Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Consolidating Corporate Control: Divisional Versus Whole‐Company Leveraged Buyouts

2002; Wiley; Volume: 25; Issue: 2 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1111/1475-6803.t01-1-00006

1475-6803

Sung C. Bae, Hoje Jo,

Financial Reporting and Valuation Research

Abstract We examine the empirical relation between firm characteristics and the likelihood of choosing a restructuring choice between two types of leveraged buyouts: a whole‐company leveraged buyout (WLBO) and a divisional leveraged buyout (DLBO). Our findings suggest that firm characteristics such as volatility of cash flow and growth potential play an important role in determining a firm's restructuring choice between a WLBO and a DLBO. In particular, firms with greater volatility of cash flow and/or greater future growth potential are more likely to adopt a DLBO than a WLBO as their restructuring choice. These results are consistent with the notion that although low‐growth, high‐cash‐flow firms would create the most value for stockholders by paying out cash and tying future cash flows to the firm's debt service through a WLBO, high‐growth, low‐cash‐flow firms would be better off by selling assets if those assets would be better managed under a DLBO.