun 2016): 249–274.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29406-3_8Virna Gutiérrez, Luis Cifuentes, Nicolás Bronfman Factors Influencing Compensation Demanded for Environmental Impacts Generated by Different Economic Activities, Sustainability 7, no.77 (Jul 2015): 9608–9627.https://doi.org/10.3390/su7079608Lachlan Thomas Caunt Hows, Whys, and But-Fors: Theorizing, Comparing, and Solution Finding within the Principle of Material Contribution to Risk in the Law of Negligence, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2015).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2409833Eiichiro Watamura, Toshihiro Wakebe, Kaori Karasawa The Influence of Improper Information on Japanese Lay Judges’ Determination of Punishment, Asian Journal of Criminology 9, no.44 (Sep 2014): 285–300.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11417-014-9193-7 윤영민 Public’s Response Toward Corporations’ and Individuals’ Wrongdoing An Experiment to Apply Fairness Theory and Explore Anti-corporate Sentiment, Journal of Public Relations 18, no.22 (May 2014): 207–247.https://doi.org/10.15814/jpr.2014.18.2.207Kelly Rebeck Understanding the Corporate Identity Effect: An Examination of How Legal Standards are Applied to the Behavior of Corporate versus Individual Defendants in a Civil Lawsuit Scenario, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2012).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2163246John M. Darley, Lawrence M. Solan, Matthew B. Kugler, Joseph Sanders Doing Wrong Without Creating Harm, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 7, no.11 (Mar 2010): 30–63.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2009.01169.xJan W. Keijser, Peter J. Koppen Paradoxes of proof and punishment: Psychological pitfalls in judicial decision making, Legal and Criminological Psychology 12, no.22 (Dec 2010): 189–205.https://doi.org/10.1348/135532506X118721John M. Darley, Lawrence M. Solan, Matthew B. Kugler, Joseph Sanders Liability for Risk: Citizens' Perspectives on Liability for Creation of Risk and Loss of Chance, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2007).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.998641Dennis J. Devine, Laura D. Clayton, Benjamin B. Dunford, Rasmy Seying, Jennifer Pryce Jury decision making: 45 years of empirical research on deliberating groups., Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 7, no.33 (Jan 2001): 622–727.https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.7.3.622Roselle L. Wissler, Patricia F. Kuehn, Michael J. Saks Instructing jurors on general damages in personal injury cases: Problems and possibilities., Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 6, no.33 (Jan 2000): 712–742.https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.6.3.712Brian H. Bornstein From Compassion to Compensation: The Effect of Injury Severity on Mock Jurors' Liability Judgments1, Journal of Applied Social Psychology 28, no.1616 (Aug 1998): 1477–1502.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01687.xEdith Greene, Elizabeth F. Loftus Psycholegal Research on Jury Damage Awards, Current Directions in Psychological Science 7, no.22 (Jun 2016): 50–50.https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep13175629Peter Zweifel, Jean-Robert Tyran Environmental impairment liability as an instrument of environmental policy, Ecological Economics 11, no.11 (Sep 1994): 43–56.https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-8009(94)90049-3Brian H. Bornstein David, Goliath, and reverend Bayes: Prior beliefs about defendants' status in personal injury cases, Applied Cognitive Psychology 8, no.33 (Jun 1994): 233–258.https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350080304Neil Vidmar, Jessica Lee, Elaina Cohen, Anne Stewart Damage awards and jurors' responsibility ascriptions in medical versus automobile negligence cases, Behavioral Sciences & the Law 12, no.22 (Jan 1994): 149–160.https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2370120205Neil Vidmar Making inferences about jury behavior from jury verdict statistics: Cautions about the Lorelei's Lied., Law and Human Behavior 18, no.66 (Jan 1994): 599–617.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01499327Ivy E. Broder, Thomas A. Husted The effect of post-trial activity on large jury awards, International Review of Law and Economics 11, no.33 (Dec 1991): 251–260.https://doi.org/10.1016/0144-8188(91)90002-URandall R. Bovbjerg Lessons for Tort Reform from Indiana, Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 16, no.33 (Jun 1991): 465–482.https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-16-3-465Valerie P. Hans, M. David Ermann Responses to corporate versus individual wrongdoing., Law and Human Behavior 13, no.22 (Jan 1989): 151–166.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01055921