Predation Risk Affects Mate Choice in a Gobiid Fish
1992; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 140; Issue: 6 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1086/285455
ISSN1537-5323
Autores Tópico(s)Marine and fisheries research
ResumoPrevious articleNext article No AccessNotes and CommentsPredation Risk Affects Mate Choice in a Gobiid FishElisabet ForsgrenElisabet ForsgrenPDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The American Naturalist Volume 140, Number 6Dec., 1992 Published for The American Society of Naturalists Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/285455 Views: 84Total views on this site Citations: 184Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1992 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Daisuke Takahashi Female Preference for Males Varies with Resource Availability for Reproduction in the Freshwater Goby Tridentiger brevispinis, Zoological Science 39, no.66 (Dec 2022).https://doi.org/10.2108/zs210100Andrew D. Cronin, Judith A. H. Smit, Matías I. Muñoz, Armand Poirier, Peter A. Moran, Paul Jerem, Wouter Halfwerk A comprehensive overview of the effects of urbanisation on sexual selection and sexual traits, Biological Reviews 97, no.44 (Mar 2022): 1325–1345.https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12845Lenka Sentenská, Catherine Scott, Pierick Mouginot, Maydianne C B Andrade, Marie Herberstein Risky business: males choose more receptive adults over safer subadults in a cannibalistic spider, Behavioral Ecology 33, no.44 (Apr 2022): 688–697.https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arac023Meredith Fitschen-Brown, M. Scarlett Tudor, Heather Hamlin, Molly Morris Higher cortisol in muscle correlates with weaker strength of female mate preference in the swordtail fish Xiphophorus multilineatus, Animal Behaviour 187 (May 2022): 63–69.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2022.02.011Joachim G Frommen, Timo Thünken, Francesca Santostefano, Valentina Balzarini, Attila Hettyey, Ulrika Candolin Effects of chronic and acute predation risk on sexual ornamentation and mating preferences, Behavioral Ecology 33, no.11 (Oct 2021): 7–16.https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arab116Karin H Olsson, Helen Nilsson Sköld, Sami Merilaita, Charlotta Kvarnemo Dark-eyed females: sexually dimorphic prespawning coloration results from sex-specific physiological response to hormone exposure in the sand goby Pomatoschistus minutus (Gobiiformes: Gobiidae), Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 135, no.33 (Jan 2022): 447–461.https://doi.org/10.1093/biolinnean/blab166Vivek H. Sridhar, Liang Li, Dan Gorbonos, Máté Nagy, Bianca R. Schell, Timothy Sorochkin, Nir S. Gov, Iain D. Couzin The geometry of decision-making in individuals and collectives, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118, no.5050 (Dec 2021).https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2102157118Bethelihem Mekonnen, Abdullahi Yusuf, Christian Pirk, Sunday Ekesi, Emilie Deletre Oviposition responses of Bactrocera dorsalis and Ceratitis cosyra to Dufour's and poison gland extracts of Oecophylla longinoda (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), International Journal of Tropical Insect Science 41, no.44 (Feb 2021): 2775–2783.https://doi.org/10.1007/s42690-021-00457-zArielle N. Enos, Genevieve M. Kozak Elevated temperature increases reproductive investment in less preferred mates in the invasive European corn borer moth, Ecology and Evolution 11, no.1717 (Aug 2021): 12064–12074.https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7972Silva Uusi‐Heikkilä Implications of size‐selective fisheries on sexual selection, Evolutionary Applications 13, no.66 (Jun 2020): 1487–1500.https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.12988Liam R. Dougherty Designing mate choice experiments, Biological Reviews 95, no.33 (Feb 2020): 759–781.https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12586Christopher J. Leary, Alexander T. Baugh Glucocorticoids, male sexual signals, and mate choice by females: Implications for sexual selection, General and Comparative Endocrinology 288 (Mar 2020): 113354.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygcen.2019.113354Gina M Calabrese, Karin S Pfennig, Rosemary Gillespie Reinforcement and the Proliferation of Species, Journal of Heredity 111, no.11 (Dec 2019): 138–146.https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/esz073Rex A. Dunham, Baofeng Su Genetically Engineered Fish: Potential Impacts on Aquaculture, Biodiversity, and the Environment, (Dec 2020): 241–275.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53183-6_11Denis Meuthen, Sebastian A. Baldauf, Theo C.M. Bakker, Timo Thünken High perceived predation risk during development affects mutual mate choice in a cichlid fish, Animal Behaviour 158 (Dec 2019): 227–237.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2019.10.019Elio de Almeida Borghezan, Kalebe da Silva Pinto, Jansen Zuanon, Tiago Henrique da Silva Pires, John A. B. Claydon Someone like me: Size-assortative pairing and mating in an Amazonian fish, sailfin tetra Crenuchus spilurus, PLOS ONE 14, no.99 (Sep 2019): e0222880.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222880Karin H. Olsson, Elisabet Forsgren, Sami Merilaita, Charlotta Kvarnemo, Colette St Mary Effect of sand texture on nest quality and mating success in a fish with parental care, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 73, no.77 (Jun 2019).https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-019-2711-yRonald D. MacLaren Evidence of an emerging female preference for an artificial male trait and the potential for spread via mate choice copying in Poecilia latipinna, Ethology 106 (May 2019).https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.12885Andrew D. Cronin, Michael J. Ryan, Rachel A. Page, Kimberly L. Hunter, Ryan C. Taylor Environmental heterogeneity alters mate choice behavior for multimodal signals, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 73, no.44 (Mar 2019).https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-019-2654-3Sarah E. Westrick, E. Dale Broder, David N. Reznick, Cameron K. Ghalambor, Lisa Angeloni Rapid evolution and behavioral plasticity following introduction to an environment with reduced predation risk, Ethology 125, no.44 (Feb 2019): 232–240.https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.12849Malin Ah-King Flexible Mate Choice, (Jan 2019): 421–431.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809633-8.01280-2Klaudia Witte, Katharina Baumgärtner, Corinna Röhrig, Sabine Nöbel Test of the Deception Hypothesis in Atlantic Mollies Poecilia mexicana—Does the Audience Copy a Pretended Mate Choice of Others?, Biology 7, no.33 (Jul 2018): 40.https://doi.org/10.3390/biology7030040Noriyosi Sato, Yu Uchida, Takeshi Takegaki The effect of predation risk on post-copulatory sexual selection in the Japanese pygmy squid, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 72, no.88 (Jul 2018).https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-018-2540-4Andrew N. Bloch, Layla Al-Shaer, Kimberly Little, Murray Itzkowitz Effect of territory intruders on the perceived quality of territorial males in an endangered pupfish, Cyprinodon bovinus, Behaviour 155, no.66 (Jun 2018): 465–479.https://doi.org/10.1163/1568539X-00003499Anssi Karvonen, Kai Lindström Spatiotemporal and gender-specific parasitism in two species of gobiid fish, Ecology and Evolution 8, no.1212 (May 2018): 6114–6123.https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4151Katja Heubel, Ingo Schlupp Female mating competition alters female mating preferences in common gobies, Current Zoology 64, no.33 (Apr 2018): 351–361.https://doi.org/10.1093/cz/zoy024Piotr Bursztyka, Céline Lafont-Lecuelle, Eva Teruel, Julien Leclercq, Antoine Brin Behavioural response of xerophilous land snail and slug species to chemical cues from ground-beetle predators: the role of ecological relevance, Journal of Molluscan Studies 84, no.22 (Mar 2018): 141–147.https://doi.org/10.1093/mollus/eyy007Stefanie Gierszewski, Melissa Keil, Klaudia Witte Mate-choice copying in sailfin molly females: public information use from long-distance interactions, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 72, no.22 (Jan 2018).https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-018-2441-6Rebecca Nagel, Frank Kirschbaum, Jacob Engelmann, Volker Hofmann, Felix Pawelzik, Ralph Tiedemann Male-mediated species recognition among African weakly electric fishes, Royal Society Open Science 5, no.22 (Feb 2018): 170443.https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.170443Victoria A. Underhill, Gerlinde Höbel Variation in nocturnal light levels does not alter mate choice behavior in female eastern gray treefrogs (Hyla versicolor), Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 71, no.1010 (Sep 2017).https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-017-2386-1Luke Reding, Molly E. Cummings Context-dependent preferences vary by multicomponent signals in a swordtail, Animal Behaviour 129 (Jul 2017): 237–247.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2017.05.017Regina Vega-Trejo, Patricia R. Y. Backwell Testing female preferences under more natural conditions: a case study on a fiddler crab, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 71, no.55 (Apr 2017).https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-017-2314-4Krisanadej Jaroensutasinee, Fahmida Wazed Tina, Phurich Boonsanit, Mullica Jaroensutasinee Chimneys of the fiddler crab Uca rosea (Tweedie, 1937) reduce the risk of losing burrows to intruders, Crustaceana 90, no.55 (Apr 2017): 589–600.https://doi.org/10.1163/15685403-00003671Natalie Pilakouta, Maria A. Correa, Suzanne H. Alonzo, M. Herberstein Predation Risk Reduces a Female Preference for Heterospecific Males in the Green Swordtail, Ethology 123, no.22 (Nov 2016): 95–104.https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.12573Laura M. Travers, Leigh W. Simmons, Francisco Garcia-Gonzalez Lifetime changes in phenotypic expression and evolutionary potential of female mating traits in Drosophila melanogaster, Animal Behaviour 121 (Nov 2016): 147–155.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.09.002Malin Ah‐King, Patricia Adair Gowaty A conceptual review of mate choice: stochastic demography, within‐sex phenotypic plasticity, and individual flexibility, Ecology and Evolution 6, no.1414 (Jun 2016): 4607–4642.https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2197Breanna N. Harris, James A. Carr The role of the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal/interrenal axis in mediating predator-avoidance trade-offs, General and Comparative Endocrinology 230-231 (May 2016): 110–142.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygcen.2016.04.006Denis Meuthen, Sebastian A. Baldauf, Theo C. M. Bakker, Timo Thünken Conspecific alarm cues affect interspecific aggression in cichlid fishes, Hydrobiologia 767, no.11 (Sep 2015): 37–49.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-015-2473-0Brent Stoffer, George W. Uetz Social experience affects female mate preferences for a visual trait in a wolf spider, Behavioral Ecology 27, no.11 (Sep 2015): 252–261.https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arv143Samantha Lostrom, Jonathan P. Evans, Pauline F. Grierson, Shaun P. Collin, Peter M. Davies, Jennifer L. Kelley Linking stream ecology with morphological variability in a native freshwater fish from semi‐arid Australia, Ecology and Evolution 5, no.1616 (Jul 2015): 3272–3287.https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1590Brent Stoffer, George W. Uetz The effects of social experience with varying male availability on female mate preferences in a wolf spider, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 69, no.66 (Apr 2015): 927–937.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-015-1904-2Ashley Atwell, William E. Wagner Along came a spider who sat down beside her: Perceived predation risk, but not female age, affects female mate choosiness, Behavioural Processes 115 (Jun 2015): 143–148.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2015.04.002Hungsoo Kim, Tuyen Van Nguyen, Takashi Uehara, Muyoung Heo, Tae-Soo Chon Zebrafish (Danio rerio) movement in addressing stress to conflicting stimuli, foods and predators, Ecological Modelling 306 (Jun 2015): 257–267.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.10.009Genevieve M. Kozak, Janette W. Boughman Predator experience overrides learned aversion to heterospecifics in stickleback species pairs, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 282, no.18051805 (Apr 2015): 20143066.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.3066Tadeas Priklopil, Eva Kisdi, Mats Gyllenberg Evolutionarily stable mating decisions for sequentially searching females and the stability of reproductive isolation by assortative mating, Evolution 69, no.44 (Mar 2015): 1015–1026.https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.12618Laura B. Catano, Bridgette K. Gunn, Megan C. Kelley, Deron E. Burkepile, Christopher J Fulton Predation Risk, Resource Quality, and Reef Structural Complexity Shape Territoriality in a Coral Reef Herbivore, PLOS ONE 10, no.22 (Feb 2015): e0118764.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118764Bradley E. Carlson, Tracy Langkilde Predation risk in tadpole populations shapes behavioural responses of prey but not strength of trait-mediated indirect interactions, Oikos 123, no.1212 (Jun 2014): 1519–1527.https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.01488 References, (Oct 2014): 391–450.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118891360.refsMaria Norevik Andrén, Charlotta Kvarnemo Filial cannibalism in a nest-guarding fish: females prefer to spawn in nests with few eggs over many, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 68, no.1010 (Jul 2014): 1565–1576.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-014-1766-zJan Heuschele, Sara Ceballos, Christian Marc Andersen Borg, Oda Bjærke, Stamatina Isari, Rachel Lasley-Rasher, Elin Lindehoff, Anissa Souissi, Sami Souissi, Josefin Titelman Non-consumptive effects of predator presence on copepod reproduction: insights from a mesocosm experiment, Marine Biology 161, no.77 (May 2014): 1653–1666.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-014-2449-zO. M. Selz, M. E. R. Pierotti, M. E. Maan, C. Schmid, O. Seehausen Female preference for male color is necessary and sufficient for assortative mating in 2 cichlid sister species, Behavioral Ecology 25, no.33 (Mar 2014): 612–626.https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/aru024N. Pilakouta, S. H. Alonzo Predator exposure leads to a short-term reversal in female mate preferences in the green swordtail, Xiphophorus helleri, Behavioral Ecology 25, no.22 (Dec 2013): 306–312.https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/art120Ryan A. Martin, Rüdiger Riesch, Justa L. Heinen-Kay, R. Brian Langerhans EVOLUTION OF MALE COLORATION DURING A POST-PLEISTOCENE RADIATION OF BAHAMAS MOSQUITOFISH ( GAMBUSIA HUBBSI ), Evolution 68, no.22 (Oct 2013): 397–411.https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.12277Nick Ruktanonchai, David L. Smith, Colette M. St. Mary Selection of interdependent choice of 2 complementary resources, Behavioral Ecology 25, no.11 (Oct 2013): 35–43.https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/art082Kai Lindström, Topi K. Lehtonen Mate sampling and choosiness in the sand goby, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 280, no.17651765 (Aug 2013): 20130983.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.0983Andrew Trappett, Catriona H. Condon, Craig White, Phil Matthews, Robbie S. Wilson, Anthony Herrel Extravagant ornaments of male threadfin rainbowfish ( Iriatherina werneri ) are not costly for swimming, Functional Ecology 27, no.44 (Apr 2013): 1034–1041.https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12097Kaiming Liang, Jia-en Zhang, Li Fang, Benliang Zhao, Mingzhu Luo, Prem Parajuli, Ying Ouyang The biological control of Pomacea canaliculata population by rice-duck mutualism in paddy fields, Biocontrol Science and Technology 23, no.66 (Jun 2013): 674–690.https://doi.org/10.1080/09583157.2013.790933Samuel Kaplan Review: Pharmacological Pollution in Water, Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology 43, no.1010 (Jan 2013): 1074–1116.https://doi.org/10.1080/10934529.2011.627036C. Michael Wagner, Gary D. Grossman Input matching and patch use by native and invasive minnows, Ecology of Freshwater Fish 22, no.11 (Aug 2012): 55–65.https://doi.org/10.1111/eff.12001Ivonne Meuche, Oscar Brusa, K Linsenmair, Alexander Keller, Heike Pröhl Only distance matters – non-choosy females in a poison frog population, Frontiers in Zoology 10, no.11 (Jan 2013): 29.https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-9994-10-29Nelika K. Hughes, Jennifer L. Kelley, Peter B. Banks, Greg Grether Dangerous liaisons: the predation risks of receiving social signals, Ecology Letters 15, no.1111 (Aug 2012): 1326–1339.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01856.xRickey D. Cothran, Kristopher Chapman, Andy R. Stiff, Rick A. Relyea "Cryptic" direct benefits of mate choice: choosy females experience reduced predation risk while in precopula, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 66, no.66 (Mar 2012): 905–913.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-012-1339-ySergio Castellano, Giorgia Cadeddu, Paolo Cermelli Computational mate choice: Theory and empirical evidence, Behavioural Processes 90, no.22 (Jun 2012): 261–277.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2012.02.010Topi K. Lehtonen Signal value of male courtship effort in a fish with paternal care, Animal Behaviour 83, no.55 (May 2012): 1153–1161.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.01.040Pamela M. Willis, Gil G. Rosenthal, Michael J. Ryan, Vincent Laudet An Indirect Cue of Predation Risk Counteracts Female Preference for Conspecifics in a Naturally Hybridizing Fish Xiphophorus birchmanni, PLoS ONE 7, no.44 (Apr 2012): e34802.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034802Johannes R. Björk, Charlotta Kvarnemo Mechanisms behind size-assortative nest choice by sand goby males in the absence of intrasexual competition, Animal Behaviour 83, no.11 (Jan 2012): 55–62.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.09.033Gerlind U C Lehmann Weighing costs and benefits of mating in bushcrickets (Insecta: Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae), with an emphasis on nuptial gifts, protandry and mate density, Frontiers in Zoology 9, no.11 (Jan 2012): 19.https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-9994-9-19David Bierbach, Matthias Schulte, Nina Herrmann, Michael Tobler, Stefan Stadler, Christian T Jung, Benjamin Kunkel, Rüdiger Riesch, Sebastian Klaus, Madlen Ziege, Jeane Rimber Indy, Lenin Arias-Rodriguez, Martin Plath Predator-induced changes of female mating preferences: innate and experiential effects, BMC Evolutionary Biology 11, no.11 (Jul 2011).https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-11-190Marja Järvenpää, Kai Lindström Algal blooms decrease care but increase egg survival in a fish with paternal care, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 65, no.1111 (Jun 2011): 2023–2028.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-011-1211-5Pamela M. Willis, Michael J. Ryan, Gil G. Rosenthal Encounter rates with conspecific males influence female mate choice in a naturally hybridizing fish, Behavioral Ecology 22, no.66 (Jul 2011): 1234–1240.https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arr119Sarah Belle Mathilde Kraak, Paul J. B. Hart Modelling sympatric speciation by means of biologically plausible mechanistic processes as exemplified by threespine stickleback species pairs, Organisms Diversity & Evolution 11, no.44 (Sep 2011): 287–306.https://doi.org/10.1007/s13127-011-0051-5Richard T. Carson, Jordan J. Louviere A Common Nomenclature for Stated Preference Elicitation Approaches, Environmental and Resource Economics 49, no.44 (Jan 2011): 539–559.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-010-9450-xKelly M. Pennington, Anne R. Kapuscinski Predation and Food Limitation Influence Fitness Traits of Growth-Enhanced Transgenic and Wild-Type Fish, Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 140, no.22 (May 2011): 221–234.https://doi.org/10.1080/00028487.2011.545012Aaron S. Rundus, Laura Sullivan-Beckers, Dustin J. Wilgers, Eileen A. Hebets FEMALES ARE CHOOSIER IN THE DARK: ENVIRONMENT-DEPENDENT RELIANCE ON COURTSHIP COMPONENTS AND ITS IMPACT ON FITNESS, Evolution 65, no.11 (Sep 2010): 268–282.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01125.xMegan L. Head, Bob B. M. Wong, Robert Brooks, Tapio Mappes Sexual Display and Mate Choice in an Energetically Costly Environment, PLoS ONE 5, no.1212 (Dec 2010): e15279.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0015279K. KARLSSON, F. EROUKHMANOFF, R. HÄRDLING, E. I. SVENSSON Parallel divergence in mate guarding behaviour following colonization of a novel habitat, Journal of Evolutionary Biology 23, no.1212 (Oct 2010): 2540–2549.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02102.xSusan N. Gershman, Scott K. Sakaluk Mate Quality and Novelty Influence Post-Copulatory Female Choice in Decorated Crickets, Gryllodes sigillatus, Ethology 116, no.1111 (Sep 2010): 1113–1117.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2010.01826.xMinna Saaristo, John A. Craft, Kari K. Lehtonen, Kai Lindström An endocrine disrupting chemical changes courtship and parental care in the sand goby, Aquatic Toxicology 97, no.44 (May 2010): 285–292.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2009.12.015Karen M. Cogliati, Lynda D. Corkum, Stéphanie M. Doucet Bluegill Coloration as a Sexual Ornament: Evidence From Ontogeny, Sexual Dichromatism, and Condition Dependence, Ethology 116, no.55 (May 2010): 416–428.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2010.01755.xAlexander T. Baugh, Michael J. Ryan Ambient light alters temporal-updating behaviour during mate choice in a Neotropical frog, Canadian Journal of Zoology 88, no.55 (May 2010): 448–453.https://doi.org/10.1139/Z10-018Astrid Kodric-Brown Sexual Selection, Male Quality and Swimming Performance, (Oct 2010): 249–268.https://doi.org/10.1201/b10190-9Maren N. Vitousek Investment in mate choice depends on resource availability in female Galápagos marine iguanas (Amblyrhynchus cristatus), Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 64, no.11 (Jul 2009): 105–113.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-009-0825-3Bob B. M. Wong, Marja Järvenpää, Kai Lindström Risk-sensitive mating decisions in a visually compromised environment, Biology Letters 5, no.55 (Oct 2009): 600–602.https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2009.0350Patricia Adair Gowaty, Stephen P. Hubbell Reproductive decisions under ecological constraints: It's about time, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106, no.supplement_1supplement_1 (Jun 2009): 10017–10024.https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0901130106Marie-Ange Gravel, Steven J. Cooke Influence of Inter-Lake Variation in Natural Nest Predation Pressure on the Parental Care Behaviour of Smallmouth Bass ( Micropterus dolomieu ), Ethology 115, no.66 (Jun 2009): 608–616.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2009.01641.xBennett G. Galef, Nicole Yarkovsky Further studies of reliance on socially acquired information when foraging in potentially risky situations, Animal Behaviour 77, no.55 (May 2009): 1329–1335.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.01.038Joseph M Leese, Jennifer L Snekser, Alexandra Ganim, Murray Itzkowitz Assessment and decision-making in a Caribbean damselfish: nest-site quality influences prioritization of courtship and brood defence, Biology Letters 5, no.22 (Jan 2009): 188–190.https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2008.0698Jens R. Poschadel, Martin Plath, Ingo Schlupp Divergent female mating preference in a clonal fish, acta ethologica 12, no.11 (Mar 2009): 55–60.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10211-009-0055-8Minna Saaristo, John A. Craft, Kari K. Lehtonen, Heikki Björk, Kai Lindström Disruption of sexual selection in sand gobies (Pomatoschistus minutus) by 17α-ethinyl estradiol, an endocrine disruptor, Hormones and Behavior 55, no.44 (Apr 2009): 530–537.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2009.01.006L. K. SNOWBERG, C. W. BENKMAN Mate choice based on a key ecological performance trait, Journal of Evolutionary Biology 22, no.44 (Apr 2009): 762–769.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01699.xXimena J. Nelson, Robert R. Jackson The influence of ants on the mating strategy of a myrmecophilic jumping spider (Araneae, Salticidae), Journal of Natural History 43, no.11-1211-12 (Mar 2009): 713–735.https://doi.org/10.1080/00222930802610469Tae Won Kim, John H Christy, Stefan Dennenmoser, Jae C Choe The strength of a female mate preference increases with predation risk, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 276, no.16571657 (Nov 2008): 775–780.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2008.1070Karin H. Olsson, Charlotta Kvarnemo, Ola Svensson Relative costs of courtship behaviours in nest-building sand gobies, Animal Behaviour 77, no.22 (Feb 2009): 541–546.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.10.021RAY LLOYD, ROSS A. ALFORD, LIN SCHWARZKOPF Chemical discrimination among predators by lizards: Responses of three skink species to the odours of high- and low-threat varanid predators, Austral Ecology 34, no.11 (Feb 2009): 50–54.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.2008.01881.xHisaya Manabe, Kazutaka Hagiwara, Akemi Yonemori, Keiichi Fujiwara, Akihiko Shinomiya Semi-lunar spawning cycle and mating tactics in the marine goby Asterropteryx semipunctata, Ichthyological Research 56, no.11 (May 2008): 92–95.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10228-008-0056-zG.A. Lozano Multiple cues in mate selection: The sexual interference hypothesis, Bioscience Hypotheses 2, no.11 (Jan 2009): 37–42.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bihy.2008.09.001Topi K. Lehtonen, Kai Lindström Females decide whether size matters: plastic mate preferences tuned to the intensity of male–male competition, Behavioral Ecology 20, no.11 (Oct 2008): 195–199.https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arn134Alison M. Dunn, Jaimie T.A. Dick, Melanie J. Hatcher The less amorous Gammarus: predation risk affects mating decisions in Gammarus duebeni (Amphipoda), Animal Behaviour 76, no.44 (Oct 2008): 1289–1295.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.06.013William E. Wagner, Alexandra L. Basolo Incidental Sanctions and the Evolution of Direct Benefits, Ethology 114, no.66 (Jun 2008): 521–539.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2008.01511.xDebora Arlt, Tomas Pärt Post-breeding information gathering and breeding territory shifts in northern wheatears, Journal of Animal Ecology 77, no.22 (Mar 2008): 211–219.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01329.xDaisuke Takahashi Life-history variation in relation to nest site abundance in males of the freshwater goby Tridentiger brevispinis, Ecology of Freshwater Fish 17, no.11 (Mar 2008): 71–77.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0633.2007.00260.xIngrid Ahnesjö, Elisabet Forsgren, Charlotta Kvarnemo Variation in Sexual Selection in Fishes, (Feb 2014): 303–335.https://doi.org/10.1201/b10757-11Ulrika Candolin, Bob Wong Mate Choice, (Feb 2014): 337–376.https://doi.org/10.1201/b10757-12Carin Magnhagen, Anne Magurran Decision-making and Trade-offs in Fish Behaviour, (Feb 2014): 499–523.https://doi.org/10.1201/b10757-18Topi K. Lehtonen, Kai Lindström Repeatability of mating preferences in the sand goby, Animal Behaviour 75, no.11 (Jan 2008): 55–61.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.04.011Daniel I. Bolnick, Benjamin M. Fitzpatrick Sympatric Speciation: Models and Empirical Evidence, Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 38, no.11 (Dec 2007): 459–487.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.38.091206.095804K. Silva, M.N. Vieira, V.C. Almada, N.M. Monteiro The effect of temperature on mate preferences and female–female interactions in Syngnathus abaster, Animal Behaviour 74, no.55 (Nov 2007): 1525–1533.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.03.008Erik I. Svensson, Kristina Karlsson, Magne Friberg, Fabrice Eroukhmanoff Gender Differences in Species Recognition and the Evolution of Asymmetric Sexual Isolation, Current Biology 17, no.2222 (Nov 2007): 1943–1947.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.09.038Glenn P. Svenssona, Christer Löfstedt, Niels Skals Listening in Pheromone Plumes: Disruption of Olfactory-Guided Mate Attraction in a Moth by a Bat-Like Ultrasound, Journal of Insect Science 7, no.5959 (Nov 2007): 1–9.https://doi.org/10.1673/031.007.5901Tracie M. Ivy, Scott K. Sakaluk Sequential mate choice in decorated crickets: females use a fixed internal threshold in pre- and postcopulatory choice, Animal Behaviour 74, no.44 (Oct 2007): 1065–1072.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.01.017Katie E. McGhee, Rebecca C. Fuller, Joseph Travis Male competition and female choice interact to determine mating success in the bluefin killifish, Behavioral Ecology 18, no.55 (Jun 2007): 822–830.https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arm051L. K. SNOWBERG, C. W. BENKMAN The role of marker traits in the assortative mating within red crossbills, Loxia curvirostra complex, Journal of Evolutionary Biology 20, no.55 (Jun 2007): 1924–1932.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007.01372.xTopi K. Lehtonen, Kai Lindström Mate compatibility, parental allocation and fitness consequences of mate choice in the sand goby Pomatoschistus minutus, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 61, no.1010 (Apr 2007): 1581–1588.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-007-0390-6T. K. Lehtonen, S. Rintakoski, K. Lindstrom Mate preference for multiple cues: interplay between male and nest size in the sand goby, Pomatoschistus minutus, Behavioral Ecology 18, no.44 (May 2007): 696–700.https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arm032Tae Won Kim, John H. Christy, Jae C. Choe, Tom Tregenza A Preference for a Sexual Signal Keeps Females Safe, PLoS ONE 2, no.55 (May 2007): e422.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000422Anna M. Billing, Gunilla Rosenqvist, Anders Berglund No terminal investment in pipefish males: only young males exhibit risk-prone courtship behavior, Behavioral Ecology 18, no.33 (Mar 2007): 535–540.https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arm007Gerlind U. C. Lehmann Density-dependent plasticity of sequential mate choice in a bushcricket (Orthoptera:Tettigoniidae), Australian Journal of Zoology 55, no.22 (Jan 2007): 123.https://doi.org/10.1071/ZO06105Bennett G. Galef, Elaine E. Whiskin Increased reliance on socially acquired information while foraging in risky situations?, Animal Behaviour 72, no.55 (Nov 2006): 1169–1176.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.05.003CHARLOTTA KVARNEMO, SAMI MERILAITA Mating distribution and its temporal dynamics affect operational sex ratio: a simulation study, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 89, no.33 (Oct 2006): 551–559.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2006.00694.xManuel J. Vélez, H. Jane Brockmann Seasonal Variation in Female Response to Male Calling Song in the Field Cricket, Gryllus rubens, Ethology 112, no.1111 (Nov 2006): 1041–1049.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2006.01262.xÅsa A. Borg, Elisabet Forsgren, Trond Amundsen Seasonal change in female choice for male size in the two-spotted goby, Animal Behaviour 72, no.44 (Oct 2006): 763–771.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.11.025Kathy F.Y. Su, Daiqin Li Female-biased predation risk and its differential effect on the male and
Referência(s)