Editorial Acesso aberto Revisado por pares

Chronic kidney disease and the aging population

2013; Elsevier BV; Volume: 85; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1038/ki.2013.467

ISSN

1523-1755

Autores

Marcello Tonelli, Miguel C. Riella,

Tópico(s)

Renal and Vascular Pathologies

Resumo

"Youth, which is forgiven everything, forgives itself nothing: age, which forgives itself everything, is forgiven nothing."George Bernard Shaw The proportion of older people in the general population is steadily increasing worldwide, with the most rapid growth in low- and middle-income countries.1.Good health adds life to years: global brief for World Health Day. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland2012Google Scholar This demographic change is to be celebrated, because it is the consequence of socioeconomic development and better life expectancy. However, population aging also has important implications for society, in diverse areas including health systems, labor markets, public policy, social programs, and family dynamics.2.Wiener J.M. Tilly J. Population aging in the United States of America: implications for public programmes.Int J Epidemiol. 2002; 31: 776-781Crossref PubMed Scopus (194) Google Scholar A successful response to the aging population will require capitalizing on the opportunities that this transition offers, as well as effectively addressing its challenges. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is an important public health problem that is characterized by poor health outcomes and very high health-care costs. CKD is a major risk multiplier in patients with diabetes, hypertension, heart disease, and stroke, all of which are key causes of death and disability in older people.3.Couser W.G. Remuzzi G. Mendis S. et al.The contribution of chronic kidney disease to the global burden of major noncommunicable diseases.Kidney Int. 2011; 80: 1258-1270Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (925) Google Scholar Since the prevalence of CKD is higher in older people, the health impact of population aging will depend in part on how the kidney community responds. 13 March 2014 will mark the celebration of the ninth World Kidney Day (WKD), an annual event jointly sponsored by the International Society of Nephrology and the International Federation of Kidney Foundations. Since its inception in 2006, WKD has become the most successful effort to raise awareness among policymakers and the general public about the importance of kidney disease. The topic for WKD 2014 is CKD in older people. This article reviews the key links between kidney function, age, health, and illness and discusses the implications of the aging population for the care of people with CKD. The key drivers of population aging are socioeconomic development and increasing prosperity, which result in lower perinatal, infant, and childhood mortality; lower risk of death in early adulthood due to accidents and unsafe living conditions; and improving survival of middle-aged and older people with chronic disease. The resulting increases in life expectancy (together with the lower birth rates that typically accompany socioeconomic development) mean that older people account for a larger proportion of the general population.1.Good health adds life to years: global brief for World Health Day. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland2012Google Scholar The extent of the resulting changes in population characteristics can be startling, especially for developing countries (Figure 1). In contrast to the situation even two generations ago, people can expect to live for many years after the usual retirement age. For example, men and women aged 65 years in the United Kingdom in 2030 can expect to live until age 88 and 91 years, respectively.4.Select Committee on Public Service and Demographic. House of Lords, London, UK2013Google Scholar Predicted life expectancy for today's children is controversial, but experts estimate that 50% of UK children born in 2007 will live to at least 103 years.4.Select Committee on Public Service and Demographic. House of Lords, London, UK2013Google Scholar Although it is clear that people are living longer, it is uncertain how much of the increased life expectancy will translate into years of good health. These demographic changes have dramatic potential implications for conditions such as CKD, whose prevalence increases with age. It has been known for decades that estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) declines in parallel with age.5.Davies D.F. Shock N.W. Age changes in glomerular filtration rate, effective renal plasma flow, and tubular excretory capacity in adult males.J Clin Invest. 1950; 29: 496-507Crossref PubMed Scopus (811) Google Scholar The prevalence of CKD among females in the Chinese general population increases from 7.4% among those aged 18–39 years to 18.0% and 24.2% among those aged 60–69 and 70 years, respectively.6.Zhang L. Wang F. Wang L. et al.Prevalence of chronic kidney disease in China: a cross-sectional survey.Lancet. 2012; 379: 815-822Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (1511) Google Scholar Relative increases in the prevalence of CKD with age are equally striking for populations in the United States, Canada, and Europe,7.Coresh J. Selvin E. Stevens L.A. et al.Prevalence of chronic kidney disease in the United States.JAMA. 2007; 298: 2038-2047Crossref PubMed Scopus (3894) Google Scholar,8.Zhang Q.L. Rothenbacher D. Prevalence of chronic kidney disease in population-based studies: systematic review.BMC Public Health. 2008; 8 ([online]): 117Crossref PubMed Scopus (712) Google Scholar,9.Arora P. Vasa P. Brenner D. et al.Prevalence estimates of chronic kidney disease in Canada: results of a nationally representative survey.CMAJ. 2013; 185: E417-E423Crossref PubMed Scopus (230) Google Scholar although there are between-country differences in the absolute prevalence. At older ages, an increased proportion of prevalent CKD cases has low eGFR alone (as compared with albuminuria alone, or both low eGFR and albuminuria).10.James M.T. Hemmelgarn B.R. Tonelli M. Early recognition and prevention of chronic kidney disease.Lancet. 2010; 375: 1296-1309Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (452) Google Scholar Although this might suggest that many older people with CKD can expect lower rates of kidney function loss, available data are inconclusive, and current knowledge does not allow clinicians to reliably distinguish between those whose CKD will and will not progress. As for other age groups, the incidence of dialysis-dependent kidney failure has steadily increased among older people over the past few decades: in the United States, a 57% age-adjusted increase in the number of incident octogenarians and nonagenarians was noted between 1996 and 2003 alone.11.Kurella M. Covinsky K.E. Collins A.J. et al.Octogenarians and nonagenarians starting dialysis in the United States.Ann Intern Med. 2007; 146: 177-183Crossref PubMed Scopus (442) Google Scholar Despite this increase, patients aged >80 years are still less likely to initiate dialysis than those aged 75–79 years, although a large recent study suggested that the risk of developing very low eGFR ( 75 years with two or more comorbidities.18.Chandna S.M. Da Silva-Gane M. Marshall C. et al.Survival of elderly patients with stage 5 CKD: comparison of conservative management and renal replacement therapy.Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011; 26: 1608-1614Crossref PubMed Scopus (298) Google Scholar,19.Murtagh F.E. Marsh J.E. Donohoe P. et al.Dialysis or not? A comparative survival study of patients over 75 years with chronic kidney disease stage 5.Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2007; 22: 1955-1962Crossref PubMed Scopus (513) Google Scholar Similarly, the presence of two to three comorbid conditions in US dialysis patients aged >65 years was associated with substantially increased mortality compared with those in better health.11.Kurella M. Covinsky K.E. Collins A.J. et al.Octogenarians and nonagenarians starting dialysis in the United States.Ann Intern Med. 2007; 146: 177-183Crossref PubMed Scopus (442) Google Scholar When functional status is lower at baseline, initiation of dialysis often signals the onset of further declines: among 3702 nursing home residents initiating dialysis, 58% had died and 87% had experienced additional loss of function at 1 year.20.Kurella Tamura M. Covinsky K.E. Chertow G.M. et al.Functional status of elderly adults before and after initiation of dialysis.N Engl J Med. 2009; 361: 1539-1547Crossref PubMed Scopus (756) Google Scholar Although available data have limitations, quality of life appears to be reasonable among selected older dialysis patients and can remain stable despite moderate or high levels of comorbidity.21.Lamping D.L. Constantinovici N. Roderick P. et al.Clinical outcomes, quality of life, and costs in the North Thames Dialysis Study of elderly people on dialysis: a prospective cohort study.Lancet. 2000; 356: 1543-1550Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (328) Google Scholar,22.Unruh M.L. Newman A.B. Larive B. et al.The influence of age on changes in health-related quality of life over three years in a cohort undergoing hemodialysis.J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008; 56: 1608-1617Crossref PubMed Scopus (77) Google Scholar These data suggest that dialysis is an appropriate treatment option for well-informed older patients with kidney failure, especially for those with good baseline quality of life. On the other hand, the very poor outcomes experienced in those with more comorbidity or lower functional status at baseline clearly demonstrate that dialysis does not improve clinical outcomes for all older people with kidney failure, and that good clinical judgment and careful communication will be increasingly required as the general population continues to age. It is generally accepted that older age alone does not preclude kidney transplantation in otherwise suitable candidates. However, older patients with kidney failure are more likely to have absolute and relative contraindications to transplantation, and are less likely to be placed on the kidney transplantation waiting list. Unsurprisingly, patient and graft 5-year survival probabilities are lower among US kidney transplant recipients aged ≥65 years as compared with those aged 35–49 years (patient: 67.2% versus 89.6%, respectively; graft: 60.9% versus 75.4%, respectively).23.Knoll G.A. Kidney transplantation in the older adult.Am J Kidney Dis. 2013; 61: 790-797Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (139) Google Scholar In addition, older people who are potential kidney transplant recipients face several potential disadvantages compared with their younger counterparts (Box 1).Box 1Unmet needs for kidney transplantation in older CKD patients•Address organ shortage•Increase use of live donors•Revise organ allocation policies to appropriately weight likelihood of benefit from transplantation as well as chronological age•Ensure appropriate referral of potentially suitable older recipients for transplantation assessment•Address ethical concerns about offering a kidney to an older patient versus a younger one•Determine optimal immunosuppressive regimen(Adapted from ref. 29.Mohanlal V. Weir M.R. Kidney transplantation in the elderly: it's not all gloom and doom.ASN Kidney News. 2011; 3: 15-17Google Scholar.) •Address organ shortage•Increase use of live donors•Revise organ allocation policies to appropriately weight likelihood of benefit from transplantation as well as chronological age•Ensure appropriate referral of potentially suitable older recipients for transplantation assessment•Address ethical concerns about offering a kidney to an older patient versus a younger one•Determine optimal immunosuppressive regimen (Adapted from ref. 29.Mohanlal V. Weir M.R. Kidney transplantation in the elderly: it's not all gloom and doom.ASN Kidney News. 2011; 3: 15-17Google Scholar.) Nonetheless, transplantation appears to reduce mortality among patients of all ages. For example, among those aged 74 years, receiving a deceased-donor transplant was associated with a hazard ratio of mortality of 0.67 (95% confidence interval 0.53–0.86) as compared with remaining on dialysis.23.Knoll G.A. Kidney transplantation in the older adult.Am J Kidney Dis. 2013; 61: 790-797Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (139) Google Scholar Use of expanded-criteria deceased donors24.Merion R.M. Ashby V.B. Wolfe R.A. et al.Deceased-donor characteristics and the survival benefit of kidney transplantation.JAMA. 2005; 294: 2726-2733Crossref PubMed Scopus (549) Google Scholar,25.Cohen B. Smits J.M. Haase B. et al.Expanding the donor pool to increase renal transplantation.Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2005; 20: 34-41Crossref PubMed Scopus (142) Google Scholar as well as more liberal use of older living donors26.Gill J. Bunnapradist S. Danovitch G.M. et al.Outcomes of kidney transplantation from older living donors to older recipients.Am J Kidney Dis. 2008; 52: 541-552Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (136) Google Scholar also appears to reduce mortality among older people with kidney failure, as compared with similar patients who remain on the transplant waiting list (Box 2). These latter two strategies are especially appealing for use in developing countries, where growth in the prevalence of older people has been most pronounced. However, because transplant surgery itself temporarily increases the risk of death, the mortality benefits associated with kidney transplantation (regardless of donor type) are restricted to those with reasonable baseline life expectancy and without dramatically increased perioperative risk.27.Gill J.S. Tonelli M. Johnson N. et al.The impact of waiting time and comorbid conditions on the survival benefit of kidney transplantation.Kidney Int. 2005; 68: 2345-2351Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (153) Google ScholarBox 2Meeting the growing demand for kidney transplantation in older CKD patients•Enlarging the donor pool by accepting expanded-criteria donors: ≥60 years old or ≥50 with any two of the following conditions: history of hypertension, serum creatinine ≥1.5 mg/dl, or death due to cerebrovascular accident•'Old for old': preferentially using kidneys from older living donors for older recipients•Transplanting two marginal kidneys instead of one(Adapted from ref. 29.Mohanlal V. Weir M.R. Kidney transplantation in the elderly: it's not all gloom and doom.ASN Kidney News. 2011; 3: 15-17Google Scholar.) •Enlarging the donor pool by accepting expanded-criteria donors: ≥60 years old or ≥50 with any two of the following conditions: history of hypertension, serum creatinine ≥1.5 mg/dl, or death due to cerebrovascular accident•'Old for old': preferentially using kidneys from older living donors for older recipients•Transplanting two marginal kidneys instead of one (Adapted from ref. 29.Mohanlal V. Weir M.R. Kidney transplantation in the elderly: it's not all gloom and doom.ASN Kidney News. 2011; 3: 15-17Google Scholar.) Although much is known about CKD in older populations, a great deal remains to be learned. Many trials of therapies for CKD have excluded older patients,28.O'Hare A.M. Kaufman J.S. Covinsky K.E. et al.Current guidelines for using angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II-receptor antagonists in chronic kidney disease: is the evidence base relevant to older adults?.Ann Intern Med. 2009; 150: 717-724Crossref PubMed Scopus (108) Google Scholar and most do not provide guidance on how to manage comorbidities that often accompany CKD but may lead to competing therapeutic priorities. More information is needed on how to accurately identify people who will progress to kidney failure—and, among these, the subset that can expect reasonable life expectancy and quality of life if they opt for dialysis treatment. Future studies should test new ways to communicate information about the risks and benefits of dialysis (as compared with conservative management), to facilitate informed patient decisions. Above all, we need more studies that demonstrate how to optimize quality of life and manage symptoms in elderly people with CKD—including those who have chosen conservative management. The aging of the general population means that older people now account for a much greater proportion of patients with or at risk for kidney disease and kidney failure. The tremendous clinical heterogeneity within this population indicates the need for more discerning management. Chronological age alone will not be sufficient as the basis for clinical decisions, and a more nuanced approach is required, based on the comorbidities, functional status, quality of life, and preferences of each individual patient. Clinicians can be reassured that dialysis and kidney transplantation can increase life expectancy—and will allow reasonable quality of life in selected older people with kidney failure. Perhaps more importantly, clinicians, patients, and their families can be comforted by the knowledge that timely specialist evaluation can help to improve outcomes and reduce symptoms in older people with advanced kidney disease—whether they have selected conservative management or dialysis as their treatment plan. M. T. was supported by a Government of Canada research chair in the optimal care of people with chronic kidney disease.

Referência(s)
Altmetric
PlumX