Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Altered aggregation properties of mutant γ-crystallins cause inherited cataract

2002; Springer Nature; Volume: 21; Issue: 22 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1093/emboj/cdf609

1460-2075

Aileen Sandilands, Aileen M. Hutcheson, Heather A. Long, Alan R. Prescott, Gijs F.J.M. Vrensen, Jana Löster, Norman Klopp, Raimund B. Lutz, Jochen Graw, Shigeo Masaki, Christopher M. Dobson, Cait E. MacPhee, Roy A. Quinlan,

Calpain Protease Function and Regulation

Article15 November 2002free access Altered aggregation properties of mutant γ-crystallins cause inherited cataract Aileen Sandilands Aileen Sandilands Department of Biochemistry, Medical Science Institutes, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 5EH UK Search for more papers by this author Aileen M. Hutcheson Aileen M. Hutcheson Department of Biochemistry, Medical Science Institutes, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 5EH UK Search for more papers by this author Heather A. Long Heather A. Long Department of Biological Sciences, Science Laboratories, University of Durham, Durham, DH1 3LE UK Search for more papers by this author Alan R. Prescott Alan R. Prescott Department of Biochemistry, Medical Science Institutes, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 5EH UK Search for more papers by this author Gijs Vrensen Gijs Vrensen Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical School, Leiden, The Netherlands Search for more papers by this author Jana Löster Jana Löster GSF-National Research Center for Environment and Health, Institute of Developmental Genetics, D-85764 Neuherberg, Germany Search for more papers by this author Norman Klopp Norman Klopp GSF-National Research Center for Environment and Health, Institute of Developmental Genetics, D-85764 Neuherberg, Germany Present address: GSF-National Research Center, Institute of Epidemiology, D-85764 Neuherberg, Germany Search for more papers by this author Raimund B. Lutz Raimund B. Lutz Present address: GSF-National Research Center, Institute of Epidemiology, D-85764 Neuherberg, Germany Search for more papers by this author Jochen Graw Jochen Graw GSF-National Research Center for Environment and Health, Institute of Developmental Genetics, D-85764 Neuherberg, Germany Search for more papers by this author Shigeo Masaki Shigeo Masaki Department of Biochemistry, Institute for Developmental Research, Aichi Human Service Center, 713-8 Kamiya-cho, Kasguai, Aichi, 480-0392 Japan Search for more papers by this author Christopher M. Dobson Christopher M. Dobson Department of Chemistry, Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 0HE UK Department of Physics, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge, CB2 1EW UK Search for more papers by this author Cait E. MacPhee Cait E. MacPhee Department of Physics, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge, CB2 1EW UK Search for more papers by this author Roy A. Quinlan Corresponding Author Roy A. Quinlan Department of Biological Sciences, Science Laboratories, University of Durham, Durham, DH1 3LE UK Search for more papers by this author Aileen Sandilands Aileen Sandilands Department of Biochemistry, Medical Science Institutes, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 5EH UK Search for more papers by this author Aileen M. Hutcheson Aileen M. Hutcheson Department of Biochemistry, Medical Science Institutes, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 5EH UK Search for more papers by this author Heather A. Long Heather A. Long Department of Biological Sciences, Science Laboratories, University of Durham, Durham, DH1 3LE UK Search for more papers by this author Alan R. Prescott Alan R. Prescott Department of Biochemistry, Medical Science Institutes, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 5EH UK Search for more papers by this author Gijs Vrensen Gijs Vrensen Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical School, Leiden, The Netherlands Search for more papers by this author Jana Löster Jana Löster GSF-National Research Center for Environment and Health, Institute of Developmental Genetics, D-85764 Neuherberg, Germany Search for more papers by this author Norman Klopp Norman Klopp GSF-National Research Center for Environment and Health, Institute of Developmental Genetics, D-85764 Neuherberg, Germany Present address: GSF-National Research Center, Institute of Epidemiology, D-85764 Neuherberg, Germany Search for more papers by this author Raimund B. Lutz Raimund B. Lutz Present address: GSF-National Research Center, Institute of Epidemiology, D-85764 Neuherberg, Germany Search for more papers by this author Jochen Graw Jochen Graw GSF-National Research Center for Environment and Health, Institute of Developmental Genetics, D-85764 Neuherberg, Germany Search for more papers by this author Shigeo Masaki Shigeo Masaki Department of Biochemistry, Institute for Developmental Research, Aichi Human Service Center, 713-8 Kamiya-cho, Kasguai, Aichi, 480-0392 Japan Search for more papers by this author Christopher M. Dobson Christopher M. Dobson Department of Chemistry, Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 0HE UK Department of Physics, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge, CB2 1EW UK Search for more papers by this author Cait E. MacPhee Cait E. MacPhee Department of Physics, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge, CB2 1EW UK Search for more papers by this author Roy A. Quinlan Corresponding Author Roy A. Quinlan Department of Biological Sciences, Science Laboratories, University of Durham, Durham, DH1 3LE UK Search for more papers by this author Author Information Aileen Sandilands1, Aileen M. Hutcheson1, Heather A. Long2, Alan R. Prescott1, Gijs Vrensen3, Jana Löster4, Norman Klopp4,5, Raimund B. Lutz5, Jochen Graw4, Shigeo Masaki6, Christopher M. Dobson7,8, Cait E. MacPhee8 and Roy A. Quinlan 2 1Department of Biochemistry, Medical Science Institutes, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 5EH UK 2Department of Biological Sciences, Science Laboratories, University of Durham, Durham, DH1 3LE UK 3Department of Ophthalmology, Leiden University Medical School, Leiden, The Netherlands 4GSF-National Research Center for Environment and Health, Institute of Developmental Genetics, D-85764 Neuherberg, Germany 5Present address: GSF-National Research Center, Institute of Epidemiology, D-85764 Neuherberg, Germany 6Department of Biochemistry, Institute for Developmental Research, Aichi Human Service Center, 713-8 Kamiya-cho, Kasguai, Aichi, 480-0392 Japan 7Department of Chemistry, Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 0HE UK 8Department of Physics, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge, CB2 1EW UK *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] The EMBO Journal (2002)21:6005-6014https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/cdf609 PDFDownload PDF of article text and main figures. ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyWechatReddit Figures & Info Protein inclusions are associated with a diverse group of human diseases ranging from localized neurological disorders through to systemic non-neuropathic diseases. Here, we present evidence that the formation of intranuclear inclusions is a key event in cataract formation involving altered γ-crystallins that are un likely to adopt their native fold. In three different inherited murine cataracts involving this type of γ-crystallin mutation, large inclusions containing the altered γ-crystallins were found in the nuclei of the primary lens fibre cells. Their formation preceded not only the first gross morphological changes in the lens, but also the first signs of cataract. The inclusions contained filamentous material that could be stained with the amyloid-detecting dye, Congo red. In vitro, recombinant mutant γB-crystallin readily formed amyloid fibrils under physiological buffer conditions, unlike wild-type protein. These data suggest that this type of cataract is caused by a mechanism involving the nuclear targeting and deposition of amyloid-like inclusions. The mutant γ-crystallins initially disrupt nuclear function, but then this progresses to a full cataract phenotype. Introduction By the year 2020, the number of blind people in the world will have risen to 45 million (Foster, 1999). The vast majority of these will be caused by untreated cataract, which not only underlines the huge socio-economic impact of this disease, but also identifies a very significant and growing medical problem. In fact, there are some 600 000 new cases every year in the USA and UK alone. The development of novel treatments for cataract are needed, but this is hindered currently by our incomplete understanding of the process(es) of cataract formation in lens cells. Here, we have studied a group of mutations in γ-crystallins that cause inherited cataract. The eye lens is an organ that retains all its cells for the lifetime of the organism. It is enclosed in a collagen capsule and is bathed in the aqueous humour and so is completely avascular. The lens fibre cells that make up the bulk of the lens are post-mitotic, and the differentiation process involves the complete removal of all cellular organelles including nuclei (Dahm et al., 1998), making these fibre cells incapable of protein synthesis, DNA replication and RNA transcription. Although there are many other post-mitotic cells in the body that are equally long lived, none of them survive for decades without these key organelles. The lens fibre cells express a unique set of proteins (Ireland et al., 2000) including the γ-crystallins (Graw, 1999), which are a family of structural proteins in the lens. Several autosomal-dominant human cataracts have been identified which are the result of mutations in γ-crystallin (Heon et al., 1999; Santhiya et al., 2002). In the mouse, there are six distinct γ-crystallin-encoding genes (Cryga–Crygf), and mutations in these proteins lead to lens cataract (Graw, 1999). In this study, three established murine models of cataract have been investigated: Crygbnop (formerly Cat2nop), Cryget (formerly Cat2t) and Crygeelo (formerly Elo) (for a review, see Graw, 1999). All three models have arisen by either a natural frameshift (Crygeelo), natural deletion (Crygbnop) or radiation-induced nonsense (Cryget) mutations that result in the complete loss of the last (fourth) Greek key motif in domain 2 of the γ-crystallins, which is expected to disrupt the β-barrel arrangement of this domain significantly in each of the mutants. These can be considered as appropriate models for a similar human frameshift mutation in γD-crystallin that also results in the loss of the fourth Greek key motif in domain 2 (Santhiya et al., 2002). The γ-crystallins are most similar to the β-crystallins as they too comprise domains rich in β-sheets arranged in Greek key motifs to form a β-barrel. Both sets of proteins are largely restricted to the lens, although some β-crystallin expression has been reported in the retina (Head et al., 1991). Outside the lens, only one protein has been identified thus far that contains βγ-crystallin motifs—a putative tumour suppressor protein, AIM1, that is widely expressed in many different cell types (Ray et al., 1997; Teichmann et al., 1998). The γ-crystallins are, however, also structurally related to proteins such as IgG and transthyretin (Getzoff et al., 1989). Besides the arrangement of β-sheets in these proteins, the other most notable feature is that both are amyloidogenic (Hurle et al., 1994; Lashuel et al., 1999), causing disease in both cases (reviewed in Jacobson and Buxbaum, 1991). The data presented here show that the βγ-crystallin motif has similar properties once mutations disrupt the structure and this is the cause of the murine cataracts described in this study. Results Mutant γ-crystallins form intranuclear inclusions before the first morphological changes in the lens We initially examined the events leading up to cataract formation by a comprehensive study of Cryget and Crygbnop lenses throughout embryonic development until birth. The data for Crygbnop are presented in Figure 1. A section through the mutant lens at embryonic day 14.5 (E14.5; Figure 1B) is comparable with a similar section through the wild-type lens at the same stage of development (Figure 1A): the lens vesicle is completely filled by primary fibre cells and the first secondary fibre cells appear to be formed normally at the equatorial region. By E15.5, however, Crygbnop lenses appear slightly smaller than the wild-type, and swelling of the lens fibre cells is observed from the lack of stain in the anterior part of the lens (compare Figure 1D with C). The swelling of fibre cells at the centre of the lens continued until E17.5. Vacuoles become transiently visible at the anterior lateral parts and, although at birth the vacuoles are no longer apparent, the nuclei of the fibre cells are shifted toward the anterior of the lens (compare Figure 1F with E). The degeneration of the lens centre begins at E18.5 and is progressive throughout the life of the animal. By postnatal day 1, an amorphous mass, which can be clearly identified as a cataract, has formed at the core of the Crygbnop lens (Figure 1F, arrows). At this stage, however, the anterior epithelium and even the most recently differentiated fibre cells show no obvious morphological abnormalities. Figure 1.Histochemical analysis of the appearance of the cataract phenotype in the Crygbnop mouse compared with the wild-type from E14.5 to birth (P1). At E14.5, the primary fibre cells fill the lumen of the lens vesicle and the first secondary fibre cells are formed at the lens cortex in both the wild-type (A) and the Crygb (B) lenses. The γBnop-crystallin is first expressed at this developmental time point [see (G) and (H) below]. (C and D) At E15.5, the first phenotypic changes are obvious. The fibre cells appear swollen and the lens is clearly smaller (D) as compared with the wild-type lens (C). This process continues in the newborn mouse where, in contrast to the wild-type lens (E), the centre of the Crygbnop lens remains opaque and the primary lens fibre cells become completely disorganized (F, arrows). (G) All six Cryg cDNAs were amplified from E12.5 to P1 from mouse tissues (E12.5–E14.5, head; E15.5, whole eyes; P1, lens). The individual transcripts are indicated along the vertical and the developmental times along the horizontal. The expression of GAPDH was used as a positive control. Cryge/f and Cryga are expressed by E12.5, whereas Crygb is first detected at E14.5. (H) Polyclonal antibodies specific to γBnop-crystallin (Klopp et al., 1998) were used to detect the mutant protein in E14.5 lenses. E13.5 lenses were negative (data not shown), but in the E14.5 lens, γBnop-crystallin (green channel) is present both as nuclear inclusions (arrow and inset) and in the lens fibre cell cytoplasm (bracket) where it is not present as inclusions. This section has been counterstained with propidium iodide (red channel) to locate the cell nuclei. ep, lens epithelium; fc, fibre cell; re, retina; co, cornea. Scale bars = 250 μm in (A–F) and 30 μm in (H). Download figure Download PowerPoint To correlate these morphological changes with the developmental expression pattern of Cryg genes in the mouse, RT–PCR was performed. At E12.5 and E13.5, we detected expression of Cryga and Cryge/f and weak expression of Crygd, but detected neither Crygc nor Crygb (Figure 1G). The latter were first expressed at E14.5, just prior to the first morphological changes at E15.5 for the Crygbnop lenses (compare Figure 1D with C). Similar observations were made for Cryget. Expression of γBnop-crystallin was first detected at E14.5 by immunofluorescence microscopy (Figure 1H). The youngest fibre cells, found at the lens periphery, were negative for γBnop-crystallin (Figure 1H; arrowheads), and this region of the lens appears unaffected at all stages of development (Figure 1A–F). In the more central regions of the lens, where γBnop-crystallin is expressed (Figure 1H, green channel), some of the protein accumulates as inclusions (Figure 1H, arrow). These are intranuclear (Figure 1H, inset arrow) as shown by co-localization with the DNA stain, propidium iodide (Figure 1H, inset, red channel). Note that at this stage, not all the γBnop-crystallin is present in nuclear inclusions. Some material was also detected in the cytoplasm, but not as inclusions (Figure 1H, bracket). γBnop-crystallin expression therefore precedes the first morphological changes in the lens that occur at E15.5. Immunofluorescence microscopy of sections from Crygbnop, Crygeelo and Cryget lenses taken at E17.5 indicate that the three different mutations all cause the formation of intranuclear inclusions (Figure 2A–D). These are exclusively nuclear, and no cytoplasmic inclusions nor any cytoplasmic staining in general were seen post-E14.5 in Crygbnop lenses, despite the fact that in the wild-type lens γ-crystallins are evenly distributed throughout the cytoplasm of the lens fibre cells and are never seen concentrated in inclusions, whether nuclear or cytoplasmic (Figure 2E, arrows). Using antibodies specific to either γEelo-crystallin (Figure 2C, arrow) or γBnop-crystallin (Figure 2D, arrow), it is clear that the intranuclear inclusions contain the detectable altered γ-crystallin proteins. In Cryget lenses probed with polyclonal γ-crystallin antibodies, the conspicuous absence of cytoplasmic staining in the mutant lens suggests that the nuclear inclusions also seen in this mutant contained the wild-type γ-crystallins as well as γEt-crystallin. Figure 2.Nuclear inclusions are common to the three different Cryg cataracts. These murine models of cataract have altered γ-crystallin genes that induce similar structural consequences. Crygbnop is caused by a replacement of 11 bp by 4 bp in the third exon of γB-crystallin at Ser138, generating a unique hexapeptide sequence at the C-terminus of γBnop-crystallin and truncating the 174 amino acid wild-type sequence at residue 144. A C→G transversion in exon 3 accounts for Cryget, which truncates the protein after residue 143 with no changes to the sequence. Crygeelo is characterized by a single base pair deletion in the third exon of Cryge, and this also introduces a unique hendecapeptide sequence before a premature termination at residue 145 for γEelo-crystallin. Lenses from E17.5 mice from Cryget (A and B), Crygeelo (C) and Crygbnop (D) were stained (green channel) with polyclonal specific antibodies to all γ-crystallins (A and B), γEelo-crystallin (C) and γBnop-crystallin (D), and also counterstained with propidium iodide (red channel) to highlight the nuclei. Ep, lens epithelium; fc, lens fibre cells. Scale bars = 50 μm in (A) and 5 μm in (B–D). (E) Staining of E17.5 lens from a wild-type mouse using polyclonal antibodies that detect all six mouse γ-crystallins (green channel), counterstained with propidium iodide (red channel). Scale bar = 5 μm. Ptk2 cells were transiently transfected with wild-type Crygb (F) and Crygbnop (G) both fused to GFP tags to examine the role of the lens environment in nuclear-specific location of the inclusions. Wild-type γB-crystallin is found in both the nuclei (n) and cytoplasm of cells, but does not form protein inclusions. γBnop-crystallin forms both nuclear (arrows) and cytoplasmic inclusions (arrowheads) in transfected cells, the two extremes captured in this image (G). Transfected cells containing both cytoplasmic and nuclear inclusions were a more usual observation. Scale bars = 10 μm. Download figure Download PowerPoint The lens environment determines the location of the inclusions of altered protein To explore the importance of the unique environment of the lens to the Crygbnop phenotype, γB- and γBnop-crystallin were expressed as green fluorescent protein (GFP) fusions in PtK2 cells, which do not originate from the lens. Inclusions of γBnop-crystallin were formed in both the cytoplasmic and nuclear compartments of PtK2 cells (Figure 2G) whereas the wild-type protein remained distributed throughout the nuclear and cytoplasmic compartments, but not as inclusions (Figure 2F). These data show that inclusion formation per se is independent of the lens environment, but the exclusive formation of nuclear inclusions in the lens could reflect the presence of inhibitory factor(s) in the lens cytoplasm. A likely candidate is α-crystallin, which has been shown to inhibit protein aggregation due to its properties as a molecular chaperone (Horwitz, 1992; Hatters et al., 2001). We examined the in vitro interaction between α-crystallin and the mutant protein by size exclusion chromatography. In the absence of α-crystallin, recombinant γBnop-crystallin protein eluted in the void volume of the size exclusion column with a retention time of 73 min (Figure 3A, red chromatogram), equivalent to a mol. wt <2 × 106 Da. This indicated a larger size than even native α-crystallin (800 000 Da) that eluted after 91 min (Figure 3A, black chromatogram). Mixing equimolar amounts of the γBnop-crystallin with α-crystallin gave two peaks, but the γBnop-crystallin peak was shifted and was now not excluded from the column (Figure 3A, green chromatogram). Subsequent analysis of the protein content of these peaks by SDS–PAGE (Figure 3B) indicated that γBnop-crystallin and α-crystallins co-eluted, as both peaks contained both proteins. Both proteins have changed their elution profiles, which now overlap, indicating that mixed complexes have formed. In contrast, when wild-type γ-crystallins were mixed with α-crystallins and subjected to size exclusion chromatography, both proteins eluted as well-separated peaks (Figure 3A, blue chromatogram). They were mixed together in 6 M urea to promote protein unfolding prior to subsequent dialysis into the elution buffer ready for chromatography. The wild-type γ-crystallin peak was well separated from the α-crystallin peak, in line with its expected mol. wt of ∼20 kDa. These data suggested that α-crystallin associated with γBnop-crystallin, and prevented the formation of large aggregates that were excluded from the size exclusion column. These data support a role for α-crystallins by possibly preventing the formation of cytoplasmic aggregates by γBnop-crystallin and the other mutated γ-crystallins, leaving the nuclear deposits as the characteristic histopathological feature. Figure 3.α-crystallin prevents Crygbnop aggregation in vitro. (A) Recombinant γBnop-crystallin (red chromatogram) elutes in the void volume of a BioSec size exclusion column indicating aggregation to a size significantly bigger than the molecular weight of the monomeric protein (∼20 kDa). α-crystallin (black chromatogram), which oligomerizes in vivo to form particles of 800 kDa, elutes after the γBnop- crystallin peak. Wild-type mouse γ-crystallins and α-crystallins elute independently when separated on the same column (blue chromatogram): the γ-crystallins elute after 148 min, equivalent to their mol. wt of 20 kDa, whereas the α-crystallins elute at 91 min. When purified γBnop-crystallin was mixed in equimolar amounts with α-crystallin, two peaks were observed (green chromatogram). One peak has an equivalent elution time to α-crystallin, whilst the other peak is slightly smaller and shifted from the position seen for γBnop-crystallin alone (major peak in the red chromatogram). OD values have been adjusted relative to those obtained for α-crystallin to allow overlay of the different chromatograms. (B) The protein content of the two peaks from the green chromatogram was determined by SDS–PAGE, and each peak contains both α-crystallin (α) and γBnop-crystallin (N). This shows that γBnop-crystallin and α-crystallins co-elute, indicating that a protein complex has formed between these proteins. Proteins in fractions after 70, 72, 78, 82, 86, 90, 94 and 98 min are shown in tracks 1–8, respectively. Track M contains marker proteins of 30, 17.2 and 12.3 kDa, indicated by dots. The purity of the starting material γBnop-crystallin is shown (track Nop). Download figure Download PowerPoint In the lens, the γBnop-crystallin-containing inclusions first appeared at E14.5 in the very central fibre cell nuclei (Figure 1H, arrow). Cytoplasmic staining was also noted, but the cytoplasmic γBnop-crystallin was not present as inclusions. This suggests that other forms of the mutant protein can co-exist with the inclusions, which may be an important consideration for disease mechanisms (Bucciantini et al., 2002). As α-crystallin levels are significantly reduced in nuclei compared with the cytoplasm of cells (Bhat et al., 1999), these data offer an explanation for the formation of nuclear inclusions by the altered γ-crystallins in lens fibre cells. Intranuclear inclusions of γBnop-crystallin disrupt nuclear function We next investigated the influence of γBnop-crystallin on cellular metabolism and integrity by staining for lens-specific proteins. The lens-specific intermediate filament protein CP49 enters the lens fibre cell nuclear compartment only when transcription has been shut down and programmed nuclear destruction has started (Sandilands et al., 1995; Dahm et al., 1998). Immunofluorescence staining shows that some CP49 had entered the nuclear compartment and was found in the intranuclear inclusions of Crygbnop embryo samples (Figure 4A, arrow). Cell apoptosis is stimulated in neurodegenerative diseases in response to inclusion formation (Warrick et al., 1998), and the presence of CP49 in the nuclear deposits is also an indicator that apoptotic events have been initiated (Dahm et al., 1998) as part of the cataract-forming process. Prox1 is a transcription factor needed to maintain both lens fibre cell differentiation and the expression of Crygb and Crygd (Wigle et al., 1999). In Figure 4B, Prox1 can be seen in all the cell nuclei in a wild-type lens including the central fibre cell nuclei (Figure 4B, arrow). In the Cryget lens, Prox1 is clearly absent from the nuclei of the central fibre cells (Figure 4C, arrow) that also contain the nuclear inclusions. The lens epithelial and early differentiating fibre cells at the lens equator in the Cryget lens still possess nuclear Prox1 (Figure 4C, arrowheads). Figure 4.Identification of lens proteins that associate with the γEt-crystallin and γBnop-crystallin nuclear deposits. (A) E17.5 Crygenop lenses were stained with polyclonal rabbit antibodies to CP49 (green channel) and counterstained with propidium iodide to detect chromatin (red channel). The CP49 localizes to the intranuclear inclusions, suggesting that the nuclei have activated those apoptotic-like responses found in normal lens fibre cell differentiation. (B and C) Cryosections from E15.5 wild-type (B) and Cryget (C) mice were stained with polyclonal antibodies to Prox1 (green channel) and counterstained with propidium iodide (red channel). The nuclei of the wild-type lens, including the central fibre cells (B, arrow), are positive for Prox1, whilst in the Cryget lens, these same nuclei are clearly Prox1 negative (C, arrow). Prox1 expression is lost from all of the fibre cells in the Cryget lens, except for the most recently differentiated cells closest to the lens bow (arrowheads). Download figure Download PowerPoint The nuclear-specific location of the γ-crystallin-containing nuclear aggregates and the disruption of Prox1 expression suggest that nuclear transcription is disrupted, and this was investigated using established markers of transcription and monitoring the expression of some key lens proteins. Using antibodies to fibrillarin (Figure 5A–D) and coilin (data not shown), it was clear that the transcriptional machinery of E17.5 Crygbnop lens fibre nuclei was altered significantly. As has been documented for the bovine lens (Dahm et al., 1998), fibrillarin and coilin are sensitive markers of the transcriptional status of lens fibre cell nuclei. Just prior to transcriptional shutdown in these cells, the open floret staining of fibrillarin (Figure 5B, arrow) adopted a closed staining pattern, which coalesced further (Figure 5B, asterisk) as the nuclei break down (Dahm et al., 1998). In Crygbnop mice, fibrillarin staining was either absent or present in a very diffuse pattern in the nuclei containing intranuclear inclusions (Figure 5D, arrowheads) compared with wild-type embryos at the same stage (E17.5; Figure 5A and B). The aggregates are visible in the nuclei by the exclusion of propidium iodide staining (Figure 5D, arrowheads). The fibrillarin staining also appears irregular in the Crygbnop lenses (Figure 5C) compared with wild type (Figure 5A). Closer examination showed that there is a mixture of nuclei with open (Figure 5D, arrow) and closed fibrillarin staining patterns (Figure 5D, asterisk) in the fibre cells adjacent to those containing nuclear inclusions. The most striking effect of the inclusions has been to disrupt the subnuclear organization of the lens fibre cells (Figure 5D, arrowheads), particularly the nucleolar and Cajal body (data not shown) compartments. Figure 5.Wild-type (A and B) and Crygbnop (C and D) embryos at E17.5 were stained with antibodies to fibrillarin (green channel) and counterstained with propidium iodide (red channel). In the wild-type lens (A), fibrillarin adopts an open floret staining pattern in those nuclei that are transcriptionally active (B, arrow). This pattern then changes in the differentiated fibre cells, resulting in a compact spot(s), indicating that transcriptional activity is reduced (B, asterisk). In the Crygbnop E17.5 lens (C), the fibrillarin pattern is punctate when compared with the wild-type lens (A). Many of the nuclei appear to have shut down transcription, as shown by the intense coalesced staining for fibrillarin (C and D, asterisk). Some Crygbnop nuclei retain an open staining of fibrillarin (D, arrow), whilst in the nuclei containing prominent γBnop-crystallin inclusions (arrowheads), the fibrillarin is no longer present in foci. This staining pattern was not observed in the wild-type lens. Scale bars = 50 μm in (A and B) and 10 μm in (C and D). (E) Immunoblotting with antibodies to vimentin, CP49