Foundations of Democracy
1955; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 66; Issue: 1, Part 2 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1086/291036
ISSN1539-297X
Autores Tópico(s)Law and Political Science
ResumoPrevious article No AccessFoundations of DemocracyHans KelsenHans KelsenPDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Ethics Volume 66, Number 1, Part 2Oct., 1955Part 2: Foundations of Democracy Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/291036 Views: 152Total views on this site Citations: 72Citations are reported from Crossref PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Haemin Jee, Hans Lueders, Rachel Myrick Towards a unified approach to research on democratic backsliding, Democratization 29, no.44 (Dec 2021): 754–767.https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2021.2010709Tore Vincents Olsen The elitist defence of democracy against populists using education and money, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 18 (May 2022): 1–21.https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2022.2077014Carlo Invernizzi Accetti, Giulia Oskian What Is a Consultative Referendum? The Democratic Legitimacy of Popular Consultations, Perspectives on Politics 20, no.11 (Sep 2020): 123–138.https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592720002340Jacob Giltaij Hermann Kantorowicz and Hans Kelsen: from debating legal sociology to constructing an international legal order, History of European Ideas 48, no.11 (Mar 2021): 112–128.https://doi.org/10.1080/01916599.2021.1898438David Dyzenhaus Deus in Machina: Heller on Sovereignty and the State of Exception, (Sep 2022): 167–183.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-37577-5_8Aleksandra Anđelković Populism as a threat to the rule of law, Eudaimonia , no.2/20212/2021 (Dec 2021): 137–185.https://doi.org/10.51204/IVRS_21205AEmanuela Ceva, Valeria Ottonelli Second‐personal authority and the practice of democracy 1, Constellations 22 (Sep 2021).https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12575Yavuz Selim ALKAN Ancient Athenian Direct Democracy: Any Liberal Democratic Potential?, Ekonomi, Politika & Finans Araştırmaları Dergisi 6, no.33 (Sep 2021): 805–823.https://doi.org/10.30784/epfad.991852Manuel Hensmans Exploring the dark and bright sides of Internet democracy: Ethos-reversing and ethos-renewing digital transformation, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 168 (Jul 2021): 120777.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120777Stefan Matern Hans Kelsens kritischer Liberalismus. Freiheit, Rechtsstaatlichkeit und Volkssouveränität, Zeitschrift für Politische Theorie 11, no.2-20202-2020 (Apr 2021): 225–239.https://doi.org/10.3224/zpth.v11i2.04Lisa Hill Compulsory Voting: Activating the Demos and Enhancing Procedural Democracy in Australia, (Mar 2021): 165–187.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4025-1_9Mauro Zamboni (Absence of) Omnibus Legislation in Sweden: When Legislative Drafting Affects the Political Discourse, (May 2021): 315–333.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72748-2_13Eva Krick Stopping Rules in Political Settings, (Aug 2021): 163–194.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75329-0_5Eva Krick Introduction, (Aug 2021): 1–22.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75329-0_1Michael Goldhammer Von Weimar nach Bonn – Die Weimarer Theorien der Grundrechte, (Oct 2021): 43–61.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-60913-2_4Michael Hannon Empathetic Understanding and Deliberative Democracy, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 101, no.33 (Jul 2019): 591–611.https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12624François Lecoutre Platon totalitaire ? Une controverse du XXe siècle, Revue de métaphysique et de morale N° 107, no.33 (Jul 2020): 403–421.https://doi.org/10.3917/rmm.203.0403Viviana Asara The Limits of Liberal Democracy, Democratic Theory 7, no.11 (Jun 2020): 73–85.https://doi.org/10.3167/dt.2020.070105Alberto Bitonti Where it all starts: Lobbying, democracy and the Public Interest, Journal of Public Affairs 20, no.22 (Aug 2019).https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2001Kaius Tuori Empire of Law, 28 (Mar 2020).https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108678582Niclas Berggren, Jerg Gutmann Securing personal freedom through institutions: the role of electoral democracy and judicial independence, European Journal of Law and Economics 49, no.22 (Feb 2020): 165–186.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-020-09643-9Benjamin A. Schupmann Constraining political extremism and legal revolution, Philosophy & Social Criticism 46, no.33 (Jun 2019): 249–273.https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453719856652Stephen Turner Democracy, Liberalism, and Discretion: The Political Puzzle of the Administrative State, (Feb 2020): 41–62.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28760-3_2Ana Luiza Rodrigues Braga Relativismo moral em Kelsen: do juspositivismo à democracia, Revista Direito GV 16, no.22 (Jan 2020).https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-6172201958Oliver Hidalgo The Theory of Democratic Antinomies and the Identification of Value Trade-Offs in Political Practice, Politics and Governance 7, no.44 (Nov 2019): 264–274.https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v7i4.2243Gustavo H. Dalaqua DEMOCRACY AS COMPROMISE: AN ALTERNATIVE TO THE AGONISTIC VS. EPISTEMIC DIVIDE, Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia 60, no.144144 (Sep 2019): 587–607.https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-512x2019n14405ghdKlaus Ferdinand Gärditz Die Staatsrechtslehre im Streit um ihren Gegenstand, Der Staat 57, no.44 (Oct 2018): 633–648.https://doi.org/10.3790/staa.57.4.633TIMOTHY STANTON JOHN LOCKE AND THE FABLE OF LIBERALISM, The Historical Journal 61, no.0303 (Apr 2018): 597–622.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0018246X17000450Sandrine Baume Rehabilitating political parties: an examination of the writings of Hans Kelsen, Intellectual History Review 28, no.33 (Jan 2018): 425–449.https://doi.org/10.1080/17496977.2017.1366728ULRICH WAGRANDL Transnational militant democracy, Global Constitutionalism 7, no.22 (Jun 2018): 143–172.https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045381718000084Anthoula Malkopoulou, Ludvig Norman Three Models of Democratic Self-Defence: Militant Democracy and Its Alternatives, Political Studies 66, no.22 (Oct 2017): 442–458.https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321717723504Carlo Invernizzi-Accetti Reconciling legal positivism and human rights: Hans Kelsen's argument from relativism, Journal of Human Rights 17, no.22 (Jun 2017): 215–228.https://doi.org/10.1080/14754835.2017.1332519Jo Eric Khushal Murkens Democracy as the legitimating condition in the UK Constitution, Legal Studies 38, no.11 (Apr 2018): 42–58.https://doi.org/10.1017/lst.2017.10Bastiaan Rijpkema Militant Democracy beyond Loewenstein: George van den Bergh's 1936 Inaugural Lecture, (Nov 2018): 117–152.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97004-2_7Klaus Zeleny Hans Kelsen jako politický člověk, AUC IURIDICA 2017, no.44 (Dec 2017): 107–122.https://doi.org/10.14712/23366478.2017.25Eva Krick The Myth of Effective Veto Power under the Rule of Consensus. Dynamics and Democratic Legitimacy of Collective Decision-Making by "Tacit Consent", Négociations n° 27, no.11 (Mar 2017): 109–128.https://doi.org/10.3917/neg.027.0109Peter Langford, Ian Bryan, John McGarry Introduction: Kelsen, Legal Science and Positive Law, (May 2017): 1–19.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51817-6_1Christine Chwaszcza Kelsen on Democracy in Light of Contemporary Theories of Human Rights, (May 2017): 193–212.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51817-6_11Paolo Carrozza Kelsen and Contemporary Constitutionalism: The Continued Presence of Kelsenian Themes, (May 2017): 75–98.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51817-6_5Audrey Alejandro, Knud Erik Jørgensen, Alexander Reichwein, Felix Rösch, Helen Turton Reconstruction, (Nov 2017): 83–106.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58400-3_7Alberto Bitonti The Role of Lobbying in Modern Democracy: A Theoretical Framework, (Jan 2017): 17–30.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55256-3_2Misabel Abreu Machado Derzi, Tarcisio Diniz Magalhaes Levando a Democracia a Sério: Uma Abordagem da Regra Decisória Ideal para o CONFAZ (Taking Democracy Seriously: An Approach to the Optimal Decision Rule for the Brazilian National Finance Policy Council), SSRN Electronic Journal 110 (Jan 2017).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3522630 Références bibliographiques, (Nov 2016): 255–263.https://doi.org/10.3917/gall.simon.2016.01.0255Niclas Berggren Does belief in objective morality lead to coercion? An analysis of the arguments of Kelsen and Buchanan, The Review of Austrian Economics 29, no.33 (Jun 2015): 315–326.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-015-0318-8Gerardo L. Munck What is democracy? A reconceptualization of the quality of democracy, Democratization 23, no.11 (Jun 2014): 1–26.https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2014.918104Eerik Lagerspetz Interpretations, (Jan 2016): 247–340.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23261-4_5Eerik Lagerspetz Pluralism and Majority Decision, (Jan 2016): 341–382.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23261-4_6David Ingram A Morally Enlightened Positivism? Kelsen and Habermas on the Democratic Roots of Validity in Municipal and International Law, (Aug 2016): 175–213.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33130-0_10Joshua W. Felix Kelsen, Justice, and Constructivism, (Aug 2016): 319–328.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33130-0_16Elisabeth Lefort Arriving at Justice by a Process of Elimination: Hans Kelsen and Leo Strauss, (Aug 2016): 115–133.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33130-0_7Daniel F. Rice Kelsen and Niebuhr on Democracy, (Aug 2016): 135–159.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33130-0_8Luke Tomlinson Reaching Agreement Through Fair Process, (Jan 2015): 59–83.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17184-5_3Luke Tomlinson Political Equality: Levelling the Playing Field, (Jan 2015): 109–131.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17184-5_5Luke Tomlinson Voting, (Jan 2015): 157–176.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17184-5_7 Turnout, Abstention, and Democratic Legitimacy, (Jun 2014): 125–153.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139649742.008David Ingram Reconciling positivism and realism, Philosophy & Social Criticism 40, no.33 (Mar 2014): 237–267.https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453713520164Jan-Werner Müller A Post-Post-Liberal Order: How Western Europe Emerged from Its Thirty-Year Crisis, (Jan 2013): 193–212.https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137315113_10Lisa Hill , Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy 12, no.44 ( 2013): 454.https://doi.org/10.1089/elj.2013.0204Valerio Nitrato Izzo Beyond Consensus: Law, Disagreement and Democracy, International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique 25, no.44 (Oct 2011): 563–575.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-011-9236-7Silvio Ferrari Law and Religion in a Secular World: A European Perspective, Ecclesiastical Law Journal 14, no.33 (Aug 2012): 355–370.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0956618X1200035XGerry Mackie The Values of Democratic Proceduralism, Irish Political Studies 26, no.44 (Dec 2011): 439–453.https://doi.org/10.1080/07907184.2011.619730Luigi Ferrajoli The Normative Paradigm of Constitutional Democracy, Res Publica 17, no.44 (Oct 2011): 355–367.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-011-9169-8Denise Cristina Vitale Ramos Mendes, Representação política e participação: reflexões sobre o déficit democrático, Revista Katálysis 10, no.22 (Dec 2007): 143–153.https://doi.org/10.1590/S1414-49802007000200002Zoran Oklopcic Skewed Imaginary of Polity-Creation, Circular Vocabulary of Peoplehood: The Idea of Enlarged Constituent Power and its Tradeoffs, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2007).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1108236Stefan Andreasson Stand and Deliver: Private Property and the Politics of Global Dispossession, Political Studies 54, no.11 (Jun 2016): 3–22.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2006.00563.xMohan J. Dutta-Bergman Civil Society and Public Relations: Not So Civil After All, Journal of Public Relations Research 17, no.33 (Jul 2005): 267–289.https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr1703_3William E. Scheuerman Die politische Theorie konkurrierender Eliten: Joseph Schumpeter, (Jan 2002): 399–437.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-94929-5_13José M. Rosales Liberal reformism and democratic citizenship, Citizenship Studies 2, no.22 (Jul 1998): 257–272.https://doi.org/10.1080/13621029808420682John Keane Democracy and the Media — Without Foundations, Political Studies 40, no.1_suppl1_suppl (Jun 2016): 116–129.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1992.tb01816.xCharles Covell Introduction: Modern Legal Philosophy, (Jan 1992): 1–29.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-22359-6_1 Charner Perry Ethics and Democracy, Ethics 83, no.22 (Oct 2015): 87–107.https://doi.org/10.1086/291869Felix E. Oppenheim The Natural Law Thesis: Affirmation or Denial?, American Political Science Review 51, no.11 (Sep 2013): 41–53.https://doi.org/10.2307/1951769
Referência(s)