Interference of mRNA Function by Sequence-specific Endoribonuclease PemK
2004; Elsevier BV; Volume: 279; Issue: 20 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1074/jbc.m314284200
ISSN1083-351X
AutoresJunjie Zhang, Yonglong Zhang, Ling Zhu, Motoo Suzuki, Masayori Inouye,
Tópico(s)RNA Research and Splicing
ResumoIn Escherichia coli, programmed cell death is mediated through the system called "addiction module," which consists of a pair of genes encoding a stable toxin and a labile antitoxin. The pemI-pemK system is an addiction module present on plasmid R100. It helps to maintain the plasmid by post-segregational killing in E. coli population. Here we demonstrate that purified PemK, the toxin encoded by the pemI-pemK addiction module, inhibits protein synthesis in an E. coli cell-free system, whereas the addition of PemI, the antitoxin against PemK, resumes the protein synthesis. Further studies reveal that PemK is a sequence-specific endoribonuclease that cleaves mRNAs to inhibit protein synthesis, whereas PemI blocks the endoribonuclease activity of PemK. PemK cleaves only single-stranded RNA preferentially at the 5′ or 3′ side of the A residue in the "UAH" sequences (where H is C, A, or U). Upon induction, PemK cleaves cellular mRNAs to effectively block protein synthesis in E. coli. The pemK homologue genes have been identified on the genomes of a wide range of bacteria. We propose that PemK and its homologues form a novel endoribonuclease family that interferes with mRNA function by cleaving cellular mRNAs in a sequence-specific manner. In Escherichia coli, programmed cell death is mediated through the system called "addiction module," which consists of a pair of genes encoding a stable toxin and a labile antitoxin. The pemI-pemK system is an addiction module present on plasmid R100. It helps to maintain the plasmid by post-segregational killing in E. coli population. Here we demonstrate that purified PemK, the toxin encoded by the pemI-pemK addiction module, inhibits protein synthesis in an E. coli cell-free system, whereas the addition of PemI, the antitoxin against PemK, resumes the protein synthesis. Further studies reveal that PemK is a sequence-specific endoribonuclease that cleaves mRNAs to inhibit protein synthesis, whereas PemI blocks the endoribonuclease activity of PemK. PemK cleaves only single-stranded RNA preferentially at the 5′ or 3′ side of the A residue in the "UAH" sequences (where H is C, A, or U). Upon induction, PemK cleaves cellular mRNAs to effectively block protein synthesis in E. coli. The pemK homologue genes have been identified on the genomes of a wide range of bacteria. We propose that PemK and its homologues form a novel endoribonuclease family that interferes with mRNA function by cleaving cellular mRNAs in a sequence-specific manner. In Escherichia coli, programmed cell death is proposed to be mediated through the system called "addiction module," which consists of a pair of genes encoding a toxin and an antitoxin (1Engelberg-Kulka H. Glaser G. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 1999; 53: 43-70Crossref PubMed Scopus (315) Google Scholar). The addiction module has the following properties. (a) The toxic protein is stable, whereas the antitoxin is a labile protein. (b) The toxin and the antitoxin are coexpressed from an operon and interact with each other to form a stable complex. (c) Their expression is auto-regulated either by the toxin-antitoxin complex or by the antitoxin alone. When the co-expression is inhibited under stress conditions, the antitoxin is degraded by proteases, enabling the toxin to act on its target. In E. coli, some extrachromosomal elements are known to contain addiction modules causing the bacterial programmed cell death by the so-called postsegregational killing effect. The most studied extrachromosomal addiction modules are the phd-doc system on bacteriophage P1 (2Lehnherr H. Maguin E. Jafri S. Yarmolinsky M.B. J. Mol. Biol. 1993; 233: 414-428Crossref PubMed Scopus (209) Google Scholar, 3Gazit E. Sauer R.T. J. Biol. Chem. 1999; 274: 16813-16818Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (50) Google Scholar, 4Magnuson R. Lehnherr H. Mukhopadhyay G. Yarmolinsky M.B. J. Biol. Chem. 1996; 271: 18705-18710Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (60) Google Scholar, 5Lehnherr H. Yarmolinsky M.B. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1995; 92: 3274-3277Crossref PubMed Scopus (155) Google Scholar), the ccdA-ccdB system on factor F (6Tam J.E. Kline B.C. J. Bacteriol. 1989; 171: 2353-2360Crossref PubMed Google Scholar, 7Bahassi E.M. O'Dea M.H. Allali N. Messens J. Gellert M. Couturier M. J. Biol. Chem. 1999; 274: 10936-10944Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (84) Google Scholar, 8Afif H. Allali N. Couturier M. Van Melderen L. Mol. Microbiol. 2001; 41: 73-82Crossref PubMed Scopus (118) Google Scholar, 9Dao-Thi M.H. Charlier D. Loris R. Maes D. Messens J. Wyns L. Backmann J. J. Biol. Chem. 2002; 277: 3733-3742Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (67) Google Scholar), the kis-kid system on plasmid R1 (10Ruiz-Echevarria M.J. Berzal-Herranz A. Gerdes K. Diaz-Orejas R. Mol. Microbiol. 1991; 5: 2685-2693Crossref PubMed Scopus (71) Google Scholar, 11Hargreaves D. Santos-Sierra S. Giraldo R. Sabariegos-Jareno R. de la Cueva-Mendez G. Boelens R. Diaz-Orejas R. Rafferty J.B. Structure. 2002; 10: 1425-1433Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (76) Google Scholar, 12Ruiz-Echevarria M.J. Gimenez-Gallego G. Sabariegos-Jareno R. Diaz-Orejas R. J. Mol. Biol. 1995; 247: 568-577PubMed Google Scholar, 13Santos-Sierra S. Lemonnier M. Nunez B. Hargreaves D. Rafferty J. Giraldo R. Andreu J.M. Diaz-Orejas R. Plasmid. 2003; 50: 120-130Crossref PubMed Scopus (14) Google Scholar), and the pemI-pemK system on plasmid R100 (14Tsuchimoto S. Nishimura Y. Ohtsubo E. J. Bacteriol. 1992; 174: 4205-4211Crossref PubMed Google Scholar, 15Tsuchimoto S. Ohtsubo H. Ohtsubo E. J. Bacteriol. 1988; 170: 1461-1466Crossref PubMed Scopus (120) Google Scholar, 16Tsuchimoto S. Ohtsubo E. Mol. Gen. Genet. 1993; 237: 81-88Crossref PubMed Scopus (36) Google Scholar, 17Tsuchimoto S. Ohtsubo E. Mol. Gen. Genet. 1989; 215: 463-468Crossref PubMed Scopus (19) Google Scholar). Interestingly, the E. coli chromosome also contains several addiction module systems, such as the relBE system (18Gotfredsen M. Gerdes K. Mol. Microbiol. 1998; 29: 1065-1076Crossref PubMed Scopus (261) Google Scholar, 19Christensen S.K. Mikkelsen M. Pedersen K. Gerdes K. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2001; 98: 14328-14333Crossref PubMed Scopus (377) Google Scholar, 20Christensen S.K. Gerdes K. Mol. Microbiol. 2003; 48: 1389-1400Crossref PubMed Scopus (276) Google Scholar, 21Pedersen K. Zavialov A.V. Pavlov M.Y. Elf J. Gerdes K. Ehrenberg M. Cell. 2003; 112: 131-140Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (457) Google Scholar), the mazEF system (22Aizenman E. Engelberg-Kulka H. Glaser G. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1996; 93: 6059-6063Crossref PubMed Scopus (505) Google Scholar, 23Marianovsky I. Aizenman E. Engelberg-Kulka H. Glaser G. J. Biol. Chem. 2001; 276: 5975-5984Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (116) Google Scholar, 24Kamada K. Hanaoka F. Burley S.K. Mol. Cell. 2003; 11: 875-884Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (254) Google Scholar, 25Zhang J. Zhang Y. Inouye M. J. Biol. Chem. 2003; 278: 32300-32306Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (92) Google Scholar), and the chpB system (26Santos Sierra S. Giraldo R. Diaz Orejas R. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1998; 168: 51-58Crossref PubMed Google Scholar, 27Masuda Y. Miyakawa K. Nishimura Y. Ohtsubo E. J. Bacteriol. 1993; 175: 6850-6856Crossref PubMed Google Scholar, 28Christensen S.K. Pedersen K. Hansen F.G. Gerdes K. J. Mol. Biol. 2003; 332: 809-819Crossref PubMed Scopus (317) Google Scholar). The cellular effects of the toxins in the addiction modules have been studied quite extensively. CcdB, the toxin in the ccdA-ccdB system, interacts with DNA gyrase to block DNA replication (7Bahassi E.M. O'Dea M.H. Allali N. Messens J. Gellert M. Couturier M. J. Biol. Chem. 1999; 274: 10936-10944Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (84) Google Scholar, 29Kampranis S.C. Howells A.J. Maxwell A. J. Mol. Biol. 1999; 293: 733-744Crossref PubMed Scopus (38) Google Scholar), and RelE, the toxin in the relBE system, is not able to degrade free RNA but cleaves mRNA in the ribosome A site with high codon specificity (21Pedersen K. Zavialov A.V. Pavlov M.Y. Elf J. Gerdes K. Ehrenberg M. Cell. 2003; 112: 131-140Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (457) Google Scholar). Recently, it was demonstrated that the A-site mRNA cleavage can occur in the absence of RelE (30Hayes C.S. Sauer R.T. Mol. Cell. 2003; 12: 903-911Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (194) Google Scholar). The exact mechanism of the A-site mRNA cleavage is still unknown. It has been proposed that MazF (ChpAK), the toxin encoded by the mazEF system, and ChpBK, the toxin encoded by chpB system, inhibit translation by a mechanism very similar to that of RelE in a ribosome-dependent and codon-specific manner (28Christensen S.K. Pedersen K. Hansen F.G. Gerdes K. J. Mol. Biol. 2003; 332: 809-819Crossref PubMed Scopus (317) Google Scholar). However, we have recently demonstrated that MazF is a sequence-specific endoribonuclease functional only for single-stranded RNA, which preferentially cleaves mRNAs at the ACA sequence in a manner independent of ribosomes and codon, and is therefore functionally distinct from RelE (31Zhang Y. Zhang J. Hoeflich K.P. Ikura M. Qing G. Inouye M. Mol. Cell. 2003; 12: 913-923Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (464) Google Scholar). The pemI-pemK system and the kis-kid system are involved in the stable maintenance of two closely related incFII low copy plasmids, plasmid R100 (14Tsuchimoto S. Nishimura Y. Ohtsubo E. J. Bacteriol. 1992; 174: 4205-4211Crossref PubMed Google Scholar, 15Tsuchimoto S. Ohtsubo H. Ohtsubo E. J. Bacteriol. 1988; 170: 1461-1466Crossref PubMed Scopus (120) Google Scholar) and plasmid R1 (10Ruiz-Echevarria M.J. Berzal-Herranz A. Gerdes K. Diaz-Orejas R. Mol. Microbiol. 1991; 5: 2685-2693Crossref PubMed Scopus (71) Google Scholar, 32Bravo A. de Torrontegui G. Diaz R. Mol. Gen. Genet. 1987; 210: 101-110Crossref PubMed Scopus (129) Google Scholar), respectively. These two systems turned out to be identical (1Engelberg-Kulka H. Glaser G. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 1999; 53: 43-70Crossref PubMed Scopus (315) Google Scholar). It has been demonstrated that Kid (PemK) inhibits the ColE1 replication acting at the initiation of DNA synthesis but does not inhibit P4 DNA replication in vitro (12Ruiz-Echevarria M.J. Gimenez-Gallego G. Sabariegos-Jareno R. Diaz-Orejas R. J. Mol. Biol. 1995; 247: 568-577PubMed Google Scholar). It has not been shown whether Kid (PemK) inhibits the chromosome DNA replication. Toxin Kid (PemK) and antidote Kis (PemI) not only function in bacteria but also function efficiently in a wide range of eukaryotes. Kid (PemK) inhibits cell proliferation in yeast, Xenopus laevis, and human cells, and the inhibition was released by Kis (PemI) (33de la Cueva-Mendez G. Mills A.D. Clay-Farrace L. Diaz-Orejas R. Laskey R.A. EMBO J. 2003; 22: 246-251Crossref PubMed Scopus (61) Google Scholar). It has also been demonstrated that Kid (PemK) triggers apoptosis in human cells (33de la Cueva-Mendez G. Mills A.D. Clay-Farrace L. Diaz-Orejas R. Laskey R.A. EMBO J. 2003; 22: 246-251Crossref PubMed Scopus (61) Google Scholar). These results suggest that there is a common target for Kid (PemK) in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes. In this paper, we demonstrate that PemK is an endoribonuclease, which effectively blocks protein synthesis by cleaving cellular mRNAs in a sequence-specific manner. We propose that PemK and its homologues constitute a novel endoribonuclease family that interferes with mRNA function. Strains and Plasmids—E. coli BL21(DE3) and BW25113 cells were used. The pemIK gene was amplified by PCR with plasmid R100 as template and cloned into the NdeI-XhoI sites of pET21cc (Novagen) to create an in-frame translation with a (His)6 tag at the PemK C terminus. The plasmid was designated as pET21cc-IK(His)6. The pemI gene was cloned into the NdeI-BamHI sites of pET28a (Novagen), creating plasmid pET28a-(His)6I. PemI was expressed as a fusion with an N-terminal (His)6 tag followed by a thrombin cleavage site named (His)6PemI. The pemK gene cloned into pBAD (34Guzman L.M. Belin D. Carson M.J. Beckwith J. J. Bacteriol. 1995; 177: 4121-4130Crossref PubMed Scopus (3978) Google Scholar), creating plasmid pBAD-K. E. coli mazG gene was cloned into NdeI-BamHI sites of pET11a (New England Biolabs), creating plasmid pET11a-MazG. The mazG gene was cloned into a pINIII vector (35Nakano E.T. Rao M.M. Perucho M. Inouye M. J. Virol. 1987; 61: 302-307Crossref PubMed Google Scholar), creating plasmid pIN-MazG. E. coli era gene was cloned into the ScaI-XhoI sites of pET28a, creating plasmid pET28a-Era. The era gene was also cloned into pINIII vector to create plasmid pIN-Era. Protein Purification—For purification of (His)6PemI, pET28a-(His)6I was introduced into E. coli BL21(DE3) strain and (His)6PemI expression was induced with 1 mm IPTG 1The abbreviations used are: IPTG, isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside; ORF, open reading frame; d, oligodeoxyribonucleotide. for 4 h. (His)6PemI protein was purified with use of nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid resin (Qiagen). pET21cc-IK(His)6 was also introduced into E. coli BL21(DE3) strain. The co-expression of PemI and PemK(His)6 was induced in the presence of 1 mm IPTG for 4 h. The PemI-PemK(His)6 complex was purified with the use of nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid (Qiagen). To purify PemK(His)6 from the purified PemI-PemK(His)6 complex, PemI in the purified PemI-PemK(His)6 complex was dissociated from PemK(His)6 in 5 m guanidine HCl. PemK(His)6 was retrapped on nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid resin (Qiagen) and then eluted and refolded by stepwise dialysis. Assays of Protein and DNA Syntheses in Vivo—E. coli BW25113 cells containing pBAD-K were grown in modified M9 medium with 0.5% glycerol (no glucose) and an amino acid mixture (1 mm each) without methionine. When the A600 of the culture reached 0.6, arabinose was added to a final concentration of 0.2% to induce PemK expression. Cell cultures (1 ml) were taken at the time points indicated and mixed with 5 μCi of [35S]methionine (protein synthesis) or 2 μCi of [methyl-3H]thymidine (DNA synthesis). After 1-min incorporation at 37 °C, the rates of DNA replication and protein synthesis were determined as described previously (36Pedersen K. Christensen S.K. Gerdes K. Mol. Microbiol. 2002; 45: 501-510Crossref PubMed Scopus (305) Google Scholar). To prepare the samples for SDS-PAGE analysis of the total cellular protein synthesis, [35S]methionine incorporation reaction mixture (500 μl) was taken at the time points indicated and added into a chilled test tube containing 25 μl of 100% trichloroacetic acid solution and 100 μg/ml non-radioactive methionine. Cell pellets were collected by centrifugation and subjected to SDS-PAGE followed by autoradiography. Primer Extension Analysis—The DNA fragment containing a T7 promoter and the mazG gene was obtained by PCR amplification with T7 primer d(AGATCTCGATCCCGCAAATTAAT) and primer G6 d(TTAGAGATCAATTTCCTGCCGTTTTAC) with pET11a-MazG as template. Another DNA fragment containing a T7 promoter and the era gene was obtained by PCR amplification with the same T7 primer above and primer E5 d(TTAAAGATCGTCAACGTAACCG) with pET28a-Era as template. The mazG mRNA and era mRNA were prepared from these two DNA fragments, respectively, using the T7 large-scale transcription kit (Promega). RNA substrates were partially digested with PemK(His)6 at 37 °C for 15 min. The digestion reaction mixture (20 μl) contained 4 μg of RNA substrate, 0.2 μg of PemK(His)6, 1 μl of RNase inhibitor, 20 mm Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 100 mm NaCl, and 1 mm DTT. Partial digestion products were purified with the RNeasy column (Qiagen) to remove PemK(His)6 protein. The primers G1 d(TGCTCTTTATCCCACGGGCAGC), G2 d(GCCCAGTTCACCGCGAAGATCGTC), G3 d(GGTTTTGATTTGCTCCCAACGGGCAAG), G4 d(CATTTCCTCCTCCAGTTTAGCCTGGTC), and G5 d(TTGCCAGACTTCTTCCATTGTTTCGAG) were used for primer extension analyses of the mazG RNA. The primers E1 d(GATCCCCACAATGCGGTGACGAGT), E2 d(CACGTTGTCCACTTTGTTCACC GC), E3 d(CAGTTCAGCGCCGAGGAAACGCAT), and E4 d(GCGTTCGTCGTCGGCCCAACCGGA) were used for primer extension analyses of the era RNA. The primers were 5′-labeled with [γ-32P]ATP using T4 polynucleotide kinase. Primer extension reactions were performed at 42 °C for 1 h. The control experiments were performed under the same condition with the exception that PemK(His)6 was not added in the digestion reaction mixture. The primer extension product was analyzed on a 6% sequencing gel running along side by side with the DNA sequencing ladder prepared with the same primer. Cleavage of Synthesized RNA by PemK—The 30-base RNA (UAAGAAGGAGAUAUACAUAUGAAUCAAAUC), antisense RNA (GAUUUGAUUCAUAUGUAUAUCUCCUUCUUA), and the complementary DNA d(GATTTGATTCATATGTATATCTCCTTCTTA) were commercially synthesized. The 30-base RNA was 5′ end-labeled with [γ-32P]ATP using T4 polynucleotide kinase and used as the substrate to PemK(His)6. The cleavage products of the 30-base RNA were applied to a 20% sequencing gel (with 7 m urea) along with a RNA ladder, which was prepared by partial alkaline hydrolysis of the 5′ end-labeled 30-base RNA as described previously (37Smith J.S. Roth M.J. J. Biol. Chem. 1992; 267: 15071-15079Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar). The effects of the RNA-RNA duplex and RNA-DNA duplex formation on the PemK-mediated RNA cleavage were determined as described previously (31Zhang Y. Zhang J. Hoeflich K.P. Ikura M. Qing G. Inouye M. Mol. Cell. 2003; 12: 913-923Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (464) Google Scholar). Northern Blot and Primer Extension Analyses of the PemK Effects on mRNAs in Vivo—pIN-MazG plasmid and pIN-Era plasmid were transformed into E. coli BW25113 containing pBAD-K, creating the BW25113/pBAD-K/pIN-MazG and BW25113/pBAD-K/pIN-Era strains, respectively. Cells were grown at 37 °C in LB medium containing ampicillin (50 μg/ml) and chloramphenicol (20 μg/ml). When the A600 value reached 0.4, IPTG was added to a final concentration of 1 mm to induce the synthesis of the mazG or era mRNA. After another 30-min incubation at 37 °C, arabinose was added to a final concentration of 0.2% to induce the expression of PemK. The samples were taken at different time intervals after the induction of PemK. Total cellular RNA was isolated using the hot-phenol method as described previously (38Sarmientos P. Sylvester J.E. Contente S. Cashel M. Cell. 1983; 32: 1337-1346Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (163) Google Scholar). The DNA fragment containing the full-length ORF of the mazG or era gene was used to prepare the radioactively labeled probe, which was used in the Northern blot analysis. Primer extension analysis was performed with primer G2 (for the mazG mRNA) or E1 (for the era mRNA). To detect the lpp mRNA, total cellular RNA was extracted from E. coli BW25113/pBAD-K at various time points after the addition of arabinose and subjected to Northern blot analysis using the radiolabeled lpp ORF DNA fragment as probe. The primer extension analysis of the lpp mRNA was performed with primer lpp-C d(AGAATGTGCGCCATTTTTCACT). The Effects of PemK on DNA and Protein Syntheses in Vivo— The pemK gene was cloned into pBAD vector (34Guzman L.M. Belin D. Carson M.J. Beckwith J. J. Bacteriol. 1995; 177: 4121-4130Crossref PubMed Scopus (3978) Google Scholar), creating plasmid pBAD-K, which was transformed into E. coli BW25113. The expression of PemK in BW25113/pBAD-K was induced by the addition of arabinose to a final concentration of 0.2%. After the induction of PemK, the rates of DNA replication and protein synthesis were measured at various time points as indicated in Fig. 1, A and B, respectively. Both DNA replication and protein synthesis were affected by the induction of PemK, but DNA replication was inhibited at a significant slower rate than protein synthesis. Protein synthesis was rapidly reduced by ∼50% at 10 min after the induction of PemK, whereas it took approximately 100 min for similar inhibition of DNA replication. As shown in Fig. 1C, SDS-PAGE analysis of total cellular protein synthesis at different time points after the induction of PemK indicates that PemK is a general inhibitor for the synthesis of cellular proteins. After the induction of PemK, the intensity of a band indicated by an arrow increased from 0 to 30 min and then decreased. On the basis of its molecular mass, this band probably represents the induced PemK protein. PemK Inhibits Protein Synthesis in a Cell-free System— PemK(His)6 (C-terminally tagged) was purified from E. coli strain BL21(DE3)/pET21cc-IK(His)6 co-expressing both PemI and PemK(His)6 as described under "Experimental Procedures." (His)6PemI (N-terminally tagged) was purified from E. coli strain BL21(DE3)/pET28a-(His)6I. PemK(His)6 and (His)6PemI are referred to as PemK and PemI, respectively, in the following in vitro experiments. To determine whether PemK inhibits protein synthesis, we examined the effects of purified PemK on the synthesis of MazG and (His)6Era in an E. coli cell-free RNA/protein synthesis system. The synthesis of MazG from plasmid pET11a-MazG and the synthesis of (His)6Era from plasmid pET28a-Era were carried out at 37 °C for 1 h using E. coli T7 S30 extract system (Promega) in the absence of PemK (Fig. 2A, lane 1) or in the presence of increasing amounts of PemK (Fig. 2A, lanes 2–5). Both MazG and (His)6Era synthesis were blocked by PemK in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 2A). These results demonstrate that PemK indeed inhibits protein synthesis, consistent with the PemK-mediated inhibition of protein synthesis observed in vivo (Fig. 1, B and C). The delayed PemK-mediated inhibition of DNA replication observed in vivo (Fig. 1A) thus is speculated to be due to a secondary effect of the inhibition of cellular protein synthesis. Interestingly, the addition of the antitoxin PemI blocked the PemK-mediated inhibition of protein synthesis and resumed MazG and (His)6Era synthesis in a PemI dose-dependent manner (Fig. 2B). It should be noted that preincubation of the E. coli cell-free system with PemK for 15 min at 37 °C did not have a significant adverse effect on (His)6Era synthesis if PemI was added together with the plasmid DNA after the 15-min preincubation (Fig. 2C, compare lanes 1 and 3). However, in the absence of PemI, no protein was produced (Fig. 2C, lane 2). (His)6Era synthesis was resumed regardless of whether PemI was added after the 15-min preincubation with PemK (Fig. 2C, lane 3), or it was added together with PemK during the 15-min preincubation (Fig. 2C, lane 4). These results suggest that the primary target of PemK is mRNAs but not tRNA, ribosomes, or any other factors that are required for protein synthesis in the cell-free system. Endoribonuclease Activity of PemK—The DNA fragment containing a T7 promoter and the mazG gene was obtained by PCR amplification using the plasmid pET11a-MazG as a template as described under "Experimental Procedures." Similarly, another DNA fragment containing a T7 promoter and the era gene was obtained with the plasmid pET28a-Era as a template. The mazG mRNA and the era mRNA were then prepared from these two DNA fragments, respectively, using the T7 large-scale transcription kit (Promega). The mazG mRNA was digested into smaller fragments after incubation with PemK at 37 °C for 15 min (Fig. 3A, lane 2), whereas the addition of PemI inhibited the cleavage of mazG mRNA in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 3A, lanes 3–6). PemI itself had no effect on the mazG mRNA (Fig. 3A, lane 7). A similar result was obtained with the era mRNA as substrate (data not shown). These results demonstrate that PemK is an endoribonuclease that cleaves mRNA to inhibit protein synthesis and that PemI functions as an antitoxin to block the endoribonuclease activity of PemK. The fact that the digestion products of mazG mRNA by PemK form distinct bands on a 3.5% polyacrylamide gel (Fig. 3A) indicates that PemK cleaves RNA at specific sites. The mazG mRNA was partially digested by PemK and then subjected to primer extension using five different oligodeoxyribonucleotide primers, G1–G5, as described under "Experimental Procedures." A number of specific cleavage sites along the mazG mRNA were detected on a 6% sequence gel compared with the controls without PemK treatment (data not shown). Partially digested era mRNA by PemK was also subjected to primer extension using four different primers, E1–E4, as described under "Experimental Procedures" to detect the PemK cleavage sites along the era mRNA. To determine the exact sequence around the PemK cleavage sites, each primer extension product was analyzed on a 6% sequencing gel with the DNA sequencing ladder prepared with the same primer (Fig. 3, B–E). Table I shows the sequences around the major cleavage sites in the mazG mRNA, the era mRNA, and the lpp mRNA (see Fig. 5D for the lpp mRNA) determined by the primer extension experiments. It reveals that a UA dinucleotide is common in all but one cleavage site and that the primary cleavages occur at the 5′ or 3′ side of the A residue in the UAH sequence (where H is C, A, or U) with only one exception in which the cleavage occurs between U and G residues in the UGC sequence (Table I, row 7). The UAC sequence appears at 11 of the 18 cleavage sites determined.Table ImRNA sequences around the PemK cleavage sitesGene namesPrimermRNA sequences around the cleavage sitesmazGG1-27UUUUAACUUU ↓ A AGAAGGAGA-8-14AAGGAGAUAU ↓ A CAUAUGAAT+6G2+112GAAGAAACCU A↓CGAAGUGCU+131G3+196GUGGUGUUUU ↓ A CGCGCAAAU+215+234CUUUGACUUU ↓ A AUGAUAUUU+253+240CUUUAAUGAU ↓ A UUUGCGCUG+259+290CGCAUGUUUU ↓ G CUGAUAGUU+309G4+523GAGGUGAUGU A↓CGAAGCGCG+542G5+597UGCCACGGUU ↓ A AUCUGGCUC+616+684AGUGGAGCGU ↓ A UUGUUGCCG+703eraE1+10GATAAAAGUU ↓ A CUGCGGAUU+29E2+144GGGGAUCCAU ↓ A CUGAAGGCG+163+169CAGGCGAUCU ↓ A CGUCGAUAC+188E3+509GUAAGCAUCU ↓ A CCUGAAGCG+528+541CCGGAAGAUU ↓ A CAUCACCGA+560E4+625GAACUGCCGU A↓CUCCGUGAC+644+676CGCGGUGGUU ↓ A UGACAUCAA+695lpplppC+210CAACAUGGCU A↓CTAAATACC+229 Open table in a new tab A 30-base RNA substrate was designed on the basis of the sequence around one PemK cleavage site in the mazG mRNA that contains a UAC sequence (Table I, row 2). The RNA was labeled at the 5′ end with [γ-32P]ATP using T4 polynucleotide kinase. The 30-base RNA was cleaved equally well at either 5′ or 3′ side of the A residue (residue 15 in the 30-base RNA) in the UAC sequence (Fig. 4A). However, in the primer extension experiment using the full-length mazG mRNA, this UAC sequence was cleaved only at the 5′ side of the A residue (Fig. 3B). It is interesting to note that, for the full-length mazG RNA, PemK cleavages can happen at the 3′ side of the A residue in some cleavage sites, whereas in the other cleavage sites, cleavages can happen at the 5′ side (Table I). The reason for these different cleavage patterns is unknown at present. On a 15% native PAGE, the cleavage products from the 30-base RNA migrated as a single band (Fig. 4B, lane 2). When the antisense RNA was annealed with the 30-base RNA substrate in different ratios before the addition of PemK, it blocked the RNA cleavage in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 4B, lanes 3–7). A similar result was obtained when the 30-base RNA substrate formed a duplex with its complementary DNA (data not shown). These results indicate that the PemK cleavage sites in the 30-base RNA substrate became protected in the RNA-RNA and RNA-DNA duplexes. Therefore, we conclude that PemK is a sequence-specific endoribonuclease for single-stranded RNA. In Vivo mRNA Cleavage upon the Induction of PemK—To examine the effect of PemK on mRNAs in vivo, Northern blot and primer extension analyses were performed with the total cellular RNA extracted at different time points after the induction of PemK as described under "Experimental Procedures." The 16 and 23 S rRNAs were stable against PemK in vivo, because no significant changes were observed in their band intensities in 1% agarose gel electrophoresis in the total cellular RNA samples during the 60-min period after the induction of PemK (data not shown). This finding indicates that in vivo both 16 and 23 S rRNA are well protected from PemK cleavage. Fig. 5A shows the Northern blot analyses of the mazG, era, and lpp mRNAs at the various time points with or without the induction of PemK. The mazG mRNA and the era mRNA were produced, respectively, from pIN-MazG and pIN-Era in the presence of 1 mm IPTG for 30 min before the addition of arabinose (the final concentration of 0.2%) to induce PemK expression. The lpp mRNA was transcribed from the E. coli chromosome. All of the three mRNAs were degraded after a 10-min induction of PemK expression, whereas no changes were observed during the 60-min incubation without the induction of PemK (Fig. 5A). In comparison with the mazG and lpp mRNAs, the era mRNA was mostly converted to a smaller distinct band, which was comparatively stable during the 60-min induction of PemK. The nature of this stable mRNA cleavage product is unknown. Primer extension experiments were also carried out to determine the PemK cleavage sites in mRNAs in vivo. One cleavage site for each mRNA is shown in Fig. 5, B–D, for mazG, era, and lpp, respectively. In all of the cases, a band appeared at 10 min after the induction of PemK (lane 2 in Fig. 5, B–D) whose intensity further increased during the 60-min induction of PemK (lanes 2–6). Importantly, the band was hardly detected at 0 min (lane 1), clearly demonstrating that the observed cleavages were caused by the induction of PemK. Both the mazG and lpp mRNAs were cleaved between the A and C residues in the UAC sequence, whereas the era mRNA was cleaved between the U and A residues. The mazG mRNA was cleaved at the identical site in vivo and in vitro (compare Fig. 3C and Fig. 5B). The in vivo cleavage of the era mRNA also occurred at the same site as detected in vitro with use of the same primer (compare Fig. 3D with Fig. 5C). The cleaved UAC sequences in the mazG and the era mRNAs are in the reading frame of the both ORFs, encoding Tyr-41 in MazG and Tyr-7 in Era, whereas the cleaved UAC sequence in the lpp mRNA is between two adjacent codons, GCU for Ala-73 and ACU for Thr-74. The in vivo mRNA cleavages by PemK were very specific because no other cleavages were detected in Fig. 5, B–D. Therefore, unlike RelE that stimulates codon-specific mRNA cleavage at the A site on ribosomes (20Christensen S.K. Gerdes K. Mol. Microbiol. 2003; 48: 1389-1400Crossref PubMed Scopus (276) Google Scholar, 21Pedersen K. Zavialov A.V. Pavlov M.Y. Elf J. Gerdes K. Ehrenberg M. Cell. 2003; 112: 131-140Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (457) Google Scholar, 30Hayes C.S. Sauer R.T. Mol. Cell. 2003; 12: 903-911Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (194) Google Scholar), PemK is a sequence-specific endoribonuclease inhibiting protein synthesis by cleaving mRNAs in a manner independent of ribosomes and codon-reading frames. In this paper, we demonstrate that PemK, the toxin encoded by the pemI-pemK addiction module, is a sequence-specific endoribonuclease. Both in vitro and in vivo studies support that PemK inhibits protein synthesis by cleaving mRNAs at specific sites. Purified PemK inhibits protein synthesis in an E. coli cell-free system, whereas the addition of PemI is able to block the inhibitory effect of PemK and resume protein synthesis. Further, we demonstrate that mRNAs are degraded by PemK and that the PemK-mediated mRNA cleavage is inhibited by PemI. Therefore, PemI functions as an antitoxin to block the endoribonuclease activity of PemK by the formation of a PemI-PemK complex. PemK was found to be highly specific to single-stranded RNA, because the PemK-mediated RNA cleavage was blocked when an RNA substrate was annealed with its antisense RNA or complementary DNA to form an RNA-RNA or RNA-DNA duplex. The present results demonstrate that PemK cleaves preferentially at the 5′ or 3′ side of the A residue in UAH sequences (where H is C, A, or U). It remains to be determined how the phosphodiester bond is cleaved either at the 3′ end of the bond or at the 5′ end of the bond. Our results also show that the RNA cleavage by PemK is independent of ribosomes, which is distinctly different from RelE, the toxin encoded by the relBE addiction module. RelE is not able to cleave free RNA but stimulates mRNA cleavage at the ribosome A site with a high codon specificity (20Christensen S.K. Gerdes K. Mol. Microbiol. 2003; 48: 1389-1400Crossref PubMed Scopus (276) Google Scholar, 21Pedersen K. Zavialov A.V. Pavlov M.Y. Elf J. Gerdes K. Ehrenberg M. Cell. 2003; 112: 131-140Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (457) Google Scholar, 30Hayes C.S. Sauer R.T. Mol. Cell. 2003; 12: 903-911Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (194) Google Scholar). In the previous study on the kis-kid system, which is an addiction module identical to the pemI-pemK system, it has been reported that Kid (PemK) inhibits the in vitro ColE1 replication at the initiation stage but has no significant effect on the P4 DNA replication. DnaB has been proposed as the target for the inhibitory action of Kid (PemK) (12Ruiz-Echevarria M.J. Gimenez-Gallego G. Sabariegos-Jareno R. Diaz-Orejas R. J. Mol. Biol. 1995; 247: 568-577PubMed Google Scholar). However, so far there have been no data to support the interaction between Kid (PemK) and DnaB. It is interesting to note that the ColE1 replication is initiated by RNA II and inhibited by RNA I (39Cesareni G. Helmer-Citterich M. Castagnoli L. Trends Genet. 1991; 7: 230-235Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (98) Google Scholar, 40Davison J. Gene (Amst.). 1984; 28: 1-15Crossref PubMed Scopus (97) Google Scholar), whereas the P4 DNA replication is mainly regulated by α protein (41Briani F. Deho G. Forti F. Ghisotti D. Plasmid. 2001; 45: 1-17Crossref PubMed Scopus (61) Google Scholar). RNases involved in the metabolism of RNA I and RNA II are expected to play a key role in the control of the ColE1 plasmid replication (42Jung Y.H. Lee Y. Mol. Biol. Rep. 1995; 22: 195-200Crossref PubMed Scopus (16) Google Scholar). RNA II contains several UAC sequences, two of which exist in the loop regions of the first and second stem-loop structures (43Tomizawa J.I. Itoh T. Cell. 1982; 31: 575-583Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (58) Google Scholar, 44Tomizawa J. Cell. 1984; 38: 861-870Abstract Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (236) Google Scholar). Therefore, the inhibition of ColE1 DNA replication by Kid (PemK) is probably because of degradation of RNA II by its endoribonuclease activity. Furthermore, the fact that Kid (PemK), a toxin in bacteria, inhibits the growth of various eukaryotic cells (33de la Cueva-Mendez G. Mills A.D. Clay-Farrace L. Diaz-Orejas R. Laskey R.A. EMBO J. 2003; 22: 246-251Crossref PubMed Scopus (61) Google Scholar) can be readily explained by its endoribonuclease activity against cellular mRNAs rather than by its interaction with DnaB. PemK homologues are identified in a wide range of bacteria. MazF (ChpAK) and ChpBK are the two PemK-like proteins in E. coli (26Santos Sierra S. Giraldo R. Diaz Orejas R. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1998; 168: 51-58Crossref PubMed Google Scholar, 27Masuda Y. Miyakawa K. Nishimura Y. Ohtsubo E. J. Bacteriol. 1993; 175: 6850-6856Crossref PubMed Google Scholar, 28Christensen S.K. Pedersen K. Hansen F.G. Gerdes K. J. Mol. Biol. 2003; 332: 809-819Crossref PubMed Scopus (317) Google Scholar). MazF (ChpAK), the toxin encoded by the mazEF addiction module, is 25% identical with PemK. ChpBK, the toxin encoded by the chpB addiction module, is 41% identical with PemK. It had been demonstrated that MazF (ChpAK) and ChpBK inhibit translation by cleaving mRNAs in a manner similar to RelE (28Christensen S.K. Pedersen K. Hansen F.G. Gerdes K. J. Mol. Biol. 2003; 332: 809-819Crossref PubMed Scopus (317) Google Scholar). On the other hand, we have recently demonstrated that MazF is an endoribonuclease that acts independently of ribosomes and inhibits protein synthesis by sequence specifically cleaving single-stranded mRNA (31Zhang Y. Zhang J. Hoeflich K.P. Ikura M. Qing G. Inouye M. Mol. Cell. 2003; 12: 913-923Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (464) Google Scholar). MazF preferentially cleaves mRNA between A and C residues at the ACA sequence (31Zhang Y. Zhang J. Hoeflich K.P. Ikura M. Qing G. Inouye M. Mol. Cell. 2003; 12: 913-923Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (464) Google Scholar). In this paper, we demonstrated that PemK is a different endoribonuclease from MazF having a different sequence specificity. However, because MazF and PemK are folded in a similar three-dimensional structure (24Kamada K. Hanaoka F. Burley S.K. Mol. Cell. 2003; 11: 875-884Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (254) Google Scholar), these two endoribonucleases are likely to bind to RNA substrates and to hydrolyze them in a similar manner. The crystal structure of Kid (PemK) protein has been determined as a homodimer (11Hargreaves D. Santos-Sierra S. Giraldo R. Sabariegos-Jareno R. de la Cueva-Mendez G. Boelens R. Diaz-Orejas R. Rafferty J.B. Structure. 2002; 10: 1425-1433Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (76) Google Scholar, 45Hargreaves D. Giraldo R. Santos-Sierra S. Boelens R. Rice D.W. Diaz Orejas R. Rafferty J.B. Acta Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 2002; 58: 355-358Crossref PubMed Scopus (11) Google Scholar). Although the structure of MazF has not been determined, Kamada et al. (24Kamada K. Hanaoka F. Burley S.K. Mol. Cell. 2003; 11: 875-884Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (254) Google Scholar) have reported the crystal structure of the MazE-MazF complex (MazF2-MazE2-MazF2), which was formed by two MazF homodimers and one MazE homodimer. Interestingly, the structure of the Kid (PemK) homodimer and that of the MazF homodimer in the MazE-MazF complex are similar. However, the conserved loops between β strands S1 and S2 (termed the S1-S2 loops) in the MazE-bound MazF homodimer that project into solvent are mostly disordered, whereas in the Kid (PemK) homodimer, the two corresponding loops are in a "closed" conformation (24Kamada K. Hanaoka F. Burley S.K. Mol. Cell. 2003; 11: 875-884Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (254) Google Scholar). The S1-S2 loops in the structure of the Kid (PemK) homodimer form a cavity-like structure covering a basic surface and a conserved hydrophobic pocket. The conserved hydrophobic pocket plays an essential role in the recognition of MazE in the MazE-MazF complex formation (24Kamada K. Hanaoka F. Burley S.K. Mol. Cell. 2003; 11: 875-884Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (254) Google Scholar). We have proposed that the highly negative charged C-terminal extension of MazE may mimic the single-stranded RNA, which binds between the S1-S2 loops in the MazF homodimer (31Zhang Y. Zhang J. Hoeflich K.P. Ikura M. Qing G. Inouye M. Mol. Cell. 2003; 12: 913-923Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (464) Google Scholar). PemI is assumed to bind to PemK in a very similar manner to block the endoribonuclease activity of PemK. The determination of the crystal structure of the PemK·RNA complex will shed light onto our understanding of the exact molecular mechanism of its sequence-specific endoribonuclease activity. Both PemK and MazF have now been characterized as sequence-specific endoribonucleases for single-stranded RNA; however, their physiological function appears to be distinct from other known endoribonucleases such as RNase E, A, and T1, because PemK and MazF function as general protein synthesis inhibitors by interfering with the function of cellular mRNAs. It is well known that the small RNAs, such as micRNA (mRNA-interfering-complementary RNA) (46Mizuno T. Chou M.Y. Inouye M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1984; 81: 1966-1970Crossref PubMed Scopus (455) Google Scholar), miRNA (47Ambros V. Cell. 2001; 107: 823-826Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (1453) Google Scholar), and siRNA (48Billy E. Brondani V. Zhang H. Muller U. Filipowicz W. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2001; 98: 14428-14433Crossref PubMed Scopus (349) Google Scholar), interfere with the function of the specific target RNAs. The ribozyme also acts on the target RNA specifically and interferes with its function (49Puerta-Fernandez E. Romero-Lopez C. Barroso-del Jesus A. Berzal-Herranz A. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2003; 27: 75-97Crossref PubMed Scopus (105) Google Scholar). We propose that PemK and the PemK homologues form a novel endoribonuclease family with a new mRNA-interfering mechanism by cleaving mRNAs at specific sequences, which could be termed as "mRNA interferase." mRNA interferases may be useful to detect the second structures in RNA, because both PemK and MazF are able to cleave only single-stranded RNAs. As reported previously, Kid (PemK) triggers apoptosis in human cancer cells, whereas Kis (PemI) inhibits the toxic effect of Kid (PemK) (33de la Cueva-Mendez G. Mills A.D. Clay-Farrace L. Diaz-Orejas R. Laskey R.A. EMBO J. 2003; 22: 246-251Crossref PubMed Scopus (61) Google Scholar). Therefore, this new regulatable mRNA-interfering system could be used for the gene therapy for human diseases. We thank Dr. Sangita Phadtare for assistance in preparation of the paper. We thank Drs. Eiichi Ohtsubo and Suguru Tsuchimoto (the University of Tokyo) for generous gift of R100 plasmid.
Referência(s)