The messenger may be wrong, but the message may be right
1995; Wiley; Volume: 18; Issue: 2 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1111/j.1467-9817.1995.tb00081.x
ISSN1467-9817
Autores Tópico(s)Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
ResumoJournal of Research in ReadingVolume 18, Issue 2 p. 146-153 The messenger may be wrong, but the message may be right Connie Juel, Corresponding Author Connie Juel University of VirginiaAddress for correspondence: Connie Juel, University of Virginia, McGuffey Reading Center, Curry School of Education, 125 Ruffner Hall, 405 Emmet Street, Charlottesville, Virginia 22903, USA.Search for more papers by this author Connie Juel, Corresponding Author Connie Juel University of VirginiaAddress for correspondence: Connie Juel, University of Virginia, McGuffey Reading Center, Curry School of Education, 125 Ruffner Hall, 405 Emmet Street, Charlottesville, Virginia 22903, USA.Search for more papers by this author First published: September 1995 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.1995.tb00081.xCitations: 4AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat REFERENCES ADAMS, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge , MA : MIT Press. Google Scholar BECK, I. L. (1981). Reading problems and instructional practices. In G. E. MacKinnon and T. G. Waller (Eds.), Reading research: Advances in theory and practice (Vol. 2, pp. 53–95). New York : Academic Press. Google Scholar BIEMILLER, A. (1970). The development of the use of graphic and contextual information as children learn to read. Reading Research Quarterly, 13, 223–253. 10.2307/747307 Google Scholar BISSEX, G. L. (1980). Gnys at Wrk. Cambridge , MA : Harvard University. Google Scholar CLARK, H. H., and CLARK, E. V. (1977). Psychology and language. New York : Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. Google Scholar CLAY, M. M., and CAZDEN, C. B. (1992). A Vygotskian interpretation of reading recovery. In C. B. Cazden, Whole language plus (pp. 114–135). New York : Teachers College Press. Google Scholar EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGIST (1994). Special issue: The scientific evaluation of the whole-language approach to literacy development. Educational Psychologist, 29, 173–222. Google Scholar FOORMAN, B. R. (in press). The relevance of a connectionist model of reading for "The great debate. Educational Psychology Review. PubMedGoogle Scholar GOODMAN, K. S. (19701976) Reading: A psycholinguistic guessing game. In H. Singer and R. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (pp. 497–508). Newark , DE : International Reading Association. Google Scholar GOODMAN, K. S., and GOODMAN, Y. M. (1979). Learning to read is naturd. In L. B. Resnick and P. A. Weaver (Eds.), Theory and practice of ear& reading (Vol. 1, pp. 137–154). Hillsdale , NJ : Erlbaum. Google Scholar GOUGH, P. B. (1983). Context, form, and interaction. In R. Rayner (Ed.), Eye movements in reading (pp. 203–211). New York : Academic Press. Google Scholar GOUGH, P. B., and HILLINGER, M. L. (1980). Learning to read: An unnatural act. Bulletin of the Orton Society, 30, 179–196. 10.1007/BF02653717 Google Scholar GUSZAK, F. J. (1985). Diagnostic reading instruction in the elementary school ( 3rd ed.). New York : Harper and Row. Google Scholar HIEEERT, E. H. (1994). Becoming literate through authentic tasks: Evidence and adaptations. In R. B. Ruddell, M. R. Ruddell, and H. Singer (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading, 4th edition (pp. 391–413). Newark , DE : International Reading Association. Google Scholar HOFFMAN, J. V., MCCARTHEY, S.J., ABBOTT, J., CHRISTIAN, C., CORMAN, L., CURRY, C., DRESSMAN, M., ELLIOTT, B., MATHERNE, D., and STAHLE, D. (1994). So what's new in the new basals? A focus on first grade. Journal of Reading Behavior, 26, 47–74. 10.1080/10862969409547836 Web of Science®Google Scholar IVERSEN, S., and TUNMER, W. E. (1993). Phonological processing skills and the Reading Recovery program. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 112–126. 10.1037/0022-0663.85.1.112 Web of Science®Google Scholar JUEL, C., and ROPER/SCHNEIDER, D. (1985). The influence of basal readers on first grade reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 134–152. 10.2307/747751 Web of Science®Google Scholar JUEL, C. (1991a) Beginning reading. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. D. Pearson, and P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research, (Vol. 2, pp. 759–788). New York , NY : Longman. Google Scholar JUEL, C. (1991b) Cross-age tutoring between student athletes and at-risk children. The Reading Teacher, 45, 178–186. Web of Science®Google Scholar JUEL, C. (1994a). Learning to read and write in one elementary school. New York : Springer-Verlag. 10.1007/978-1-4612-4282-6 Google Scholar JUEL, C. (1994b). The role of phonics in the integrated language arts. In L. M. Morrow, J. K. Smith, and L. C. Wilkinson (Eds.), The Integrated language arts: Controversy to consensus (pp. 133–154). Needham , MA : Allyn and Bacon. Google Scholar JUEL, C. ( in preparation). What is it about one-on-one tutoring that most helps a poor reader?. Google Scholar LIBERMAN, I. Y., and LIBERMAN, A. M. (1992). Whole language versus code emphasis: Underlying assumptions and their implications for reading instruction. In P. B. Gough, L. C. Ehri, and R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 343–366). Hillsdale , NJ : Erlbaum. Google Scholar PERPETTI, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. New York : Oxford University Press. Google Scholar RESNICK, L. B. (1979). Theories and prescriptions for early reading instruction. In L. B. Resnick and P. A. Weaver (Eds.), Theory and practice of early reading (Vol. 2, pp. 321–338). Hillsdale , NJ : Erlbaum. Google Scholar SEIDENBERG, M. S., and MCCLELLAND, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523–568. 10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.523 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar SILVER BURDETT and GINN (1989) All through the town. Needham , MA : Silver Burdett and Ginn. Google Scholar SILVER BURDETT and GINN. (1993). Here comes the band! Needham , MA : Silver Burdett and Ginn. Google Scholar SMITH, F. (1971). Understanding reading. New York : Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Google Scholar SMITH, F. (Ed.. (1973). Psycholinguistics and reading. New York : Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Google Scholar SÖDERBERGH, R. (1977). Reading in early childhood: A linguistic study of a preschool child's gradual acquisition of reading ability. Washington , DC : Georgetown University Press. Google Scholar STANOVICH, K. E. (1980). Toward an interactive-compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 32–71. 10.2307/747348 Web of Science®Google Scholar STANOVICH, X. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–406. 10.1598/RRQ.21.4.1 Web of Science®Google Scholar STANOVICH, K. E. (1991a). Changing models of reading and reading acquisition. In L. Rieben and C. A. Perfetti (Eds.), Learning to read (pp. 19–31). Hillsdale , NJ : Erlbaum. Google Scholar STANOVICH, K. E. (1991b). Word recognition: Changing perspectives. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, and P. D. Pearson (Eds.) Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 418–452). New York : Longman. Google Scholar Citing Literature Volume18, Issue2September 1995Pages 146-153 ReferencesRelatedInformation
Referência(s)