Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

On the Evolution of Plant Mating Systems: A Reply to Waller

1987; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 130; Issue: 5 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1086/284747

1537-5323

Douglas W. Schemske, Russell Lande,

Plant Reproductive Biology

Previous articleNext article No AccessNotes and CommentsOn the Evolution of Plant Mating Systems: A Reply to WallerDouglas W. Schemske, and Russell LandeDouglas W. Schemske Search for more articles by this author , and Russell Lande Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The American Naturalist Volume 130, Number 5Nov., 1987 Published for The American Society of Naturalists Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/284747 Views: 6Total views on this site Citations: 16Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1987 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Carol Goodwillie, Risa D. Sargent, Christopher G. Eckert, Elizabeth Elle, Monica A. Geber, Mark O. Johnston, Susan Kalisz, David A. Moeller, Richard H. Ree, Mario Vallejo‐Marin, Alice A. Winn Correlated evolution of mating system and floral display traits in flowering plants and its implications for the distribution of mating system variation, New Phytologist 185, no.11 (Oct 2009): 311–321.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03043.xBoris Igic, Joshua R. Kohn THE DISTRIBUTION OF PLANT MATING SYSTEMS: STUDY BIAS AGAINST OBLIGATELY OUTCROSSING SPECIES, Evolution 60, no.55 (May 2006): 1098–1103.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2006.tb01186.xBoris Igic, Joshua R. Kohn THE DISTRIBUTION OF PLANT MATING SYSTEMS: STUDY BIAS AGAINST OBLIGATELY OUTCROSSING SPECIES, Evolution 60, no.55 (Jan 2006): 1098.https://doi.org/10.1554/05-383.1Carol Goodwillie, Susan Kalisz, Christopher G. Eckert The Evolutionary Enigma of Mixed Mating Systems in Plants: Occurrence, Theoretical Explanations, and Empirical Evidence, Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 36, no.11 (Dec 2005): 47–79.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.091704.175539Mark O. Johnston Evolution of intermediate selfing rates in plants: pollination ecology versus deleterious mutations, (Jan 1998): 267–278.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5210-5_22Juan Núnez-Farfán, Roberto A. Cabrales-Vargas, Rodolfo Dirzo Mating system consequences on resistance to herb ivory and life history traits in Datura stramonium, American Journal of Botany 83, no.88 (Aug 1996): 1041–1049.https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1996.tb12801.xKen Inoue, Masayuki Maki, Michiko Masuda Evolution of Campanula Flowers in Relation to Insect Pollinators on Islands, (Jan 1996): 377–400.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1165-2_14SPENCER C.H. BARRETT, BRIAN C. HUSBAND, WILLIAM W. COLE Variation in Outcrossing Rates in Eichhornia paniculata: Temporal Changes in Populations of Contrasting Style Morph Structure, Plant Species Biology 8, no.2-32-3 (Dec 1993): 141–148.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-1984.1993.tb00065.xTetsukazu Yahara, Masayuki Maki Effects of biparental inbreeding on the evolution of gynodioecy: A model and a case study inChionographis japonica var.kurohimensis, Journal of Plant Research 106, no.33 (Sep 1993): 279–281.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02344595Tetsukazu Yahara GRAPHICAL ANALYSIS OF MATING SYSTEM EVOLUTION IN PLANTS, Evolution 46, no.22 (May 2017): 557–561.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1992.tb02059.xDouglas E. Soltis, Pamela S. Soltis THE DISTRIBUTION OF SELFING RATES IN HOMOSPOROUS FERNS, American Journal of Botany 79, no.11 (Jan 1992): 97–100.https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1992.tb12628.xYoh Iwasa Evolution of the Selfing Rate and Resource Allocation Models, Plant Species Biology 5, no.11 (Jun 1990): 19–30.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-1984.1990.tb00189.xSpencer C. H. Barrett, Brian C. Husband Variation in Outcrossing Rates in Eichhornia paniculata: The Role of Demographic and Reproductive Factors*, Plant Species Biology 5, no.11 (Jun 1990): 41–55.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-1984.1990.tb00191.xKen Inoue Evolution of Mating Systems in Island Populations of Campanula microdonta: Pollinator Availability Hypothesis, Plant Species Biology 5, no.11 (Jun 1990): 57–64.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-1984.1990.tb00192.xSPENCER C.H. BARRETT, CHRISTOPHER G. ECKERT Variation and Evolution of Mating Systems in Seed Plants, (Jan 1990): 229–254.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-402960-6.50019-6Klaus Wöhrmann Population Genetics, (Jan 1989): 251–261.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-75154-7_16