Vigilin, a Ubiquitous Protein with 14 K Homology Domains, Is the Estrogen-inducible Vitellogenin mRNA 3′-Untranslated Region-binding Protein
1997; Elsevier BV; Volume: 272; Issue: 19 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1074/jbc.272.19.12249
ISSN1083-351X
AutoresRobin E. Dodson, David J. Shapiro,
Tópico(s)Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
ResumoRNA-binding proteins containing KH domains are widely distributed. One KH domain protein of unknown function, vigilin (also known as the high density lipoprotein-binding protein), contains 14 KH domains and is ubiquitous in vertebrate cells. We previously used RNA gel mobility shift assays to describe an estrogen-inducible protein which binds specifically to a segment of the 3′-untranslated region (3′-UTR) of vitellogenin mRNA, an area which has been implicated in the estrogen-mediated stabilization of vitellogenin mRNA. Here we show that the vitellogenin mRNA-binding protein (VitRNABP) is vigilin. The VitRNABP was isolated as a 150–155-kDa protein on a vitellogenin mRNA 3′-UTR affinity column. Peptide microsequencing revealed that the purified protein was vigilin, a conclusion confirmed in Western blot analysis with antibodies to vigilin. Direct confirmation that vigilin is the VitRNABP was obtained from RNA gel mobility shift assays which demonstrated that antibodies to chicken vigilin supershifted the Xenopus VitRNABP band.Xenopus liver vigilin mRNA and the VitRNABP exhibited similar induction by estrogen, providing additional confirmation that vigilin is the estrogen-inducible protein which binds to the 3′-UTR of estrogen-stabilized vitellogenin mRNA. These data support a role for vigilin in the hormonal control of mRNA metabolism. RNA-binding proteins containing KH domains are widely distributed. One KH domain protein of unknown function, vigilin (also known as the high density lipoprotein-binding protein), contains 14 KH domains and is ubiquitous in vertebrate cells. We previously used RNA gel mobility shift assays to describe an estrogen-inducible protein which binds specifically to a segment of the 3′-untranslated region (3′-UTR) of vitellogenin mRNA, an area which has been implicated in the estrogen-mediated stabilization of vitellogenin mRNA. Here we show that the vitellogenin mRNA-binding protein (VitRNABP) is vigilin. The VitRNABP was isolated as a 150–155-kDa protein on a vitellogenin mRNA 3′-UTR affinity column. Peptide microsequencing revealed that the purified protein was vigilin, a conclusion confirmed in Western blot analysis with antibodies to vigilin. Direct confirmation that vigilin is the VitRNABP was obtained from RNA gel mobility shift assays which demonstrated that antibodies to chicken vigilin supershifted the Xenopus VitRNABP band.Xenopus liver vigilin mRNA and the VitRNABP exhibited similar induction by estrogen, providing additional confirmation that vigilin is the estrogen-inducible protein which binds to the 3′-UTR of estrogen-stabilized vitellogenin mRNA. These data support a role for vigilin in the hormonal control of mRNA metabolism. Post-transcriptional events including nuclear RNA processing and export, localization of RNA within the cell, degradation and stabilization of RNAs, and mRNA translation are increasingly seen as important cellular regulatory sites, whose alteration can contribute to disease states. These processes are largely mediated by RNA-binding proteins (1Nagai K. Mattaj I.W. RNA-Protein Interactions. Oxford University Press, Oxford1994Google Scholar). One important and widely distributed class of RNA-binding proteins contains K homology (KH) 1The abbreviations used are: KH, K homology; FPLC, fast performance liquid chromatography; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; BSA, bovine serum albumin; VitRNABP, vitellogenin mRNA-binding protein; HDL-BP, high density lipoprotein-binding protein; UTR, untranslated region; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; CAPS, 3-(cyclohexylamino)-1-propanesulfonic acid. 1The abbreviations used are: KH, K homology; FPLC, fast performance liquid chromatography; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; BSA, bovine serum albumin; VitRNABP, vitellogenin mRNA-binding protein; HDL-BP, high density lipoprotein-binding protein; UTR, untranslated region; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; CAPS, 3-(cyclohexylamino)-1-propanesulfonic acid. domains (2Burd C.G. Dreyfuss G. Science. 1994; 265: 615-621Crossref PubMed Scopus (1719) Google Scholar). This class of proteins includes such biologically significant KH domain-containing proteins as the FMR protein, which is involved in Fragile X mental retardation (3Siomi H. Siomi M.C. Nussbaum R.L. Dreyfuss G. Cell. 1993; 74: 291-298Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (554) Google Scholar), the Drosophila bicaudal C protein which is important in development (4Mahone M. Saffman E.E. Lasko P.F. EMBO J. 1995; 14: 2043-2055Crossref PubMed Scopus (113) Google Scholar), and the α-poly(C)-binding protein which is found in the α-globin mRNA ribonucleoprotein complex (5Kiledjian M. Wang X. Liebhaber S.A. EMBO J. 1995; 14: 4357-4364Crossref PubMed Scopus (218) Google Scholar). One notable but little understood KH domain protein is vigilin (also identified as the human high density lipoprotein-binding protein, HDL-BP), a ubiquitous, highly conserved protein with 14 KH domains (6Schmidt C. Henkel B. Pöschl E. Zorbas H. Purschke W.G. Gloe T.R. Müller P.K. Eur. J. Biochem. 1992; 206: 625-634Crossref PubMed Scopus (57) Google Scholar, 7McKnight G.L. Reasoner J. Gilbert T. Sundquist K.O. Hokland B. McKernan P.A. Champagne J. Johnson C.J. Bailey M.C. Holly R. O'Hara P.J. Oram J.F. J. Biol. Chem. 1992; 267: 12131-12141Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar). Since vigilin has been found in all cell lines and tissues examined (8Neu-Yilik G. Zorbas H. Gloe T.R. Raabe H.M. Hopp-Christensen T.A. Müller P.K. Eur. J. Biochem. 1993; 213: 727-736Crossref PubMed Scopus (27) Google Scholar), appears to be regulated by diverse factors (7McKnight G.L. Reasoner J. Gilbert T. Sundquist K.O. Hokland B. McKernan P.A. Champagne J. Johnson C.J. Bailey M.C. Holly R. O'Hara P.J. Oram J.F. J. Biol. Chem. 1992; 267: 12131-12141Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar, 8Neu-Yilik G. Zorbas H. Gloe T.R. Raabe H.M. Hopp-Christensen T.A. Müller P.K. Eur. J. Biochem. 1993; 213: 727-736Crossref PubMed Scopus (27) Google Scholar, 9Plenz G. Gan Y. Raabe H.M. Müller P.K. Cell Tissue Res. 1993; 273: 381-389Crossref PubMed Scopus (28) Google Scholar, 10Plenz G. Kügler S. Schnittger S. Rieder H. Fonatsch C. Müller P.K. Hum. Genet. 1994; 93: 575-582Crossref PubMed Scopus (40) Google Scholar, 11Chen Z. Menon K.M.J. Endocrinology. 1994; 134: 2360-2366Crossref PubMed Scopus (14) Google Scholar), and its 14 KH domains represent the largest number of KH domains in any known protein (3Siomi H. Siomi M.C. Nussbaum R.L. Dreyfuss G. Cell. 1993; 74: 291-298Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (554) Google Scholar, 12Musco G. Stier G. Joseph C. Antonietta M. Morelli C. Nilges M. Gibson T.J. Pastore A. Cell. 1996; 85: 237-245Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (248) Google Scholar), it likely plays an important role in RNA metabolism. While vigilin has been used as a model protein in solving the structure of a KH domain uncomplexed to RNA (12Musco G. Stier G. Joseph C. Antonietta M. Morelli C. Nilges M. Gibson T.J. Pastore A. Cell. 1996; 85: 237-245Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (248) Google Scholar), its RNA binding properties have been elusive, and its function(s) have remained obscure. We have been studying a protein which binds to a segment of the 3′-untranslated region (3′-UTR) of the mRNA encoding the egg yolk precursor protein, vitellogenin. In male Xenopus liver, vitellogenin mRNA levels increase >10,000-fold following estrogen administration (13Brock M.L. Shapiro D.J. J. Biol. Chem. 1982; 258: 5449-5455Google Scholar, 14Brock M.L. Shapiro D.J. Cell. 1983; 34: 207-214Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (282) Google Scholar). The estrogen-mediated induction of vitellogenin mRNA is brought about both by an increase in the rate of vitellogenin gene transcription and by stabilization of cytoplasmic vitellogenin mRNA (13Brock M.L. Shapiro D.J. J. Biol. Chem. 1982; 258: 5449-5455Google Scholar, 14Brock M.L. Shapiro D.J. Cell. 1983; 34: 207-214Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (282) Google Scholar). Hepatic vitellogenin mRNA is degraded with a half-life of 16 h in the absence of estrogen, and 500 h following addition of estrogen to the culture medium (14Brock M.L. Shapiro D.J. Cell. 1983; 34: 207-214Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (282) Google Scholar). The estrogen-mediated stabilization of vitellogenin mRNA requires association of the mRNA with ribosomes (15Blume J.E. Shapiro D.J. Nucleic Acids Res. 1989; 17: 9003-9014Crossref PubMed Scopus (44) Google Scholar) and involves the 3′-UTR of the mRNA (16Nielsen D.A. Shapiro D.J. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1990; 10: 371-376Crossref PubMed Scopus (45) Google Scholar). We identified a protein which binds specifically to a segment of the 3′-UTR of vitellogenin mRNA in an estrogen-inducible manner and named it the vitellogenin mRNA 3′-UTR-binding protein (VitRNABP) (17Dodson R.E. Shapiro D.J. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1994; 14: 3130-3138Crossref PubMed Google Scholar, 18Dodson R.E. Acena M.R. Shapiro D.J. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 1995; 52: 505-515Crossref PubMed Scopus (11) Google Scholar). Here we describe the isolation of the VitRNABP and demonstrate by several criteria that this protein is Xenopus vigilin. A protein mixture from salt-extracted polysomes from livers of estrogen-treated maleXenopus laevis was prepared as we have described (17Dodson R.E. Shapiro D.J. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1994; 14: 3130-3138Crossref PubMed Google Scholar). The pB1-15pA used in affinity chromatography was made by cloning theHindIII-DraI fragment of pB1-15 (17Dodson R.E. Shapiro D.J. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1994; 14: 3130-3138Crossref PubMed Google Scholar) into theHindIII-SmaI site of pSP64pA (Promega). B1-15pA RNA was made by in vitro transcription from the SP6 promoter of the pB1-15pA vector linearized with EcoRI yielding a 146-nucleotide RNA. Poly(U)-agarose beads (Pharmacia Biotech Inc.) were prepared by rinsing (i) once in 4 volumes of water, (ii) once in wash buffer (25 mm HEPES, pH 7.4, 10 mm EDTA, 1 mm EGTA, 0.05 m NaCl), and (iii) six times in binding buffer (25 mm HEPES, pH 7.4, 10 mmEDTA, 1 mm EGTA, 1 m LiCl). pB1-15pA RNA (approximately 4 μg of RNA/μl of beads) was added to the beads in 2 volumes of binding buffer and allowed to hybridize for 5–6 h at room temperature. The beads were kept in suspension by rotation. The beads were washed twice in hybridization buffer (HB) (6 mm Tris, pH 7.6, 6% glycerol, 1 mm EDTA, 0.01 mm EGTA, 0.25 mm magnesium acetate) with 50 mm NaCl and once in HB with 50 mm NaCl containing 1 μg/μl yeast tRNA, 1 μg/μl heparin, 0.3 unit/μl RNasin, and protease inhibitors (17Dodson R.E. Shapiro D.J. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1994; 14: 3130-3138Crossref PubMed Google Scholar). The beads were then incubated with the polysome extract in HB with tRNA, heparin, RNasin, and protease inhibitors with 200 μg of polysome extract per 20 μl of beads in a 300-μl total volume for 30 min at room temperature. The beads were then washed in buffer containing 200 mm KCl, 2.5 mm magnesium acetate, 10 mm Tris, pH 7.6, 10% glycerol, 0.1 mm EGTA, 1 mm EDTA, 1 mmdithiothreitol, and protease inhibitors. Proteins were eluted in the above buffer containing 500 mm KCl. Eluted proteins were resolved on a 7.5% SDS-PAGE gel (19Laemmli U.K. Nature. 1970; 227: 680-685Crossref PubMed Scopus (205516) Google Scholar) and visualized using a silver stain (20Ausubel F.M. Brent R. Kingston R.E. Moore D.D. Seidman J.G. Smith J.A. Struhl K. Current Protocols in Molecular Biology.2. Greene Publishing Associates and Wiley-Interscience, New York1989Google Scholar). For microsequencing, resolved proteins were transferred to a ProBlott membrane (Applied Biosystems) in 10 mm CAPS, pH 10, with 10% methanol at 50 V for 3 h and stained in Amido Black (21Fernandez J. Andrews S. Mische S.M. Anal. Biochem. 1994; 218: 112-118Crossref PubMed Scopus (143) Google Scholar). The 150-kDa protein was cut from the membrane and sent to the Rockefeller University Technology Center (New York, NY) for digestion with endoproteinase Lys-C and internal sequencing (21Fernandez J. Andrews S. Mische S.M. Anal. Biochem. 1994; 218: 112-118Crossref PubMed Scopus (143) Google Scholar). For FPLC analysis, protein extracts were concentrated using Microcon 30 or 50 filters to about 0.25 original volume. Protein (1.2 mg) was loaded onto a Superdex 200 HR 10/30 column (Pharmacia) and resolved using a Pharmacia FPLC System at a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min at 4 °C. A total of 25 ml of buffer (10 mm Tris, pH 7.6, 200 mm KCl, 1 mm EDTA, 1 mmdithiothreitol, 5 μg/ml phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) was used to elute proteins in 0.5-ml fractions. Proteins eluting from the column were monitored at 280 nm. Fractions were assayed using the RNA gel mobility shift assay, and band intensities were determined using a PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics) or a densitometer. Total RNA was isolated from livers of control or estrogen-treated X. laevis as described (22Baker H.J. Shapiro D.J. J. Biol. Chem. 1977; 252: 8434-8438Google Scholar). RNA was resolved on a 0.75% formaldehyde-agarose gel, transferred to a Nytran membrane (Schleicher and Schuell) and hybridized to cDNA probes as described (23Barton M.C. Shapiro D.J. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1988; 85: 7119-7123Crossref PubMed Scopus (71) Google Scholar). cDNA was radiolabeled with [32P]dCTP by nick translation or random priming using standard methods (20Ausubel F.M. Brent R. Kingston R.E. Moore D.D. Seidman J.G. Smith J.A. Struhl K. Current Protocols in Molecular Biology.2. Greene Publishing Associates and Wiley-Interscience, New York1989Google Scholar). Ribosomal RNA band intensity was used to control for loading of samples. Intensities of labeled bands were determined using a PhosphorImager. Oligonucleotides for PCR were made to two conserved regions in the 5′ portion of vigilin corresponding to nucleotide numbers 213–243 and 315–340 in the chicken vigilin sequence (GenBankTM accession numberX65292) (6Schmidt C. Henkel B. Pöschl E. Zorbas H. Purschke W.G. Gloe T.R. Müller P.K. Eur. J. Biochem. 1992; 206: 625-634Crossref PubMed Scopus (57) Google Scholar). Xenopus liver RNA (10 μg) was PCR-amplified using the above oligonucleotides (24White B. PCR Protocols, Methods in Molecular Biology.15. Humana Press Inc., Lake Clifton, NJ1994Google Scholar), gel-purified, and radiolabeled by nick translation. The labeled 128-nucleotide cDNA was used to screen a X. laevis liver cDNA library (25Pastori R.L. Moskaitis J.E. Smith Jr., L.H. Schoenberg D.R. Biochemistry. 1990; 29: 2599-2605Crossref PubMed Scopus (22) Google Scholar). A positive clone was identified, plaque-purified, and excised, and its 980 nucleotide insert was subcloned into pGEM3 (Promega). This clone is referred to as pVIG10. Gel mobility shift assays were performed as we have described (17Dodson R.E. Shapiro D.J. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1994; 14: 3130-3138Crossref PubMed Google Scholar) with the following modifications. Antiserum (42 μg) was added to the hybridization mixture in the absence of RNA probe for 45 min at 4 °C. RNA probe was then added, and the incubation was continued for an additional 45 min before gel analysis. Rabbit antibody to a segment of recombinant vigilin was a kind gift from Drs. S. Kügler and P. K. Müller (26Kügler S. Grünweller A. Probst C. Klinger M. Müller P.K. Kruse C. FEBS Lett. 1996; 382: 330-334Crossref PubMed Scopus (40) Google Scholar). Rabbit anti-BSA was a gift from S. Miklasz. Western blot analysis was done as described previously (27Wren C.K. Katzenellenbogen B.S. Mol. Endocrinol. 1990; 4: 1647-1654Crossref PubMed Scopus (39) Google Scholar), except that sodium azide was not added to buffers, SDS (0.1%) was added to the transfer buffer, and blots were transferred at 60 mA (14 V) overnight at 4 °C. Anti-vigilin antiserum was diluted 1:1500 and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit second antibody (EY Laboratories) was used at a 1:2000 dilution. Bands were visualized with an ECL kit (Amersham). We described the VitRNABP as an estrogen-inducible protein which bound to a segment of the vitellogenin mRNA 3′-UTR in RNA gel mobility shift assays and in UV cross-linking experiments (17Dodson R.E. Shapiro D.J. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1994; 14: 3130-3138Crossref PubMed Google Scholar). We used RNA affinity chromatography to isolate the VitRNABP. A 94-nucleotide segment of the vitellogenin mRNA 3′-UTR with a 30-nucleotide poly(A) tail, which is efficiently bound by the VitRNABP, was immobilized on poly(U)-agarose beads by hybridization. A salt extract of polysomes prepared from the livers of 14-day estrogen-treated male X. laevis was incubated with the RNA affinity column, and control extracts were incubated with the poly(U)-agarose. Bound proteins were eluted in 500 mm salt and resolved on an SDS-PAGE gel. As shown in Fig. 1 A, a predominant protein band of approximately 150–155 kDa, which appeared as a very closely spaced doublet, was eluted from the agarose beads containing the vitellogenin mRNA segment (Fig. 1 A, lane 2), but not from control poly(U)-agarose beads (Fig. 1 A, lane 3). RNA binding activity and the presence of the 150–155-kDa band were well correlated since the eluate from the B1-15pA RNA beads, but not the eluate from the poly(U) beads, bound RNA in the RNA gel mobility shift assay (data not shown). We next determined whether the vitellogenin mRNA 3′-UTR binding activity was in the same 150–155-kDa molecular mass range as the protein purified by the RNA affinity column. Since we have been unable to reconstitute mRNA binding after denaturing the protein, we size-fractionated a concentrated polysome extract under native conditions. Proteins eluted from the FPLC sizing column were assayed using the RNA gel mobility shift assay. As shown in Fig.2, peak binding activity corresponded to a molecular mass range of 145–190 kDa, which was consistent with the 150–155-kDa protein being the VitRNABP. The 150–155-kDa protein was enriched by RNA affinity chromatography (Fig.1 A), size-fractionated on an SDS-polyacrylamide gel, transferred to a membrane, and submitted for microsequencing. Internal sequencing of one of the peptide fragments yielded the sequence; N(R/V)IRIEQDPQXVQQA. This sequence was used to search a protein sequence data base (Wisconsin Sequence Analysis Package of the Genetics Computer Group). Twelve out of fifteen amino acids were identical to those in chicken vigilin (amino acids 478–492) (6Schmidt C. Henkel B. Pöschl E. Zorbas H. Purschke W.G. Gloe T.R. Müller P.K. Eur. J. Biochem. 1992; 206: 625-634Crossref PubMed Scopus (57) Google Scholar) and the human HDL-BP (amino acids 479–493) (7McKnight G.L. Reasoner J. Gilbert T. Sundquist K.O. Hokland B. McKernan P.A. Champagne J. Johnson C.J. Bailey M.C. Holly R. O'Hara P.J. Oram J.F. J. Biol. Chem. 1992; 267: 12131-12141Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar). Since vigilin and HDL-BP are the independently identified avian and human forms of the same protein, we subsequently refer to this protein as vigilin. To verify that the protein we purified as the VitRNABP was vigilin, a second peptide was sequenced. The sequence of this peptide, VI(S/T)QIR had a 5- out of 6-amino acid match with both the chicken and human sequences, confirming that the protein sequenced was vigilin. To ensure that the isolated protein was Xenopus vigilin, a Western blot of the protein from the RNA affinity beads was probed with antibodies to a segment of recombinant chicken vigilin, expressed inEscherichia coli and affinity-purified (26Kügler S. Grünweller A. Probst C. Klinger M. Müller P.K. Kruse C. FEBS Lett. 1996; 382: 330-334Crossref PubMed Scopus (40) Google Scholar). In Western blots using crude polysome extracts, the antibody reacts with a single protein (Fig. 1 B, lane 1) which is the same size as the protein shown to be vigilin by microsequencing. The protein eluted from the B1-15pA affinity beads is also specifically recognized by the antibody (Fig. 1 B, lane 2) and on shorter exposures can be seen to be a doublet (data not shown). Although this is a polyclonal antibody, in agreement with previous reports (26Kügler S. Grünweller A. Probst C. Klinger M. Müller P.K. Kruse C. FEBS Lett. 1996; 382: 330-334Crossref PubMed Scopus (40) Google Scholar), we see no cross-reactivity with other proteins. Since the elution pattern was identical in both the SDS-PAGE gels and Western blots, we were confident that the isolated protein was indeed vigilin. While these data demonstrated that the protein purified by affinity chromatography was vigilin, and that vigilin was approximately the same size as the VitRNABP, it was still important to directly establish that the protein bound to the vitellogenin mRNA 3′-UTR in our gel mobility shift assays was vigilin. If the VitRNABP was indeedXenopus vigilin, antibodies to vigilin added to the RNA gel mobility shift assays should alter the mobility of the VitRNABP·RNA complex. In an RNA gel mobility shift assay, the VitRNABP in a polysome extract formed a specific complex with a radiolabeled probe containing a segment of the vitellogenin mRNA 3′-UTR (Fig.3 A, lane 2). Addition of antibody to vigilin supershifted this complex (Fig. 3 A, lane 4). Since this is a polyclonal antibody, the number of antibody molecules that can bind to each gel-shifted complex is variable, and some tailing of the supershifted band is observed (Fig. 3 A,lane 4 and Fig. 3 B, lane 2). This supershift was specific for anti-vigilin, since it did not occur when a control antibody to bovine serum albumin was used (Fig. 3 A,lane 6). Control experiments also showed that the antibodies alone did not interact with the RNA probe (Fig. 3 A,lanes 3 and 5). By increasing the ratio of anti-vigilin antibody to polysome extract, we were able to almost completely supershift the VitRNABP·RNA complex (Fig. 3 B), indicating that vigilin is present in all of the complexes with the vitellogenin mRNA 3′-UTR segment. Since we had previously reported that the VitRNABP was estrogen-inducible (17Dodson R.E. Shapiro D.J. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1994; 14: 3130-3138Crossref PubMed Google Scholar), we wanted to determine whetherXenopus vigilin mRNA was also regulated by estrogen. We therefore isolated and sequenced a 980-nucleotide Xenopusvigilin cDNA clone (see "Experimental Procedures") with a high homology to sequences at the 5′-end of chicken and human vigilin. TheXenopus vigilin cDNA showed a 74% and 76% nucleotide identity with the chicken and human vigilin cDNAs, respectively, and an 86% identity to amino acid sequences from both species. To compare the regulation of Xenopus vigilin mRNA levels and vitellogenin mRNA 3′-UTR binding activity, three animals each were treated with vehicle or estrogen, total RNA was isolated from half the liver, and whole cell protein extracts were prepared from the other half. Consistent with our earlier work (17Dodson R.E. Shapiro D.J. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1994; 14: 3130-3138Crossref PubMed Google Scholar, 18Dodson R.E. Acena M.R. Shapiro D.J. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 1995; 52: 505-515Crossref PubMed Scopus (11) Google Scholar), binding activity in RNA gel shift assays from liver extracts from estrogen-inducedXenopus liver was about 3-fold higher than in control extracts (Fig. 4 B). In agreement with the RNA gel shift data, Northern blot analysis showed that a predominant 5.7-kilobase vigilin mRNA was induced 2–3-fold after estrogen administration (Fig. 4, A and B). Its broad distribution and the presence of 14 KH domains suggested an important, but unidentified, role for vigilin in RNA metabolism. In this work we show that vigilin is the estrogen-inducible protein we previously demonstrated binds to a segment of the vitellogenin mRNA 3′-UTR. This conclusion is supported by our findings that: vigilin is retained on a vitellogenin mRNA 3′-UTR affinity column; in gel shift assays, vigilin antiserum binds to the VitRNABP; the mRNA binding activity and vigilin are approximately the same size; and both are induced by estrogen. We now refer to the VitRNABP as vigilin. Vigilin has been proposed to be an RNA-binding protein because of its numerous KH domains (3Siomi H. Siomi M.C. Nussbaum R.L. Dreyfuss G. Cell. 1993; 74: 291-298Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (554) Google Scholar) but to date had only been shown to bind tRNA (28Kruse C. Grünweller A. Notbohn H. Kügler S. Purschke W.G. Müller P.K. Biochimie. 1996; 320: 247-252Crossref Scopus (43) Google Scholar). Our work demonstrates for the first time that vigilin can bind to an mRNA. We previously reported that the affinity for the vitellogenin mRNA 3′-UTR was orders of magnitude greater than that for tRNA (17Dodson R.E. Shapiro D.J. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1994; 14: 3130-3138Crossref PubMed Google Scholar). Since vigilin is present in a wide variety of tissues and cell types and is regulated by diverse factors, it almost certainly binds to RNAs other than vitellogenin mRNA. The relative binding affinity of vigilin for different RNA sequences may play a role in its function in different tissues. The exact determinants of RNA binding specificity remain to be determined and may involve specific KH domains within vigilin and proteins which associate with vigilin. The nucleic acid binding properties of individual KH domains vary (29Dejgaard K. Leffers H. Eur. J. Biochem. 1996; 241: 425-431Crossref PubMed Scopus (101) Google Scholar). The 14 KH domains in vigilin may therefore interact on different RNA templates to create different binding surfaces, allowing vigilin to bind to a diverse array of RNAs. It is possible that other proteins may associate with the vigilin·RNA complex and play a role in creating binding specificity. Although other proteins which might play a role in RNA binding are not yet identified, there are several minor proteins in the vitellogenin mRNA affinity column eluent which may contribute to this function. The ability of vigilin to bind the vitellogenin mRNA 3′-UTR suggests that it may be involved in mRNA stabilization. Since the 3′-UTR of vitellogenin mRNA is critical for estrogen-mediated stabilization (16Nielsen D.A. Shapiro D.J. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1990; 10: 371-376Crossref PubMed Scopus (45) Google Scholar), and vigilin is the major protein which binds to this region (17Dodson R.E. Shapiro D.J. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1994; 14: 3130-3138Crossref PubMed Google Scholar), we have proposed that vigilin is involved in the stabilization of the message. Other KH domain-containing proteins have been shown to be involved in RNA stabilization (5Kiledjian M. Wang X. Liebhaber S.A. EMBO J. 1995; 14: 4357-4364Crossref PubMed Scopus (218) Google Scholar), and vigilin has been reported to protect tRNA from RNase (28Kruse C. Grünweller A. Notbohn H. Kügler S. Purschke W.G. Müller P.K. Biochimie. 1996; 320: 247-252Crossref Scopus (43) Google Scholar). Other functions have been proposed for vigilin based on its intracellular distribution (26Kügler S. Grünweller A. Probst C. Klinger M. Müller P.K. Kruse C. FEBS Lett. 1996; 382: 330-334Crossref PubMed Scopus (40) Google Scholar). Additional studies will be required to determine the role of vigilin in mRNA stabilization and any additional functions it may serve. While a clear role for vigilin has not been established, its tight regulation accentuates its importance in RNA metabolism. We have shown that vigilin levels are increased by estrogen in liver (Fig. 4 and Refs. 17Dodson R.E. Shapiro D.J. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1994; 14: 3130-3138Crossref PubMed Google Scholar and 18Dodson R.E. Acena M.R. Shapiro D.J. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 1995; 52: 505-515Crossref PubMed Scopus (11) Google Scholar) and by testosterone in muscle, and that it is decreased by testosterone in testis (18Dodson R.E. Acena M.R. Shapiro D.J. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 1995; 52: 505-515Crossref PubMed Scopus (11) Google Scholar). Our findings are consistent with reports in several experimental models that vigilin can be regulated by several factors and that increased levels of vigilin correlate with increased protein production (8Neu-Yilik G. Zorbas H. Gloe T.R. Raabe H.M. Hopp-Christensen T.A. Müller P.K. Eur. J. Biochem. 1993; 213: 727-736Crossref PubMed Scopus (27) Google Scholar, 9Plenz G. Gan Y. Raabe H.M. Müller P.K. Cell Tissue Res. 1993; 273: 381-389Crossref PubMed Scopus (28) Google Scholar, 11Chen Z. Menon K.M.J. Endocrinology. 1994; 134: 2360-2366Crossref PubMed Scopus (14) Google Scholar, 30Rumpel E. Kruse C. Müller P.K. Kühnel W. Ann. Anat. Anatomischer Anzeiger. 1996; 178: 337-344Crossref PubMed Scopus (11) Google Scholar). Vigilin has been localized immunocytochemically to polysomes (8Neu-Yilik G. Zorbas H. Gloe T.R. Raabe H.M. Hopp-Christensen T.A. Müller P.K. Eur. J. Biochem. 1993; 213: 727-736Crossref PubMed Scopus (27) Google Scholar), and we have extracted vigilin from liver polysomes indicating its association with cytoplasmic RNA. In a situation such as the estrogen-induced liver inXenopus, where vitellogenin is 50% of the total cellular mRNA (31Shapiro D.J. Barton M.C. McKearin D.M. Chang T.-C. Lew D. Blume J. Nielsen D.A. Gould L. Recent Prog. Horm. Res. 1989; 45: 29-64PubMed Google Scholar), a substantial fraction of intracellular vigilin may be bound to the relatively high affinity binding site in the vitellogenin mRNA 3′-UTR. Our findings are also in agreement with the ubiquitous distribution of vigilin, since we have found vigilin in allXenopus tissues we have examined and in several cell lines (18Dodson R.E. Acena M.R. Shapiro D.J. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 1995; 52: 505-515Crossref PubMed Scopus (11) Google Scholar). In conclusion, we have identified vigilin, a widely distributed protein containing 14 RNA binding domains, as the estrogen-regulated protein which binds to the 3′-UTR of vitellogenin mRNA. Our data provide the first evidence that vigilin can bind a specific mRNA and suggest a role for vigilin in mRNA metabolism. Protein sequence data were obtained at the Rockefeller University Protein/DNA Technology Center, which is supported in part by National Institutes of Health shared instrumentation grants and by funds provided by the U.S. Army and Navy for purchase of equipment. We thank S. Kügler and P. K. Müller for the gift of vigilin antiserum and D. Schoenberg for providing the Xenopus cDNA library. We would also like to thank J. Gerlt and members of his laboratory for assistance with the FPLC.
Referência(s)