Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Comparison of the intubating laryngeal mask airway versus laryngoscopy in the Bell 206-L3 EMS helicopter

2004; Elsevier BV; Volume: 23; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1016/j.amj.2003.10.008

1532-6497

Eric R. Swanson, David E. Fosnocht, Ken Matthews, Erik D. Barton,

Respiratory Support and Mechanisms

The purpose of this study is to compare intubation success rate and time to intubation for the intubating laryngeal mask airway (I-LMA) versus direct laryngoscopy (DL) using a manikin model during a simulated in-flight scenario.The setting for the study was a University hospital-based air medical program.This was a prospective, randomized, crossover trial. Eight nurses and 7 paramedics were randomly assigned to perform 3 intubations with either the I-LMA or DL first and then 3 intubations using the alternate technique. Descriptive statistics, 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of means, and Fisher's Exact test were conducted for comparisons.Fifteen set-ups and 45 intubations were performed with each technique. Previous experience was 74 mm (95% CI 64-84) with DL and 18 mm (95% CI 9-27) with the I-LMA. Set-up time was 33 seconds (95% CI 26-40) for DL and 40 seconds (95% CI 29-50) for I-LMA. Time to intubation was 12 seconds (95% CI 10-14) for DL and 39 seconds (95% CI 31-48) for I-LMA. Success rate was 100% for DL and I-LMA placement and 98% for intubation through the I-LMA. Crew rated difficulty of DL 13 mm (95% CI 6-20), placing the I-LMA 23 mm (95% CI 13-32), and intubating through the I-LMA 17 mm (95% CI 10-24).Intubation success was very high for both DL and the I-LMA, despite less flight crew experience with the I-LMA. Total time to intubation was longer with the I-LMA but still less than 1 minute. The flight crews considered both techniques easy to perform. The I-LMA appears to be a useful adjunct for airway management in the Bell 206-L3 helicopter.