Amateurs versus Professionals: The Controversy over Telescope Size in Late Victorian Science
1981; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 72; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1086/352648
ISSN1545-6994
Autores Tópico(s)History of Science and Natural History
ResumoPrevious articleNext article No AccessAmateurs versus Professionals: The Controversy over Telescope Size in Late Victorian ScienceJohn LankfordJohn Lankford Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Isis Volume 72, Number 1Mar., 1981 Publication of the History of Science Society Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/352648 Views: 14Total views on this site Citations: 50Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1981 History of Science Society, Inc.PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Yuuri Kimura Amateur Scientists: Unique Characteristics and Possible Factors Supporting Japanese Amateur Scientists’ Continuous Scientific Practices, (Jul 2021): 85–108.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2746-0_5Carlos Sanhueza-Cerda, Lorena B. Valderrama, Stefan Meier, José Soto Todos los instrumentos están en buen estado’. Disputas en torno al funcionamiento de los telescopios del Observatorio Astronómico Nacional de Chile en el siglo XIX, Asclepio 72, no.11 (Jun 2020): 300.https://doi.org/10.3989/asclepio.2020.09Jeremy Vetter Knowing the Great Plains Weather: Field Life and Lay Participation on the American Frontier during the Railroad Era, East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal 13, no.22 (Oct 2020): 195–213.https://doi.org/10.1215/18752160-7341700Wayne Orchiston The Role of the Independent Astronomer in Early Australian Astronomy, (Nov 2016): 109–131.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44521-2_4Tsuko Nakamura, Wayne Orchiston Introduction, (Nov 2017): 1–22.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62082-4_1Dagomar Degroot “A Catastrophe Happening in Front of Our Very Eyes”: The Environmental History of a Comet Crash on Jupiter, Environmental History 22, no.11 (Jan 2017): 23–49.https://doi.org/10.1093/envhis/emw067Richard Edwards Amateurism and autodidactism: a modest proposal?, Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 36, no.66 (Apr 2014): 868–880.https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2014.903634Stella Cottam, Wayne Orchiston Discussion, (Jul 2014): 255–286.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08341-4_6Wayne Orchiston The Amateur-Turned-Professional Syndrome: Two Australian Case Studies, (Oct 2014): 259–350.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07614-0_17Richard Edwards RETRACTED ARTICLE: The ‘citizens’ in citizen science projects: Educational and conceptual issues, International Journal of Science Education, Part B 4, no.44 (Aug 2014): 376–391.https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2014.953228Prof. Tara Fenwick, Prof. John Field, Richard Edwards Amateurism and professionalism in work and learning, Journal of Workplace Learning 26, no.6/76/7 (Sep 2014): 406–417.https://doi.org/10.1108/JWL-08-2013-0059Richard Edwards Citizen science and lifelong learning, Studies in the Education of Adults 46, no.22 (Jan 2016): 132–144.https://doi.org/10.1080/02660830.2014.11661662Ana Simões, Luís Miguel Carolino The Portuguese Astronomer Melo e Simas (1870–1934): Republican Ideals and Popularization of Science, Science in Context 27, no.11 (Feb 2014): 49–77.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269889713000380Roy H. Garstang, John Rogers Williams, Arthur Stanley, (Dec 2016): 2338–2340.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9917-7_1477Suhasini Kumar, Trudy E. Bell Hough, George Washington, (Dec 2016): 1010–1013.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9917-7_653Susana Biro Astronomy by Correspondence, Science Communication 34, no.66 (Apr 2012): 803–819.https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547012438466Georgina H. Endfield, Carol Morris Exploring the role of the amateur in the production and circulation of meteorological knowledge, Climatic Change 113, no.11 (Feb 2012): 69–89.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0415-7PEDRO RUIZ-CASTELL Priority claims and public disputes in astronomy: E.M. Antoniadi, J. Comas i Solà and the search for authority and social prestige in the early twentieth century, The British Journal for the History of Science 44, no.44 (Feb 2011): 509–531.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007087410001536Jeremy Vetter Introduction: Lay Participation in the History of Scientific Observation, Science in Context 24, no.22 (Apr 2011): 127–141.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269889711000032Jeremy Vetter Lay Observers, Telegraph Lines, and Kansas Weather: The Field Network as a Mode of Knowledge Production, Science in Context 24, no.22 (Apr 2011): 259–280.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269889711000093 Notes, (May 2011): 351–408.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511977251.033Lisa R. Messeri The Problem with Pluto, Social Studies of Science 40, no.22 (Dec 2009): 187–214.https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312709347809JAMES MUSSELL Arthur Cowper Ranyard, Knowledge and the reproduction of astronomical photographs in the late nineteenth-century periodical press, The British Journal for the History of Science 42, no.33 (Apr 2009): 345–380.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007087409002180David H. DeVorkin In the grip of the big telescope age, Experimental Astronomy 25, no.1-31-3 (Feb 2009): 63–77.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10686-009-9146-9David H. DeVorkin In the grip of the big telescope age, (Jan 2009): 61–75.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2233-2_5Benno van Dalen, Donald K. Yeomans, Wayne Orchiston, Douglas Scott, Trudy E. Bell, Charles H. Smith, Jeff Suzuki, Daniel W. E. Green, Thomas R. Williams, Guo Shirong, Robert Alan Hatch, Scott W. Teare, M. Colleen Gino, Paul Charbonneau, David Jefferies, Peter Broughton, Richard P. Wilds, Thomas Dobbins, William Sheehan, László Szabados, Anneliese Schnell, Y. P. Varshni, Fernand Hallyn, Cindy Lammens, Martin Solc, Eugene F. Milone, Frieda A. Stahl, Kenneth W. Ford, Michael S. Reidy, Malcolm R. Forster, Frieda A. Stahl, Virginia Trimble, Stephen D. Snobelen, Daniel Kolak, Michael Rich, Frieda A. Stahl, Roy H. Garstang, Fathi Habashi, Gary A. Wegner, Jürgen Hamel, Richard Baum, Dennis Danielson, Alena Hadravová, Petr Hadrava, Ian T. Durham, John Rogers, Roy H. Garstang, David W. Dewhirst, Mark Hurn, Christof A. Plicht, Roy H. Garstang, Thomas R. Williams, Thomas R. Williams, Sallie Baliunas, John McFarland, Craig B. Waff, Trudy E. Bell, Christof A. Plicht, Donald K. Yeomans, Thomas D. Kinman, Mihkel Joeveer, Jordan D. Marché, Adam Mosley, Solange Grillot, Paul Charbonneau, Oliver Knill, Daniel Kolak, Lodewijk Woltjer, Thomas R. Williams, Thomas A. Dobbins, Roy H. Garstang, Christian E. Hauer, Robinson M. Yost, Alan H. Batten, Robinson M. Yost, Christof A. Plicht, John Hearnshaw Williams, Arthur Stanley, (Jan 2007): 1223–1224.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30400-7_1477Thomas R. Williams, François Charette, Roy H. Garstang, Katherine Bracher, Yoshihide Kozai, Jürgen Hamel, Daniel W. E. Green, Sonja Brentjes, Thomas R. Williams, Ronald Florence, Michael Meo, Thomas R. Williams, Donald K. Yeomans, Hartmut Frommert, Thomas A. Dobbins, Jordan D. Marché, Truls Lynne Hansen, Wolfgang Kokott, Ke Ve Sarma, Alan W. Hirshfeld, Durruty Jesús de Alba Martínez, Richard A. Jarrell, Thomas A. Dobbins, Christ of A. Plicht, K. Sakurai, Sonja Brentjes, Mònica Rius, Steven L. Reshaw, Saori Thara, Patrick Moore, Paul A. Schons, Paul L. Butzer, Katherine Bracher, Robert Alan Hatch, Paul A. Schons, Jürgen Hamel, Alan W. Hirshfeld, Ronald Brashear, Raymonde Barthalot, Karl‐Heinz Bohm, Christian Nitschelm, Anthony F. Beavers, Katherine Bracher, Douglas Scott, Jürgen Hamel, Martin Beech, Steven Ruskin, Patrick Poitevin, David S. Evans, Michael J. Crowe, Keith R. Lafortune, Dieter B. Herrmann, Takeshi Oka, John M. McMahon, Daniel Kolak, Fathi Habashi, Thomas R. Williams, Woodruff T. Sullivan, Ian T. Durham, Alan J. Bowden, Steven J. Dick, Jordan D. Marché, Stephen Shectman, William Sheehan, Thomas J. Bogdan, Alistair Kwan, John M. McMahon, Yoshihide Kozai, David J. Sturdy, Julian Holland, Jürgen Hamel, Marvin Bolt, Elliott Horch, Miloslav Zejda, Peter Wlasuk, László Szabados, Gary A. Wegner, Jürgen Hamel, John M. McMahon, Yoshihide Kozai, Ellen Tan Drake, Fabrizio Bònoli, Truls Lynne Hansen, Truls Lynne Hansen, Francine Jackson, Suhasini Kumar, Michael Meo, Tim Trachet, Donald D. Clayton, Helge Kragh, Mary T. Brück, Mary T. Brück, Virginia Trimble, Eugene F. Milone, Virginia Trimble, Jürgen Hamel, Klaus Hentschel, David A. King, Rudi Paul Lindner, Clifford J. Cunningham, Henk Kubbinga, Naomi Pasachoff, Jay M. Pasachoff, Katherine Bracher Hough, George Washington, (Jan 2007): 528–530.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-30400-7_653 W. Patrick McCray Amateur Scientists, the International Geophysical Year, and the Ambitions of Fred Whipple W. Patrick McCray, Isis 97, no.44 (Jul 2015): 634–658.https://doi.org/10.1086/509947 K. Maria D. Lane Geographers of Mars: Cartographic Inscription and Exploration Narrative in Late Victorian Representations of the Red Planet K. Maria D. Lane, Isis 96, no.44 (Jul 2015): 477–506.https://doi.org/10.1086/498590 Introduction, (Jan 2005): 1–30.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822387275-001 “A Situation in Many Respects Similar to Our Own”, (Jan 2005): 31–60.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822387275-002 Lowell and the Canal Controversy, (Jan 2005): 61–114.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822387275-003 “Different Beyond the Most Bizarre Imaginings of Nightmare”, (Jan 2005): 115–149.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822387275-004 Lichens on Mars, (Jan 2005): 150–181.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822387275-005 Mars at the Limits of Imagination, (Jan 2005): 182–229.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822387275-006 The Missions to Mars, (Jan 2005): 230–268.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822387275-007 Transforming Mars, Transforming “Man”, (Jan 2005): 269–302.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822387275-008 Mars at the Turn of a New Century, (Jan 2005): 303–354.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822387275-009 Falling into Theory, (Jan 2005): 355–384.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822387275-010 Epilogue, (Jan 2005): 385–388.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822387275-011 Notes, (Jan 2005): 389–404.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822387275-012 Works Cited, (Jan 2005): 405–434.https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822387275-013Wayne Orchiston Tebbutt vs Russell: Passion, Power and Politics in Nineteenth Century Australian Astronomy, (Jan 2002): 169–201.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9862-0_14Wayne Orchiston Comets and Communication: Amateur–Professional Tension in Australian Astronomy, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia 16, no.0202 (Mar 2013): 212–221.https://doi.org/10.1071/AS99212Holly Rothermel Images of the sun: Warren De la Rue, George Biddell Airy and celestial photography, The British Journal for the History of Science 26, no.22 (Jan 2009): 137–169.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007087400030739Simon Schaffer Astronomers Mark Time: Discipline and the Personal Equation, Science in Context 2, no.11 (Sep 2008): 115–145.https://doi.org/10.1017/S026988970000051XIskender Gökalp On the dynamics of controversies in a borderland scientific domain: the case of turbulent combustion, Social Science Information 26, no.33 (Sep 2016): 551–576.https://doi.org/10.1177/053901887026003005Karl Hufbauer Amateurs and the Rise of Astrophysics 1840–1910, Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte 9, no.33 (Jan 1986): 183–190.https://doi.org/10.1002/bewi.19860090309Steven Shapin History of Science and its Sociological Reconstructions, (Jan 1986): 325–386.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4498-5_18 Marc Rothenberg History of Astronomy, Osiris 1, no.11 (Oct 2015): 117–131.https://doi.org/10.1086/368641
Referência(s)