Control of telomere length by a trimming mechanism that involves generation of t-circles
2009; Springer Nature; Volume: 28; Issue: 7 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1038/emboj.2009.42
ISSN1460-2075
AutoresHilda A. Pickett, Anthony J. Cesare, Rebecca L. Johnston, Axel A. Neumann, Roger R. Reddel,
Tópico(s)Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
ResumoArticle12 February 2009Open Access Control of telomere length by a trimming mechanism that involves generation of t-circles Hilda A Pickett Hilda A Pickett Cancer Research Group, Children's Medical Research Institute, Westmead, NSW, Australia Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia Search for more papers by this author Anthony J Cesare Anthony J Cesare Cancer Research Group, Children's Medical Research Institute, Westmead, NSW, Australia Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia Search for more papers by this author Rebecca L Johnston Rebecca L Johnston Cancer Research Group, Children's Medical Research Institute, Westmead, NSW, Australia Search for more papers by this author Axel A Neumann Axel A Neumann Cancer Research Group, Children's Medical Research Institute, Westmead, NSW, Australia Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia Search for more papers by this author Roger R Reddel Corresponding Author Roger R Reddel Cancer Research Group, Children's Medical Research Institute, Westmead, NSW, Australia Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia Search for more papers by this author Hilda A Pickett Hilda A Pickett Cancer Research Group, Children's Medical Research Institute, Westmead, NSW, Australia Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia Search for more papers by this author Anthony J Cesare Anthony J Cesare Cancer Research Group, Children's Medical Research Institute, Westmead, NSW, Australia Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia Search for more papers by this author Rebecca L Johnston Rebecca L Johnston Cancer Research Group, Children's Medical Research Institute, Westmead, NSW, Australia Search for more papers by this author Axel A Neumann Axel A Neumann Cancer Research Group, Children's Medical Research Institute, Westmead, NSW, Australia Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia Search for more papers by this author Roger R Reddel Corresponding Author Roger R Reddel Cancer Research Group, Children's Medical Research Institute, Westmead, NSW, Australia Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia Search for more papers by this author Author Information Hilda A Pickett1,2, Anthony J Cesare1,2, Rebecca L Johnston1, Axel A Neumann1,2 and Roger R Reddel 1,2 1Cancer Research Group, Children's Medical Research Institute, Westmead, NSW, Australia 2Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia *Corresponding author. Cancer Research Group, Children's Medical Research Institute, 214 Hawkesbury Road, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia. Tel.: +61 2 9687 2800; Fax: +61 2 9687 2120; E-mail: [email protected] The EMBO Journal (2009)28:799-809https://doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2009.42 There is a Have you seen ...? (April 2009) associated with this Article. PDFDownload PDF of article text and main figures. ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions Figures & Info Telomere lengths are maintained in many cancer cells by the ribonucleoprotein enzyme telomerase but can be further elongated by increasing telomerase activity through the overexpression of telomerase components. We report here that increased telomerase activity results in increased telomere length that eventually reaches a plateau, accompanied by the generation of telomere length heterogeneity and the accumulation of extrachromosomal telomeric repeat DNA, principally in the form of telomeric circles (t-circles). Telomeric DNA was observed in promyelocytic leukemia bodies, but no intertelomeric copying or telomere exchange events were identified, and there was no increase in telomere dysfunction-induced foci. These data indicate that human cells possess a mechanism to negatively regulate telomere length by trimming telomeric DNA from the chromosome ends, most likely by t-loop resolution to form t-circles. Additionally, these results indicate that some phenotypic characteristics attributed to alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT) result from increased mean telomere length, rather than from the ALT mechanism itself. Introduction In human cells, telomeric DNA is composed of double-stranded (ds) arrays of a (TTAGGG)n repeat unit, terminating in a single-stranded (ss) G-rich 3′ overhang (Moyzis et al, 1988; de Lange et al, 1990; Makarov et al, 1997; Wright et al, 1997). Telomeres have been shown to exist in a stable secondary structure called a telomere-loop (t-loop), which is formed by strand invasion of the 3′ overhang into internal telomeric repeats on the same chromosome end and the consequent formation of a displacement loop at the site of sequestration (Griffith et al, 1999). The shelterin complex, which comprises six telomere-specific proteins (TRF1, TRF2, POT1, TIN2, TPP1 and Rap1), associates with the telomeric repeat DNA to form a protective structure that prevents the chromosome terminus from being inappropriately processed by DNA repair pathways (de Lange, 2005). It has been proposed that shelterin is responsible for the structural stability of the t-loop and acts dynamically with a number of interacting partners, which are involved in DNA processing, to shape the telomere and ensure telomere integrity (de Lange, 2005; Palm and de Lange, 2008). Nevertheless, the details of t-loop formation and their dynamics throughout the cell cycle remain elusive. To counteract telomere shortening, which occurs as a result of end-replication limitations, the majority of immortal cells as well as cells of the germline use the ribonucleoprotein enzyme telomerase, the catalytic core of which comprises the reverse transcriptase hTERT and the RNA component hTR (Feng et al, 1995; Nakamura et al, 1997). Levels of hTR and hTERT are both limiting for telomerase activity and telomere length in immortalised cells, and telomerase-positive cancer cell lines typically have a very small number of telomerase molecules and stably short telomeres (Cristofari and Lingner, 2006; Cao et al, 2008). In such situations, telomerase is preferentially recruited to the shorter telomeres (Bianchi and Shore, 2008). Telomerase-positive immortal cells maintain a balance between telomere attrition and telomere elongation by negative feedback of telomere length on telomerase activity, mediated in cis at each individual chromosome end by the binding of shelterin proteins, especially TRF1, along the telomeric tract (Smogorzewska et al, 2000; Smogorzewska and de Lange, 2004; Bianchi and Shore, 2008). This feedback mechanism is likely to involve monitoring of the number of telomere-binding proteins and resultant changes in telomere accessibility by telomerase. Telomeres can be lengthened by increasing telomerase activity through exogenous expression of hTR and hTERT, resulting in an increase in telomere-bound shelterin proteins in proportion to the increased telomere length (Cristofari and Lingner, 2006). In this study, we examined the long-term effects of exogenous hTR expression in telomerase-positive human cancer cell lines and the effects of elongation on telomere function and stability. The results indicate the existence of a mechanism in human cells to negatively regulate telomere length by trimming of telomeric DNA from the chromosome ends. Results Increased telomerase activity resulted in telomere elongation and telomere length heterogeneity in telomerase-positive cells HT1080 and HeLa telomerase-positive cells were transduced with pBABEpuro containing hTR driven by the U3 promoter, or with an empty vector control. Cells were selected and passaged as stable mass cultures for 300 population doublings (pds) from the point at which they were transduced. After transduction, hTR expression increased approximately 20-fold in both HeLa and HT1080 cells, compared with vector controls, and was maintained at this level throughout the 300 pds (Figure 1A). hTERT expression remained unchanged after hTR overexpression in both cell lines (data not shown). Figure 1.hTR overexpression increases telomerase activity, telomere length and telomere length heterogeneity in telomerase-positive cells. (A) Expression of hTR as fold change relative to parental control cells at increasing pd of HeLa and HT1080 cells after transduction with pBABEpuro (vector) or pBABEpuroU3hTR (hTR), measured by quantitative RT–PCR. Error bars represent standard deviation between three separate experiments. (B) Telomerase activity measured by IP-RQ-TRAP and expressed as fold change relative to vector sample at pd 10. Error bars represent standard deviation between three separate experiments. (C) TRF analysis of genomic DNA digested with HinfI and RsaI from HeLa and HT1080 vector and hTR cells at increasing pds. Digested DNA from the ALT cell line VA13 was included as an example of telomere length heterogeneity. (D) Telomere-FISH of HeLa and HT1080 vector and hTR cells using a PNA probe against the G-rich telomeric DNA strand. Chromosomes were counterstained with DAPI. Download figure Download PowerPoint Measurement of telomerase activity by conventional TRAP is sometimes unreliable due to the presence of telomerase inhibitors in cell extracts. To avoid this potential complication, we developed a modified real-time quantitative (RQ)-TRAP assay containing a telomerase purification step. Telomerase was immunoaffinity purified (IP) from cell lysate using an hTERT antibody, which has been verified previously for this application (Cohen and Reddel, 2008). After purification, telomerase-mediated extension of a nontelomeric primer was measured by quantitative PCR (IP-RQ-TRAP) (Wege et al, 2003; Cohen and Reddel, 2008). Linearity of the IP-RQ-TRAP technique was shown (Supplementary Figure S1). Telomerase activity increased approximately 6-fold in HeLa hTR cells and approximately 10-fold in HT1080 hTR cells (Figure 1B). Terminal restriction fragments (TRFs) were generated by digestion of genomic DNA with HinfI and RsaI restriction endonucleases, separated by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), and then hybridised in-gel to a telomere-specific probe. Mean TRF lengths in HeLa vector control cells remained constant throughout the course of experimentation, at approximately 4.5 kb, whereas mean TRF lengths in HT1080 vector cells grew slightly at later pds from approximately 6.5–7.5 kb (Figure 1C). HeLa hTR cells showed increasing telomere lengths over 150 pds, after which TRFs stabilised at approximately 8 kb (Figure 1C). Telomere lengths of HT1080 hTR cells strikingly continued to elongate with increasing pd, producing an increasingly heterogeneous TRF length profile. This was compared with the TRF profile of the cell line WI-38 VA13/2RA (referred to here as VA13) (Figure 1C). VA13 cells use the recombination-based alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT) mechanism of telomere length maintenance, which is characterised by marked telomere length heterogeneity (Bryan et al, 1995). TRF analysis of ALT cells frequently shows residual telomeric signal in the wells of the gel. The nature of this DNA and whether it originates from ALT-associated promyelocytic leukemia (PML) bodies (APBs), is simply too large to be resolved, or whether it represents highly branched t-complex DNA (Nabetani and Ishikawa, 2009) is not known. At later pds, HT1080 hTR cells increasingly phenocopied the ALT TRF profile, including the retention of telomeric DNA in the wells, yet notably lacked the smallest sized telomeric fragments (Figure 1C). Fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) analysis of metaphase spreads using a telomeric peptide nucleic acid (PNA) probe confirmed telomere length heterogeneity (Figure 1D). Telomere FISH from vector transduced control cells showed homogeneous telomeric signals indicative of short and stable telomere lengths, whereas both HeLa hTR and HT1080 hTR cells showed an overall increase in telomeric signal, accompanied by marked signal heterogeneity between different telomeres within a single metaphase. This was particularly apparent in HT1080 hTR cells at later pd (Figure 1D). Telomere lengthening in telomerase-positive cells resulted in the formation and accumulation of extrachromosomal telomeric repeat DNA To determine whether extrachromosomal telomeric repeat (ECTR) DNA accounted for some of the increased telomeric content of HeLa hTR and HT1080 hTR cells, 2D gel electrophoresis was used to detect extrachromosomal t-circles. For optimal size resolution, TRFs were separated by 2D PFGE and hybridised to a telomere-specific probe. Bacteriophage lambda DNA, that was digested with HindIII endonuclease and then circularised by DNA ligase was loaded as ds circular DNA markers. The prominent arc represents ds linear telomeric DNA of high molecular weight, which increases in size and signal intensity in HeLa and HT1080 hTR cells at pd 235, consistent with elongated telomeres (Figure 2A). An arc of open-form ds DNA circles containing telomeric sequence was present in the HeLa and HT1080 hTR cells, but not evident in HT1080 vector controls (Figure 2A). A faint arc of circular DNA could, however, be seen after longer exposure of the HeLa vector gel. The circular molecules were detected at all molecular weights within the range of detection (∼2–9 kb) and are consistent with the t-circles observed previously in ALT cells (Cesare and Griffith, 2004). A lower arc that has been identified previously as consisting of ss telomeric DNA (Cesare et al, 2008; Raices et al, 2008; Nabetani and Ishikawa, 2009) migrated beneath the linear ds DNA in HeLa hTR cells and was not present in the HT1080 hTR cells (Figure 2A). Figure 2.Telomere lengthening results in t-circle accumulation and an increase in ss G-rich and t-complex telomeric DNA. (A) 2D PFGE of TRFs from HeLa and HT1080 vector and hTR cells at pd 235, digested with HinfI and RsaI. Gels were Southern blotted and hybridised with a C-rich telomeric DNA probe. The black arrows indicate circular telomeric DNA. Circularised HindIII-digested bacteriophage lambda DNA was electrophoresed simultaneously as a marker for ds circular DNA. Open circular (oc) spots are indicated, as is the remaining linear (l) telomere-derived signal. (B) 2D gel electrophoresis of TRFs from HT1080 vector and hTR cells at increasing pd. Telomeric DNA was detected in-gel with a γ-32P-labelled C-rich probe. (C) 2D gel electrophoresis of TRFs from HT1080 vector and hTR cells at pd 300. Hybridisation was carried out in-gel with a γ-32P-labelled C-rich or G-rich probe under native and denaturing conditions, to detect ss and ds telomeric DNA, respectively. Download figure Download PowerPoint To determine at what stage the t-circles became abundant and to confirm that the circles are the result of progressive telomere elongation, standard 2D gels of HT1080 vector and hTR cells at increasing pds were hybridised to a telomeric probe (Figure 2B). Several prominent lower molecular weight spots, specific to the HT1080 cells were identified. These spots did not change in size and intensity and are therefore most likely to represent interstitial bands of telomeric sequence. By using these spots as a marker of exposure, the gels shown in Figure 2B and C appear to be suitably comparable. T-circles were detected at early pds in the hTR-expressing cells after longer exposure, and increased substantially in intensity over successive pds (Figure 2B). In addition, an arc of telomeric repeat DNA migrating beneath the linear material was detected at later pds. Very faint arcs of circular telomeric DNA could also be observed after extended exposure in the HT1080 vector cells at later pds (Figure 2B). HT1080 hTR cells show strong telomeric signal near the wells, consistent with t-complex DNA, which comprises highly branched telomeric repeats with large amounts of internal ss portions (Nabetani and Ishikawa, 2009). This type of telomeric DNA was recently described as a characteristic feature of ALT cells and was proposed to arise from Holliday junctions in the DNA (Nabetani and Ishikawa, 2009). Circular telomeric DNA appears to be present at low levels in control HT1080 and HeLa cells but, most strikingly, we show that ECTR DNA including t-complex DNA accumulates with increasing telomere lengths in the cells with overexpressed telomerase. To determine more accurately the nature of the ECTR DNA, 2D gels were used to analyse DNA isolated from HT1080 vector and hTR cells at pd 300 and probed in-gel under native or denaturing conditions using a C-rich or G-rich telomeric probe (Figure 2C). Hybridisation under native conditions showed that the arc migrating beneath the linear ds telomeric DNA in the HT1080 hTR cells was composed of ss G-rich telomeric sequence, and that a smaller, but detectable amount was also present in the vector control cells (Figure 2C). Somewhat surprisingly, an increase in C-rich linear telomeric signal was seen under native conditions in hTR expressing cells, indicating the existence of either ss C-rich overhangs at the chromosome termini, or gapped ds linear TRFs, which have been identified previously in ALT cells (Nabetani and Ishikawa, 2009). T-complex DNA was detected in the hTR expressing cells under both native and denaturing conditions, consistent with this type of telomeric DNA containing portions of ss telomeric repeats (Nabetani and Ishikawa, 2009). T-circles were clearly visible with both strand-specific probes under denaturing conditions in HT1080 hTR cells, but not vector cells (Figure 2C). This shows that the t-circles are predominantly ds, although some ss C-rich t-circles can also be detected in HT1080 hTR cells, but are likely to represent ss regions of gapped circles. Promyelocytic leukemia bodies were associated with telomeric DNA in telomerase-positive cells with extended telomeres PML bodies are discrete nuclear foci that are present in the majority of mammalian cells and have been implicated in numerous cellular processes (Bernardi and Pandolfi, 2007). A subset of PML bodies known as APBs, which are thought to be specific to ALT cells, are distinguished from other PML bodies by containing telomeric DNA, telomeric-binding proteins and proteins involved in recombination (Yeager et al, 1999). HeLa and HT1080 vector and hTR interphase cells were immunostained using an antibody against PML protein and then hybridised with a telomeric PNA probe. True colocalisations were confirmed by deconvolution of z-stacked images, followed by 3D imaging (Figure 3A and B). PML protein typically exists in a spherical or doughnut-shaped body (Jiang and Ringertz, 1997) and colocalisations were only counted when the telomeric DNA localised, throughout the z-stacks, to the centre of the PML body (Figure 3B). Figure 3.Elongated telomeres are not substrates for telomeric exchange events. (A) Colocalisation of PML protein and FITC-conjugated telomeric PNA probe in interphase HT1080 hTR cells at pd 200 by deconvolution microscopy of z-stacked images as a 2D-image and (B) as a 3D-image. Arrows indicate colocalisations. (C) CO-FISH analysis of HeLa and HT1080 vector and hTR cells, compared with VA13 (ALT+) positive control, using a Texas Red PNA probe to the C-rich strand and an Alexa 488 PNA probe to the G-rich strand. Chromosomes were counterstained with DAPI. Insets show a representative chromosome with no telomere exchange event in the HeLa and HT1080 cells and with telomere exchange events detected at both telomeres in the VA13 cells. Download figure Download PowerPoint APB-like foci were identified in approximately 3% of both HeLa and HT1080 cells with elongated telomeres at varying pds (Figure 3A and B), whereas no colocalisations were detected in any vector controls (data not shown). PML protein also colocalised with TRF2 and the components of the Mre11/Rad50/Nbs1 (MRN) homologous recombination complex in both HeLa and HT1080 hTR cells, but not in vector controls (Supplementary Figure S2). In view of this unexpected result, DNA fingerprinting of HeLa and HT1080 vector and hTR cells was used to confirm that there had been no cell line cross-contamination with ALT cells (data not shown). The frequency of telomere exchange events was unaltered in telomerase-positive cells with elongated telomeres Long, heterogeneous telomeres, the presence of ECTR DNA and the colocalisation of telomeric DNA with PML protein partly phenocopied the telomeres of cells that use the ALT mechanism, so we investigated whether the hTR-transduced HeLa and HT1080 cells had other features of ALT, including elevated telomeric exchange events, usually referred to as telomere sister chromatid exchanges (t-SCEs) (Bailey et al, 2004; Bechter et al, 2004; Londono-Vallejo et al, 2004; Muntoni and Reddel, 2005). Chromosome-orientation-FISH (CO-FISH) was carried out on metaphase spreads from BrdU:BrdC treated cells using a Texas Red-conjugated PNA probe against the C-rich strand and an Alexa 488-conjugated PNA probe against the G-rich strand, to detect the parental telomeric DNA strands of the two sister telomeres at each end of metaphase chromosomes (Londono-Vallejo et al, 2004). The ALT cell line VA13 was included in the analysis as a positive control. As described previously, the basal rate of t-SCE events in telomerase-positive cells was very low (Londono-Vallejo et al, 2004), in contrast to the high frequency of exchange events detected in VA13 cells. The rate of t-SCEs did not increase in either the HeLa hTR or HT1080 hTR cells compared with vector controls (Table I; Figure 3C). We therefore conclude that the extended telomeres of HT1080 and HeLa hTR cells are not subjected to postreplicative telomere exchange events. Table 1. T-SCE analysis in HeLa and HT1080 vector- and hTR-expressing cells at pd 300 and VA13 cells as positive control Cell line No. of chromosome ends analysed No. of T-SCE Frequency of T-SCE per chromosome end (%) HeLa vector 4830 1 0.02 HeLa hTR 4646 0 0 HT1080 vector 4680 1 0.02 HT1080 hTR 4794 0 0 VA13 3438 778 22.6 Telomere–telomere copying was not detected in telomerase-positive cells with extended telomeres Integration of a telomere-targeting plasmid tag has been used previously to examine intertelomere copy templating in ALT cells (Dunham et al, 2000). This technique was used in this study to investigate whether homologous recombination-mediated telomere replication events also occurred in telomerase-positive cell lines overexpressing hTR and showing some of the phenotypic characteristics of ALT. A neomycin resistance gene (neoR) cassette flanked on either side by 800 bp of telomeric repeats was used as a telomeric DNA tag by targeting into the telomeres of HeLa and HT1080 vector and hTR cells at pd 230. Integration of the DNA tag was detected in clonal cell populations by FISH at early pds (pd +25). Two HT1080 vector clones (clones 13 and 20) and three HT1080 hTR clones (clones 3, 15 and 16), all of which contained a single telomeric integration site (Figure 4A), were picked and cultured separately. HT1080 hTR clone 15 also contained an interstitial tag integration site. No telomeric integration of the tag was obtained in any HeLa vector clones analysed. Two HeLa hTR clones (clones 2 and 4) with telomeric integration of the tag were chosen for analysis (Figure 4A). Clone 2 had a single telomere integration site, and clone 4 contained three telomeric integration sites (Table II). The variation in telomere tag signal intensities within a single metaphase spread, in clones that have more than one tagged telomere, indicates that at least some telomeres contain more than one copy of the tag; this is consistent with the possibility that the tag has integrated as an array. Figure 4.Telomere targeting results in loss of telomeric repeats, but no intertelomere copying. (A) Telomere tagged clones of HeLa and HT1080 vector and hTR cells, indicating the position of tag integration at the earliest timepoint (pd +25). The neoR tag was detected by FISH using the pSXneo plasmid as a probe. Chromosomes were counterstained with DAPI. (B) Tagged DNA was progressively excised from the telomere in HeLa hTR clone 2, resulting in tagged extrachromosomal fragments, where the tag FISH signal colocalised with the propidium iodide DNA stain (indicated by arrows). Insets show an enlarged colocalisation, indicated by the top arrow. (C) Telomere signal was detected as extrachromosomal fragments using an FITC-telomeric PNA probe in HeLa hTR clone 2. Chromosomes were counterstained with propidium iodide. Arrows indicate extrachromosomal telomere fragments. Download figure Download PowerPoint Table 2. Telomere-tagged chromosomes in HeLa and HT1080 clones at early population doubling following tag integration (pd +25) and at late population doubling (pd +60) Cell line and clone Early pd (pd +25) Late pd (pd +60) HeLa hTR clone 2 12pter None hTR clone 4 2qter, 19pter, 21pter 2qter, 19pter, 21pter HT1080 Vector clone 13 1qter 1qter Vector clone 20 11q+ter 11q+ter hTR clone 3 9qter 9qter hTR clone 15 6p or 3pdelinter, 21pter 6p or 3pdelinter, 21pter hTR clone 16 Bpter Bpter All clones were passaged for 60 pds after integration of the tag. The number of tagged telomeres did not increase in any of the vector or hTR clones, as observed previously in telomerase-expressing cell lines (Dunham et al, 2000); that is, no telomeric copying events involving a tagged chromosome end were detected (Table II). Therefore, despite the increase in chromosomal telomeric and ECTR DNA, there is no evidence in these telomerase-positive cells of the recombination-mediated telomere replication events observed in ALT cells. In HeLa hTR clone 2, the telomere tag was entirely lost after 60 pds. Loss of the telomere tag in this clone and not in any of the other analysed clones is likely to reflect a more distal position of tag insertion in the telomere repeat array, resulting in the tag being readily subjected to loss by telomeric deletion events. This clone provided us with an informative system for investigating the partial loss of telomeric DNA from a specific chromosome end. NeoR-FISH was carried out at pd +28, a timepoint after verification of telomeric tag integration and, intriguingly, deletion of the tag from the telomere could be visualised in metaphase spreads (Figure 4B). We observed neoR-FISH signals separate from chromosomes, that colocalised with propidium iodide or DAPI stained DNA fragments, although this was only evident when the signal intensity of the red or blue channel, respectively, was increased substantially, indicating that the fragment was very small. Several deleted fragments could be seen in a single metaphase (Figure 4B). We hypothesise that this resulted from the tag integrating as an array and one or more copies being lost in progressive rounds of telomere truncation. Telomeric deletion events were confirmed in HeLa hTR clone 2 pd +28 by telomere-FISH (Figure 4C). The deleted telomere fragments were identified as doublets, irregularly shaped fragments, and also as single signals within the cells. No telomere fragments were identified in vector controls. Importantly, no telomere signal-free ends were identified. Telomerase-positive cells with elongated telomeres showed no increase in telomere dysfunction-induced foci Telomere uncapping results in telomere dysfunction, shown by the formation of telomeric foci containing DNA damage response factors (telomere dysfunction-induced foci, TIFs) and the consequent activation of a DNA damage response (de Lange, 2002; Takai et al, 2003). We quantitated the number of TIFs, as visualised by the presence of the DNA double strand break marker phosphorylated histone H2AX (γ-H2AX), at telomere ends in HeLa and HT1080 vector and hTR cells at pd 220 and pd 300 (Figure 5A). Figure 5.No increase in TIFs was detected in cells undergoing telomeric deletion events. (A) Cytospun HeLa and HT1080 hTR chromosomes were immunostained for γ-H2AX in conjunction with FITC-telomeric PNA probe. Chromosomes were counterstained with DAPI. (B) Quantitation of TIF data from HeLa and HT1080 parental cells compared with vector and hTR cells at pd 220 and pd 300, expressed as percentage γ-H2AX associated chromosome ends. Approximately 3000 chromosome ends were counted per experiment. Error bars represent standard deviation between three separate experiments. Download figure Download PowerPoint The proportion of γ-H2AX associated chromosome ends in HeLa or HT1080 hTR cells undergoing telomere-trimming events and t-circle formation did not increase compared with vector controls (Figure 5B). On the contrary, a slight decrease in the number of TIFs was identified in HeLa and HT1080 hTR cells compared with vector cells (Figure 5B), probably due to a decrease in the number of very short telomeres as the result of increased telomerase activity. Discussion In this study, we used the generation of artificially elongated telomeres by overexpression of hTR and the consequent increase in telomerase activity in telomerase-positive cell lines, to reveal a mechanism by which human cells negatively regulate telomere length by trimming telomeric repeats from the chromosome ends (Figure 6). This process is distinct from the gradual telomere attrition seen with each round of cell replication, and from the cis-acting telomere length control mechanism operative in telomerase-positive cells that appears to depend on modulation of telomere accessibility to telomerase (Bianchi and Shore, 2008). Figure 6.Schematic of proposed telomere length control by deletion events. In situations of nonlimiting telomerase, telomeres extend beyond a threshold length, after which resolution of the t-loop Holliday Junction intermediate p
Referência(s)