Typing ofClostridium perfringensstrains by use of Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) system in comparison with zymotyping
1997; Elsevier BV; Volume: 3; Issue: 4 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1006/anae.1997.0094
ISSN1095-8274
AutoresVéronique Leflon‐Guibout, Jean-Louis Pons, Béate Heym, Marie-Hélène Nicolas-Chanoine,
Tópico(s)Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies
ResumoThe definition of strain clonality postulates that strains showed identical phenotypic and genetic traits are likely to descend from a common ancestor even if they were isolated from different sources and locations. Regarding this definition, non-epidemiologically linked strains might be clonal strains. To overcome this ambiguity, the discriminatory capability of RAPD typing was assessed firstly on eight Clostridium perfringens strains proven to be chromosomally different with one being the mutant of another one. Thirteen primers were tested but only two were able to differentiate seven of the eight strains. With none of the used primers it was possible to differentiate the parental strain and its mutant harboring an insertion of 180 kb. The four most discriminant primers were retained to determine the RAPD fingerprints of a further 20 previously zymotyped strains from which seventeen were unrelated. To compare the two typing systems, the zymotype of the eight chromosomally different strains was determined. Thus, the discriminatory index was calculated on the basis of 25 unrelated C. perfringens strains. This was 0.97 with RAPD typing and 0.99 with zymotyping. From these results we conclude that the RAPD typing which is less fastidious than zymotyping can be used as an epidemiological marker for C. perfringens.
Referência(s)