Moral Testimony and Moral Epistemology
2009; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 120; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1086/648610
ISSN1539-297X
Autores Tópico(s)Free Will and Agency
ResumoPrevious articleNext article No AccessMoral Testimony and Moral Epistemology*Alison HillsAlison Hills Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUSFull Text Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Ethics Volume 120, Number 1October 2009 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/648610 Views: 1464Total views on this site Citations: 163Citations are reported from Crossref © 2009 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.PDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Christopher Kennedy, Malte Willer Familiarity inferences, subjective attitudes and counterstance contingency: towards a pragmatic theory of subjective meaning, Linguistics and Philosophy 45, no.66 (May 2022): 1395–1445.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-022-09358-xNeil Levy Do your own research!, Synthese 200, no.55 (Aug 2022).https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03793-wClaire Field At least you tried: The value of De Dicto concern to do the right thing, Philosophical Studies 179, no.99 (Mar 2022): 2707–2730.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-022-01791-9Cathy Mason Iris Murdoch, privacy, and the limits of moral testimony, European Journal of Philosophy 30, no.33 (Sep 2021): 1125–1134.https://doi.org/10.1111/ejop.12721Steven Diggin Ethical evidence, Synthese 200, no.44 (Aug 2022).https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03808-6Miloud Belkoniene Reassessing Lucky Understanding, Episteme (Jul 2022): 1–15.https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2022.23Giovanni Rolla, Felipe Novaes Ecological-enactive scientific cognition: modeling and material engagement, Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 21, no.33 (Nov 2020): 625–643.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-020-09713-yKumar Viswanathan Moral Testimony, Knowledge and Understanding, Philosophical Investigations 45, no.33 (Oct 2021): 297–319.https://doi.org/10.1111/phin.12333Lidal Dror Is there an epistemic advantage to being oppressed?, Noûs 29 (Jun 2022).https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12424Emily Slome Moral Testimony and Re-Conceived Understanding: A Reply to Callahan, The Philosophical Quarterly 72, no.33 (Dec 2021): 763–770.https://doi.org/10.1093/pq/pqab067Matthias Brinkmann In Defence of Non-Ideal Political Deference, Episteme 19, no.22 (Jul 2020): 264–285.https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2020.26Paul Faulkner Communicating your point of view, European Journal of Philosophy 30, no.22 (May 2021): 661–675.https://doi.org/10.1111/ejop.12670Felipe Morales Carbonell Understanding Attribution: Problems, Options, and a Proposal, Theoria 88, no.33 (Dec 2021): 558–583.https://doi.org/10.1111/theo.12380Daniel Vanello Moral understanding, affect, and the imagination, Inquiry 169 (May 2022): 1–26.https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2022.2077431Avner Baz On the Moralization of Moral Theory, Mind 131, no.522522 (Apr 2021): 549–573.https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzab007Dong An Appreciation as an Epistemic Emotion, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 25, no.22 (Jan 2022): 249–264.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-021-10265-6Matthew Chick The Epistemic Value of Testimony, Contemporary Political Theory 21, no.11 (May 2021): 93–113.https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-021-00496-8Alison Hills Aesthetic testimony, understanding and virtue, Noûs 56, no.11 (Jul 2020): 21–39.https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12344Nicholas Emmerson Understanding and scientific progress: lessons from epistemology, Synthese 200, no.11 (Feb 2022).https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03501-8Jonathan Matheson Why Think for Yourself?, Episteme 6 (Jan 2022): 1–19.https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2021.49Iskra Fileva Moral Testimony and Collective Moral Governance, Australasian Journal of Philosophy (Jan 2022): 1–14.https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2021.2024584Michael Klenk Debunking, Epistemic Achievement, and Undermining Defeat, American Philosophical Quarterly 59, no.11 (Jan 2022): 43–60.https://doi.org/10.5406/21521123.59.1.04J. Adam Carter, Emma C. Gordon, J. P. Grodniewicz Understanding a communicated thought, Synthese 198, no.1212 (Sep 2020): 12137–12151.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02854-2Christoph Jäger, Federica Isabella Malfatti The social fabric of understanding: equilibrium, authority, and epistemic empathy, Synthese 199, no.1-21-2 (Jul 2020): 1185–1205.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02776-zRobert Weston Siscoe Grounding and a priori epistemology: challenges for conceptualism, Synthese 199, no.3-43-4 (Jul 2021): 11445–11463.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-021-03297-zGregory Currie, Jacopo Frascaroli Poetry and the Possibility of Paraphrase, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 79, no.44 (Aug 2021): 428–439.https://doi.org/10.1093/jaac/kpab040Sven Delarivière, Bart Van Kerkhove The Mark of Understanding: In Defense of an Ability Account, Axiomathes 31, no.55 (Jan 2021): 619–648.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-020-09529-0Robert Weston Siscoe Grounding, Understanding, and Explanation, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 112 (Sep 2021).https://doi.org/10.1111/papq.12391Rico Hauswald Non-Tethered Understanding and Scientific Pluralism, Journal for General Philosophy of Science 52, no.33 (May 2021): 371–388.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-020-09547-xBenoit Gaultier When is epistemic dependence disvaluable?, Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 10, no.33 (Apr 2021): 178–187.https://doi.org/10.1002/tht3.491L.A. Paul The Paradox of Empathy, Episteme 18, no.33 (Aug 2021): 347–366.https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2021.31Melanie Altanian Remembrance and Denial of Genocide: On the Interrelations of Testimonial and Hermeneutical Injustice, International Journal of Philosophical Studies 29, no.44 (Nov 2021): 595–612.https://doi.org/10.1080/09672559.2021.1997397Christian Herzog né Hoffmann On formal ethics versus inclusive moral deliberation, AI and Ethics 1, no.33 (Mar 2021): 313–329.https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00045-4Claire Field Moral Appraisal for Everyone: Neurodiversity, Epistemic Limitations, and Responding to the Right Reasons, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 24, no.33 (Jul 2021): 733–752.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-021-10212-5Michael Hannon RECENT WORK IN THE EPISTEMOLOGY OF UNDERSTANDING, American Philosophical Quarterly 58, no.33 (Jul 2021): 269–290.https://doi.org/10.2307/48616060Garrett Cullity Moral Disagreement, Self-Trust, and Complacency, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 11 (Jun 2021).https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-021-10209-0Dan O'Brien Testimony, Moral, (Jun 2021): 1–4.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444367072.wbiee490.pub2Emma C. Gordon Elgin on understanding: How does it involve know-how, endorsement and factivity?, Synthese 198, no.66 (Sep 2019): 4955–4972.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02381-9Paddy Jane McShane Against epistemic pessimism about moral testimony, Episteme 18, no.22 (May 2019): 200–223.https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2019.11Nick Wiltsher Understanding What It's Like To Be (Dis)Privileged, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 102, no.22 (Mar 2021): 320–356.https://doi.org/10.1111/papq.12338Vishnu Sridharan The Wrong Understanding of Praise, Erkenntnis 99 (May 2021).https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-021-00419-4Scott Woodcock Thinking the Right Way (at the Right Time) about Virtues and Skills, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 24, no.22 (Nov 2020): 577–586.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-020-10142-8Eleonora Severini Moral Progress and Evolution: Knowledge Versus Understanding, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 24, no.11 (Feb 2021): 87–105.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-021-10158-8Michael Klenk, Ibo Van de Poel COVID-19, uncertainty, and moral experiments, History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 43, no.11 (Jan 2021).https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-020-00360-9Jack M. C. Kwong Shame and moral autonomy, Ratio 34, no.11 (Jul 2020): 44–55.https://doi.org/10.1111/rati.12283Amber Riaz How to Identify Moral Experts, The Journal of Ethics 25, no.11 (Jun 2020): 123–136.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-020-09338-yMicah Lott Practical Intelligibility and Moral Skepticism: Should Realists Worry About Grass‐Counters and Hand‐Claspers?, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 102, no.11 (Feb 2021): 103–125.https://doi.org/10.1111/papq.12334Hichem Naar The possibility of fitting love: irreplaceability and selectivity, Synthese 198, no.22 (Jan 2019): 985–1010.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-02079-4Jonathan D. Matheson Applying Moral Caution in the Face of Disagreement, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 6 (Jan 2021).https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-021-10155-xJonathan Knutzen Deference and Ideals of Practical Agency, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 51, no.11 (Jan 2021): 17–32.https://doi.org/10.1017/can.2020.59Finnur Dellsén Beyond Explanation: Understanding as Dependency Modelling, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 71, no.44 (Dec 2020): 1261–1286.https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axy058Kevin McCain What the Debasing Demon Teaches Us About Wisdom, Acta Analytica 35, no.44 (Dec 2019): 521–530.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12136-019-00420-1Coran Stewart EXPERTISE AND AUTHORITY, Episteme 17, no.44 (Jan 2019): 420–437.https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2018.43Ulf Hlobil Why you cannot make people better by telling them what is good, European Journal of Philosophy 28, no.44 (May 2020): 986–996.https://doi.org/10.1111/ejop.12542Sean Donahue Public Justification and the Veil of Testimony*, Journal of Political Philosophy 28, no.44 (Apr 2020): 378–396.https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12216Kieron O'Hara Explainable AI and the philosophy and practice of explanation, Computer Law & Security Review 39 (Nov 2020): 105474.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2020.105474Armond Duwell Understanding quantum phenomena and quantum theories, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 72 (Nov 2020): 278–291.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2018.06.002Joseph McKenna The circularity of moral exemplarity, Theory and Research in Education 18, no.33 (Dec 2020): 339–351.https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878520981296VITOR SOMMAVILLA SETTING LIMITS TO PRACTICAL REFLECTION, (Dec 2020): 213–228.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119746874.ch12Gopal Sreenivasan Deference and delegation: What is the difference?, Zeitschrift für Ethik und Moralphilosophie 3, no.22 (Oct 2020): 345–352.https://doi.org/10.1007/s42048-020-00075-3James Andow Why don't we trust moral testimony?, Mind & Language 35, no.44 (Aug 2019): 456–474.https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12255Alison Hills Moral Testimony: Transmission Versus Propagation, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 101, no.22 (May 2019): 399–414.https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12595Christoph Kelp Moral Assertion, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 71 (Aug 2020).https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-020-10107-xMax Lewis A defense of the very idea of moral deference pessimism, Philosophical Studies 177, no.88 (Jun 2019): 2323–2340.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-019-01312-1Tristram McPherson Epistemology and Methodology in Ethics, 3 (May 2020).https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108581493Michele Palmira Expert Deference about the Epistemic and Its Metaepistemological Significance, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 50, no.44 (Jan 2020): 524–538.https://doi.org/10.1017/can.2019.46Max Lewis The New Puzzle of Moral Deference, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 50, no.44 (Feb 2020): 460–476.https://doi.org/10.1017/can.2019.56Nicolas Cornell, Amy Sepinwall Complicity and hypocrisy, Politics, Philosophy & Economics 19, no.22 (May 2020): 154–181.https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X20924666Daniel Wodak Redundant Reasons, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 98, no.22 (Jun 2019): 266–278.https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2019.1620301Michel Croce Moral Understanding, Testimony, and Moral Exemplarity, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 23, no.22 (Dec 2019): 373–389.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-019-10051-5Vitor Sommavilla SETTING LIMITS TO PRACTICAL REFLECTION, Metaphilosophy 51, no.2-32-3 (Apr 2020): 375–390.https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12412Chris Ranalli The puzzle of philosophical testimony, European Journal of Philosophy 28, no.11 (Apr 2019): 142–163.https://doi.org/10.1111/ejop.12449David A. Borman First-Personal Moral Testimony: a Defence, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 23, no.11 (Dec 2019): 163–179.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-019-10052-4Max Lewis Moral Deference, Moral Assertion, and Pragmatics, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 23, no.11 (Mar 2020): 5–22.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-020-10065-4Federica I. Malfatti Can Testimony Transmit Understanding?, Theoria 86, no.11 (Jan 2020): 54–72.https://doi.org/10.1111/theo.12220Casey Doyle Remembering what is right, Philosophical Explorations 23, no.11 (Jan 2020): 49–64.https://doi.org/10.1080/13869795.2020.1711959Kenneth Boyd Moral Understanding and Cooperative Testimony, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 50, no.11 (Oct 2019): 18–33.https://doi.org/10.1017/can.2019.3John Bengson True Enough, by Catherine Z. Elgin, Mind 129, no.513513 (Mar 2019): 256–268.https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzz003J. Adam Carter, Robin McKenna Kornblith versus Sosa on grades of knowledge, Synthese 196, no.1212 (Jan 2018): 4989–5007.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-1689-8J. Adam Carter, Duncan Pritchard, Joshua Shepherd Knowledge-how, Understanding-why and Epistemic Luck: an Experimental Study, Review of Philosophy and Psychology 10, no.44 (Jan 2019): 701–734.https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-018-0429-9Federica Isabella Malfatti Can Testimony Generate Understanding?, Social Epistemology 33, no.66 (Jul 2019): 477–490.https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2019.1628319Insa Lawler Understanding why, knowing why, and cognitive achievements, Synthese 196, no.1111 (Jan 2018): 4583–4603.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1672-9Matthew Bedke Practical Oomph: A Case for Subjectivism, The Philosophical Quarterly 69, no.277277 (Jun 2019): 657–677.https://doi.org/10.1093/pq/pqz024Nathan Robert Howard One Desire Too Many, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 20 (Sep 2019).https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12642Rico Hauswald Kollektives Verstehen, Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 67, no.33 (Sep 2019): 373–391.https://doi.org/10.1515/dzph-2019-0030Federica Isabella Malfatti On Understanding and Testimony, Erkenntnis 14 (Aug 2019).https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-019-00157-8Max Lewis The Norm of Moral Assertion: A Reply to Simion, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 22, no.44 (Oct 2019): 1043–1049.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-019-10033-7Keith Allen VI—Should We Believe Philosophical Claims on Testimony?, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 119, no.22 (Jul 2019): 105–125.https://doi.org/10.1093/arisoc/aoz010Matthew H. Slater, Joanna K. Huxster, Julia E. Bresticker Understanding and Trusting Science, Journal for General Philosophy of Science 50, no.22 (Apr 2019): 247–261.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-019-09447-9Casey Doyle Deferring to Others about One's Own Mind, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 100, no.22 (Jan 2019): 432–452.https://doi.org/10.1111/papq.12268Joshua Blanchard Moral realism and reliance on moral testimony, Philosophical Studies 176, no.55 (Feb 2018): 1141–1153.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-018-1051-5Xingming Hu Is knowledge of causes sufficient for understanding?, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 49, no.33 (Jan 2020): 291–313.https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.2018.1497923Jessica Isserow Moral Worth and Doing the Right Thing by Accident, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 97, no.22 (Apr 2018): 251–264.https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2018.1463270Han van Wietmarschen Political testimony, Politics, Philosophy & Economics 18, no.11 (Sep 2018): 23–45.https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X18798062Michel Croce EXPERT-ORIENTED ABILITIES VS. NOVICE-ORIENTED ABILITIES: AN ALTERNATIVE ACCOUNT OF EPISTEMIC AUTHORITY, Episteme 15, no.44 (May 2017): 476–498.https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2017.16Helen De Cruz Religious Disagreement, 16 (Nov 2018).https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108557849Nathan Robert Howard Sentimentalism about Moral Understanding, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 21, no.55 (Nov 2018): 1065–1078.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-018-9946-yOrnaith O’Dowd “Microaggressions: A Kantian Account”, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 21, no.55 (Dec 2018): 1219–1232.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-018-9964-9Alison Hills XI—Moral and Aesthetic Virtue, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 118, no.33 (Dec 2018): 255–274.https://doi.org/10.1093/arisoc/aoy015Casey Doyle Internalism and Pessimism, Journal of Moral Philosophy 72 (Jul 2018).https://doi.org/10.1163/17455243-20180002Laura Frances Callahan Moral Testimony: A Re-Conceived Understanding Explanation, The Philosophical Quarterly 68, no.272272 (Dec 2017): 437–459.https://doi.org/10.1093/pq/pqx057McShane Paddy Jane Moral Testimony and Moral Understanding, Journal of Moral Philosophy 15, no.33 (Jun 2018): 245–271.https://doi.org/10.1163/17455243-20170003Mona Simion The Explanation Proffering Norm of Moral Assertion, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 21, no.33 (Aug 2018): 477–488.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-018-9922-6Stephen Wright Trust in the Normative Domain, International Journal of Philosophical Studies 26, no.22 (Mar 2018): 187–204.https://doi.org/10.1080/09672559.2018.1450076Paddy Jane McShane The non-remedial value of dependence on moral testimony, Philosophical Studies 175, no.33 (Feb 2017): 629–647.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-017-0885-6James Fritz What Pessimism about Moral Deference Means for Disagreement, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 21, no.11 (Jan 2018): 121–136.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-017-9860-8Matthew A. Butkus , 129 ( 2018): 227.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92759-6_13Jonathan Matheson, Scott McElreath, Nathan Nobis , 129 ( 2018): 87.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92759-6_5Youngjae Lee REASONABLE DOUBT AND DISAGREEMENT, Legal Theory 23, no.44 (Jan 2018): 203–257.https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352325217000180J. Adam Carter, Bolesław Czarnecki (ANTI)-Anti-Intellectualism and the Sufficiency Thesis, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 98 (Dec 2016): 374–397.https://doi.org/10.1111/papq.12187Jonathan Pugh, Hannah Maslen ‘Drugs That Make You Feel Bad’? Remorse-Based Mitigation and Neurointerventions, Criminal Law and Philosophy 11, no.33 (Oct 2015): 499–522.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-015-9383-0Andreas L. Mogensen Moral Testimony Pessimism and the Uncertain Value of Authenticity, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 95, no.22 (Nov 2015): 261–284.https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12255Owen Ware Fichte on Conscience, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 95, no.22 (Apr 2016): 376–394.https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12286Rafael Vogelmann A Problem for Moral Naturalism: Outsourcing Moral Judgments, Manuscrito 40, no.33 (Sep 2017): 1–27.https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-6045.2017.v40n3.rvNicole Dular Moral Testimony under Oppression, Journal of Social Philosophy 48, no.22 (Jun 2017): 212–236.https://doi.org/10.1111/josp.12183L. A. Paul First personal modes of presentation and the structure of empathy, Inquiry 60, no.33 (Dec 2016): 189–207.https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2017.1261991Paulina Sliwa Moral Understanding as Knowing Right from Wrong, Ethics 127, no.33 (Mar 2017): 521–552.https://doi.org/10.1086/690011Kenneth Boyd TESTIFYING UNDERSTANDING, Episteme 14, no.11 (Nov 2015): 103–127.https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2015.53Allan Hazlett Towards Social Accounts of Testimonial Asymmetries, Noûs 51, no.11 (Jun 2015): 49–73.https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12098Richard Rowland The epistemology of moral disagreement, Philosophy Compass 12, no.22 (Feb 2017): e12398.https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12398Hrishikesh Joshi What’s the matter with Huck Finn?, Philosophical Explorations 20, no.11 (Oct 2016): 70–87.https://doi.org/10.1080/13869795.2016.1246669Alison Hills Understanding Why, Noûs 50, no.44 (Apr 2015): 661–688.https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12092David Archard The Methodology of Applied Philosophy, (Oct 2016): 18–33.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118869109.ch2Peter J. Graham Testimonial Knowledge: A Unified Account, Philosophical Issues 26, no.11 (Oct 2016): 172–186.https://doi.org/10.1111/phis.12082Paulina Sliwa Moral Worth and Moral Knowledge, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 93, no.22 (Jun 2015): 393–418.https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12195Paul T. Berghaus The problems of authority and the want of apprenticeship in soldiers’ character development, Journal of Moral Education 45, no.33 (Aug 2016): 324–337.https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2016.1204272Insa Lawler Reductionism about Understanding Why, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 116, no.22 (Sep 2016): 229–236.https://doi.org/10.1093/arisoc/aow007Patrick Fleming Good Advice, Philosophical Papers 45, no.1-21-2 (May 2016): 181–207.https://doi.org/10.1080/05568641.2016.1187484Kevin McCain Explanation and Understanding, (Jun 2016): 133–154.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33405-9_9MARTIN MONTMINY Doing One's Reasonable Best: What Moral Responsibility Requires, Journal of the American Philosophical Association 2, no.11 (Feb 2016): 55–73.https://doi.org/10.1017/apa.2015.31Robert Cowan Clarifying Ethical Intuitionism, European Journal of Philosophy 23, no.44 (Apr 2013): 1097–1116.https://doi.org/10.1111/ejop.12031Alison Hills The Intellectuals and the Virtues, Ethics 126, no.11 (Oct 2015): 7–36.https://doi.org/10.1086/682192Cory Davia, Michele Palmira Moral Deference and Deference to an Epistemic Peer, The Philosophical Quarterly 65, no.261261 (Mar 2015): 605–625.https://doi.org/10.1093/pq/pqv014Robert Pasnau Disagreement and the value of self-trust, Philosophical Studies 172, no.99 (Dec 2014): 2315–2339.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-014-0413-xJon Robson Aesthetic Testimony and the Norms of Belief Formation, European Journal of Philosophy 23, no.33 (Mar 2013): 750–763.https://doi.org/10.1111/ejop.12007Felix Pinkert What If I Cannot Make a Difference (and Know It), Ethics 125, no.44 (Oct 2015): 971–998.https://doi.org/10.1086/680909Tobey K. Scharding Imprudence and Immorality: A Kantian Approach to the Ethics of Financial Risk, Business Ethics Quarterly 25, no.22 (Jul 2015): 243–265.https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2015.17Paulina Sliwa IV-Understanding and Knowing, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Hardback) 115, no.1pt11pt1 (Aug 2015): 57–74.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9264.2015.00384.xAmber Riaz Moral understanding and knowledge, Philosophical Studies 172, no.11 (May 2014): 113–128.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-014-0328-6Julia Hermann Moral Competence, (Jan 2015): 119–166.https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137447180_6Robert J. Howell Google Morals, Virtue, and the Asymmetry of Deference, Noûs 48, no.33 (Jul 2012): 389–415.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0068.2012.00873.xJon Robson A social epistemology of aesthetics: belief polarization, echo chambers and aesthetic judgement, Synthese 191, no.1111 (Mar 2014): 2513–2528.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-014-0437-yAdam Green DEFICIENT TESTIMONY IS DEFICIENT TEAMWORK, Episteme 11, no.22 (Nov 2013): 213–227.https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2013.49Hallvard Lillehammer I—Hallvard Lillehammer: Moral Testimony, Moral Virtue, and the Value of Autonomy, Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 88, no.11 (Jun 2014): 111–127.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8349.2014.00235.xRoger Crisp II—Roger Crisp: Moral Testimony Pessimism: A Defence, Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 88, no.11 (Jun 2014): 129–143.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8349.2014.00236.xJ. Adam Carter, Emma C. Gordon A new maneuver against the epistemic relativist, Synthese 191, no.88 (Nov 2013): 1683–1695.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-013-0357-2John Maier The Argument from Moral Responsibility, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 92, no.22 (Jun 2013): 249–267.https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2013.808679Thomas Douglas Enhancing Moral Conformity and Enhancing Moral Worth, Neuroethics 7, no.11 (Apr 2013): 75–91.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-013-9183-yMasashi Kasaki Subject-Sensitive Invariantism and Isolated Secondhand Knowledge, Acta Analytica 29, no.11 (Dec 2013): 83–98.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12136-013-0215-3J. Adam Carter RELATIVISM, KNOWLEDGE AND UNDERSTANDING, Episteme 11, no.11 (Nov 2013): 35–52.https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2013.45Daniel Groll, Jason Decker Moral Testimony: One of These Things Is Just Like the Others, Analytic Philosophy 55, no.11 (Jan 2014): 54–74.https://doi.org/10.1111/phib.12033Duncan Pritchard Knowledge and Understanding, (Mar 2014): 315–327.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04672-3_18Stephen R. Grimm Understanding as Knowledge of Causes, (Mar 2014): 329–345.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04672-3_19Valerie Tiberius IN DEFENSE OF REFLECTION, Philosophical Issues 23, no.11 (Oct 2013): 223–243.https://doi.org/10.1111/phis.12011Jason D. Swartwood Wisdom as an Expert Skill, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16, no.33 (Apr 2012): 511–528.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-012-9367-2Alison Hills Moral Testimony, Philosophy Compass 8, no.66 (Jun 2013): 552–559.https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12040Dan O'Brien Testimony, Moral, (Feb 2013).https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444367072.wbiee490Julia Driver MORAL EXPERTISE: JUDGMENT, PRACTICE, AND ANALYSIS, Social Philosophy and Policy 30, no.1-21-2 (Feb 2014): 280–296.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052513000137Justin Tiwald Xunzi on Moral Expertise, Dao 11, no.33 (Jul 2012): 275–293.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-012-9282-1Julia Markovits Saints, heroes, sages, and villains, Philosophical Studies 158, no.22 (Mar 2012): 289–311.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-012-9883-xPaulina Sliwa In defense of moral testimony, Philosophical Studies 158, no.22 (Mar 2012): 175–195.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-012-9887-6Jon Robson Aesthetic Testimony, Philosophy Compass 7, no.11 (Jan 2012): 1–10.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2011.00455.xTobias Steinig Experts, Teachers and Their Epistemic Roles in Normative and Non-normative Domains, Analyse & Kritik 34, no.22 (Jan 2012).https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-2012-0207
Referência(s)