On the Fitness of Behavior Sequences
1976; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 110; Issue: 974 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1086/283093
ISSN1537-5323
AutoresRichard M. Sibly, David McFarland,
Tópico(s)Marine animal studies overview
ResumoPrevious articleNext article No AccessOn the Fitness of Behavior SequencesRichard Sibly and David McFarlandRichard Sibly and David McFarlandPDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The American Naturalist Volume 110, Number 974Jul. - Aug., 1976 Published for The American Society of Naturalists Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/283093 Views: 18Total views on this site Citations: 253Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1976 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:David Lusseau, Lotte Kindt-Larsen, Floris M. van Beest Emergent interactions in the management of multiple threats to the conservation of harbour porpoises, Science of The Total Environment (Sep 2022): 158936.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158936Piret Avila, Tadeas Priklopil, Laurent Lehmann Hamilton's rule, gradual evolution, and the optimal (feedback) control of phenotypically plastic traits, Journal of Theoretical Biology 526 (Oct 2021): 110602.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2021.110602Andres Hagmayer, Andrew I. Furness, Bart J. A. Pollux Differences in ontogenetic and diurnal microhabitat selection by sympatric live‐bearing fish species with different reproductive modes, Freshwater Biology 66, no.99 (Jun 2021): 1709–1720.https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.13786John Lazarus Negativity bias: An evolutionary hypothesis and an empirical programme, Learning and Motivation 75 (Aug 2021): 101731.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2021.101731Tin Yan Hui, Gray A. Williams Behavioural plasticity in the monsoonal tropics: implications for thermoregulatory traits in sandy shore crabs, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 75, no.55 (May 2021).https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-021-03026-zSwami Iyer, Timothy Killingback Evolution of Cooperation in Social Dilemmas with Assortative Interactions, Games 11, no.44 (Sep 2020): 41.https://doi.org/10.3390/g11040041Floris M. van Beest, Larissa T. Beumer, Marianna Chimienti, Jean-Pierre Desforges, Nicholas Per Huffeldt, Stine Højlund Pedersen, Niels Martin Schmidt Environmental conditions alter behavioural organization and rhythmicity of a large Arctic ruminant across the annual cycle, Royal Society Open Science 7, no.1010 (Oct 2020): 201614.https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201614Tim Koglin, Bulcsú Sándor, Claudius Gros, Dante R. Chialvo When the goal is to generate a series of activities: A self-organized simulated robot arm, PLOS ONE 14, no.66 (Jun 2019): e0217004.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217004Nicholas M. Sutton and James P. O'Dwyer Born to Run? Quantifying the Balance of Prior Bias and New Information in Prey Escape Decisions, The American Naturalist 192, no.33 (Jul 2018): 321–331.https://doi.org/10.1086/698692Amine Chohra, Kurosh Madani Biological Regulation and Psychological Mechanisms Models of Adaptive Decision-Making Behaviors: Drives, Emotions, and Personality, (Apr 2018): 69–83.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90287-6_4Thomas McGrath, Kevin G. Murphy, Nick S. Jones Quantitative approaches to energy and glucose homeostasis: machine learning and modelling for precision understanding and prediction, Journal of The Royal Society Interface 15, no.138138 (Jan 2018): 20170736.https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2017.0736Naoto Yoshida Homeostatic Agent for General Environment, Journal of Artificial General Intelligence 8, no.11 (Mar 2018): 1–22.https://doi.org/10.1515/jagi-2017-0001Floris M. Beest, Lotte Kindt‐Larsen, Francois Bastardie, Valerio Bartolino, Jacob Nabe‐Nielsen Predicting the population‐level impact of mitigating harbor porpoise bycatch with pingers and time‐area fishing closures, Ecosphere 8, no.44 (Apr 2017).https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1785Stuart Nattrass, David Lusseau Using resilience to predict the effects of disturbance, Scientific Reports 6, no.11 (May 2016).https://doi.org/10.1038/srep25539Swami Iyer, Timothy Killingback Evolutionary dynamics of a smoothed war of attrition game, Journal of Theoretical Biology 396 (May 2016): 25–41.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2016.02.014Andrew D. Higginson, John M. McNamara, Alasdair I. Houston Fatness and fitness: exposing the logic of evolutionary explanations for obesity, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 283, no.18221822 (Jan 2016): 20152443.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.2443Amrita Srivastava, Shalie Malik, Garima Yadav, Sangeeta Rani Intermittent Food Absence Motivates Reallocation of Locomotion and Feeding in Spotted Munia (Lonchura punctulata), Journal of Circadian Rhythms 13 (Jun 2015).https://doi.org/10.5334/jcr.afFredrik Christiansen, Ned M. Lynas, David Lusseau, Ursula Tscherter, Brian Lee Beatty Structure and Dynamics of Minke Whale Surfacing Patterns in the Gulf of St. Lawrence, Canada, PLOS ONE 10, no.55 (May 2015): e0126396.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126396Bernd Rosslenbroich The Evolution of Brains and Behavior: Is There a Trend?, (Mar 2014): 161–207.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04141-4_10Diana G. Lunardi, Renata G. Ferreira Group composition influences on behavioral sequence patterns of the Guiana dolphin Sotalia guianensis, Journal of Ethology 31, no.11 (Oct 2012): 49–53.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-012-0347-8Alasdair I. Houston, Andrew D. Higginson, John M. McNamara Optimal foraging for multiple nutrients in an unpredictable environment, Ecology Letters 14, no.1111 (Sep 2011): 1101–1107.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01678.xPhilippe Louâpre, Jacques J. M. van Alphen, Jean-Sébastien Pierre, James Arthur Robert Marshall Humans and Insects Decide in Similar Ways, PLoS ONE 5, no.1212 (Dec 2010): e14251.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0014251Patrick Anselme The uncertainty processing theory of motivation, Behavioural Brain Research 208, no.22 (Apr 2010): 291–310.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2009.12.020Timothy Killingback, Michael Doebeli, Christoph Hauert Diversity of Cooperation in the Tragedy of the Commons, Biological Theory 5, no.11 (Apr 2015): 3–6.https://doi.org/10.1162/BIOT_a_00019Walter Zucchini, David Raubenheimer, Iain L. MacDonald Modeling Time Series of Animal Behavior by Means of a Latent‐State Model with Feedback, Biometrics 64, no.33 (Nov 2007): 807–815.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0420.2007.00939.xG. Radice, C. R. McInnes Autonomous behavioural algorithm for space applications, The Aeronautical Journal 107, no.10741074 (Jul 2016): 521–527.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0001924000013403John Greenman, Owen Holland, Ian Kelly, Kevin Kendall, David McFarland, Chris Melhuish Towards robot autonomy in the natural world: a robot in predator's clothing, Mechatronics 13, no.33 (Apr 2003): 195–228.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0957-4158(01)00045-9 Timothy Killingback and Michael Doebeli The Continuous Prisoner's Dilemma and the Evolution of Cooperation through Reciprocal Altruism with Variable Investment. T. Killingback and M. Doebeli, The American Naturalist 160, no.44 (Jul 2015): 421–438.https://doi.org/10.1086/342070Gianmarco Radice Behavioural Algorithm for Spacecraft Autonomy, (Jun 2012).https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2002-4980Jonathan J Cooper, Georgia J Mason Increasing costs of access to resources cause re-scheduling of behaviour in American mink (Mustela vison): implications for the assessment of behavioural priorities, Applied Animal Behaviour Science 66, no.1-21-2 (Feb 2000): 135–151.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(99)00069-6A. Guillot, J.-A. Meyer A cost-benefit analysis of behavioural sequence organization in laboratory mice, Ethology Ecology & Evolution 9, no.22 (Apr 1997): 119–132.https://doi.org/10.1080/08927014.1997.9522891Jean-Arcady Meyer Artificial Life and the Animat Approach to Artificial Intelligence, (Jan 1996): 325–354.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012161964-0/50013-3A. Guillot, J.-A. Meyer A functional analysis of ultradian activity in laboratory mice, Ethology Ecology & Evolution 7, no.33 (Jul 1995): 205–219.https://doi.org/10.1080/08927014.1995.9522951David McFarland The Biology of Behavior — Criteria for Success in Animals and Robots, (Jan 1995): 1–20.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79629-6_1 A multi-level analysis of feeding behaviour: the geometry of nutritional decisions, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 342, no.13021302 (Jan 1997): 381–402.https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1993.0166Ted L. Gragson Strategic procurement of fish by the pum�: A South American ?fishing culture?, Human Ecology 20, no.11 (Mar 1992): 109–130.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00889698J.E.R. Staddon Article Commentary: Rationality, Melioration, and Law-of-Effect Models for Choice, Psychological Science 3, no.22 (Apr 2017): 136–141.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00013.xDavid McFarland Animals as cost‐based robots, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 6, no.22 (Jan 1992): 133–153.https://doi.org/10.1080/02698599208573422Bernard Botteron, Paolo Marcellini A general approach to the existence of minimizers of one-dimensional non-coercive integrals of the calculus of variations, Annales de l'Institut Henri Poincaré C, Analyse non linéaire 8, no.22 (Mar 1991): 197–223.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0294-1449(16)30272-4B. Botteron, R. Arditi Central Place Foraging in Nonpatchy Habitats, Biometrical Journal 33, no.77 (Jan 1991): 875–891.https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.4710330717David McFarland Defining motivation and cognition in animals, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 5, no.22 (Jan 1991): 153–170.https://doi.org/10.1080/02698599108573387Bernard Botteron, Bernard Dacorogna Existence and non-existence results for non-coercive variational problems and applications in ecology, Journal of Differential Equations 85, no.22 (Jun 1990): 214–235.https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0396(90)90116-7 Donald Ludwig , and Locke Rowe Life-History Strategies for Energy Gain and Predator Avoidance Under Time Constraints, The American Naturalist 135, no.55 (Oct 2015): 686–707.https://doi.org/10.1086/285069Bernard Botteron, Bernard Dacorogna Existence of solutions for a variational problem associated to models in optimal foraging theory, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 147, no.11 (Mar 1990): 263–276.https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-247X(90)90397-XMarian Stamp Dawkins From an animal's point of view: Motivation, fitness, and animal welfare, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13, no.11 (May 2011): 1–9.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00077104Peter Singer The significance of animal suffering, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13, no.11 (May 2011): 9–12.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00077116John Archer Ethological motivational theory as a basis for assessing animal suffering, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13, no.11 (May 2011): 12–13.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00077128Arnold Arluke The significance of seeking the animal's perspective, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13, no.11 (May 2011): 13–14.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0007713XD. M. Broom The importance of measures of poor welfare, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13, no.11 (May 2011): 14–14.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00077141Gordon M. Burghardt Animal suffering, critical anthropomorphism, and reproductive rights, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13, no.11 (May 2011): 14–15.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00077153Richard W. Byrne Having the imagination to suffer, and to prevent suffering, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13, no.11 (May 2011): 15–16.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00077165C. Richard Chapman On the neurobiological basis of suffering, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13, no.11 (May 2011): 16–17.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00077177Robert Dantzer Animal suffering: The practical way forward, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13, no.11 (May 2011): 17–18.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00077189David DeGrazia On Singer: More argument, less prescriptivism, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13, no.11 (May 2011): 18–18.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00077190Strachan Donnelley Epistemology, ethics, and evolution, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13, no.11 (May 2011): 18–19.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00077207John Dupré The philosophical foundations of animal welfare, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13, no.11 (May 2011): 19–20.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00077219Michael Allen Fox Taking the animal's viewpoint seriously, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13, no.11 (May 2011): 20–21.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00077220Andrew F. Fraser Concepts of suffering in veterinary science, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13, no.11 (May 2011): 21–22.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00077232R. G. Frey Animals, science, and morality, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13, no.11 (May 2011): 22–22.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00077244J. A. Gray In defence of speciesism, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13, no.11 (May 2011): 22–23.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00077256B. O. Hughes, J. C. Petherick Experimental investigation of animal suffering, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13, no.11 (May 2011): 23–24.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00077268Frank Jackson Singer's intermediate conclusion, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13, no.11 (May 2011): 24–25.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0007727XDale Jamieson Science and subjective feelings, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13, no.11 (May 2011): 25–26.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00077281David Magnus, Peter Thiel Hidden adaptationism, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13, no.11 (May 2011): 26–26.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00077293Anne E. Magurran Obtaining and applying objective criteria in animal welfare, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13, no.11 (May 2011): 26–27.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0007730XDavid McFarland Suffering by analogy, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13, no.11 (May 2011): 27–27.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00077311Joy A. Mench, W. Ray Stricklin Consumer demand theory and social behavior: All chickens are not equal, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13, no.11 (May 2011): 28–28.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00077323Michael Mendl Development experience and the potential for suffering: Does "out of experience" mean "out of mind"?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13, no.11 (May 2011): 28–29.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00077335P. Monaghan Consumer demand: Can we deal with differing priorities?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13, no.11 (May 2011): 29–30.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00077347Yew-Kwang Ng The case for and difficulties in using "demand areas" to measure changes in well-being, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13, no.11 (May 2011): 30–31.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00077359Melinda A. Novak, Jerrold S. Meyer Seeking the sources of simian suffering, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13, no.11 (May 2011): 31–32.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00077360Howard Rachlin Suffering as a behaviourist views it, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13, no.11 (May 2011): 32–32.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00077372Bernard E. Rollin Science and value, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13, no.11 (May 2011): 32–33.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00077384Andrew N. Rowan To suffer, or not to suffer? That is the question, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13, no.11 (May 2011): 33–34.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00077396Eric A. Salzen Emotion, empathy, and suffering, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13, no.11 (May 2011): 34–35.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00077402S. F. Sapontzis The meaning of speciesism and the forms of animal suffering, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13, no.11 (May 2011): 35–36.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00077414Evalyn F. Segal Animal well-being: There are many paths to enlightenment, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13, no.11 (May 2011): 36–37.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00077426S. J. Shettleworth, N. Mrosovsky From one subjectivity to another, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13, no.11 (May 2011): 37–38.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00077438William Timberlake The attribution of suffering, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13, no.11 (May 2011): 38–40.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0007744XFrederick Toates Broadening the welfare index, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13, no.11 (May 2011): 40–41.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00077451Aubrey Townsend Pain, suffering, and distress, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13, no.11 (May 2011): 41–42.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00077463Jaylan Sheila Turkkan Paradoxical experimental outcomes and animal suffering, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13, no.11 (May 2011): 42–43.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00077475Stephen Walker Natural and unnatural justice in animal care, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13, no.11 (May 2011): 43–43.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00077487P. D. Wall Who suffers?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13, no.11 (May 2011): 43–44.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00077499Françoise Wemelsfelder "Perceived cost" may reveal frustration, but not boredom, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13, no.11 (May 2011): 44–44.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00077505Tina Widowski Consumer demand theory and animal welfare: Value and limitations, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13, no.11 (May 2011): 45–45.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00077517Peter Singer Ethics and animals, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13, no.11 (May 2011): 45–48.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00077529Marian Stamp Dawkins Other minds and other species, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13, no.11 (May 2011): 49–61.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00077530F. Reed Hainsworth, Larry L. Wolf Comparative Studies of Feeding, (Jan 1990): 265–296.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0577-4_11Alasdair I. Houston, John M. McNamara A framework for the functional analysis of behaviour, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.11 (Feb 2010): 117–130.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00053061R. McN. Alexander The risks of the chase, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.11 (Feb 2010): 130–130.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00053073C. J. Barnard Policy-making for survival: Reading the rules and small print, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.11 (Feb 2010): 130–131.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00053085William A. Calder State, function, and optimization, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.11 (Feb 2010): 131–133.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00053097Thomas Caraco Fitness, currencies, and models, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.0101 (Feb 2010): 133.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00053103Colin W. Clark Applications and limitations of dynamic programming in behavioral theory, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.11 (Feb 2010): 134–134.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00053115Marian Stamp Dawkins Motivation, decision-making, and choice, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.11 (Feb 2010): 134–135.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00053127Edmund Fantino Conditioned reinforcement and reproductive success, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.11 (Feb 2010): 135–135.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00053139Ronald A. Heiner Adapting canonical costs and robust rules for imperfect decisions, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.11 (Feb 2010): 135–136.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00053140Gene M. Heyman Optimization theory: A too narrow path, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.11 (Feb 2010): 136–137.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00053152Felicity A. Huntingford, Neil B. Metcalfe The functional analysis of behaviour: Making room for Prufrock, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.11 (Feb 2010): 137–138.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00053164George R. King, A. W. Logue Norms of behavior: Balancing generality with testability, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.11 (Feb 2010): 138–139.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00053176Marc Mangel Dynamic theories of behavior, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.11 (Feb 2010): 139–141.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00053188Douglass H. Morse Behavior and fitness, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.11 (Feb 2010): 141–141.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0005319XDouglas J. Navarick Is there a preference for variability?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.11 (Feb 2010): 141–142.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00053206Lloyd D. Partridge Evolution of a controller of state!, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.11 (Feb 2010): 142–143.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00053218William T. Powers A nonfunctional analysis of behavior, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.11 (Feb 2010): 143–144.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0005322XHoward Rachlin Biological relevance, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.11 (Feb 2010): 144–144.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00053231Alliston K. Reid Realistic versus minimal models, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.11 (Feb 2010): 144–145.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00053243Francesco M. Scudo Behavior, adaptedness, and Darwinian theories, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.11 (Feb 2010): 145–146.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00053255Robert E. Shaw, Thomas F. Carolan Adjoint optimal control, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.11 (Feb 2010): 146–147.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00053267David F. Sherry Dynamic programming: From eternity to here, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.11 (Feb 2010): 147–148.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00053279Andrew Sih On analyzing complex relationships between behaviour, state and fitness, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.11 (Feb 2010): 148–149.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00053280Eric Alden Smith Realism, generality, or testability: The ecological modeler's dilemma, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.11 (Feb 2010): 149–150.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00053292Nils Chr. Stenseth Houston & McNamara are right, but are they helpful to empiricists?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.11 (Feb 2010): 150–151.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00053309William Timberlake Constructing optimal sequences of behavior: Backwards is beautiful, but…, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.11 (Feb 2010): 151–152.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00053310Klaas Westerterp Optimization of energy gain: Theory and practice, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.11 (Feb 2010): 152–153.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00053322Sonja I. Yoerg Skepticism about dynamic modeling: General problems and the special problems of learning, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.11 (Feb 2010): 153–154.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00053334Alasdair I. Houston, John M. McNamara There's no such thing as a free lunch, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11, no.11 (Feb 2010): 154–163.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00053346Alasdair I. Houston, John M. McNamara Singing to attract a mate: a stochastic dynamic game, Journal of Theoretical Biology 129, no.11 (Nov 1987): 57–68.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5193(87)80203-5N. Giles Predation risk and reduced foraging activity in fish: experiments with parasitized and non-parasitized three-spined sticklebacks, Gasterosteus aculeatus L., Journal of Fish Biology 31, no.11 (Jul 1987): 37–44.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1987.tb05212.xColin W. Clark The lazy, adaptable lions: a Markovian model of group foraging, Animal Behaviour 35, no.22 (Apr 1987): 361–368.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(87)80259-2M. Milinski A review of competitive resource sharing under constraints in sticklebacks, Journal of Fish Biology 29, no.sasa (Dec 1986): 1–14.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1986.tb04994.xDavid L. G. Noakes When to feed: decision making in sticklebacks, Gasterosteus aculeatus, Environmental Biology of Fishes 16, no.1-31-3 (Jun 1986): 95–104.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00005162David L. G. Noakes When to feed: decision making in sticklebacks, Gasterosteus aculeatus, (Jan 1986): 95–104.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1158-6_7Michel Cabanac Influence of food and water deprivation on the behavior of the white rat foraging in a hostile environment, Physiology & Behavior 35, no.55 (Nov 1985): 701–709.https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9384(85)90400-7Richard Sibly, Robin McCleery Optimal decision rules for herring gulls, Animal Behaviour 33, no.22 (May 1985): 449–465.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(85)80069-5James P. Shaffery, Nigel J. Ball, Charles J. Amlaner Manipulating daytime sleep in herring gulls (Larus argentatus), Animal Behaviour 33, no.22 (May 1985): 566–572.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(85)80080-4Ana Magdalena Hurtado, Kristen Hawkes, Kim Hill, Hillard Kaplan Female subsistence strategies among Ache hunter-gatherers of Eastern Paraguay, Human Ecology 13, no.11 (Mar 1985): 1–28.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01531086 Manfred Milinski The Patch Choice Model: No Alternative to Balancing, The American Naturalist 125, no.22 (Oct 2015): 317–320.https://doi.org/10.1086/284344Nadav Nur Feeding frequencies of nestling blue tits (Parus caeruleus): costs, benefits and a model of optimal feeding frequency, Oecologia 65, no.11 (Dec 1984): 125–137.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00384475R. C. Ydenberg The conflict between feeding and territorial defence in the great tit, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 15, no.22 (Jul 1984): 103–108.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00299376D.W. Lendrem Sleeping and vigilance in birds, II. An experimental study of the Barbary dove (Streptopelia risoria), Animal Behaviour 32, no.11 (Feb 1984): 243–248.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(84)80343-7W. L. Morgan, D. A. Ritz Effect of prey density and hunger state on capture of krill, Nyctiphanes australis Sars, by Australian salmon, Arripis trutta (Bloch & Schneider), Journal of Fish Biology 24, no.11 (Jan 1984): 51–58.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.1984.tb04775.xE. Curio Time-energy budgets and optimization, Experientia 39, no.11 (Jan 1983): 25–34.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01960617John R. Krebs Territorial defence in the great tit (Parus major): Do residents always win?, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 11, no.33 (Nov 1982): 185–194.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00300061Antoinette Hodapp, Dennis Frey Optimal foraging by firemouth cichlids, Cichlasoma meeki, in a social context, Animal Behaviour 30, no.44 (Nov 1982): 983–989.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(82)80186-3Alasdair I. Houston Transitions and time-sharing, Animal Behaviour 30, no.22 (May 1982): 615–625.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(82)80075-4Howard Rachlin, Ray Battalio, John Kagel, Leonard Green Maximization theory in behavioral psychology, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4, no.33 (Feb 2010): 371–388.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00009407James Allison Two cheers for maximization theory, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4, no.33 (Feb 2010): 388–389.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00009419William M. Baum, John A. Nevin Maximization theory: Some empirical problems, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4, no.33 (Feb 2010): 389–390.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00009420Robert C. Bolles Trouble in reinforcementland, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4, no.33 (Feb 2010): 390–390.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00009432Edmund J. Fantino Is maximization theory general, and is it refutable?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4, no.33 (Feb 2010): 390–391.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00009444Stephen José Hanson To maximize or not to maximize …, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4, no.33 (Feb 2010): 391–392.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00009456R. J. Herrnstein A first law for behavioral analysis, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4, no.33 (Feb 2010): 392–395.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00009468A. I. Houston, J. E. R. Staddon Optimality principles and behavior: It's all for the best, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4, no.33 (Feb 2010): 395–396.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0000947XMichael C. Keeley The microeconomics of nonhuman behavior, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4, no.33 (Feb 2010): 396–397.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00009481Peter R. Killeen, Craig M. Allen Maximization theory: The "package" will not serve as an atom, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4, no.33 (Feb 2010): 397–398.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00009493Julian C. Leslie Is operant conditioning ready for formal molar theories?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4, no.33 (Feb 2010): 398–398.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0000950XRobert A. Moffitt The power of maximization theory, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4, no.33 (Feb 2010): 399–400.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00009511M. Susan Motheral Ideal versus real worlds: Bliss points, time allocation and curve fitting, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4, no.33 (Feb 2010): 400–400.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00009523William T. Powers Maximization, or control?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4, no.33 (Feb 2010): 400–401.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00009535Harvey S. Rosen Rate and utility maximization: An economist's view, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4, no.33 (Feb 2010): 401–401.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00009547Neil Rowland Deprivation and maximization: Mixed feelings about Tom Collins et al., Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4, no.33 (Feb 2010): 402–402.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00009559Harold K. Schneider Economic psychology: From Descartes to Newton, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4, no.33 (Feb 2010): 402–403.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00009560Richard H. Thaler Maximization and self-control, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4, no.33 (Feb 2010): 403–404.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00009572William Timberlake Bliss points and utility functions, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4, no.33 (Feb 2010): 404–405.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00009584William Vaughan Reinforcement or maximization?, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4, no.33 (Feb 2010): 405–405.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00009596Howard Rachlin, Ray Battalio, John Kagel, Leonard Green Maximization theory vindicated, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4, no.33 (Feb 2010): 405–417.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00009602H. C. Plotkin, F. J. Odling-Smee A multiple-level model of evolution and its implications for sociobiology, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4, no.22 (Feb 2010): 225–235.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00008566Jerome H. Barkow The logical relation between cultural and
Referência(s)