Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Economics and the Law: A Critical Review of the Foundations of the Economic Approach to Law

1984; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 94; Issue: 4 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1086/292582

1539-297X

Jules L. Coleman,

Economic and Environmental Valuation

Previous articleNext article No AccessSurvey ArticleEconomics and the Law: A Critical Review of the Foundations of the Economic Approach to LawJules L. ColemanJules L. ColemanPDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Ethics Volume 94, Number 4Jul., 1984 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/292582 Views: 17Total views on this site Citations: 30Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1984 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Fabrice Etilé Economic Perspectives on Food Choices, Marketing, and Consumer Welfare, Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 50, no.22 (Jul 2022): 221–232.https://doi.org/10.1017/jme.2022.46Lawrence W.C. Lai, Frank Lorne, Stephen N.G. Davies A reflection on the trading of pollution rights via land use exchanges and controls: Coase Theorems, Coase's land use parable, and Schumpeterian innovations, Progress in Planning 137 (Apr 2020): 100427.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2018.10.001Elodie Bertrand George Stigler, the First Apostle of the "Coase Theorem", (May 2020): 445–475.https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-56815-1_15Paul Baumgardner The Law : "Something He and His People Naturally Would Be Drawn To": The Reagan Administration and the Law‐and‐Economics Movement, Presidential Studies Quarterly 49, no.44 (Oct 2019): 959–975.https://doi.org/10.1111/psq.12611Gregory Robson TO PROFIT MAXIMIZE, OR NOT TO PROFIT MAXIMIZE: FOR FIRMS, THIS IS A VALID QUESTION, Economics and Philosophy 35, no.0202 (Oct 2018): 307–320.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267118000329Elodie Bertrand Much ado about nothing? The controversy over the validity of the Coase theorem, The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 26, no.33 (Jun 2019): 502–536.https://doi.org/10.1080/09672567.2019.1622752Virgilio Zapatero Gómez Legislative Policy, (Oct 2019): 67–82.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23388-4_5Vinicius Figueiredo Chaves, Nilton Cesar da Silva Flores Possibilidades e limites no aproveitamento dos critérios econômicos na apreciação e justificação de escolhas normativas, Revista Brasileira de Direito 14, no.11 (Apr 2018): 131.https://doi.org/10.18256/2238-0604.2018.v14i1.2500Osamuyimen Enabulele, Mahdi Zahraa, Franklin N. Ngwu Addressing Climate Change due to Emission of Greenhouse Gases Associated with the Oil and Gas Industry: Market-Based Regulation to the Rescue, (Dec 2016): 45–75.https://doi.org/10.1108/S2051-503020160000019003Nathalie Berta, Elodie Bertrand MARKET INTERNALIZATION OF EXTERNALITIES: WHAT IS FAILING?, Journal of the History of Economic Thought 36, no.33 (Jul 2014): 331–357.https://doi.org/10.1017/S1053837214000364Mark D. White Well-Being, (Jan 2014): 51–90.https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137361158_3Clotilde Champeyrache The Assumption of Law Neutrality: Property Rights Theory versus Legal-Economic Nexus, OEconomia 2013, no.0303 (Mar 2014): 391–419.https://doi.org/10.4074/S2113520713013029Marco Fabbri, Diogo Gerhard Castro de Britto When Choosing the Social Welfare Function Really Matters: A Quantitative Analysis, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2013).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2232220Waheed Hussain CORPORATIONS, PROFIT MAXIMIZATION AND THE PERSONAL SPHERE, Economics and Philosophy 28, no.33 (Nov 2012): 311–331.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267112000260Bingyuan Hsiung Ten Questions for Legal Scholars, Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics 21, no.22 (Jul 2009): 111–142.https://doi.org/10.1177/02601079X09002100202Mark D. White Pareto, Consent, and Respect for Dignity: A Kantian Perspective, Review of Social Economy 67, no.11 (Mar 2009): 49–70.https://doi.org/10.1080/00346760802450553Stefan Mann Comparing Interpersonal Comparisons in Utility Theory and Happiness Research, Forum for Social Economics 36, no.11 (Jan 2007): 29–42.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12143-007-0003-1Mark D. White A Kantian critique of neoclassical law and economics, Review of Political Economy 18, no.22 (Aug 2006): 235–252.https://doi.org/10.1080/09538250600571494Scott Shapiro, Edward F. McClennen Law-and-Economics from a Philosophical Perspective, (Jan 2017): 1118–1123.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-74173-1_212Charles Lockhart Controversy in Environmental Policy Decisions: Conflicting Policy Means or Rival Ends?, Science, Technology, & Human Values 26, no.33 (Aug 2016): 259–277.https://doi.org/10.1177/016224390102600301Frank L. Winfrey An Examination of Elements of the ALI Corporate Governance Project Report, Corporate Governance: An International Review 4, no.44 (Oct 1996): 235–239.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.1996.tb00152.xJulianne Nelson Fairness, efficiency and externalities, Japan and the World Economy 7, no.11 (May 1995): 85–103.https://doi.org/10.1016/0922-1425(94)00033-PJulianne Nelson Persuasion and Economic Efficiency: The Cost-Benefit Analysis of Banning Abortion, Economics and Philosophy 9, no.22 (Oct 2009): 229–252.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267100001541Richard A. Epstein Two Conceptions of Civil Rights, Social Philosophy and Policy 8, no.22 (Jan 2009): 38–59.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052500001126Roger A. Shiner Meir Dan-Cohen Rights, Persons, and Organizations. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press1986. Pp. xi + 271. US $32.50. ISBN 0-520-04711-7., Canadian Journal of Philosophy 19, no.44 (Jan 2020): 661–684.https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.1989.10716789Rick Molz Employee job rights: Foundation considerations, Journal of Business Ethics 6, no.66 (Aug 1987): 449–458.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00383287David Schap The nonequivalence of property rules and liability rules, International Review of Law and Economics 6, no.11 (Jun 1986): 125–132.https://doi.org/10.1016/0144-8188(86)90045-1 Stephen L. Elkin Economic & Political Rationality, Polity 18, no.22 (Nov 2016): 253–271.https://doi.org/10.2307/3234949Stephen L. Elkin Regulation as a political question, Policy Sciences 18, no.11 (Mar 1985): 95–108.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00149753Jules L. Coleman Market Contractarianism and the Unanimity Rule, Social Philosophy and Policy 2, no.22 (Jan 2009): 69–114.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052500003228