The Future of Energy Security for Europe: Turkey's Role as an Energy Corridor
2011; Taylor & Francis; Volume: 47; Issue: 2 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1080/00263206.2010.481176
ISSN1743-7881
AutoresMeltem Müftüler‐Baç, Deniz Başkan,
Tópico(s)Economic Sanctions and International Relations
ResumoAbstract The question of energy security is one of the main concerns for the future of Europe because of the growing dependency of the European countries on third parties, namely Russia, for natural gas. The future of European energy security will be shaped by the EU's dependence on Russia and its ability to find alternative sources of energy as well as multiple routes of transport. Turkey's location between the major energy producers in the Caspian and the major energy consumers in Europe has increased Turkey's potential role as the transit country. The article addresses the Turkish role in the transport of resources from the Caspian region to the European territory. As the Caspian region's resources provide a viable alternative for the EU to diversify its energy suppliers, Turkey emerges as a major hub for energy transport and assumes a greater role in the future of energy security. This article investigates the future challenges to the transport of natural gas into Europe and the role that Turkey will acquire as a transit country, largely replacing Ukraine. The article addresses the following questions: (i) what is Turkey's potential role for energy security in Europe? (ii) what kind of challenges emerge with the increased role for Turkey in European energy routes? (iii) what are the main sources of tension over energy security? The main proposition of the article is that Turkey plays a critical role for the EU's energy security, decreasing its reliance on Russia specifically for the transport of natural gas. Notes 1. ‘Turkey, EU Countries Sign Gas Pipeline Deal’, Zaman, 13 July 2009. 2. The EU's reliance on Russia for oil imports is much lower as the OPEC countries in the Middle East are the main oil providers for Europe and Russia's oil is mostly destined for countries in Asia. 3. ‘Vladimir Putin warns era of cheap gas coming to an end’, Daily Telegraph, 23 Dec. 2008, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/energy/gas/3917269/Vladimir-Putin-warns-era-of-cheap-gas-is-coming-to-an-end.html (accessed 8 Dec. 2009). 4. ‘EU Wrong to Prioritize Energy Diversification’, EUActive, 15 Oct. 2008. 5. M. Müftüler-Baç, ‘Turkey's Accession to the European Union: The EU's Internal Dynamics', International Studies Perspectives, Vol.9, No.2 (May 2008), pp.208–26. 6. M. Müftüler-Baç, ‘The European Union's Accession Negotiations with Turkey from a Foreign Policy Perspective’, Journal of European Integration, Special Issue on European Union's Foreign Policy, Vol.30, No.1 (March 2008), pp.63–78. 7. A. Murinson, ‘Azerbaijan, Turkey–Israel Relations: The Energy Factor’, Meria – the Middle Eastern Review of International Affairs, Vol.12, No.3 (2008), http://www.meriajournal.com/en/asp/journal/2008/september/murinson/index.asp (accessed 16 June 2008). 8. International Energy Agency (IEA), Caspian Oil and Gas: The Supply Potential of Central Asia and Transcaucasia (Paris: OECD, 1998). 9. Euractiv, EU Sees ‘Huge Scope for Cooperation’ with Central Asia’, 11 April 2008, http://www. euractiv.com/en/foreign-affairs/eu-sees-huge-scope-cooperation-central-asia/article-171533 (accessed 18 May 2008). 10. R. Ibrahimov, ‘2009: Russian Gas Policy – First Step Taken’, USAK, International Strategic Research Foundation, 21 Jan. 2009, http://www.usak.org.tr/EN/makale.asp?id=840 (accessed 6 Feb. 2010). 11. A. Moravscik, The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1998). 12. European Commission, Towards a European Strategy for the Security of Energy Supply, Green Paper, 2000, COM (2000) 769 final. 13. P. Cayrade, ‘Investments in Gas Pipelines and LNG Infrastructure: What Impact on the Security of Supply?’, INDES Working Paper, No.3 (2004). 14. European Commission, European Strategy for Sustainable, Competitive and Secure Energy, Green Paper, 2006, COM (2006) 105 final, Brussels. 15. EC Press Release IP/06/1657, The EU and the Countries of the Black Sea and Caspian Sea Regions Agree on a Common Energy Strategy (Brussels: EC, 2006). 16. Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Tajikistan, Turkey, Ukraine, Uzbekistan and the Russian Federation (observer). 17. European Commission, An Energy Policy for Europe, Communication from the Commission to the European Council and the European Parliament, 2007, COM (2007) 1 final, Brussels. 18. Ibid. 19. P. Belkin, ‘The European Union's Energy Security Challenges', Congressional Research Service, Washington DC, 2007, RL33636. 20. ‘Russia Looks to Reroute Gas’, BBC News, 2 Jan. 2009, http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/7808937.stm (accessed 20 Jan. 2010). 21. H. Amirahmadi, ‘Pipeline Politics in the Caspian Region’, in H. Amirahmadi (ed.), The Caspian Region at a Crossroad: Challenges of a New Frontier of Energy and Development (London: Macmillan Press Ltd., 2000), p.163. 22. D. Fink, ‘Assessing Turkey's Future as an Energy Transit Country’, The Washington Institute for Near East Policy Research Notes (July 2006). 23. K. Barysch, Turkey's Role in European Energy Security (Centre for European Forum Essays, London: CER publications, 2007). 24. D. Mavrakis, F. Thomaidis and I. Ntroukas, ‘An Assessment of the Natural Gas Supply Potential of the South Energy Corridor from the Caspian Region to the EU’, Energy Policy, Vol.34 (2006), pp.1671–80. 25. S. Bölükbaşı, ‘Jockeying for Power in the Caspian Basin: Turkey versus Iran and Russia’, in S. Akiner (ed.), The Caspian: Politics, Energy and Security (London: Routledge Curzon, 2004), pp.219–29. 26. Barysch, Turkey's Role in European Energy Security. 27. ‘RWE Joins Nabucco Gas Pipeline Project’, Energy Business Review, 7 Feb. 2008, http://www.energy-business-review.com/article_news.asp?guid=0BC9F3F9-0CFC-4753-9387-DF04837A248D (accessed 19 May 2008). 28. A. Piebalgs, ‘European Energy Security Policy’, Speech at the European Business Summit, Brussels, Speech/08/96, 21 Feb. 2008. 29. European Commission, An Energy Policy for Europe, Communication from the Commission to the European Council and the European Parliament, 2007, COM (2007) 1 final, Brussels. 30. ‘EU Official Says Nabucco Gas Pipeline Project is Now “More of a Reality”’, Kyiv Post, 18 Feb. 2008. 31. ‘Commissioner Piebalgs welcomes agreement to accelerate Nabucco project’, EC Press Release IP/06/842, EC: Brussels, 2006. 32. M. Malek, ‘The South Caucasus at the Cross-Roads: Ethno-Territorial Conflicts, Russian Interests and the Access to Russian Energy Resources’, in G. Hauser and F. Kernic (eds.), European Security in Transition (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2006), pp.145–60. 33. International Energy Agency (IEA). Caspian Oil and Gas: The Supply Potential of Central Asia and Transcaucasia (Paris: OECD, 1998), p.36. 34. P. Belkin, ‘The European Union's Energy Security Challenges’, Congressional Research Service, RL33636, 2007. 35. ‘Turkey, EU Countries Sign Gas Pipeline Deal’, Zaman, 13 July 2009. 36. ‘Ashgabat Offers Gas for Nabucco’, Zaman, 10 July 2009. 37. N. Gnesotto and G. Grevi, The New Global Puzzle: What World for the EU in 2025 (Paris: Institute for Security Studies, 2006), p.61. 38. ‘Ankara Courts the EU over Nabucco Gas Supplies’, EUActive, 6 Oct. 2009. 39. International Energy Agency (IEA), World Energy Outlook (Paris: WEO, 1998), p.368. 40. The Nabucco gas pipeline project has received [euro]1,682,700 from the TEN budget whereas the TEN financed [euro]4,330,000 for technical and environmental studies of the Turkey–Greece gas interconnector, http://ec.europa.eu/energy/infrastructure/tent_e/doc/2009_ten_e_financed_projects_1999_2009.pdf (TEN Energy Website). 41. The European Commission, Issues Arising from Turkey's Membership Perspective. Commission Staff Working Document, SEC(2004) 1202, Brussels, 2004, p.9. 42. M. Aydın and S.A. Açıkmeşe, ‘To Be or Not To Be With Turkey: December 2004 Blues for the EU’, Turkish Policy Quarterly, Vol.3, No.3 (2004), p.54. 43. The European Commission, An External Policy to Serve Europe's Energy Interests, Paper from Commission/SG/HR for the European Council. S/160/06, 2006, p.3.
Referência(s)