Mate choice decisions by parasitized female upland bullies, Gobiomorphus breviceps
1994; Royal Society; Volume: 256; Issue: 1346 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1098/rspb.1994.0068
ISSN1471-2954
Autores Tópico(s)Parasite Biology and Host Interactions
ResumoRestricted accessMoreSectionsView PDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail Cite this article Poulin Robert 1994Mate choice decisions by parasitized female upland bullies, Gobiomorphus brevicepsProc. R. Soc. Lond. B.256183–187http://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1994.0068SectionRestricted accessArticleMate choice decisions by parasitized female upland bullies, Gobiomorphus breviceps Robert Poulin Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Search for more papers by this author Robert Poulin Google Scholar Find this author on PubMed Published:23 May 1994https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1994.0068AbstractParasites can affect mate choice, and may have driven the evolution of secondary sexual characteristics. However, all attention thus far has been focused on how parasites of males make their host less attractive to females; how parasites of females affect the mate choice decisions of their host is unknown. Parasitized females, because of depleted energy reserves and poorer physical condition, may invest less time and energy in discriminating among mates than unparasitized females. I examined mate choice decisions of female upland bullies (Gobiomorphus breviceps) harbouring trematode cysts known to affect physical condition and risk of predation. In standard mate choice tests, heavily parasitized female bullies made fewer mate inspections and were more likely to choose lower-quality mates than lightly parasitized females. Fecundity, however, had no detectable effect on mate choice decisions of female bullies. The potential of parasites as a driving force in sexual selection and the evolution of male secondary sexual traits may therefore be reduced by their negative effects on female choosiness.FootnotesThis text was harvested from a scanned image of the original document using optical character recognition (OCR) software. As such, it may contain errors. Please contact the Royal Society if you find an error you would like to see corrected. Mathematical notations produced through Infty OCR. Previous ArticleNext Article VIEW FULL TEXT DOWNLOAD PDF FiguresRelatedReferencesDetailsCited by De Simone G, Pompilio L, Manrique G and Bertram S (2020) Females of a blood‐sucking bug may adjust their mating decisions according to the risk of ovipositing infertile eggs, Ethology, 10.1111/eth.12997, 126:5, (493-502), Online publication date: 1-May-2020. Mattson C, Roberts N and Mendelson T (2020) Male preference for conspecific females depends on male size in the splendid darter, Etheostoma barrenense, Animal Behaviour, 10.1016/j.anbehav.2020.04.022, 165, (89-96), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2020. Han C, Brooks R and Dingemanse N (2020) Condition-Dependent Mutual Mate Preference and Intersexual Genetic Correlations for Mating Activity, The American Naturalist, 10.1086/708497, 195:6, (997-1008), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2020. Ah-King M (2019) Flexible Mate Choice Encyclopedia of Animal Behavior, 10.1016/B978-0-12-809633-8.01280-2, (421-431), . Billings A, Schultz K, Hernandez E, Jones W and Price D (2018) Male courtship behaviors and female choice reduced during experimental starvation stress, Behavioral Ecology, 10.1093/beheco/ary144, 30:1, (231-239), Online publication date: 4-Mar-2019. Astaraki M, Rasekh A, Shishehbor P and Mahi H (2019) Mate choice in the parasitoid Lysiphlebus fabarum is conditioned by host species and influences progeny fitness, Biological Control, 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2019.01.001, 131, (8-17), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2019. Kuczynski M, Getty T and Gering E (2017) Larger females are choosier in the gray treefrog (Hyla versicolor), Behavioural Processes, 10.1016/j.beproc.2016.11.019, 135, (29-35), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2017. Kalb N, Lindström K, Sprenger D, Anthes N and Heubel K (2016) Male personality and female spawning consistency in a goby with exclusive male care, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 10.1007/s00265-016-2089-z, 70:5, (683-693), Online publication date: 1-May-2016. Pompilio L, González Franco M, Chisari L and Manrique G Female choosiness and mating opportunities in the blood-sucking bug Rhodnius prolixus, Behaviour, 10.1163/1568539X-00003395, 153:15, (1863-1878) Ah‐King M and Gowaty P (2016) A conceptual review of mate choice: stochastic demography, within‐sex phenotypic plasticity, and individual flexibility, Ecology and Evolution, 10.1002/ece3.2197, 6:14, (4607-4642), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2016. Burris Z and Dam H (2015) Resource and mate availability, and previous social experience modulate mate choice in the copepods Acartia tonsa and Acartia hudsonica, Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 10.1016/j.jembe.2015.06.009, 471, (180-189), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2015. Ah-King M and Gowaty P (2015) Reaction Norms of Sex and Adaptive Individual Flexibility in Reproductive Decisions Current Perspectives on Sexual Selection, 10.1007/978-94-017-9585-2_10, (211-234), . Landis S, Sundin J, Rosenqvist G, Poirier M, Jørgensen G and Roth O (2015) Female pipefish can detect the immune status of their mates, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 10.1007/s00265-015-2004-z, 69:12, (1917-1923), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2015. Mensink P, Geange S and Shima J (2014) Reproductive success of parasitized males in a marine reef fish, Marine Biology, 10.1007/s00227-014-2533-4, 161:11, (2689-2696), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2014. Judge K, Ting J and Gwynne D (2014) Condition dependence of female choosiness in a field cricket, Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 10.1111/jeb.12509, 27:11, (2529-2540), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2014. Gowaty P and Hubbell S (2012) The evolutionary origins of mating failures and multiple mating, Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 10.1111/eea.12023, 146:1, (11-25), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2013. Meuche I, Brusa O, Linsenmair K, Keller A and Pröhl H (2013) Only distance matters – non-choosy females in a poison frog population, Frontiers in Zoology, 10.1186/1742-9994-10-29, 10:1, (29), . Beckers O and Wagner W (2013) Parasitoid infestation changes female mating preferences, Animal Behaviour, 10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.01.025, 85:4, (791-796), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2013. Castellano S, Cadeddu G and Cermelli P (2012) Computational mate choice: Theory and empirical evidence, Behavioural Processes, 10.1016/j.beproc.2012.02.010, 90:2, (261-277), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2012. Wilgers D and Hebets E (2011) Age-related female mating decisions are condition dependent in wolf spiders, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 10.1007/s00265-011-1248-5, 66:1, (29-38), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2012. Raveh S, Heg D, Dobson F, Coltman D, Gorrell J, Balmer A, Röösli S and Neuhaus P (2011) No experimental effects of parasite load on male mating behaviour and reproductive success, Animal Behaviour, 10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.06.018, 82:4, (673-682), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2011. Mikheev V (2009) Combined effects of predators and parasites on shoaling behavior of fishes, Journal of Ichthyology, 10.1134/S0032945209110034, 49:11, (1032-1041), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2009. Candolin U and Salesto T (2009) Does Competition Allow Male Mate Choosiness in Threespine Sticklebacks?, The American Naturalist, 10.1086/595753, 173:2, (273-277), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2009. Gowaty P and Hubbell S (2009) Reproductive decisions under ecological constraints: It's about time, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 10.1073/pnas.0901130106, 106:Supplement_1, (10017-10024), Online publication date: 16-Jun-2009. Lehtonen T and Lindström K (2008) Repeatability of mating preferences in the sand goby, Animal Behaviour, 10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.04.011, 75:1, (55-61), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2008. Ahnesjö I, Forsgren E and Kvarnemo C (2008) Variation in Sexual Selection in Fishes Fish Behaviour, 10.1201/b10757-11, (303-335), Online publication date: 9-Jan-2008. Candolin U and Wong B (2008) Mate Choice Fish Behaviour, 10.1201/b10757-12, (337-376), Online publication date: 9-Jan-2008. Hebets E, Wesson J and Shamble P (2008) Diet influences mate choice selectivity in adult female wolf spiders, Animal Behaviour, 10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.12.021, 76:2, (355-363), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2008. Koga T (2007) A trematode infection with no effect on reproductive success of a sand-bubbler crab, Ecological Research, 10.1007/s11284-007-0409-5, 23:3, (557-563), Online publication date: 1-May-2008. Aguilar T, Maia R, Santos E and Macedo R (2007) Parasite levels in blue-black grassquits correlate with male displays but not female mate preference, Behavioral Ecology, 10.1093/beheco/arm130, 19:2, (292-301), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2008., Online publication date: 1-Mar-2008. Kempenaers B (2007) Mate Choice and Genetic Quality: A Review of the Heterozygosity Theory , 10.1016/S0065-3454(07)37005-8, (189-278), . Lynch K, Crews D, Ryan M and Wilczynski W (2006) Hormonal state influences aspects of female mate choice in the Túngara Frog (Physalaemus pustulosus), Hormones and Behavior, 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2005.10.001, 49:4, (450-457), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2006. Cotton S, Small J and Pomiankowski A (2006) Sexual Selection and Condition-Dependent Mate Preferences, Current Biology, 10.1016/j.cub.2006.08.022, 16:17, (R755-R765), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2006. Hunt J, Brooks R and Jennions M (2005) Female Mate Choice as a Condition‐Dependent Life‐History Trait, The American Naturalist, 10.1086/430672, 166:1, (79-92), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2005. Pélabon C, Borg Å, Bjelvenmark J, Barber I, Forsgren E and Amundsen T (2005) Do microsporidian parasites affect courtship in two-spotted gobies?, Marine Biology, 10.1007/s00227-005-0056-8, 148:1, (189-196), Online publication date: 1-Nov-2005. Lefebvre F, Fredensborg B, Armstrong A, Hansen E and Poulin R (2005) Assortative pairing in the amphipod Paracalliope fluviatilis: a role for parasites?, Hydrobiologia, 10.1007/s10750-005-2211-0, 545:1, (65-73), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2005. Kavaliers M, Choleris E, Ågmo A and Pfaff D (2004) Olfactory-mediated parasite recognition and avoidance: linking genes to behavior, Hormones and Behavior, 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2004.03.005, 46:3, (272-283), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2004. Mazzi D (2004) Parasites make male pipefish careless, Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00704.x, 17:3, (519-527) Gowaty P (2004) Sex roles, contests for the control of reproduction, and sexual selection Sexual Selection in Primates, 10.1017/CBO9780511542459.005, (37-54) Córdoba-Aguilar A, Salamanca-Ocaña J and Lopezaraiza M (2003) Female reproductive decisions and parasite burden in a calopterygid damselfly (Insecta: Odonata), Animal Behaviour, 10.1006/anbe.2003.2198, 66:1, (81-87), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2003. Klein S (2003) Parasite manipulation of the proximate mechanisms that mediate social behavior in vertebrates, Physiology & Behavior, 10.1016/S0031-9384(03)00163-X, 79:3, (441-449), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2003. Field S, Schirp H and Michiels N (2003) The influence of Monocystis sp. infection on growth and mating behaviour of the earthworm Lumbricus terrestris , Canadian Journal of Zoology, 10.1139/z03-110, 81:7, (1161-1167), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2003. Rolff J (2002) Bateman's principle and immunity, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 269:1493, (867-872), Online publication date: 22-Apr-2002. Barber I (2005) Parasites, male‐male competition and female mate choice in the sand goby, Journal of Fish Biology, 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2002.tb01745.x, 61:1, (185-198), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2002. Pfennig K and Tinsley R (2002) Different mate preferences by parasitized and unparasitized females potentially reduces sexual selection, Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2002.00406.x, 15:3, (399-406) Kelly A, Hatcher M, Evans L and Dunn A (2001) Mate choice and mate guarding under the influence of a vertically transmitted, parasitic sex ratio distorter, Animal Behaviour, 10.1006/anbe.2000.1644, 61:4, (763-770), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2001. Sandland G and Goater C (2001) PARASITE-INDUCED VARIATION IN HOST MORPHOLOGY: BRAIN-ENCYSTING TREMATODES IN FATHEAD MINNOWS, Journal of Parasitology, 10.1645/0022-3395(2001)087[0267:PIVIHM]2.0.CO;2, 87:2, (267-272), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2001. Hingle A, Fowler K and Pomiankowski A (2001) Size-dependent mate preference in the stalk-eyed fly Cyrtodiopsis dalmanni, Animal Behaviour, 10.1006/anbe.2000.1613, 61:3, (589-595), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2001. Hamilton W and Poulin R (1999) Female preference and male nuptial colouration in the freshwater fish Gobiomorphus breviceps : geographic variation among populations , Canadian Journal of Zoology, 10.1139/z98-224, 77:3, (463-469), Online publication date: 1-Sep-1999. Thomas , Oget , Gente , Desmots and Renaud (2001) Assortative pairing with respect to parasite load in the beetle Timarcha maritima (Chrysomelidae) , Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 10.1046/j.1420-9101.1999.00042.x, 12:2, (385-390), Online publication date: 1-Mar-1999. ZUK M, KIM T, ROBINSON S and JOHNSEN T (1998) Parasites influence social rank and morphology, but not mate choice, in female red junglefowl,Gallus gallus, Animal Behaviour, 10.1006/anbe.1998.0807, 56:2, (493-499), Online publication date: 1-Aug-1998. James K and Poulin R (2005) The effects of perceived competition and parasitism on the foraging behaviour of the upland bully (Eleotridae), Journal of Fish Biology, 10.1111/j.1095-8649.1998.tb01835.x, 53:4, (827-834), Online publication date: 1-Oct-1998. Kavaliers M, Colwell D and Choleris E (1998) Parasitized female mice display reduced aversive responses to the odours of infected males, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 10.1098/rspb.1998.0406, 265:1401, (1111-1118), Online publication date: 22-Jun-1998. FORSGREN E (1997) Mate sampling in a population of sand gobies, Animal Behaviour, 10.1006/anbe.1996.0374, 53:2, (267-276), Online publication date: 1-Feb-1997. JENNIONS M and PETRIE M (2007) VARIATION IN MATE CHOICE AND MATING PREFERENCES: A REVIEW OF CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES, Biological Reviews, 10.1111/j.1469-185X.1997.tb00015.x, 72:2, (283-327) Stott M and Poulin R (1996) Parasites and parental care in male upland bullies (Eleotridae), Journal of Fish Biology, 10.1111/j.1095-8649.1996.tb01119.x, 48:2, (283-291), Online publication date: 1-Feb-1996. Head M, Wong B, Brooks R and Mappes T (2010) Sexual Display and Mate Choice in an Energetically Costly Environment, PLoS ONE, 10.1371/journal.pone.0015279, 5:12, (e15279) This Issue23 May 1994Volume 256Issue 1346 Article InformationDOI:https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1994.0068Published by:Royal SocietyPrint ISSN:0962-8452Online ISSN:1471-2954History: Manuscript received07/02/1994Manuscript accepted28/02/1994Published online01/01/1997Published in print23/05/1994 License:Scanned images copyright © 2017, Royal Society Citations and impact Large datasets are available through Proceedings B's partnership with Dryad
Referência(s)