Artigo Acesso aberto Revisado por pares

Effectiveness of Clopidogrel and Aspirin Versus Ticlopidine and Aspirin in Preventing Stent Thrombosis After Coronary Stent Implantation

1999; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; Volume: 99; Issue: 18 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1161/01.cir.99.18.2364

ISSN

1524-4539

Autores

Issam Moussa, Mathew Oetgen, Gary S. Roubin, Antonio Colombo, Xangdong Wang, Sriram S. Iyer, Roberta Maida, Michael J. Collins, Edward M. Kreps, Jeffrey W. Moses,

Tópico(s)

Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes

Resumo

Ticlopidine has been shown to reduce the incidence of stent thrombosis compared with warfarin, but it may cause serious hematological side effects. Clopidogrel, a new thienopyridine derivative, may be a safe alternative to ticlopidine. The aim of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of clopidogrel and aspirin with those of ticlopidine and aspirin in patients undergoing coronary stent implantation.The population of this study consisted of 2 groups: patients who underwent coronary stenting and were treated with ticlopidine and aspirin (TA group, n=1406), and patients who underwent coronary stenting followed by treatment with clopidogrel and aspirin (CA group, n=283). At 1-month follow-up, there was no difference in stent thrombosis (1.5% versus 1.4%, P=1.0) or major adverse cardiac events (3.1% versus 2.4%, P=0. 85) between the TA and CA groups, respectively. The probability of any side effect (neutropenia, diarrhea, rash) was significantly higher in the TA group (10.6% versus 5.3%, P=0.006; relative risk, 0. 53; CI, 0.32 to 0.86).These data suggest that clopidogrel may be an effective pharmacological regimen after coronary stent implantation. Furthermore, the simpler dosing regimen, the absence of neutropenia, and the lower frequency of other side effects make it a safe alternative to ticlopidine.

Referência(s)
Altmetric
PlumX