TREATMENT OF NEUROGENIC DETRUSOR OVERACTIVITY IN SPINAL CORD INJURED PATIENTS BY CONDITIONAL ELECTRICAL STIMULATION
2005; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; Volume: 173; Issue: 6 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1097/01.ju.0000158160.11083.1b
ISSN1527-3792
AutoresJohn Hansen, S. Media, M. Nøhr, Fin Biering‐Sørensen, Thomas Sinkjær, Nico Rijkhoff,
Tópico(s)Urological Disorders and Treatments
ResumoNo AccessJournal of UrologyAdult Urology: Voiding Dysfunction1 Jun 2005TREATMENT OF NEUROGENIC DETRUSOR OVERACTIVITY IN SPINAL CORD INJURED PATIENTS BY CONDITIONAL ELECTRICAL STIMULATION J. HANSEN, S. MEDIA, M. NØHR, F. BIERING-SØRENSEN, T. SINKJÆR, and N.J. M. RIJKHOFF J. HANSENJ. HANSEN , S. MEDIAS. MEDIA , M. NØHRM. NØHR , F. BIERING-SØRENSENF. BIERING-SØRENSEN , T. SINKJÆRT. SINKJÆR , and N.J. M. RIJKHOFFN.J. M. RIJKHOFF View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000158160.11083.1bAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract Purpose: The feasibility of automatic event driven electrical stimulation of the dorsal penile/clitoral nerve in the treatment of neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) was evaluated in individuals with spinal cord injury. Materials and Methods: The study included 2 women and 14 men older than 18 years with NDO, bladder capacity below 500 ml and complete or incomplete suprasacral spinal cord injury. Detrusor pressure (Pdet) was recorded during ordinary, natural bladder filling. In a similar subsequent recording Pdet was used to trigger electrical stimulation when pressure exceeded 10 cm H2O. Results: Of the 16 patients enrolled in this study 13 had increased bladder capacity together with a storage pressure decrease as a result of automatic, event driven electrical stimulation. In 2 patients stimulation could not inhibit the first undesired contraction, leakage occurred and finally 1 could not tolerate stimulation. During stimulated filling Pdet never exceeded 55 cm H2O. Thus, storage pressure was sufficiently low to prevent kidney damage. An average bladder capacity increase of 53% was achieved. Conclusions: This study demonstrates the feasibility of automatic, event driven electrical stimulation in the treatment of NDO. Although the setup in this experiment is not suitable in a clinical setting, the treatment modality is promising and it warrants further investigation. References 1 : Clinical significance of detrusor sphincter dyssynergia type in patients with post-traumatic spinal cord injury. Urology2000; 56: 565. Google Scholar 2 : Association of level of injury and bladder behavior in patients with post-traumatic spinal cord injury. Urology2000; 55: 490. Google Scholar 3 : The standardisation of terminology in lower urinary tract function: report from the standardisation sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Urology2003; 61: 37. Google Scholar 4 : Tamsulosin: efficacy and safety in patients with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction due to suprasacral spinal cord injury. J Urol2003; 170: 1242. Link, Google Scholar 5 : Intravesical capsaicin and resiniferatoxin therapy: spicing up the ways to treat the overactive bladder. J Urol1999; 162: 3. Link, Google Scholar 6 : Botulinum-A toxin for treating detrusor hyperreflexia in spinal cord injured patients: a new alternative to anticholinergic drugs? Preliminary results. J Urol2000; 164: 692. Link, Google Scholar 7 : Long-term urodynamics followup of bladder augmentation for neurogenic bladder. J Urol2003; 169: 195. Link, Google Scholar 8 : Sacral bladder denervation for treatment of detrusor hyperreflexia and autonomic dysreflexia. Urology2001; 58: 28. Google Scholar 9 : Neuromodulation of the lower urinary tract. Exp Physiol1999; 84: 149. Google Scholar 10 : Bladder inhibition by penile nerve stimulation in spinal cord injury patients. J Urol1992; 147: 100. Link, Google Scholar 11 : Conditional stimulation of the dorsal penile/clitoral nerve may increase cystometric capacity in patients with spinal cord injury. Neurourol Urodyn2003; 22: 130. Google Scholar 12 : The acute effects of continuous and conditional neuromodulation on the bladder in spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord2001; 39: 420. Google Scholar 13 : International Standards for Neurological and Functional Classification of Spinal Cord Injury. American Spinal Injury Association. Spinal Cord1997; 35: 266. Google Scholar 14 : Short-term effect of pudendal nerve electrical stimulation on detrusor hyperreflexia in spinal cord injury patients: importance of current strength. Paraplegia1996; 34: 95. Google Scholar 15 : A portable device for experimental treatment of neurogenic detrusor overactivity. Neuromodulation2003; 6: 158. Google Scholar 16 : Prognostic value of urodynamic testing in myelodysplastic patients. J Urol1981; 126: 205. Link, Google Scholar 17 : Effects of ejaculation by penile vibratory stimulation on bladder capacity in men with spinal cord lesions. J Urol2003; 169: 2216. Link, Google Scholar 18 : Is there a place for pudendal nerve maximal electrical stimulation for the treatment of detrusor hyperreflexia in spinal cord injury patients?. Spinal Cord1998; 36: 100. Google Scholar 19 : Complete 5-year follow-up of sacral (S3) segmental nerve stimulation with an implantable electrode and pulse generator in 36 consecutive patients with refractory detrusor overactivity incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn2002; 21: 390. Google Scholar Center for Sensory-Motor Interaction, Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University (JH, TS, NJMR) and Department of Urology, Aalborg Hospital (MN), Aalborg, Spinal Cord Unit, Rheumatological Department, Viborg Hospital (SM), Viborg and Clinic for Spinal Cord Injuries, NeuroScience Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital (FB-S), Copenhagen, Denmark© 2005 by American Urological Association, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byWein A (2019) Re: Conditional Neuromodulation of Neurogenic Detrusor Overactivity Using Transrectal Stimulation in Patients with Spinal Cord Injury: A Proof of Principle StudyJournal of Urology, VOL. 201, NO. 5, (863-863), Online publication date: 1-May-2019.Martens F, Heesakkers J and Rijkhoff N (2011) Surgical Access for Electrical Stimulation of the Pudendal and Dorsal Genital Nerves in the Overactive Bladder: A ReviewJournal of Urology, VOL. 186, NO. 3, (798-804), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2011.Yoo P, Horvath E, Amundsen C, Webster G and Grill W (2010) Multiple Pudendal Sensory Pathways Reflexly Modulate Bladder and Urethral Activity in Patients With Spinal Cord InjuryJournal of Urology, VOL. 185, NO. 2, (737-743), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2011.Opisso E, Borau A, Rodríguez A, Hansen J and Rijkhoff N (2008) Patient Controlled Versus Automatic Stimulation of Pudendal Nerve Afferents to Treat Neurogenic Detrusor OveractivityJournal of Urology, VOL. 180, NO. 4, (1403-1408), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2008. Volume 173Issue 6June 2005Page: 2035-2039 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2005 by American Urological Association, Inc.Keywordsbladderurinary incontinencebladder, neurogenicelectric stimulationspinal cord injuriesMetricsAuthor Information J. HANSEN More articles by this author S. MEDIA More articles by this author M. NØHR More articles by this author F. BIERING-SØRENSEN More articles by this author T. SINKJÆR More articles by this author N.J. M. RIJKHOFF More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Referência(s)