Some Agency Problems in Settlement
1987; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 16; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1086/467828
ISSN1537-5366
Autores Tópico(s)Regulation and Compliance Studies
ResumoPrevious articleNext article No AccessSome Agency Problems in SettlementGeoffrey P. MillerGeoffrey P. MillerPDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The Journal of Legal Studies Volume 16, Number 1Jan., 1987 Sponsored by The University of Chicago Law School Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/467828 Views: 17Total views on this site Citations: 67Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1987 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Sung-Hoon Park, Chad Settle Internalizing environmental damages and endogenous reimbursement in environmental conflicts: a game-theoretic analysis, International Review of Economics 97 (Sep 2022).https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-022-00405-4Sung-Hoon Park Contingent fees and endogenous timing in litigation contests, European Journal of Law and Economics 4 (Jun 2022).https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-022-09743-8Tina Søreide, Kasper Vagle Settlements in corporate bribery cases: an illusion of choice?, European Journal of Law and Economics 53, no.22 (Feb 2022): 261–287.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-022-09726-9Yannick Gabuthy, Emmanuel Peterle, Jean-Christian Tisserand Legal Fees, Cost-Shifting Rules and Litigation: Experimental Evidence, Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics 9 (Apr 2021): 101705.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2021.101705Stefan F. Schantl, Alfred Wagenhofer Deterrence of financial misreporting when public and private enforcement strategically interact, Journal of Accounting and Economics 70, no.11 (Aug 2020): 101311.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2020.101311Myriam Doriat-Duban, Yannick Gabuthy, Eve-Angéline Lambert Actions en justice et rémunération des avocats : une revue de la littérature, Revue économique Vol. 71, no.33 (Jun 2020): 557–590.https://doi.org/10.3917/reco.713.0557Eldar Maksymov, Jeffrey Pickerd, D. Jordan Lowe, Mark E. Peecher, Andrew Reffett, Dain C. Donelson The Settlement Norm in Audit Legal Disputes: Insights from Prominent Attorneys, Contemporary Accounting Research 174 (May 2020).https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12569Yun-chien Chang, Su-hao Tu Two-way selection between flat-fee attorneys and litigants: theoretical and empirical analyses, European Journal of Law and Economics 49, no.11 (Sep 2017): 131–164.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-017-9566-3Eyal Zamir Refounding Law and Economics: Behavioral Support for the Predictions of Standard Economic Analysis, Review of Law & Economics 16, no.22 (Dec 2019).https://doi.org/10.1515/rle-2019-0023Gian Marco Solas Third Party Funding, 55 (Sep 2019).https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108628723Aleksandar Mojašević Empirical study of the framing effect as a cognitive bias, Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu 67, no.22 (Jan 2019): 79–101.https://doi.org/10.5937/AnaliPFB1902083MSamantha Bielen, Wim Marneffe, Wim Vereeck Litigation Decision, (Apr 2019): 1352–1360.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7753-2_589Jean-Christian Tisserand Labor Disputes and Pretrial Settlements: The French Case, (Aug 2018): 345–373.https://doi.org/10.1108/S0193-589520180000028006Claudia M. Landeo, Maxim Nikitin Financially-constrained lawyers: An economic theory of legal disputes, Games and Economic Behavior 109 (May 2018): 625–647.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2018.03.002Kathryn E. Spier Litigation, Economics of, (Feb 2018): 7939–7950.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_2492Eldar M. Maksymov, Jeffrey Scott Pickerd, D. Jordan Lowe, Mark E. Peecher, Andrew Reffett The Settlement Norm (and Exceptions) in Audit Legal Disputes: Insights from Prominent Attorneys, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2018).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2941804Stefan Schantl, Alfred Wagenhofer Corporate Fraud, Public Enforcement, and the Dual Role of Investor Litigation, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2018).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3177487Yun-chien Chang, Su_hao Tu Two-Way Selection between Flat-Fee Attorneys and Litigants: Theoretical and Empirical Analyses, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2017).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2916219Florian Baumann, Tim Friehe Contingent Fees with Legal Discovery, American Law and Economics Review 18, no.11 (Oct 2015): 155–175.https://doi.org/10.1093/aler/ahv020S. Bielen, W. Marneffe, L. Vereeck Litigation Decision, (Feb 2015): 1–10.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7883-6_589-1Bruce H. Kobayashi The Law and Economics of Litigation, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2015).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2613145Claudia M. Landeo, Maxim Nikitin Financially-Constrained Lawyers, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2015).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2627595J.J. Prescott, Kathryn E. Spier, and Albert Yoon Trial and Settlement: A Study of High-Low Agreements, The Journal of Law and Economics 57, no.33 (Jun 2015): 699–746.https://doi.org/10.1086/677297Eyal Zamir, Barak Medina, Uzi Segal Who Benefits from the Uniformity of Contingent Fee Rates?, Review of Law & Economics 9, no.33 (Jan 2014).https://doi.org/10.1515/rle-2013-0009Paan Jindapon, Carlos Oyarzun Persuasive communication when the sender's incentives are uncertain, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 95 (Nov 2013): 111–125.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2013.08.015Eyal Zamir, Barak Medina, Uzi Segal The Puzzling Uniformity of Lawyers' Contingent Fee Rates: An Assortative Matching Solution, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2012).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1986491Dan Bernhardt, Frances Xu Trial Incentives in Sequential Litigation, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2012).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1987266Eyal Zamir and Ilana Ritov Revisiting the Debate over Attorneys' Contingent Fees: A Behavioral Analysis Zamir/Ritov, The Journal of Legal Studies 39, no.11 (Jul 2015): 245–288.https://doi.org/10.1086/605510J.J. Prescott, Kathryn E. Spier, Albert Yoon Trial and Settlement: A Study of High-Low Agreements, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2010).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1676404Todd J. Zywicki, Jeremy Kidd Meaningful Tort Reform: A Public Choice Analysis, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2010).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2273943 박성훈, Myunghoon Lee Strategic Decisions on Lawyers' Compensation Structure : in Consideration of Settlement, KUKJE KYUNGJE YONGU 15, no.22 (Aug 2009): 55–86.https://doi.org/10.17298/kky.2009.15.2.003Kathryn E. Spier Litigation, Economics of, (Dec 2016): 1–12.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_2492-1Andrew F. Daughety, Jennifer F. Reinganum Settlement, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2008).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1115299Richard Lewis Moorhead 'Improving Access to Justice' Contingency Fees: A Study of Their Operation in the United States, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2008).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1302843Richard Lewis Moorhead, Rebecca Cumming Damage-Based Contingency Fees in Employment Cases: A Survey of Practitioners, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2008).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1306308Alberto Casagrande, Marco Spallone Investigating the determinants of pretrial settlement rates: contingent versus non-contingent lawyers' fees, European Journal of Law and Economics 24, no.11 (Aug 2007): 1–13.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-007-9018-6Kathryn E. Spier Chapter 4 Litigation, (Jan 2007): 259–342.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0730(07)01004-3Shmuel Leshem Contingent Fees, Signaling and Settlement Authority, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2005).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.700903Kong-Pin Chen, Jue-Shyan Wang Fee-Shifting Rules in Litigation with Contingency Fees, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2005).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.798044 Albert Choi Allocating Settlement Authority under a Contingent‐Fee Arrangement Choi, The Journal of Legal Studies 32, no.22 (Jul 2015): 585–610.https://doi.org/10.1086/377246A. Mitchell Mitchell Polinsky, Daniel L. Rubinfeld Aligning the Interests of Lawyers and Clients, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2003).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.281628A. Mitchell Mitchell Polinsky, Daniel L. Rubinfeld A Note on Settlements under the Contingent Fee Method of Compensating Lawyers, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2003).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.286055A.Mitchell Polinsky, Daniel L. Rubinfeld A note on settlements under the contingent fee method of compensating lawyers, International Review of Law and Economics 22, no.22 (Aug 2002): 217–225.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0144-8188(02)00088-1Daniel L. Rubinfeld, Suzanne Scotchmer Contingent Fees, (Jan 2002): 415–420.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-74173-1_82Louis Kaplow, Steven Shavell Economic Analysis of Law, (Jan 2002): 1661–1784.https://doi.org/10.1016/S1573-4420(02)80029-5Amy Farmer, Paul Pecorino Pretrial Signaling with Negative Expected Value Suits, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2002).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.318690Bruce L. Hay, Kathryn E. Spier Settlement of Litigation, (Jan 2017): 1842–1851.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-74173-1_349Amy Farmer, Paul Pecorino Dispute Rates and Contingency Fees: An Analysis from the Signaling Model, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2001).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.277149Albert H. Choi Allocating Settlement Authority under a Contingent-Fee Arrangement, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2001).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.287925Myriam Doriat-Duban Analyse économique de l'accès à la justice : les effets de l'aide juridictionnelle, Revue internationale de droit économique t. XV, 1, no.11 (Jan 2001): 77.https://doi.org/10.3917/ride.151.0077Winand Emons Expertise, contingent fees, and insufficient attorney effort, International Review of Law and Economics 20, no.11 (Mar 2000): 21–33.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0144-8188(00)00019-3Richard T. Boylan, Cheryl X. Long The Sources of Agency: An Empirical Examination of United States Attorneys, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2000).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.200508Todd J. Zywicki Public Choice and Tort Reform, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2000).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.244658Bruno Deffains, Myriam Doriat The dynamics of pretrial negotiation in France:, International Review of Law and Economics 19, no.44 (Dec 1999): 447–470.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0144-8188(99)00023-XNeil Rickman Contingent fees and litigation settlement, International Review of Law and Economics 19, no.33 (Sep 1999): 295–317.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0144-8188(99)00017-4Herbert M. Kritzer Contingent-Fee Lawyers and Their Clients: Settlement Expectations, Settlement Realities, and Issues of Control in the Lawyer-Client Relationship, Law Social Inquiry 23, no.44 (Oct 1998): 795–821.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.1998.tb00034.xKathryn E. Spier, Alan O. Sykes Capital structure, priority rules, and the settlement of civil claims, International Review of Law and Economics 18, no.22 (Jun 1998): 187–200.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0144-8188(98)00005-2Peter Newman S, (Jan 1998): 395–559.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14286-6_4Linda Babcock, George Loewenstein, Samuel Issacharoff Creating Convergence: Debiasing Biased Litigants, Law & Social Inquiry 22, no.0404 (Dec 2018): 913–925.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.1997.tb01092.xLinda Babcock, Henry S. Farber, Cynthia Fobian, Eldar Shafir Forming beliefs about adjudicated outcomes: Perceptions of risk and reservation values, International Review of Law and Economics 15, no.33 (Sep 1995): 289–303.https://doi.org/10.1016/0144-8188(95)00017-3Amy Farmer, Paul Pecorino Pretrial negotiations with asymmetric information on risk preferences, International Review of Law and Economics 14, no.33 (Sep 1994): 273–281.https://doi.org/10.1016/0144-8188(94)90043-4 Saul Levmore Commissions and Conflicts in Agency Arrangements: Lawyers, Real Estate Brokers, Underwriters, and Other Agents' Rewards, The Journal of Law and Economics 36, no.1, Part 21, Part 2 (Oct 2015): 503–539.https://doi.org/10.1086/467287 George Loewenstein , Samuel Issacharoff , Colin Camerer , and Linda Babcock Self-Serving Assessments of Fairness and Pretrial Bargaining, The Journal of Legal Studies 22, no.11 (Oct 2015): 135–159.https://doi.org/10.1086/468160Herbert M. Kritzer A Comparative Perspective on Settlement and Bargaining in Personal Injury Cases, Law Social Inquiry 14, no.11 (Jan 1989): 167–184.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.1989.tb00583.x Kathleen Engelmann , and Bradford Cornell Measuring the Cost of Corporate Litigation: Five Case Studies, The Journal of Legal Studies 17, no.22 (Oct 2015): 377–399.https://doi.org/10.1086/468134A.Mitchell Polinsky, Daniel L. Rubinfeld The deterrent effects of settlements and trials, International Review of Law and Economics 8, no.11 (Jun 1988): 109–116.https://doi.org/10.1016/0144-8188(88)90019-1 Stephen J. Schulhofer Criminal Justice Discretion as a Regulatory System, The Journal of Legal Studies 17, no.11 (Oct 2015): 43–82.https://doi.org/10.1086/468121
Referência(s)