Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

How to Deal with Evil Demons: Comment on Rabinowicz and Rønnow‐Rasmussen

2005; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 115; Issue: 4 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1086/430491

1539-297X

Philip Stratton‐Lake,

Philosophical Ethics and Theory

Previous articleNext article No AccessDiscussionsHow to Deal with Evil Demons: Comment on Rabinowicz and Rønnow‐Rasmussen*Philip Stratton‐LakePhilip Stratton‐LakePDFPDF PLUSFull Text Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Ethics Volume 115, Number 4July 2005 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/430491 Views: 77Total views on this site Citations: 35Citations are reported from Crossref © 2005 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Andrew Peet Assertoric content, responsibility, and metasemantics, Mind & Language 86 (Jun 2021).https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12372Andrés G. Garcia The Finality and Instrumentality of Value in a Way, Philosophia 47, no.33 (Aug 2018): 681–692.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-018-0019-1Jonas Olson, Mark Timmons Ewing, A. C., (Jun 2019): 1–7.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444367072.wbiee184.pub2Gerhard Schönrich Was macht Entscheidungen zu weisen Entscheidungen?, Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Philosophica. Ethica-Aesthetica-Practica , no.3232 (Dec 2018): 165–184.https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6107.32.12Andrés G. Garcia, Jakob Green Werkmäster Subjectivism and the Framework of Constitutive Grounds, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 21, no.11 (Jan 2018): 155–167.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-018-9862-1Jan Gertken, Benjamin Kiesewetter The right and the wrong kind of reasons, Philosophy Compass 12, no.55 (May 2017): e12412.https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12412Nathaniel Sharadin Reasons Wrong and Right, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97, no.33 (Aug 2015): 371–399.https://doi.org/10.1111/papq.12089Andrew Reisner FITTINGNESS, VALUE, AND TRANS-WORLD ATTITUDES, The Philosophical Quarterly 65, no.260260 (Jan 2015): 464–485.https://doi.org/10.1093/pq/pqu094Richard Rowland Dissolving the wrong kind of reason problem, Philosophical Studies 172, no.66 (Jul 2014): 1455–1474.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-014-0359-zDuarte Gonçalves, , , Teoria do valor: bases para um método, Trans/Form/Ação 37, no.11 (Apr 2014): 71–104.https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-31732014000100005Antoine C. Dussault Fitting-Attitude Analyses and the Relation Between Final and Intrinsic Value, Les ateliers de l'éthique 9, no.22 (Sep 2014): 166–189.https://doi.org/10.7202/1026685arJohn Brunero Reasons as explanations, Philosophical Studies 165, no.33 (Jul 2012): 805–824.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-012-9982-8LARS SAMUELSSON The Right Version of 'the Right Kind of Solution to the Wrong Kind of Reason Problem', Utilitas 25, no.33 (Jul 2013): 383–404.https://doi.org/10.1017/S095382081200057XFrancesco Orsi What's wrong with Moorean buck-passing?, Philosophical Studies 164, no.33 (Mar 2012): 727–746.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-012-9905-8Jonas Olson Buck-Passing Accounts, (Feb 2013).https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444367072.wbiee083Daniel Jacobson Wrong Kind of Reasons Problem, (Feb 2013).https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444367072.wbiee136Wlodek Rabinowicz Value, Fitting-Attitude Account of, (Feb 2013).https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444367072.wbiee311Jonathan Way Transmission and the Wrong Kind of Reason, Ethics 122, no.33 (Jul 2015): 489–515.https://doi.org/10.1086/664749Stephane Lemaire The FA Analysis of Emotional Values and Practical Reasons, Dialogue 51, no.11 (Sep 2012): 31–53.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0012217312000224D. W. Portmore The Teleological Conception of Practical Reasons, Mind 120, no.477477 (Apr 2011): 117–153.https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzr009JOHN BRUNERO Consequentialism and the Wrong Kind of Reasons: A Reply to Lang, Utilitas 22, no.33 (Jul 2010): 351–359.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953820810000245Jonathan Way Defending the wide-scope approach to instrumental reason, Philosophical Studies 147, no.22 (Oct 2008): 213–233.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-008-9277-2P. Stratton-Lake Roger Crisp on Goodness and Reasons, Mind 118, no.472472 (Nov 2009): 1081–1094.https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzp136Jussi Suikkanen Buck-Passing Accounts of Value, Philosophy Compass 4, no.55 (Sep 2009): 768–779.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2009.00253.xJohan Brännmark Goodness, Values, Reasons, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12, no.44 (May 2009): 329–343.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-009-9175-5Jennie Louise Correct Responses and the Priority of the Normative, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12, no.44 (May 2009): 345–364.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-009-9177-3Andrew Reisner The possibility of pragmatic reasons for belief and the wrong kind of reasons problem, Philosophical Studies 145, no.22 (Jun 2008): 257–272.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-008-9222-4Ishtiyaque Haji Freedom and Practical Reason, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12, no.22 (Oct 2008): 169–179.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-008-9132-8Guy Fletcher On Hatzimoysis on Sentimental Value, Philosophia 37, no.11 (Jun 2008): 149–152.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-008-9142-8GERALD LANG The Right Kind of Solution to the Wrong Kind of Reason Problem, Utilitas 20, no.0404 (Nov 2008): 472.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953820808003282PHILIP COOK An Augmented Buck-Passing Account of Reasons and Value: Scanlon and Crisp on What Stops the Buck, Utilitas 20, no.0404 (Nov 2008): 490.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953820808003294DOUGLAS W. PORTMORE CONSEQUENTIALIZING MORAL THEORIES, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 88, no.11 (Mar 2007): 39–73.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0114.2007.00280.x by Sarah Stroud Epistemic Partiality in Friendship Stroud, Ethics 116, no.33 (Jul 2015): 498–524.https://doi.org/10.1086/500337Ben Bradley Two Concepts of Intrinsic Value, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 9, no.22 (May 2006): 111–130.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-006-9009-7Toni Rønnow-Rasmussen Buck-passing Personal Values, (): 37–51.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6872-0_2